Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 6/2019

28.09.2019 | Research Article

Assessing risk of adverse drug reactions in the elderly: a feasibility study

verfasst von: Andrew Ridge, Kate Macintyre, Alex Kitsos, Linda Murray, Luke Bereznicki

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background Adverse drug reactions are common in Australian general practice and can be a cause of, or contribute to, preventable hospital admissions. Developing practical tools to assist in identifying patients who are at high risk of serious adverse drug reactions is an important step in preventing these hospitalisations. Objective The aims of the study were to apply the Prediction of Hospitalisation due to Adverse Drug Reactions in Elderly Community-Dwelling Patients (PADR-EC) Score to assess the risk of medication-related hospitalisation among patients aged ≥ 65 years attending a rural general practice, and to investigate general practitioners’ acceptance of the PADR-EC Score. Setting The project was based in a multicentre rural general practice in southern Tasmania, Australia. Method We conducted a cross-sectional study wherein the PADR-EC score was administered to patients aged ≥ 65 years attending a general practice. A focus group of general practice doctors was conducted and thematic analysis of the transcript used to explore their views regarding the utility of the PADR-EC score. Main Outcome Measures Successful application of the PADR-EC Score and an evaluation of general practitioners' acceptance of the PADR-EC Score are the two outcome measures of the project. Results The PADR-EC score was applied by the practice pharmacist and reported to GPs for 428 patients aged ≥ 65 years, with 24.8% classified as high-risk. The focus group found the PADR-EC score helped raise awareness of the risk of adverse drug reactions in the general practice setting. Doctors demonstrated good understanding of the PADR-EC Score and there were no negative reactions to the delivery model used. No changes to prescribing were implemented directly as a result of the PADR-EC Score, but more caution was used when doctors provided their usual clinical care. Conclusion Doctors used the PADR-EC score to complement their decision making. The PADR-EC Score was used as a reminder to review existing medication lists, follow-up on pathology results that may impact drug treatment and assess patients for prevalent ADRs. Further research is needed to validate the PADR-EC score in this setting.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2016. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-74249-924-6 (PDF). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2016. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-74249-924-6 (PDF).
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliott R. Problems with medication use in the elderly: an Australian perspective. J Pharm Pract Res. 2006;36(1):58–66.CrossRef Elliott R. Problems with medication use in the elderly: an Australian perspective. J Pharm Pract Res. 2006;36(1):58–66.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Parekh N, Ali K, Stevenson JM, Graham Davies J, Schiff R, Van der Cammen T, et al. Incidence and cost of medication harm in older adults following hospital discharge: a multicentre prospective study in the UK. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(8):1789–97.CrossRef Parekh N, Ali K, Stevenson JM, Graham Davies J, Schiff R, Van der Cammen T, et al. Incidence and cost of medication harm in older adults following hospital discharge: a multicentre prospective study in the UK. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(8):1789–97.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzaglia G, Roti L, Corsini G, Colombini A, Maciocco G, Marchionni N, et al. Screening of older community-dwelling people at risk for death and hospitalization: the Assistenza Socio-Sanitaria in Italia project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(12):1955–60.CrossRef Mazzaglia G, Roti L, Corsini G, Colombini A, Maciocco G, Marchionni N, et al. Screening of older community-dwelling people at risk for death and hospitalization: the Assistenza Socio-Sanitaria in Italia project. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(12):1955–60.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Roughhead L, Semple S, Rosenfeld E. Literature review: medication safety in Australia. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2013. Roughhead L, Semple S, Rosenfeld E. Literature review: medication safety in Australia. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2013.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Admitted patient care 2016–2017: Australian hospital statistics. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-76054-347-1 (PDF). Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Admitted patient care 2016–2017: Australian hospital statistics. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2018. Contract No.: ISBN 978-1-76054-347-1 (PDF).
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nair NP, Chalmers L, Peterson GM, Bereznicki BJ, Castelino RL, Bereznicki LR. Hospitalization in older patients due to adverse drug reactions: the need for a prediction tool. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:497–505.CrossRef Nair NP, Chalmers L, Peterson GM, Bereznicki BJ, Castelino RL, Bereznicki LR. Hospitalization in older patients due to adverse drug reactions: the need for a prediction tool. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:497–505.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nair NP, Chalmers L, Connolly M, Bereznicki BJ, Peterson GM, Curtain C, et al. Prediction of hospitalization due to adverse drug reactions in elderly community-dwelling patients (The PADR-EC score). PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0165757.CrossRef Nair NP, Chalmers L, Connolly M, Bereznicki BJ, Peterson GM, Curtain C, et al. Prediction of hospitalization due to adverse drug reactions in elderly community-dwelling patients (The PADR-EC score). PLoS ONE. 2016;11(10):e0165757.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.CrossRef Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–51.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hesse-Biber SN. Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. p. c2010. Hesse-Biber SN. Mixed methods research: merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. p. c2010.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo 10. 10 ed. 2014. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo 10. 10 ed. 2014.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor MN, Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. Inappropriate prescribing. Drugs Aging. 2012;29(6):437–52.CrossRef O’Connor MN, Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. Inappropriate prescribing. Drugs Aging. 2012;29(6):437–52.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing. 2008;37(6):673–9.CrossRef Gallagher P, O’Mahony D. STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions): application to acutely ill elderly patients and comparison with Beers’ criteria. Age Ageing. 2008;37(6):673–9.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Price M, Davies I, Rusk R, Lesperance M, Weber J. Applying STOPP guidelines in primary care through electronic medical record decision support: randomized control trial highlighting the importance of data quality. JMIR Med Inf. 2017;5(2):38–48. Price M, Davies I, Rusk R, Lesperance M, Weber J. Applying STOPP guidelines in primary care through electronic medical record decision support: randomized control trial highlighting the importance of data quality. JMIR Med Inf. 2017;5(2):38–48.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimitrow MS, Airaksinen MS, Kivelä SL, Lyles A, Leikola SN. Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(8):1521–30.CrossRef Dimitrow MS, Airaksinen MS, Kivelä SL, Lyles A, Leikola SN. Comparison of prescribing criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of drug treatment in individuals aged 65 and older: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(8):1521–30.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Assessing risk of adverse drug reactions in the elderly: a feasibility study
verfasst von
Andrew Ridge
Kate Macintyre
Alex Kitsos
Linda Murray
Luke Bereznicki
Publikationsdatum
28.09.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Elektronische ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-019-00908-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.