Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastroenterology 6/2016

02.11.2015 | Original Article—Alimentary Tract

Assessment of an electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study

verfasst von: Hirotsugu Watabe, Tetsuya Nakamura, Atsuo Yamada, Yasuo Kakugawa, Sadaharu Nouda, Akira Terano

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 6/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Training for colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) procedures is currently performed as a lecture and hands-on seminar. The aims of this pilot study were to assess the utility of an electronic learning system for CCE (ELCCE) designed for the Japanese Association for Capsule Endoscopy using an objective scoring engine, and to evaluate the efficacy of ELCCE on the acquisition of CCE reading competence.

Methods

ELCCE is an Internet-based learning system with the following steps: step 1, introduction; step 2, CCE reading competence assessment test (CCAT), which evaluates the competence of CCE reading prior to training; step 3, learning reading theory; step 4, training with guidance; step 5, training without guidance; step 6, final assessment; and step 7, the same as step 2. The CCAT, step 5 and step 6 were scored automatically according to: lesion detection, diagnosis (location, size, shape of lesion), management recommendations, and quality of view. Ten trainee endoscopists were initially recruited (cohort 1), followed by a validating cohort of 11 trainee endoscopists (cohort 2).

Results

All but one participant finished ELCCE training within 7 weeks. In step 6, accuracy ranged from 53 to 98 % and was not impacted by step 2 pretest scores. The average CCAT scores significantly increased between step 2 pretest and step 7 in both cohorts, from 42 ± 18 % to 79 ± 15 % in cohort 1 (p = 0.0004), and from 52 ± 15 % to 79 ± 14 % in cohort 2 (p = 0.0003).

Conclusions

ELCCE is useful and effective for improving CCE reading competence.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.CrossRefPubMed Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.CrossRefPubMed Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:434–7.CrossRefPubMed Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:434–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:2345–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:2345–57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahi CJ, Imperiale TF, Juliar BE, Rex DK. Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:770–5 quiz 711.CrossRefPubMed Kahi CJ, Imperiale TF, Juliar BE, Rex DK. Effect of screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:770–5 quiz 711.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. New Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:55–64.CrossRefPubMed Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:55–64.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–57.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease C. Prevention: use of colorectal cancer tests–USA, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:253–8. Centers for Disease C. Prevention: use of colorectal cancer tests–USA, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57:253–8.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM, et al. Evaluation of the PillCam colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy. 2006;38:963–70.CrossRefPubMed Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM, et al. Evaluation of the PillCam colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy. 2006;38:963–70.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1026–31.CrossRefPubMed Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y, et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41:1026–31.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kakugawa Y, Saito Y, Saito S, et al. New reduced-volume preparation regimen in colon capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2012;18:2092–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kakugawa Y, Saito Y, Saito S, et al. New reduced-volume preparation regimen in colon capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol: WJG. 2012;18:2092–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Leighton JA, Rex DK. A grading scale to evaluate colon cleansing for the PillCam colon capsule: a reliability study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:123–7.CrossRefPubMed Leighton JA, Rex DK. A grading scale to evaluate colon cleansing for the PillCam colon capsule: a reliability study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:123–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirai Y, Yoshida T, Shiraishi R, et al. Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1046–50.CrossRefPubMed Shirai Y, Yoshida T, Shiraishi R, et al. Prospective randomized study on the use of a computer-based endoscopic simulator for training in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1046–50.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ. A second-generation virtual reality simulator for colonoscopy: validation and initial experience. Endoscopy. 2008;40:735–8.CrossRefPubMed Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, de Man RA, Kuipers EJ. A second-generation virtual reality simulator for colonoscopy: validation and initial experience. Endoscopy. 2008;40:735–8.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Haycock A, Koch AD, Familiari P, et al. Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:298–307.CrossRefPubMed Haycock A, Koch AD, Familiari P, et al. Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:298–307.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Postgate A, Haycock A, Thomas-Gibson S, et al. Computer-aided learning in capsule endoscopy leads to improvement in lesion recognition ability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:310–6.CrossRefPubMed Postgate A, Haycock A, Thomas-Gibson S, et al. Computer-aided learning in capsule endoscopy leads to improvement in lesion recognition ability. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:310–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai LH, Wong GL, Chow DK, et al. Inter-observer variations on interpretation of capsule endoscopies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:283–6.CrossRefPubMed Lai LH, Wong GL, Chow DK, et al. Inter-observer variations on interpretation of capsule endoscopies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18:283–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of an electronic learning system for colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study
verfasst von
Hirotsugu Watabe
Tetsuya Nakamura
Atsuo Yamada
Yasuo Kakugawa
Sadaharu Nouda
Akira Terano
Publikationsdatum
02.11.2015
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0944-1174
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-5922
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-015-1134-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2016

Journal of Gastroenterology 6/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.