Association between cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) 2 polymorphisms and schizophrenia susceptibility and symptoms in the Han Chinese population

Schizophrenia (SZ) is a complex psychiatric disorder with an estimated heritability of 60–80% that affects 1.0% of the global population [1‐3]. Previous studies have reported that the absolute risk of suicide in SZ to be 6.55% in male and 4.91% in female [4], and suicide was 13-fold higher for SZ than the general population [5]. The core symptoms of SZ vary in terms of severity among patients [6]. Research on the genetic basis of SZ has focused on identifying polymorphisms in candidate genes and linkage regions [7‐10]. To date, 108 SZ-associated gene loci have been identified in a genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) of the largest sample size to date (36,989 cases vs. 113,075 controls) [11]. However, others have reported that multiple genes contribute weakly or moderately to SZ pathogenesis [12]. Identifying SZ susceptibility genes among numerous candidates is an ongoing challenge.

Abnormal dopamine levels underlie SZ. Neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), nerve growth factor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, and cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF), can repair and protect the dopaminergic system. Previous studies have shown that BDNF is involved in the pathophysiology of SZ, with BDNF levels reduced in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients [13]. CDNF has been shown to protect and repair the dopaminergic system in rat models of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [14], which is characterized by degeneration of dopaminergic neurons; it may thus have therapeutic benefits [15]. However, the relationship between CDNF and SZ has not been previously investigated. We speculated that CDNF is a susceptibility factor for SZ. We tested this hypothesis by examining CDNF single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in two study stages with independent sample sets.

Stage 1 samples were those from our previous publications [16, 17], and included 528 paranoid SZ patients (mean age: 27.32 ± 8.03 years old) and 528 healthy controls (mean age: 27.73 ± 8.01 years old) who were recruited from March 2005 to December 2008. Stage 2 samples included 142 SZ patients (paranoid, n = 122 and undifferentiated, n = 20; mean age: 29.28 ± 7.17 years old) and 173 healthy controls (mean age: 32.49 ± 7.43 years old) who were recruited from May 2011 to December 2014.

SZ was diagnosed as previously described [16, 17] according to the criteria listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV). Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients had been diagnosed with other psychiatric disorders; or had organic brain disease, substance dependence, severe medical complications, or neurological diseases. Family mental health history (FH) was defined as at least one first- or second-degree relative of the proband who met DSM-IV criteria for SZ or schizoaffective disorder. The Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) was used to evaluate psychotic syndromes. Five factors were derived from the PANSS, including positive symptoms, negative symptoms, cognition, expression/anxiety, and excitement/hostility [18].

A total of 372 SZ patients (stage 1, n = 229 and stage 2, n = 143) who were not taking antipsychotic medications were evaluated for psychotic syndromes using the PANSS [19]. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for healthy controls were as described our previous papers [16, 17]. These subjects were screened by psychiatrists in simple non-structured interviews. All participants were unrelated Han Chinese who were born and living in North Henan province.

Five SNPs were selected as described in our previous work [16, 17] and covered the 26974145–26995906 genomic intron region on chromosome 10. In stage 1, genotyping was carried out as detailed in our earlier studies [16, 17] using Illumina GoldenGate assays on a BeadStation 500G Genotyping System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). In stage 2, samples were genotyped using a standard Illumina genotyping protocol.

Statistical analyses in this study were performed as described in our previous papers [16, 17]. Power analyses were performed using the G*Power software to calculated (http://​www.​gpower.​hhu.​de/​) for this study [20, 21]. Genotype and allele frequencies were analyzed using Haploview v.4.1. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was assessed with the χ² test with one degree of freedom. Associations between the five factors from the PANSS and different genotype carriers were evaluated by analysis of variance. Bonferroni correction for multiple pair-wise comparisons was conducted for the X × phenotype interaction to reduce the probability of false positives. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The corrected α′ (P = 0.01) is α (P = 0.05) divided by the number of possible comparisons.

None of the genotype distributions of the other four SNPs significantly deviated from HWE except for SNP rs6506891. There were no significant differences in genotype and allele frequencies between SZ and controls at five SNPs in stage 1 samples (P > 0.05, Table 1), even after subdividing by gender and FH (P > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in genotype and allele frequencies between SZ and controls at rs2249810, rs6506891, and rs2118343 in stage 2 samples. We also noted differences at rs2249810 when stage 1 and 2 samples were combined. This association was present at rs2249810 in males (χ² = 8.76; P = 0.03). To further analyze haplotype structures in this sample, we evaluated pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) of five SNPs in SZ patients and controls using standardized D′ and r² values. Haplotypes were identified at five SNPs of CDNF2 in stage 1 and 2 samples. The positions of these SNPs in stage 2, LD structure, and D′ values for all variants are shown in Fig. 1. Five SNPs formed one LD block, yielding four haplotypes; one of these (TGATC) differed significantly between SZ and controls only in stage 2 samples (χ² = 6.38; P = 0.01) (Table 2).

To explore the association between CDNF2 variations and SZ symptoms, 371 first-onset SZ patients (stage 1, n = 228 and stage 2, n = 143) with complete PANSS scores were selected from stages 1 and 2. Only rs2577075 genotypes were associated with cognition factor scores in stage 2 samples after Bonferroni correction (F = 3.39; P = 0.03) (Table 3). We also only found rs2577075 genotypes were associated with cognition factor scores in female when subdivided by gender after Bonferroni correction (F = 4.05; P = 0.04). Other SNPs from stage 1 and 2 samples did not show any associations (P > 0.05). However, rs2118343 genotypes were significantly associated with negative factor scores when stage 1 and 2 samples were combined (F = 4.396, P = 0.01). We found rs2118343 genotypes were associated with depression/anxiety and excitement/hostility scores in female when subdivided by gender in combined samples after Bonferroni correction (F = 4.39, 4.73; P = 0.04, 0.03, respectively).

This study investigated CDNF2 mutations associated with SZ and associated symptoms in the Han Chinese population. Significant differences were found in genotype and allele frequencies of rs2249810 between SZ patients and healthy controls, suggesting that CDNF2 is a susceptibility gene for SZ. We also found that rs2118343 genotypes are associated with negative psychotic symptoms of SZ.

CDNF has strong neuroprotective and restorative effects in animal models of PD [22], and protects dopaminergic neurons in the 6-hydroxydopamine rat model [14, 23]. However, the genotype and allele frequencies of the CDNF SNPs rs1901650 and rs11259365 did not differ between PD patients and controls; only the C allele of CDNF rs7094179, an intronic SNP, has been linked to PD susceptibility [24, 25].

Intron variant was relation to the CDNF2 gene organization. CDNF2 can protect and repair the dopaminergic system, and may thus have an important role in PD [14, 26, 27]. Five SNPs of CDNF2 in our study were located in intron region of chromosome 10, which variation may lead to dopaminergic system disfunction. Meanwhile, multiple SZ susceptibility loci have been found on chromosome 10 [7, 8]. In stage 1 samples, we did not detect any associations in paranoid SZ patients, possibly because we did not examine other SZ subtypes. We therefore included the undifferentiated subtype in the stage 2 analysis, and found that rs2249810 of CDNF2 may be a susceptibility locus in SZ.

SZ is influenced by dopamine, glutamate, and serotonin neurotransmission systems. We previously reported associations between Solute carrier family 6 member 4 [17] in the serotoninergic system and Glutamate ionotropic receptor NMDA type subunit 2B [16] and Reelin [28] in the glutamatergic system and SZ. The present study focused on CDNF2 because of its role in the dopaminergic system. Our results from two sets of samples suggest that SNP rs2249810 of CDNF2 may be a susceptibility locus for SZ and provide evidence that it is caused by the interaction of a large number of susceptibility genes [29]. To date, there has been a lot of GWAS researches on the susceptibility site of SZ [7‐11, 30], and a recent meta-analysis using GWAS data also found 30 new sites [31]. However, there is still no reported association between CDNF2 and SZ. The difference between GWAS and our research is samples selected more than three groups and multi-ethnic in the former, one group and only Han Chinese people in the latter. Therefore, our sample has a single genetic background. Meanwhile, we found rs2577075 genotypes and haplotype TGATC may be susceptibility factors of SZ in stage 2 samples, but those results were not found in total samples. That may be the majority of the samples were paranoid, and with less undifferentiated in total samples. Therefore, those results need to be further validated in a large sample, especially in the samples with multiple subtypes of SZ.

SZ is characterized by positive and negative symptoms, cognitive deficits, and disorganization of thoughts and behaviors [32, 33]. SZ is considered a dopamine disorder based on the psychosis-inducing effects of dopamine-releasing drugs such as amphetamines, and the anti-psychotic effects of drugs that block the dopamine D2 receptor [34]. Dopamine dysfunction has been identified as the major cause of SZ [35]. Our results have shown that CDNF2 gene polymorphisms underlie the manifestations of SZ symptoms; moreover, rs2118343 genotypes were associated with negative factor subscores in SZ patients; this provides the first evidence of an association between CDNF2 and negative symptoms in SZ and is consistent with our previous observations of a genetic basis for SZ symptoms [16, 17, 28].

This study had some limitations. Firstly, our sample size was not large enough to obtain complete PANSS scores. Secondly, although we validated our results in two independent datasets, undifferentiated subtypes were only included in the stage 2 analysis.