Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2018

27.03.2018 | Innovation and Improvement: Innovations in Medical Education

Asking a Variety of Questions on Walk Rounds: a Pilot Study

verfasst von: Helen M. Shields, M.D, Stephen R. Pelletier, Ph.D, Christopher L. Roy, M.D, James P. Honan, Ed. D

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Morning walk rounds have lost some of their engagement while remaining a useful and valued practice.

Aim

We created a pilot study to evaluate the impact on rounds of learning to asking a variety of different questions.

Setting

One-hour intervention sessions were voluntarily offered to members of the Department of Medicine and taught by an expert in the question, listen, and respond method.

Participants

Participants included attendings and residents in Internal Medicine on medical teams.

Program Description

Questionnaires were collected on six pre-intervention and six post-intervention days. Nine months later, an anonymous online survey was sent to participants asking about their use of a wider variety of questions.

Program Evaluation

Two hundred eight physicians (residents 175 (45.5%), attending physicians 25 (27.7%)) filled out pre-intervention surveys. One hundred eighty-one physicians (residents 155 (40.3%), attending physicians 18 (20%)) filled out post-intervention surveys. When survey responses from the attendings and residents on the medical teams were combined, post-intervention rounds were perceived as more worthwhile (1.99 pre-intervention and 1.55 post-intervention, [95% confidence interval 1.831–2.143]) (p < 0.001) and more engaging (1.68 pre-intervention and 1.30 post-intervention, [95% confidence interval 1.407–1.688]) (p < 0.001).Non-medical teams’ survey responses did not change. Patient census data indicated no significant difference in the hospital’s census on the pre- and post-intervention dates. Spontaneous suggestions for improving rounds came largely from the residents and included teaching points, clinical pearls, patient focus, more interactive, increased dedicated time for teaching, inclusive/multidisciplinary, questions, and evidence-based teaching. Of the participants who answered the online survey 9 months later, 75% (6/8) reported that they “actually asked a wider variety of types of questions.”

Discussion

This pilot study indicates that the 1-h intervention of learning to ask a variety of different questions is associated with rounds that are rated as more worthwhile and engaging by the medical teams.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Crumlish CM, Yialamas MA, McMahon GT. Quantification of bedside teaching by an academic hospitalist group. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:304–307.CrossRefPubMed Crumlish CM, Yialamas MA, McMahon GT. Quantification of bedside teaching by an academic hospitalist group. J Hosp Med. 2009;4:304–307.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlos WG, Kritek PA, Clay AS, et al. Teaching at the bedside. Maximal Impact in Minimal Time. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13:545–548.PubMed Carlos WG, Kritek PA, Clay AS, et al. Teaching at the bedside. Maximal Impact in Minimal Time. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13:545–548.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Landsberg L. On Rounds: 1000 Internal Medicine Pearls. Clinical Aphorisms and Related Pathophysiology. 2015 Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia Landsberg L. On Rounds: 1000 Internal Medicine Pearls. Clinical Aphorisms and Related Pathophysiology. 2015 Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Arseneau R. Residents’ question-asking behaviors during work rounds. 1997. Acad Med. 72: 71.PubMed Arseneau R. Residents’ question-asking behaviors during work rounds. 1997. Acad Med. 72: 71.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Colbert J, Pelletier S, Xavier-Depina F, et al. A pilot study of team learning on in-patient rounds. 2016. Clin Teach. 13: 38–42.CrossRefPubMed Colbert J, Pelletier S, Xavier-Depina F, et al. A pilot study of team learning on in-patient rounds. 2016. Clin Teach. 13: 38–42.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin SK, Farnan JM, Arora VM. Future: new strategies for hospitalists to overcome challenges in teaching on today’s wards. J Hosp Med.2013; 8: 409–413.CrossRefPubMed Martin SK, Farnan JM, Arora VM. Future: new strategies for hospitalists to overcome challenges in teaching on today’s wards. J Hosp Med.2013; 8: 409–413.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen CR. The discussion teacher in action: questioning, listening and response. In: CR Christensen, DA Garvin, Sweet A, eds. Education for Judgment: The Artistry of Discussion Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1991:193–213. Christensen CR. The discussion teacher in action: questioning, listening and response. In: CR Christensen, DA Garvin, Sweet A, eds. Education for Judgment: The Artistry of Discussion Leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1991:193–213.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Shields HM, Guss D, Somers SC, et al. A faculty development program to train tutors to be discussion leaders rather than facilitators. Acad Med. 2007;82:486–492.CrossRefPubMed Shields HM, Guss D, Somers SC, et al. A faculty development program to train tutors to be discussion leaders rather than facilitators. Acad Med. 2007;82:486–492.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter, SR, Whitcomb, ME, Weitzer WH. Multiple Surveys of Students and Survey Fatigue. Chapter 5 In: New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 121, Spring 2004, Wiley Periodicals, 63–73. Porter, SR, Whitcomb, ME, Weitzer WH. Multiple Surveys of Students and Survey Fatigue. Chapter 5 In: New Directions for Institutional Research, no. 121, Spring 2004, Wiley Periodicals, 63–73.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodological strategies. Survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:1424–1430.PubMedPubMedCentral Grava-Gubins I, Scott S. Effects of various methodological strategies. Survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54:1424–1430.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Asking a Variety of Questions on Walk Rounds: a Pilot Study
verfasst von
Helen M. Shields, M.D
Stephen R. Pelletier, Ph.D
Christopher L. Roy, M.D
James P. Honan, Ed. D
Publikationsdatum
27.03.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4381-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2018

Journal of General Internal Medicine 6/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Clinical Practice: Clinical Images

Lime-Induced Phytophotodermatitis

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.