Skip to main content

19.10.2018 | Short Communication | Ausgabe 1/2019

International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2019

Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success

International Journal of Legal Medicine > Ausgabe 1/2019
Xiangpei Zeng, Kyleen Elwick, Carrie Mayes, Maiko Takahashi, Jonathan L. King, David Gangitano, Bruce Budowle, Sheree Hughes-Stamm
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00414-018-1955-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Xiangpei Zeng and Kyleen Elwick contributed equally to this work.


Skeletal remains recovered from missing persons’ cases are often exposed to harsh environmental conditions resulting in the DNA being damaged, degraded, and/or the samples containing PCR inhibitors. In this study, the efficacy of common extraction methods was evaluated to remove high levels of PCR inhibitors commonly encountered with human remains, and their downstream compatibility with the two leading sequencing chemistries and platforms for human identification purposes. Blood, hair, and bone samples were spiked with high levels of inhibitors commonly identified in each particular substrate in order to test the efficiency of various DNA extraction methods prior to sequencing. Samples were extracted using three commercial extraction kits (DNA IQ™, DNA Investigator, and PrepFiler® BTA), organic (blood and hair only), and two total demineralization protocols (bone only)). Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) was performed using two different systems: Precision ID chemistry and a custom AmpliSeq™ STR and iiSNP panel on the Ion S5™ System and the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the MiSeq FGx™. The overall results showed that all DNA extraction methods were efficient and are fully compatible with both MPS systems. Key performance indicators such as STR and SNP reportable alleles, read depth, and heterozygote balance were comparable for each extraction method. In samples where CE-based STRs yielded partial profiles (bone), MPS-based STRs generated more complete or full profiles. Moreover, MPS panels contain more STR loci than current CE-based STR kits and also include SNPs, which can further increase the power of discrimination obtained from these samples, making MPS a desirable choice for the forensic analysis of such challenging samples.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

ESM 1 (PDF 208 kb)
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

International Journal of Legal Medicine 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin

07.03.2019 | Mammakarzinom | CME | Ausgabe 2/2019

Update der S3-Leitlinie Mammakarzinom

Was gibt es Neues für Pathologen?

21.02.2019 | Schwerpunkt: Neuropathologie | Ausgabe 2/2019

Neuropathologie der Medulloblastome und anderer embryonaler Tumoren des ZNS

Präzisierung der Diagnostik durch Integration genetischer Marker

21.02.2019 | Schwerpunkt: Neuropathologie | Ausgabe 2/2019

Integrierte Diagnostik der diffusen astrozytären und oligodendroglialen Gliome

04.02.2019 | Schwerpunkt: Gynäkopathologie | Ausgabe 1/2019 Open Access

Fallstricke und Probleme bei der Differenzialdiagnose epithelialer Ovarialtumoren