Skip to main content
main-content

09.11.2019 | Original Article | Ausgabe 3/2020

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 3/2020

Assessment of the impact of 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines in management of differentiated thyroid cancer patients

Zeitschrift:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging > Ausgabe 3/2020
Autoren:
Sayak Choudhury, Archi Agrawal, Gouri Pantvaidya, Sneha Shah, Nilendu Purandare, Ameya Puranik, Venkatesh Rangarajan
Wichtige Hinweise
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Oncology – Head and Neck.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline have suggested modifications in the risk stratification (RS) for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, introduced the concept of dynamic risk stratification (DRS) and redefined the role of radioactive iodine (RAI) in treatment algorithm. The aim of this retrospective audit was to assess the practical implications of these modifications in management of DTC.

Methods

A total of 138 DTC patients were stratified according to ATA 2009 and 2015 guidelines into low (LR), intermediate (IR) and high (HR) risk groups. Change in RS and in intention of RAI use was calculated. Deviation in administered RAI dosage from the guidelines was assessed. 1-year follow-up data was audited to assess how the DRS modified the initial risk estimate.

Results

A total of 11.6% of patients changed their RS categories in 2015 guidelines. A total of 10.1% got upstaged to HR, and 1.4% got downstaged to LR. In 2.17% of patients’ intention of RAI use changed to remnant ablation from adjuvant therapy and 65% of the LR patients won’t require any RAI therapy. A total of 26.7% of patients had received significantly more RAI dosage according to ATA 2015. At 1-year follow-up according to DRS 84% of LR, 75% of IR and 44% of HR patients showed excellent response (ER).

Conclusion

More patients changed RS to HR than to LR. Intention of RAI use changed in only a small number of patients. Significantly higher dosage of RAI is being administered to patients in current practice. The effect of DRS in modifying the initial RS was most prominent in IR, with most showing ER to initial therapy.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Jetzt e.Med bestellen und 100 € sparen!

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe
  1. Sie können e.Med Radiologie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

  2. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.