Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 7/2013

01.10.2013 | Original Article

Aspirin prolongs survival and reduces the number of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer

verfasst von: Lars Plassmeier, Richard Knoop, Jens Waldmann, Rebecca Kesselring, Malte Buchholz, Stefan Fichtner-Feigl, Detlef K. Bartsch, Volker Fendrich

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and aims

Gemcitabine became the reference regimen for advanced pancreatic cancer after a randomized trial showed significant improvement in the median overall survival. Since then, the combination of gemcitabine with a variety of cytotoxic and targeted agents has generally shown no significant survival advantage as compared with gemcitabine alone. Only the addition of erlotinib to gemcitabine resulted in a significant but very small improvement in overall survival, coming along with a very uncomfortable rash in the patients. Therefore, new adjuvant agents with very low toxic levels are needed. In this study, we used a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer to evaluate the chemotherapeutic potential of aspirin as an adjuvant agent to gemcitabine.

Methods

Drug treatment was initiated at the age of 3 months. LsL-Kras G12D ; Pdx1-Cre or LsL-Kras G12D ; LsL-Trp53 R172H ; Pdx1-Cre transgenic mice were randomly assigned to receive either mock treatment, gemcitabine, or a combination of gemcitabine and aspirin. All mice were treated until death. The effect of aspirin was evaluated by histopathological analyses and immunostaining.

Results

Gemcitabine prolonged overall median survival of LsL-Kras G12D ; LsL-Trp53 R172H ; Pdx1-Cre mice by 31 days as compared to mock-treated animals (median survival, 190 vs. 159 days; p = 0.396). Addition of aspirin to gemcitabine even extended the survival for ten more days, leading to a prolonged survival by 41 days, reaching virtually statistical significance versus the control group (median survival, 200 vs. 159 days; p = 0.05). Furthermore, we found that administration of aspirin in combination with gemcitabine reduced the number of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells significantly.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we identified aspirin as an effective adjuvant agent to gemcitabine in the treatment of PDAC. While fundamental differences in biology suggest the need for caution in equating mouse tumors with their human counterparts, mouse models nevertheless represent an important source of insight regarding human neoplasia. Further studies are necessary to confirm the hypothesis that aspirin might be an effective well-tolerated chemotherapeutic adjuvant agent for pancreatic cancer.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat ACS. Cancer Facts & Figures 2007. 2007 ACS. Cancer Facts & Figures 2007. 2007
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006. CA: Cancer J Clin 56:106–130CrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006. CA: Cancer J Clin 56:106–130CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldmann G, Maitra A (2008) Molecular genetics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and recent implications for translational efforts. J Mol Diagn 10:111–122PubMedCrossRef Feldmann G, Maitra A (2008) Molecular genetics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and recent implications for translational efforts. J Mol Diagn 10:111–122PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Burris HA III, Moore MJ, Andersen J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed Burris HA III, Moore MJ, Andersen J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Marco M, Di Cicilia R, Macchini M et al (2010) Metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the best standard treatment? Oncol Rep 23:1183–1192PubMedCrossRef Di Marco M, Di Cicilia R, Macchini M et al (2010) Metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the best standard treatment? Oncol Rep 23:1183–1192PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825PubMedCrossRef Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Colucci G, Giuliani F, Gebbia V et al (2002) Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell’Italia Meridionale. Cancer 94:902–911PubMedCrossRef Colucci G, Giuliani F, Gebbia V et al (2002) Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell’Italia Meridionale. Cancer 94:902–911PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD et al (2009) Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5513–5518PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD et al (2009) Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5513–5518PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P et al (2005) Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 23:3509–3516PubMedCrossRef Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P et al (2005) Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 23:3509–3516PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Oettle H, Richards D, Ramanathan RK et al (2005) A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unrespectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 16:1639–1645PubMedCrossRef Oettle H, Richards D, Ramanathan RK et al (2005) A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unrespectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 16:1639–1645PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rocha Lima CM, Green MR, Rotche R et al (2004) Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J Clin Oncol 22:3776–3783PubMedCrossRef Rocha Lima CM, Green MR, Rotche R et al (2004) Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J Clin Oncol 22:3776–3783PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966PubMedCrossRef Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Maitra A, Ashfaq R, Gunn CR, Rahman A, Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Wilentz RE (2002) Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: an immunohistochemical analysis with automated cellular imaging. Am J Clin Pathol 118:194–201PubMedCrossRef Maitra A, Ashfaq R, Gunn CR, Rahman A, Yeo CJ, Sohn TA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, Wilentz RE (2002) Cyclooxygenase 2 expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: an immunohistochemical analysis with automated cellular imaging. Am J Clin Pathol 118:194–201PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sclabas GM, Uwagawa T, Schmidt C, Hess KR, Evans DB, Abbruzzese JL, Chiao PJ (2005) Nuclear factor kappa B activation is a potential target for preventing pancreatic carcinoma by aspirin. Cancer 12:2485–2490CrossRef Sclabas GM, Uwagawa T, Schmidt C, Hess KR, Evans DB, Abbruzzese JL, Chiao PJ (2005) Nuclear factor kappa B activation is a potential target for preventing pancreatic carcinoma by aspirin. Cancer 12:2485–2490CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fendrich V, Chen NM, Neef M, Waldmann J, Bucholz M, Feldmann G, Slater EP, Maitra A, Bartsch DK (2010) The angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and aspirin delay progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer formation in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gut 59:630–637PubMedCrossRef Fendrich V, Chen NM, Neef M, Waldmann J, Bucholz M, Feldmann G, Slater EP, Maitra A, Bartsch DK (2010) The angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril and aspirin delay progression of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer formation in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Gut 59:630–637PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hingorani SR, Petricoin EF, Maitra A, Rajapakse V, King C, Jacobetz MA, Ross S, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD, Hitt BA, Kawaguchi Y, Johann D, Liotta LA, Crawford HC, Putt ME, Jacks T, Wright CV, Hruban RH, Lowy AM, Tuveson DA (2003) Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell 4:437–450PubMedCrossRef Hingorani SR, Petricoin EF, Maitra A, Rajapakse V, King C, Jacobetz MA, Ross S, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD, Hitt BA, Kawaguchi Y, Johann D, Liotta LA, Crawford HC, Putt ME, Jacks T, Wright CV, Hruban RH, Lowy AM, Tuveson DA (2003) Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell 4:437–450PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hingorani SR, Wang L, Multani AS, Combs C, Deramaudt TB, Hruban RH, Rustgi AK, Chang S, Tuveson D (2005) Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell 7:469–483PubMedCrossRef Hingorani SR, Wang L, Multani AS, Combs C, Deramaudt TB, Hruban RH, Rustgi AK, Chang S, Tuveson D (2005) Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell 7:469–483PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Olive KP, Tuveson DA, Ruhe ZC, Yin B, Willis NA, Bronson RT, Crowley D, Jacks T (2004) Mutant p53 gain of function in two mouse models of Li–Fraumeni syndrome. Cell 119:847–860PubMedCrossRef Olive KP, Tuveson DA, Ruhe ZC, Yin B, Willis NA, Bronson RT, Crowley D, Jacks T (2004) Mutant p53 gain of function in two mouse models of Li–Fraumeni syndrome. Cell 119:847–860PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fendrich V, Schneider R, Maitra A, Jacobsen ID, Opfermann T, Bartsch DK (2011) Detection of precursor lesions of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in PET-CT in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Neoplasia 13:180–186PubMed Fendrich V, Schneider R, Maitra A, Jacobsen ID, Opfermann T, Bartsch DK (2011) Detection of precursor lesions of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in PET-CT in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Neoplasia 13:180–186PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong QG, Sclabas GM, Fujioka S et al (2002) The function of multiple IkappaB: NF-kappaB complexes in the resistance of cancer cells to Taxol-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 21:6510–6519PubMedCrossRef Dong QG, Sclabas GM, Fujioka S et al (2002) The function of multiple IkappaB: NF-kappaB complexes in the resistance of cancer cells to Taxol-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 21:6510–6519PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kopp E, Ghosh S (1994) Inhibition of NF-kappa B by sodium salicylate and aspirin. Science 265:956–959PubMedCrossRef Kopp E, Ghosh S (1994) Inhibition of NF-kappa B by sodium salicylate and aspirin. Science 265:956–959PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Betts G, Jones E, Junaid S, El-Shanawany T, Scurr M, Mizen P, Kumar M, Jones S, Rees B, Williams G, Gallimore A, Godkin A (2012) Suppression of tumour-specific CD4+ T cells by regulatory T cells is associated with progression of human colorectal cancer. Gut 61:1163–1171PubMedCrossRef Betts G, Jones E, Junaid S, El-Shanawany T, Scurr M, Mizen P, Kumar M, Jones S, Rees B, Williams G, Gallimore A, Godkin A (2012) Suppression of tumour-specific CD4+ T cells by regulatory T cells is associated with progression of human colorectal cancer. Gut 61:1163–1171PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi N, Kubota K, Kato S, Watanabe S, Shimamura T, Kirikoshi H, Saito S, Ueda M, Endo I, Inayama Y, Maeda S, Nakajima A (2010) FOXP3+ regulatory T cells and tumoral indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression predicts the carcinogenesis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 10:631–640PubMedCrossRef Kobayashi N, Kubota K, Kato S, Watanabe S, Shimamura T, Kirikoshi H, Saito S, Ueda M, Endo I, Inayama Y, Maeda S, Nakajima A (2010) FOXP3+ regulatory T cells and tumoral indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression predicts the carcinogenesis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology 10:631–640PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinz S, Pagerols-Raluy L, Oberg HH, Ammerpohl O, Grüssel S, Sipos B, Grützmann R, Pilarsky C, Ungefroren H, Saeger HD, Klöppel G, Kabelitz D, Kalthoff H (2007) Foxp3 expression in pancreatic carcinoma cells as a novel mechanism of immune evasion in cancer. Cancer Res 67:8344–8350PubMedCrossRef Hinz S, Pagerols-Raluy L, Oberg HH, Ammerpohl O, Grüssel S, Sipos B, Grützmann R, Pilarsky C, Ungefroren H, Saeger HD, Klöppel G, Kabelitz D, Kalthoff H (2007) Foxp3 expression in pancreatic carcinoma cells as a novel mechanism of immune evasion in cancer. Cancer Res 67:8344–8350PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Dyke T, Jacks T (2002) Cancer modeling in the modern era: progress and challenges. Cell 108:135–144PubMedCrossRef Van Dyke T, Jacks T (2002) Cancer modeling in the modern era: progress and challenges. Cell 108:135–144PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Aspirin prolongs survival and reduces the number of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in a genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer
verfasst von
Lars Plassmeier
Richard Knoop
Jens Waldmann
Rebecca Kesselring
Malte Buchholz
Stefan Fichtner-Feigl
Detlef K. Bartsch
Volker Fendrich
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2013
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-013-1105-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2013

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 7/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.