Although short sleep is associated with an increased risk of morbidity as well as mortality and has been shown to vary by industry of employment and occupation, little is known about the relationship between work and sleep among Asian Americans.
Methods
Using a nationally representative sample of US adults (n = 125,610) in the National Health Interview Survey from 2004–2011, we estimated prevalence ratios for self-reported short sleep duration (<7 hours) in Asians compared to Whites by industry of employment and occupation using adjusted Poisson regression models with robust variance.
Results
Asians were more likely to report short sleep duration than Whites (33 vs. 28%, p < 0.001), and the Asian-White disparity was widest in finance/information and healthcare industries. Compared to Whites after adjustments, short sleep was also more prevalent among Asians employed in Public administration (PR = 1.35 [95% CI: 1.17,1.56]), Education (PR = 1.29 [95% CI: 1.08,1.53]), and Professional/Management (PR = 1.18 [95% CI: 1.03,1.36]). Short sleep, however, was lower among Asians in Accommodation/Food (PR = 0.81 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.99]) with no difference in Retail. In professional and support-service occupations, short sleep was higher among Asians, but was not different among laborers.
Conclusions
U.S. Asian-White disparities in short sleep varied by industries, suggesting a need to consider both race and occupational characteristics to identify high-risk individuals.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-552) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Competing interests
Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Authors’ contributions
CLJ, IK, SR and FBH study concept and design. CLJ acquisition of data. CLJ statistical analysis. CLJ, IK, SR and FBH interpretation of data. CLJ drafting of the manuscript. CLJ, IK, SR, HSJ and FBH critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. IK and FBH administrative, technical, and material support. IK and FBH obtaining funding and study supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Background
Insufficient sleep (<7 hours/day) has been shown to increase risk of weight gain and obesity, hypertension, diabetes, coronary heart disease and subsequent mortality [1‐11]. Among Asian populations in the US and abroad, short sleep is independently associated with insulin resistance [12] and an increased risk of diabetes [13]. In 2008, Asian Americans had a higher age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes (8.2%) than Whites (7.0%) [14], and for any given weight, they also appear to have a higher risk of obstructive sleep apnea compared to Whites [15]. In a meta-analysis of prospective studies of sleep duration and mortality, both short and long sleep in East Asian countries (Japan, Taiwan) were more strongly associated with mortality compared to studies conducted in Europe and the US [16]. In a nationally representative sample of the US, Asians, however, reported the least sleep complaints compared to Latinos, Blacks and Whites in a study that found lower socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with higher sleep complaints [17]. While Asian Americans tend to have high educational attainment and to be well represented in professional occupations with relatively high incomes, there may also be important variation in short sleep by occupation within the Asian population and in comparison to Whites.
Short sleep duration has been shown to vary by industry and occupation among US workers with certain industries (e.g. transportation, manufacturing, public administration) well above the median and several (e.g. education, agriculture) well below. [18, 19]. There, however, have been limited race-specific investigations of sleep by industry of employment and occupation although important racial/ethnic differences in influential factors are likely to exist. For instance, one’s race/ethnicity as well as occupation likely plays an important role in producing psychosocial stress and job strain that negatively impacts health through, for example, discrimination or limited control over job demands/prestige as illustrated by the Karasek and Theorell demand-control model [20‐22]. In a previous study, we found that the prevalence of short sleep increased as professional responsibility increased among Blacks while the prevalence decreased among their White counterparts [23]. We concluded that Black-White disparities in sleep duration by industry and occupation may reflect racial differences in work schedules as well as stressors and stress associated with specific jobs. In particular, Blacks are more likely to engage in shift work (especially night shifts) with non-standard work schedules and to work multiple low-wage jobs [24, 25]. Blacks are also more likely to have long work hours, report job stress related to discrimination, and to work in low control/high demand positions with low decision-making power. Among professional workers, Blacks, may have more limited networks to provide supportive resources, compared to Whites, and may develop an extraordinarily high work ethic that could damage health through inadequate sleep as a coping strategy to overcome negative racial stereotypes/stressors [26‐28].
Anzeige
The impact of industries of employment and occupations on sleep among Asian Americans as well as how they may be affected differently than Whites and Blacks is important to identify and understand to create effective, tailored interventions to improve sleep for optimal health and productivity in this population. However, very few studies have investigated Asian-White disparities in the work-sleep relationship that may occur due to differences in, for example, SES, work ethic and drive to succeed, social support, cultural factors like religion, and acculturation. Therefore, we sought to examine racial/ethnic disparities in short sleep duration by industry of employment and occupation using a nationally representative sample of US Asian and White adults reporting short sleep in the National Health Interview Survey from 2004 to 2011.
Methods
The National Health Interview Survey
We analyzed data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which is a series of cross-sectional, nationally representative surveys that use a three-stage stratified cluster probability sampling design to conduct in-person interviews in the households of non-institutionalized US civilians. A detailed description of NHIS procedures has been previously published [29]. In short, an annual probability sample of households was interviewed by trained interviewers from the US Census Bureau on a continuous basis throughout the year to obtain information about health and other characteristics of each member of the sampled household. The data were collected using computer-assisted personal interviewing (CAPI). A randomly selected adult and child (not used in this analysis) provided more extensive health-related information, and the final response rate for sample adults was 67% (range: 61-72%). Our study was approved by the Harvard School of Public Health’s Institutional Review Board, and the NHIS received informed consent from each study participant.
Study participants
Non-Hispanic White and Non-Hispanic Asian (hereafter, White and Asian) adults aged ≥18 years were included in our study. Participants were excluded from the study analysis if they had missing data on sleep, industry and employment status, were deemed unemployed or not in the labor force, or had an extreme body-mass index (BMI) – i.e. either <15 or >70 kg/m2. Although previous studies suggest sleep patterns among immigrants may differ from individuals born in the US [30], we included non-US born participants for evaluation and robust sample size (particularly, among the Asian participants). As NHIS is not designed to provide accurate estimates of military persons, participants in armed forces were excluded. Our final sample consisted of 125,610 adults.
Variable measurements
Sleep duration
Participants reported the average hours of sleep they usually get in a 24-hour period. Interviewers were trained to report hours of sleep in whole numbers, rounding values of 30 minutes or more up to the nearest hour or otherwise rounding down. Short sleep duration was defined as usual sleep duration of <7 hours, and adequate sleep was categorized as 7 hours of sleep. Seven hours of sleep was used as the reference because it has been shown to be associated with the lowest levels of morbidity and mortality [7, 11, 31], and our sample size could provide stable estimates. We are comparing short and adequate sleepers only, and do not note differences among longer sleepers as the causes (e.g. depression, poor health status, low socioeconomic status) have been shown to fundamentally differ from short sleep and the potential mechanisms linking long sleep to poor health outcomes are considered more speculative.
Race/ethnicity
Race/ethnicity was based on self-identification. Participants were asked, ‘What race or races do you consider yourself to be?”, They then selected 1 or more of the following categories: White, Black/African American, Asian, American Indian/Alaskan native or multiple race. The Asian category consists of ‘Filipino’ (24%), ‘Chinese’ (20%), ‘Asian Indian’ (20%), and ‘Other Asian’ (36%); sample size precluded us from further stratifying them by specific ethnic groups. We focus on Asian-White disparities in sleep duration because the underlying biological and social mechanisms are likely to further vary for other races/ethnicities. We have previously reported on Black-White disparities, and Whites are used as the comparison group for statistical stability and because this group represents the majority population in this country.
Industry of employment
For employed sample adults, the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Codes were categorized into the following 8 industry categories: 1) ‘Construction’; ‘Manufacturing’; ‘Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing, and Hunting’; ‘Mining’; ‘Utilities’; and ‘Wholesale Trade’; and ‘Transportation and Warehousing’, 2) ‘Retail Trade’, 3) ‘Information’; ‘Finance and Insurance’; and ‘Real Estate and Rental and Leasing’, 4) ‘Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services’; ‘Management of Companies and Enterprises’; and ‘Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation’, 5) ‘Education Services’, 6) ‘Health Care and Social Assistance’, 7) ‘Accommodation and Food Services’ as well as 8) ‘Other Services (except Public Administration)’; ‘Public Administration’; and ‘Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation’.
Occupation
Adults who were either working at a paying or non-paying job during the week prior to the survey, who had a job or business but were not at work during the prior week, or who ever worked were asked about their occupation, which was categorized based on the Standard Occupational Classification System. Based on type of work, we combined occupation categories into ‘Professional/management’, ‘Support Services’ and ‘Laborers’.
Covariates
Educational attainment was categorized as less than high school (<HS) (no high school diploma), high school (HS) (high school or general equivalency diploma), and greater than high school (>HS) (education beyond high school). Household income was dichotomized at above and below $35,000, and poverty status was based on being below the poverty line after the participants’ best estimate of total income of all family members from all sources before taxes. Employment status was based on the week prior to the interview for all adults, and was categorized as ‘working for pay’, ‘working without pay’, ‘job not at work’, ‘unemployed’, and ‘not in the labor force.’ Class of work (based on current, longest held, or most recently held job or work situation) was classified as either 1) an employee of a private company, business, or individual for wages, salary, or commission; 2) a federal, state, or local government employee; 3) self-employed in OWN business, professional practice or farm; 4) or working without pay in a family-owned business or farm.
Height and weight, based on self-report, were used to calculate body mass index (BMI) by dividing measured weight in kilograms by height in meters squared. In Whites, obesity was defined as BMI ≥30 kg/m2, overweight as 25.0 – 29.9 kg/m2, normal weight as 18.5 – 24.9 kg/m2, and underweight as BMI < 18.5 kg/m2. In Asians, obesity was defined as BMI ≥27.5 kg/m2, overweight as 23.0 – 27.4 kg/m2, normal weight as 18.5 – 22.9 kg/m2, and underweight as BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 [32]. Marital status was classified as married/living with partner, divorced/separated/widowed, or never married, and both smoking status and lifetime alcohol consumption was categorized as ‘never’, ‘current’, or ‘former’. Leisure-time physical activity was categorized as ‘never/unable’, ‘low’, or ‘high’. Participants reporting ‘never’ or ‘unable to do this type activity’ were categorized as ‘none,’ and those engaging in at least some level of activity and providing a specific number of activity bouts were dichotomized at the midpoint of these bouts and labeled as ‘low’ or ‘high’. In terms of medical conditions, adults reported if they had ever been told by a doctor or other health professional that they had “hypertension, also called high blood pressure” or, separately, if they had “diabetes or sugar diabetes”. Participants were also asked if a doctor or other health professional ever diagnosed them as having any kind of heart condition or disease other than coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, or a myocardial infarction as well as if a doctor or other health professional ever diagnosed them as having coronary heart disease. These variables were combined to adjust for heart disease. Residential regions of the country were categorized as the South, Midwest, Northeast, and West, and participant self-reported general health status was considered excellent/very good, good, or fair/poor.
Statistical analysis
We pooled NHIS data across 8 survey years (2004–2011), which was merged by the Integrated Health Interview Series [33]. Sampling weights that account for the unequal probabilities of selection resulting from the sample design, non-response, and oversampling of certain subgroups were employed in all analyses, and Taylor series linearization was used to calculate standard errors for variance estimation [34]. The STATA “subpop” command was used for correct variance estimation of estimates, and different sampling designs in 1997 to 2005 versus 2006 to 2008 were accounted for by the Integrated Health Interview Series. Rao-Scott Second-order corrected Pearson statistics take survey weights into account for contingency table chi-square tests [35]. Continuous variables were presented as means ± standard errors (SE), and categorical variables as absolute values with percentages. We used STATA statistical software version 12 (STATA Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA, 2007) [36].
Anzeige
We used Poisson regression models with a robust variance estimator to directly estimate prevalence ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals for short sleep duration in Asians compared to short sleep in Whites by industry of employment and, separately, for occupation [37]. Demographic, health behavior, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics were pre-specified and entered into the model as groups in a stepwise manner. For greater statistical stability for the Asian-White comparisons, Whites were used as the reference categories because they had the largest sample size. For models stratified for Asians and Whites, we adjusted first for age in 3 categories (18–49, 50–64, 65+ years), and then for demographic factors such as sex, marital status, and educational attainment. Subsequently, we adjusted for health behaviors including smoking status, alcohol consumption, and leisure-time physical activity and then, in a separate model, we adjusted for self-reported health status, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, cancer and 4 standard BMI categories. Living in poverty, household income above or below $35,000, classes of occupation as well as occupation (when investigating industry differences) were all accounted for in the final model. We used Rao-Scott second-order corrected Pearson statistics again for each industry to test for race-specific temporal trends in short sleep duration over the study period by industry of employment. In addition to testing racial disparities in short sleep duration for each survey period, differences in linear trends in short sleep from 2004 to 2011 between Asians and Whites within each industry category were formally tested using multivariable-adjusted linear regression models where survey year was treated as a dummy variable. In a subsidiary analysis, we investigated differences in short sleep prevalence by immigrant status.
Results
Study population
Our sample consisted of 125,610 (8,390 Asian; 117,220 White) participants. Their mean age was 51 ± 11 years, 51% were men, 5% were Asian, 32% (31 for Whites; 53 for Asians) had at least a college education. Among all participants, 35,961 (28%) were considered short sleepers (<7 hours), 40,409 (33%) adequate sleepers (7 hours), and 49,240 (39%) reported sleeping more than 7 hours. Table 1 shows weighted estimates of age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep by sociodemographic, health behavior and clinical factors among Asian and White participants. Asians were more likely to report short sleep than Whites (31 vs. 28%, p <0.001). For education, the greatest prevalence of short sleep was among high school graduates (36%) in Whites and in individuals with some college for Asians (36%). Short sleep prevalence in individuals living in poverty was similar for both Asians and Whites (35 vs. 37%). The overall percentage point difference in short sleep between Asians and Whites was 3%, 6% for professional/management positions, 6% for support services and 2% for laborers. Additional file 1: Table S1 shows the distribution of the aforementioned characteristics among participants with short sleep. Although the sample size was too low to stratify all analyses by Asian subgroup, the overall prevalence of short sleep duration varied by Asian subgroup with Chinese (prevalence (p) = 23.6% [95% CI: 21.0-26.4]) and Asian Indians (p = 24.8% [95% CI: 21.9-27.9]) having a significantly lower prevalence than Filipinos (p = 37.4% [95% CI: 34.7-40.1]) and Other Asians (p = 33.1% [95% CI: 31.0-35.2]).
Table 1
Age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration by sociodemographic, health behavior and clinical characteristics among 125,610 US Asian and White participants, 2004-2011
Short sleep duration (<7 hours)
White (n)
White (%)
Asian*(n)
Asian (%)
Total (n)
Total (%)
95% CI
95% CI
95% CI
Sample size, short sleepers
33,354
28 (27.8-28.5)
2,607
33 (31.0-34.1)
35,961
28 (27.9-28.6)
Age group, (%)
18-49
18,172
31 (30.6-31.6)
1,611
29 (27.5-31.0)
19,783
31 (30.5-31.5)
50-64
9,346
29 (28.7-29.9)
637
36 (33.2-39.4)
9,983
30 (29.0-30.2)
≥65
5,836
21 (20.6-21.7)
359
32 (28.7-35.3)
6,195
22 (20.9-22.1)
Women
16,041
28 (27.9-28.8)
1,315
32 (30.2-34.4)
18,605
28 (28.0-28.9)
Men
17,313
28 (27.3-28.3)
1,292
33 (30.7-34.8)
17,356
28 (27.5-28.4)
Educational attainment
<High school
10,418
31 (30.0-31.3)
459
32 (28.5-35.1)
10,877
31 (30.0-31.2)
High school graduate
3,303
36 (34.3-36.8)
202
32 (27.6-36.8)
3,505
35 (34.0-36.5)
Some college
11,145
30 (29.1-30.4)
651
36 (32.4-38.6)
11,796
30 (29.3-30.5)
≥ College
8,488
23 (22.1-23.2)
1,295
32 (29.5-33.9)
9,783
23 (22.7-23.8)
Marital status
Married
15,624
26 (25.8-26.7)
1,416
32 (29.8-33.5)
17,040
27 (26.1-27.0)
Divorced/separated/widowed
10,868
35 (34.4-35.8)
479
37 (33.9-40.5)
11,347
35 (34.4-35.8)
Never married
6,791
28 (26.6-28.6)
708
34 (29.3-37.9)
7,499
28 (26.8-28.8)
Non-US born
1,400
27 (25.8-28.8)
1,873
31 (29.5-32.7)
3,273
29 (27.7-29.8)
Living in poverty
3,526
37 (35.5-38.3)
297
35 (29.9-40.3)
3,823
37 (35.4-38.1)
Household income < $35,000
18,223
27 (26.1-27.0)
1,570
32 (30.5-34.4)
19,793
27 (26.4-27.2)
Class of worker
Private wage
24,910
29 (28.7-29.6)
1,989
33 (31.3-35.1)
26,899
29 (28.8-29.7)
Government
5,286
26 (25.3-26.9)
396
31 (26.7-35.5)
5,682
26 (25.5-27.1)
Self employed
2,970
25 (24.1-26.0)
200
29 (24.9-33.7)
3,170
25 (24.2-26.2)
Occupation
Professional/management
6,345
25 (24.6-26.1)
705
31 (27.7-33.9)
7,050
26 (24.9-26.3)
Support services
14,848
27 (26.0-27.0)
1,196
33 (30.7-34.9)
16,044
27 (26.3-27.3)
Laborers
12,034
32 (31.7-33.0)
689
34 (31.1-36.4)
12,723
32 (31.8-33.0)
Occupation [work hours (≥40 hours/wk)]
Professional/management
4,234
27 (25.6-28.0)
515
37 (31.1-42.0)
4,749
27 (26.0-28.4)
Support services
6,750
28 (27.0-28.9)
685
37 (33.1-41.7)
7,435
29 (27.5-29.4)
Laborers
5,643
33 (31.8-34.4)
345
35 (29.6-40.7)
5,988
33 (32.0-34.6)
Industry
Manufacturing/construction
10,628
30 (29.9-31.1)
594
31 (28.6-34.2)
11,222
30 (29.9-31.0)
Retail
3,763
29 (28.3-30.3)
244
32 (27.7-36.0)
4,007
29 (28.4-30.3)
Finances/information
2,940
26 (24.7-26.5)
272
38 (32.0-43.9)
3,212
26 (25.2-27.0)
Profess/admin/man
3,116
26 (25.2-27.5)
331
30 (25.5-35.3)
3,447
26 (25.4-27.6)
Education
2,814
23 (21.9-23.7)
246
29 (24.7-34.2)
3,060
23 (22.1-23.9)
Health care
4,201
29 (27.8-29.8)
426
37 (33.0-40.7)
4,627
29 (28.3-30.1)
Accommodation and food
2,043
33 (31.5-35.3)
185
28 (22.7-32.8)
2,228
33 (30.9-34.6)
Public administration, arts
3,849
27 (26.4-28.3)
309
34 (31.1-37.5)
4,158
28 (26.7-28.6)
Health behaviors
Smoking status
Never
15,572
26 (25.2-26.2)
1,855
32 (30.4-34.3)
17,427
26 (25.6-26.5)
Current
8,433
28 (27.2-28.5)
395
33 (30.0-36.6)
8,828
28 (27.4-28.6)
Former
9,317
34 (33.3-34.9)
354
34 (28.8-38.4)
9,671
34 (33.3-34.8)
Alcohol consumption
Never
3,799
27 (25.8-27.8)
739
31 (28.2-33.6)
4,538
27 (26.2-28.0)
Current
19,289
27 (26.7-27.6)
1,142
34 (31.9-36.9)
20,431
27 (26.8-27.8)
Former
4,878
32 (31.2-33.0)
236
38 (33.0-43.2)
5,114
32 (31.3-33.2)
Leisure-time physical activity
Never/unable
11,542
31 (30.8-32.1)
868
33 (31.1-35.6)
12,410
31 (30.8-32.1)
Low
10,778
27 (26.0-27.2)
925
33 (29.9-35.7)
11,703
27 (26.2-27.4)
High
10,917
27 (26.0-27.1)
809
32 (28.9-34.4)
11,726
27 (26.2-27.3)
Clinical characteristics
Overweight/Obesea
21,921
30 (29.4-30.3)
1,688
36 (33.1-37.9)
23,087
30 (29.5-30.4) c
Obeseb
10,153
33 (32.0-33.3)
714
38 (32.4-43.2)
10,457
33 (32.2-33.5) c
Hypertension (yes)
10,901
32 (31.1-32.4)
704
37 (34.0-40.6)
11,605
32 (31.3-32.6)
Diabetes (yes)
2,892
33 (31.8-34.7)
217
33 (28.0-38.3)
3,109
33 (31.8-34.6)
Heart disease (yes)
4,469
33 (31.6-33.7)
186
42 (35.8-48.9)
4,655
33 (31.8-33.9)
Cancer (yes)
3,467
31 (29.4-31.9)
94
30 (23.5-37.2)
3,561
31 (29.4-31.9)
Health status
Excellent/very good
18,680
25 (24.4-25.2)
1,531
31 (28.9-33.1)
20,211
25 (24.6-25.4)
Good
9,203
31 (30.5-31.9)
781
34 (31.3-36.5)
9,984
31 (30.6-31.9)
Fair/poor
5,453
40 (38.8-40.9)
293
42 (37.3-47.3)
5,746
40 (38.9-40.9)
Region of country
Northeast
6,204
30 (28.9-30.6)
472
33 (29.4-36.4)
6,676
30 (29.1-30.7)
Midwest
9,823
28 (27.7-29.3)
352
34 (29.0-38.6)
10,175
29 (27.7-29.3)
South
11,234
28 (27.8-29.0)
488
32 (27.9-35.7)
11,722
28 (27.8-29.1)
West
6,093
25 (24.7-26.2)
1,295
32 (30.3-34.6)
7,388
26 (25.5-26.9)
Weighted estimates; n (%).
aOverweight/Obese defined by Body Mass Index ≥25 kg/m2 for Whites and ≥23 kg/m2 for Asians.
bObesity defined by Body Mass Index ≥30 kg/m2 for Whites and ≥27.5 kg/m2 for Asians.
cRace-specific BMI standards were applied.
*Asian subgroups: Chinese (short sleep prevalence (p) = 23.6% [95% CI: 21.0-26.4]), Asian Indians (p = 23.6% [95% CI: 21.0-26.4]), Filipinos (p = 37.4% [95% CI: 34.7-40.1]) and Other Asians (p = 33.1% [95% CI: 31.0-35.2]).
Asian-White differences in sleep duration by industry and occupation
Table 2 shows adjusted prevalence ratios of short sleep duration for Asians and Whites by industry of employment. Compared to Whites, adjusted short sleep was more prevalent in Asians employed in the following industries: Finances/Information/Real estate (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26,1.69]), Health care and social services (PR = 1.39 [95% CI: 1.22,1.57]), Public administration/Other services (PR = 1.35 [95% CI: 1.17,1.56]), Education (PR = 1.29 [95% CI: 1.08,1.53]), Professional/Administrative/Management (PR = 1.18 [95% CI: 1.03,1.36]), and Manufacturing/Construction (PR = 1.14 [95% CI: 1.03,1.26]). Short sleep prevalence, however, was lower among Asians compared to Whites in the Accommodation and food services industry (PR = 0.81 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.99]). There was no observed difference between Asians and Whites in Retail (PR = 1.05 [95% CI: 0.87, 1.26]).
Table 2
Adjusted prevalence ratios of short sleep duration for Asians compared to Whites by industry of employment, National Health Interview Survey, 2004–2011 (n = 35,961)
Model 1:
Model 2:
Model 3:
Model 4:
Model 5:
Age
Demographics
Health behaviors
Medical conditions
Occupational characteristics
Manufacturing/construction
1.00
1.03
1.16
1.14
1.14
(0.92-1.08)
(0.95- 1.12)
(1.06-1.28)
(1.04-1.26)
(1.03-1.26)
Retail
1.01
1.03
1.16
1.13
1.05
(0.88-1.16)
(0.90-1.18)
(0.98-1.36)
(0.97-1.33)
(0.87-1.26)
Finances/information
1.30
1.36
1.49
1.44
1.46
(1.14-1.48)
(1.19-1.54)
(1.29-1.72)
(1.25-1.65)
(1.26-1.69)
Profess/admin/man
0.97
1.01
1.16
1.14
1.18
(0.86-1.09)
(0.90-1.14)
(1.02-1.33)
(1.00-1.30)
(1.03-1.36)
Education
1.20
1.20
1.27
1.25
1.29
(1.04-1.37)
(1.04-1.38)
(1.08-1.49)
(1.06-1.47)
(1.08-1.53)
Health care and social services
1.21
1.26
1.42
1.40
1.39
(1.10-1.34)
(1.13-1.39)
(1.27-1.60)
(1.25-1.57)
(1.22-1.57)
Accommodation and food
0.82
0.80
0.95
0.94
0.81
(0.70-0.96)
(0.68-0.94)
(0.79-1.15)
(0.79-1.13)
(0.66-0.99)
Public administration, arts
1.19
1.20
1.38
1.37
1.35
(1.06-1.34)
(1.07-1.35)
(1.22-1.57)
(1.21-1.56)
(1.17-1.56)
Model 1 adjusted for age categories.
Model 2 adjusted Model 1 + sex, marital status, educational attainment.
Model 3 adjusted Model 2 + smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity.
Model 4 adjusted Model 3 + health status, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, cancer.
Model 5 adjusted Model 4 + class of occupation, occupation, living in poverty, household income.
Adjusted prevalence ratios of short sleep duration for Asians compared to Whites by occupation are provided in Table 3. The prevalence of short sleep among Asians was higher among professional (PR: 1.25 (95% CI: 1.14-1.38) and management (PR: 1.28 (95% CI: 1.18-1.38) workers, and short sleep was not different among laborers (PR: 1.07 (95% CI: 0.97-1.18). Although limited by sample size, US-born Asians in professional occupations (PR: 1.56 (95% CI: 1.33-1.83) had a higher short sleep prevalence than Whites while non-US born Asians did not (see Additional file 2: Table S2).
Table 3
Adjusted prevalence ratios of short sleep duration for Asians compared to Whites by occupation, National Health Interview Survey, 2004–2011 (n = 35,961)
Model 1:
Model 2:
Model 3:
Model 4:
Model 5:
Age
Demographics
Health behaviors
Medical conditions
Occupational characteristics
Professional/management
1.08
1.11
1.25
1.23
1.25
(0.99-1.17)
(1.02-1.20)
(1.14-1.37)
(1.13-1.35)
(1.14-1.38)
Support services
1.15
1.18
1.32
1.29
1.28
(1.08-1.22)
(1.10-1.25)
(1.23-1.42)
(1.20-1.39)
(1.18-1.38)
Laborers
1.01
0.99
1.12
1.11
1.07
(0.93-1.09)
(0.92-1.07)
(1.03-1.22)
(1.02-1.21)
(0.97-1.18)
Model 1 adjusted for age categories.
Model 2 adjusted Model 1 + sex, marital status, educational attainment.
Model 3 adjusted Model 2 + smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity.
Model 4 adjusted Model 3 + health status, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, cancer.
Model 5 adjusted Model 4 + class of occupation, living in poverty, household income.
Trends in sleep duration by industry
Figure 1 illustrates temporal trends in the age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration by industry of employment among Asians and Whites for each year from 2004 to 2011. Although all trends were statistically insignificant, there appeared to be important variation in short sleep by industry for both Asians and Whites. For instance, there was an apparent decline in short sleep among Asians in the Accommodation and Food Industry that became significantly lower (p < 0.05) than Whites while short sleep remained generally stable in Whites over the study period. Short sleep prevalence estimates overlapped by race over time for the Manufacturing/Construction industry category. Short sleep was consistently higher in Asians than Whites over time in the Education and Healthcare industries, and the widest disparity over time was observed in the Finance Industry.
Figure 1
Trends in the age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep duration by industry of employment among Asians and Whites, National Health Interview Survey, 2004-2011.A. Manufacturing; Construction; Transportation; Wholesale trade; Agriculture; Utilities; Mining [P for interaction: 0.65]; lines are indistinguishable between Whites and Asians. B. Retail trade [P for interaction: 0.76]. C. Finance and insurance; Information; Real estate [P for interaction: 0.15]. D. Professional; Administrative; Management [P for interaction: 0.78]. E. Education [P for interaction: 0.53]. F. Health care and Social Assistance [P for interaction: 0.04]. G. Accommodation and Food services [P for interaction: 0.08]. H. Public Administration; Other services; Arts and Entertainment [P for interaction: 0.53] p-values in figure legends represent p for trends.
×
Discussion
In this nationally representative study of Asians and Whites, we confirmed reports that short sleep duration is high in the US, but for the first time show that Asian Americans had an overall age-adjusted prevalence of short sleep that was higher than Whites. Furthermore, we show that the difference in short sleep prevalence between Asians and Whites varied importantly by both industry and occupation, with the largest gap observed in the Finance/information industry and among both professional and support services occupations. Our study, in combination with previous investigations, suggests that population patterns of sleep duration are likely influenced by a complex interplay between factors in the social and work environment [18, 38]. Although a high prevalence of short sleep duration among manufacturing/construction, transportation/warehousing, and public administration workers was found in a prior study, the results of this study were not stratified by race. Racial/ethnic health disparities are likely influenced by occupational environments and stressors in the workplace that may, for example, affect sleep quantity and quality. Therefore, racial/ethnic differences in the work-sleep relationship deserve greater attention.
Prior research identifying risk factors for short sleep have focused on SES or race (confounded by SES) [17, 39]. These studies identified that lower SES and Black race are significant risk factors for short sleep, and the relationships were presumed to reflect socioeconomic stressors, including the impact of discrimination on sleep. However, we recently showed that not considering race and SES (e.g. occupation) in combination may limit the inferences from such research. In particular, we recently showed that occupation significantly modified the associations between short sleep and race in a comparison of Blacks and Whites [23]. Similar to the results of that analysis, we now also show that Asian professionals have a higher prevalence of short sleep than White professionals.
Sociocultural factors may connect one’s job – a marker of socioeconomic position and potentially large source of psychosocial and environmental stressors – with their overall health as occupational characteristics influence specific sleep conditions. For instance, Asians may experience racial discrimination in the workplace and great pressure to succeed in professional environments, which can conceivably increase stress in ways that displace sleep [40‐42]. The work-sleep relationship may also be affected by several factors including voluntary or involuntary extended work hours, rotating or shift work (albeit low in Asians) as well as stress related to the job [19, 24, 43‐45]. A recent study using 2010 data from the National Health Interview Study found that whites (20.9 [20.0-22.0]) were more likely than Asians (16.6 [13.9-19.9]) to formally work at least 48 hours per week [46]. Although non-significant, it appeared that whites (8.1 [7.4-8.8]) were also slightly more likely to work at least 60 hours per week than Asians (5.9 [4.3-8.0]) as well as to engage in alternative shift work (28.1 [27.0-29.2]) for whites vs. 26.2 [22.8-29.8] for Asians). A similar proportion of whites (6.2 [5.6-6.8]) and Asians (6.7 [(5.0-8.8]) worked in temporary positions. Furthermore, technology (e.g. internet with email capabilities, cellular phones) may have also increased the accessibility of employees in ways that enhance job strain as well as disrupt sleep [47, 48], and use of technology may have differential impacts by race/ethnicity. Acculturation and cultural factors (e.g. religious beliefs and practices, strong work ethic) may also be more unique sources of racial/ethnic differences in the work-sleep relationship. Additionally, the majority of Asians in this nationally representative sample were non-US born (74%), and the US born individuals appeared to have the shorter sleep, which is consistent with evidence that Western acculturation negatively influences sleep habits as has been observed among Mexican Americans [49]. As suggested by our subsidiary analysis, it would be useful to further explore sleep differences in those who were born in and outside of the US in addition to the impact of certain Asian ethnicities likely being overrepresented in certain occupations, which could spark additional research and ideas for intervention as it is apparent that short sleep may result from social, occupational, and behavioral factors.
Anzeige
The high prevalence of short sleep in Asians raises concerns that this factor may contribute to the risk of diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and other health problems in this group. Prior research has indicated that Asians report a low frequency of sleep complaints [17]. Unfortunately, there is a profound scarcity of data on sleep architecture and sleep disorders, such as sleep apnea, in Asian Americans [50]. Since some research suggests that short sleep associated with insomnia may have the most adverse effects on health [51, 52] it would be important for future studies to further consider the influence of short sleep and sleep disturbances on specific health outcomes among Asian Americans.
Furthermore, since Asians overall tend to possess high SES and other favorable factors that may be protective against suboptimal sleep, there are important opportunities to better understand interactions between sleep duration and SES in studies of health outcomes across racial groups.
Our study has several limitations. For instance, our cross-sectional study design precluded our ability to investigate prospective associations between various industries of employment among the employed and sleep duration. We also relied solely on self-reported data. More objective measures of sleep duration than self-report can be obtained through polysomnography and actigraphy [53], but measurements from these technologies were unavailable. To our knowledge, there is also no available validation data on the quality of self-reported (compared to measured) sleep duration among Asian Americans, which presents an important topic for future research. Furthermore, we did not have data on sleep disorders or sleep quality. We also could not account for number of children in the household, which likely influences sleep and differs by race. We also did not have access to data on medication use that may affect sleepiness. Employment status, which can be more variable for lower-SES, minority groups, was based on participants being employed during the week prior to the interview [54]; however, we do not expect for employment status to be more highly variable in Asians compared to Whites. Shift work, shown to differ by race and increase risk of disease, could not be accounted for although we do not expect Asians and Whites to have different participation levels of shift work [24, 55, 56]. Additionally, we did not have enough statistical power to test for differences among the various Asian-American groups, despite their known heterogeneity. For instance, Japanese Americans have the highest SES of any group in the US, but Vietnamese have the lowest SES [57].
Nonetheless, our study has important strengths that contribute to the literature. For instance, our data were based on a large population of Asian Americans for which data is typically sparse. We were also able to stratify by multiple factors (e.g. race/ethnicity, industry) while providing stable, robust estimates. Furthermore, we had access to 8 successive years of sleep data, enhancing our power to investigate sleep disparities and trends. These data are also nationally representative and were recently collected. Lastly, prevalence ratios were directly estimated, which makes it easier to interpret the results compared to odds ratios.
Anzeige
Conclusion
Asian-White differences in short sleep duration varied importantly by industry of employment and occupation, and these complex differences reflect the need to identify as well as understand sociocultural factors that may influence the work-sleep relationship in hopes of effectively addressing the identified sleep disparities for optimal health and productivity among workers in the US.
Acknowledgements
Drs. Hu, Redline and Jackson were supported by Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC) (1U54CA155626-01). The funding sources were not involved in the data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and publication. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Competing interests
Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Authors’ contributions
CLJ, IK, SR and FBH study concept and design. CLJ acquisition of data. CLJ statistical analysis. CLJ, IK, SR and FBH interpretation of data. CLJ drafting of the manuscript. CLJ, IK, SR, HSJ and FBH critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. IK and FBH administrative, technical, and material support. IK and FBH obtaining funding and study supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
