Background
Etholgy and risk factors
Criteria for RAD and DSED
Assessment of attachment disorder symptoms
The present study
Methods
Participants
Procedure
Measures
Rating for Infant-Stranger Engagement (RISE) [32]
Stranger at the Door (StrD) [9]
Disturbance of Attachment Interview (DAI) [23]
Reactive Attachment Disorder Questionnaire [28]
Results
Descriptive results
RISE | StrD | DAI disinhibited | DAI inhibited | RAD Questionnaire | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | 55 | 55 | 55 | 55 | 55 |
M (SD) | 3.99 (1.20) | 1.30 (1.23) | 1.90 (1.77) | .83 (.96) | 18.14 (5.03) |
Diagnosis frequency | 3 | 23 | 17 | 3 | – |
Rating for Infant-Stranger Engagement
Stranger at the Door
Disturbance of Attachment Interview
Reactive Attachment Disorder Questionnaire
Examination of correlations between the approaches
StrD | DAI disinhibited | DAI inhibited | RAD Questionnaire | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RISE | .40** | .41** | .19 | .10 |
StrD | .42** | .06 | .04 | |
DAI disinhibited | .28+ | − .02 | ||
DAI inhibited | .40* |
Going off without checking back | RISE above cut-off | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (23) | No (32) | Yes (3) | No (52) | |
DAI disinhibited disorder | ||||
Yes (17) | 12 (70.6%) | 5 (29.4%) | 1 (5.9%) | 16 (94.1%) |
No (38) | 11 (28.9%) | 27 (71.1%) | 2 (5.3%) | 36 (94.7%) |
RISE above cut-off | ||||
Yes (3) | 1 (33.3%) | 2 (66.7% | ||
No (52) | 22 (42.3%) | 30 (57.7%) |