Skip to main content
main-content

01.02.2013 | Original Contribution | Ausgabe 1/2013 Open Access

European Journal of Nutrition 1/2013

Association between dietary patterns and the risk of metabolic syndrome among Lebanese adults

Zeitschrift:
European Journal of Nutrition > Ausgabe 1/2013
Autoren:
F. Naja, L. Nasreddine, L. Itani, N. Adra, A. M. Sibai, N. Hwalla
Wichtige Hinweise
F. Naja and L. Nasreddine contributed equally to this manuscript.

Introduction

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) refers to a cluster of cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors that identifies individuals at particularly high risk for these chronic diseases [1]. These risk factors include hyperglycemia, raised blood pressure, elevated serum triacylglycerols (TAG) levels, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and obesity, particularly central adiposity [2]. In the Middle East region, the prevalence of MetS has increased significantly in recent years, and this increase has been attributed, for the most part, to rapid socioeconomic growth and change in lifestyle [3]. Among its neighboring countries, Lebanon—a small middle-income country on the Eastern shore of the Mediterranean sea—has unique characteristics that render the health of its population a complex challenge: a high urbanization rate (87%), fast decline in fertility and mortality rates, and a growing trend toward survival in later life, coupled with westernization and changes in lifestyle. A recent review paper showed that Lebanon has one of the highest estimated prevalence of MetS among adults in the region (31.2%) [4].
Several studies have been conducted underscoring the important role of dietary habits in influencing the risk of developing MetS, the majority of which, however, have focused on single nutrients or food items [5, 6]. This conventional approach has several limitations mainly the interaction between nutrients, confounding by foods/nutrients not eaten and the problem of collinearity. To overcome these limitations, nutritional epidemiologists suggest studying dietary patterns as an alternative approach to evaluate diet-disease association [7]. This approach looks beyond the single nutrient or food and attempts to capture the broader picture of diet that is hypothesized to be linked to health and disease. Moreover, results from dietary patterns analyses are more helpful in disseminating diet-related messages to consumers that they may be more likely to adhere to rather than those related to single foods or nutrients [8].
Although few studies have investigated the association of dietary patterns with MetS in various populations, there is still no consensus as to which dietary patterns would confer the lowest risk of MetS [912]. In the East Mediterranean region, studies evaluating this association are scarce. Using data from a recent nation-wide population-based survey of Lebanese adults, this study aims to identify and characterize the various dietary patterns among Lebanese adults and to examine the association of these dietary patterns with the risk of MetS and its various metabolic abnormalities. Findings from the study could inform prevention strategies as well as prognosis among subjects with high risk of MetS.

Methods

Study population

The data for this study were drawn from the nation-wide Nutrition and Non-Communicable Diseases Risk factors cross-sectional survey conducted in Lebanon between years 2008 and 2009. The sampling was random, multistage (by governate) and was based on the age-sex distribution of the Lebanese population [Living Conditions of households: The National Survey of Household Living Conditions 2004; Lebanese Republic Ministry of Social Affairs/Central Administration for Statistics/UNDP, pages 114–115]. Survey participants older than 18 years of age and with no chronic diseases were contacted to give blood samples (n = 1331). From these participants who were invited to participate, 323 subjects provided written consent and gave a blood sample (response rate: 24.3%). The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the American University of Beirut, and all subjects gave informed consent for their participation.

Data collection

Data collection took place in the participants’ homes by trained field workers, phlebotomists, and dietitians. Data collection procedures followed the WHO STEPwise approach to Surveillance (STEPS) [13] and included the following:
  • Step 1 Questionnaire. Information about sociodemographic, lifestyle characteristics, and meal patterns was collected. The short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used to assess physical activity among participants. Three categories of physical activity (low, moderate, and high) were assigned based on METS-min per week [14]. Dietary intake of participants was assessed by a 61-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) that measured food intake over the past year. For each food item listed on the FFQ, a standard portion size was indicated and five frequency choices were given. This FFQ was designed by a panel of nutritionists and included culture-specific dishes and recipes. It was tested on a convenient sample to check for clarity and cultural sensitivity. Daily gram intakes of food items, energy, and macronutrients intake of participants were computed using the food composition data base of the Nutritionist IV software [15]. The FFQ was administered by a trained dietitian.
  • Step 2 Anthropometric measurements including weight, height, and waist circumference were taken using standardized techniques and calibrated equipments. Blood pressure was measured using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer, after participants were seated and rested for 5 min.
  • Step 3 Biochemical measurements. Blood samples were collected from after an overnight fast. Serum was centrifuged on site and shipped on dry ice to the American University of Beirut Laboratory. Levels of TAG, HDL-C, and glucose were measured by an enzymatic spectrophotometeric technique using Vitros 350 analyzer (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Johnson & Jhonson, 50–100 Holmers Farm Way, High Wycombe, Buckighamshire, HP12 4DP, United Kingdom). The inter-assay variation of measurements did not exceed 4%. Quality control was performed within each run using standard performance verifier solutions provided by Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics. All samples were analyzed in duplicates, and the average value was used in statistical analysis.

Definition of metabolic syndrome

The definition for MetS released by the International Diabetes Federation Task force on Epidemiology and Prevention was used in this study [2].

Dietary patterns derivation

For the purpose of the determination of dietary patterns, food items were grouped into 25 food groups based on similarities in ingredients, nutrient profile, and/or culinary usage (“Appendix 1”). Food items having a unique composition that differed from other groups (e.g. eggs, olives, and mayonnaise) were classified individually. The total consumption for each group was determined by summing the daily gram intake of each item within the group. Exploratory factor analysis was implemented to identify dietary patterns. The rotated factor loadings matrix was extracted (varimax rotation). The derived dietary patterns were labeled based on food groups having a rotated factor loading greater than 0.4. Factor scores were calculated by multiple regression and were categorized into quintiles based on the total sample distribution.

Statistical analyses

Frequencies, means, and standard deviations (SD) were used to describe various sociodemographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, and clinical characteristics of participants with and without MetS. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to examine the association between dietary patterns and energy and energy-adjusted nutrient intakes. Energy adjustment was carried out using the regression residual method [16]. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess the correlates of the dietary patterns, with factor scores for each of the identified patterns as dependent variable and the sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics as independent variables. The associations between dietary patterns and risk of MetS as well as the various metabolic abnormalities were assessed using multivariate logistic regression. p for trend was performed using the median factor score for each quintile. All analyses were two tailed, and a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences was used for all computations [17].

Results

Overall prevalence of MetS in our study population was 34.7%. Demographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, and clinical characteristics of survey participants with and without MetS are presented in table 1 (n = 323). There were significant differences between participants with and without MetS by age, sex, and marital status (Table 1). Participants with MetS had worse serum profiles (lower HDL and higher TAG and glucose serum concentrations), higher BMI, waist circumference, and blood pressure as compared to participants without MetS.
Table 1
Demographic, lifestyle, anthropometric, and clinical characteristics of participants in the nutrition and non-communicable diseases survey who were included in this study (n = 323)
Demographic and lifestyle variables
Participants with MetS (n = 112)
Paticipants without MetS (n = 211)
Significancea
Age (years)
42.83 ± 15.34
36.50 ± 13.91
p < 0.001
Sex
  
X 2 = 9.994, p < 0.05
 Males
69 (61.6)
91 (43.1)
 
 Females
43 (38.4)
120 (56.9)
 
Marital status
  
X 2 = 6.575, p < 0.05
 Single
32 (28.6)
91 (43.1)
 
 Married
80 (71.4)
120 (56.9)
 
Education
  
X 2 = 11.469, p < 0.05
 Less than complimentary
58 (51.8)
69 (32.7)
 
 High school
28 (25.0)
67 (31.8)
 
 University and Higher education
26 (23.2)
75 (35.5)
 
Family history of obesity
  
X 2 = 0.298, p > 0.05
 No
67 (59.8)
119 (56.7)
 
 Yes
45 (40.2)
91 (43.3)
 
Smoking
  
X 2 = 1.155, p > 0.05
 No
72 (64.3)
148 (70.1)
 
 Yes
40 (35.7)
63 (29.9)
 
Physical activity level
  
X 2 = 1.180, p > 0.05
 Low
42 (37.5)
75 (35.5)
 
 Moderate
25 (22.3)
39 (18.5)
 
 High
45 (40.2)
97 (46.0)
 
Crowding indexb
1.14 ± 0.62
1.11 ± 0.55
p > 0.05
Breakfast per week
4.89 ± 2.82
4.93 ± 2.75
p > 0.05
Snack per day
1.85 ± 0.90
1.85 ± 0.97
p > 0.05
Eating at TV per week
2.72 ± 3.14
2.88 ± 3.20
p > 0.05
Eating out per week
3.90 ± 3.47
3.68 ± 3.44
p > 0.05
Anthropometric and clinical characteristics
 BMI(Kg/m2)
29.6 ± 4.7
25.3 ± 4.6
p < 0.05
  % Overweight
92 (49.2)
95 (45.5)
X 2 = 41.8; p < 0.001
  % Obese
46 (41.4)
30 (14.4)
X 2 = 29.4; p < 0.001
 Triacylglycerols (mg/dl)
194.0 ± 86.5
108.01 ± 51.48
p < 0.05
  % Elevated serum triacylglycerols
76 (67.9)
24 (11.4)
X 2 = 109.2; p < 0.001
 HDL-C (mg/dl)
44.2 ± 12.1
54.8 ± 14.1
p < 0.05
  % Reduced HDL-C
60 (53.6)
42 (19.9)
X 2 = 38.4; p < 0.001
 Serum glucose (mg/dl)
115.8 ± 28.0
97.0 ± 16.3
p < 0.05
  % Elevated glucose
88 (78.6)
60 (28.4)
X 2 = 74.1; p < 0.001
 Mean systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)
133.3 ± 17.6
119.2 ± 13.2
p < 0.05
 Mean diastolic blood pressure(mm Hg)
80.9 ± 10.5
74.3 ± 9.0
p < 0.05
  %With hypertension
77 (68.8)
53 (25.1)
X 2 = 57.9; p < 0.001
 Mean waist circumference (cm)
97.1 ± 11.8
83.8 ± 12.2
p < 0.05
  % Elevated waist circumference
90 (80.4)
77 (36.5)
X 2 = 56.4; p < 0.001
Categorical variables are reported as absolute and relative frequencies N(%); continuous variables are reported as mean ± SD
a p value was derived from chi-square for categorical variables and from independent student t test for continuous variables
bCrowding index was defined as the average number of people per room, excluding the kitchen and bathroom
Factor analysis revealed three main dietary patterns: Fast Food/Dessert, Traditional Lebanese, and High Protein, which explained 13.11, 9.71, and 7.8% of the dietary intake variance, respectively (Table 2). Factor loading showed that the Fast Food/Dessert pattern was characterized by high intake of fast foods sandwiches including hamburger, chawarma, falafel in addition to pizzas, pies, desserts, carbonated beverages and juices, and mayonnaise. The Traditional Lebanese pattern consisted mostly of dairy products, olives, fruits, legumes, grains, eggs, vegetable oil, dried fruits, and traditional sweets. The High Protein pattern was characterized by high intakes of fish, chicken, meat, and low-fat dairy products. The factor loading matrix of these patterns is shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Factor loading matrix for the three identified dietary patterns in the study population (n = 323)
 
Dietary patterns
Fast food/dessert
Traditional Lebanese
High protein
Hamburger
0.76
 
Chawarma
0.72
Pizza and pies
0.70
Falafel Sandwiches
0.61
Desserts
0.41
0.23
Carbonated beverages and juices
0.40
Mayonnaise
0.35
Butter
0.22
Alcoholic beverages
0.20
Dairy products-full fat
0.58
Olives
0.56
Fruits
–0.22
0.49
0.21
Legumes
 
0.47
Grains
0.27
0.47
Eggs
0.21
0.45
Vegetable oil
0.43
Nuts and dried fruits
0.27
0.40
Traditional sweets
0.37
Vegetables
0.34
Fish
0.70
Chicken
0.21
0.69
Meat
0.22
0.60
Dairy products-low fat
–0.29
0.54
Breakfast cereals
0.23
Hot drinks
Percent variance explained by each pattern
13.11
9.71
7.80
Factor loadings of <|0.2| were not listed in the table for simplicity. Loadings ≥0.3 are bolded
Table 3 shows the associations between the factor scores of the three dietary patterns with energy and energy-adjusted nutrient intakes as assessed by Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Among the three patterns, the Fast Food/Dessert pattern had the strongest positive association with energy, fat, and saturated fat intakes (r = 0.66, 0.19, and 0.26, respectively, p < 0.01). As for the Traditional Lebanese pattern, the higher the scores, the greater were the intakes of fiber and omega 6 fatty acids (r = 0.31 and 0.23, respectively, p < 0.05). Scores of the High Protein pattern displayed the highest positive correlations with intakes of proteins and cholesterol (r = 0.6 and 0.28, respectively, p < 0.05).
Table 3
Pearson’s correlation coefficients of the association between dietary pattern scores with total energy and energy-adjusted nutrient intakes
 
Dietary patterns
Fast food/dessert
Traditional Lebanese
High protein
Total energy
0.66**
0.59**
0.23**
Protein
−0.18**
−0.28**
0.60**
Carbohydrates
−0.10
0.07
−0.12*
Fat
0.19*
0.07
0.04*
 Cholesterol
0.05
−0.03
0.28**
 Saturated fat
0.26**
−0.07
−0.07
 Omega 6 fatty acids
−0.06
0.23**
−0.13**
Fiber
−0.31**
0.31**
0.19**
Alcohol
0.11
−0.05
−0.06
Sugars
0.30**
−0.02
−0.12*
Nutrient intake was adjusted by the residual method [16]. Values are Pearson’s correlation coefficients
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level
Multiple linear regression models were applied to examine the associations between selected sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics with the scores of the three patterns identified in this study (Table 4). The Fast Food/Dessert pattern was more adopted by younger adults and males, while the Traditional Lebanese pattern was more common among older subjects. The higher the crowding index, the higher were the scores of the Fast Food/Dessert pattern. Scores of both patterns showed a positive association with snack consumption per day. The High Protein pattern scores were positively associated with physical activity and the frequency of eating out per week.
Table 4
Correlates of the identified dietary patterns in the study population as assessed by multivariate linear regression
Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristic
Fast food/dessert
Traditional Lebanese pattern
High protein pattern
β
95% CI
β
95% CI
β
95% CI
Age
−0.03
(−0.05)–(−0.01)
0.10
0.01–0.32
0.01
(−0.02)–0.04
Males versus females
0.60
0.14–1.06
0.06
(−0.12)–1.14
−0.09
(−0.79)–0.61
Crowding index
0.51
0.16–0.87
0.02
(−0.37)–0.41
−0.23
(−0.77)–0.31
Education
0.17
(−0.08)–0.43
−0.11
(−0.39)–0.17
0.11
(−0.27)–0.50
Married versus unmarried
−0.09
(−0.53)–0.35
−0.05
(−0.54)–0.44
−0.38
(−1.05)–0.29
Smokers versus non-smokers
0.38
(−0.09)–0.84
−0.18
(−0.69)–0.34
−0.78
(−1.48)–(−0.07)
Existence of family history of obesity
−0.03
(−0.42)–0.35
0.03
(−0.39)–0.46
−0.16
(−0.75)–0.42
Physical activity
0.09
(−0.12)–0.30
0.00
(−0.24)–0.24
0.43
0.11–0.76
Breakfast consumption per week
−0.06
(−0.14)–0.01
0.03
(−0.05)–0.11
0.06
(−0.05)–0.17
Snack consumption per day
0.44
0.23–0.66
0.28
0.04–0.52
0.21
(−0.12)–0.54
Eating at TV weekly
0.02
(−0.04)–0.08
−0.02
(−0.09)–0.05
−0.03
(−0.12)–0.07
Frequency of eating out per week
−0.02
(−0.08)–0.05
−0.07
(−0.14)–.01
0.11
0.01–0.21
Values presented in this table are linear regression coefficients and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals
Table 5 shows the association between the quintiles of the identified dietary patterns scores with MetS and its various metabolic abnormalities. Subjects belonging to the 5th quintile of the Fast Food/Dessert factor score had significantly higher odds of hyperglycemia (OR: 3.81, 95% CI: 1.59–9.14). On the other hand, subjects belonging to the 5th quintile of the High Protein pattern had significantly higher odds of hypertension compared to those in the lowest quintile(OR: 2.98, CI: 1.26–7.02). As for the risk of MetS, the odds were three times higher in the 5th quintile of the Fast Food/Dessert compared to the 1st quintile (OR: 3.13; 95% CI: 1.36–7.22).
Table 5
Odds of metabolic abnormalities and MetS across quintiles of factor scores as assessed by multivariate-adjusted logistic regression in the study population (n = 323)
 
Elevated waist circumferencea
Hyper Triglyceridemiab
HDL-Cc
Hypertensiond
Hyperglycemiae
Metabolic syndromef
Fast food/dessert
 1st quintile
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
 3rd quintile
0.98 (0.47–2.13)
1.18 (0.52–2.70)
1.82 (0.82–4.03)
0.84 (0.38–1.82)
1.56 (0.70–3.47)
1.64 (0.75–3.59)
 5th quintile
1.70 (0.31–2.58)
2.01 (0.84–4.74)
1.32 (0.56–3.12)
1.40 (0.62–3.17)
3.81 (1.59–9.14)
3.13 (1.36–7.22)
 p for trend g
0.30
0.20
0.67
0.183
0.001
0.06
Traditional lebanese
 1st quintile
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
 3rd quintile
0.86 (0.41–1.81)
0.85 (0.38–1.88)
1.83 (0.82–4.09)
1.54 (0.69–3.43)
1.60 (0.74–3.43)
1.55 (0.70–3.43)
 5th quintile
1.07 (0.51–2.24)
1.28 (0.59–2.79)
1.77 (0.80–3.93)
2.31 (0.91–6.74)
1.44 (0.67–3.08)
1.96 (0.82–4.34)
 p for trend
0.83
0.42
0.32
<0.001
0.31
0.10
High protein
 1st quintile
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
 3rd quintile
1.76 (0.82–3.83)
1.21 (0.55–2.64)
1.18 (0.54–2.57)
1.99 (0.85–4.63)
1.13 (0.52–2.46)
0.90 (0.41–1.99)
 5th quintile
1.74 (0.79–3.85)
1.02 (0.46–2.27)
0.60 (0.30–1.38)
2.98 (1.26–7.02)
1.60 (0.70–3.62)
1.22 (0.54–2.77)
 p for trend
0.25
0.91
0.45
0.01
0.70
0.76
Values presented in this table are OR and 95% CI. OR were adjusted for age, sex, marital status, education, crowding index, physical activity, and smoking
aWC: Males > 94 cm, Females > 80 cm
b Serum triacylglycerols > 150 mg/dL
cHDL-C: Males < 50 mg/dl, Females < 40 mg/dL
dHypertension: Systolic ≥ 130 and/or diastolic ≥ 85 mm Hg
eHyperglycemia: Fasting blood sugar ≥ 100 mg/dL
fIDF definition of metabolic syndrome [2]
g p trend using the median factor score for each quintile

Discussion

In this study population, we identified three major dietary patterns by means of factor analysis: Fast Food/Dessert, Traditional Lebanese, and High Protein. Consumption of the Fast Food/Dessert pattern was associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia and metabolic syndrome. A positive association between the High Protein pattern and hypertension was also found.
The Fast Food/Dessert dietary pattern was characterized by high intake of fast foods sandwiches, pizzas and pies, desserts, and carbonated beverages and juices. This pattern was accompanied by elevated intake of energy and fat notably saturated fats, sugars and negatively correlated with intake of proteins and fibers. The excess consumption of the energy dense foods is likely to contribute to a surplus intake of energy which in turn is linked to a higher prevalence of overweight/obesity and related chronic diseases over time [18]. Furthermore, high consumption of sweetened beverages and desserts has been independently associated with MetS [19]. Desserts, which are foods with high glycemic index, are also associated with higher risk of MetS [20]. With the exception of red meat and dairy products, the Fast Food/Dessert pattern contains most of the food groups of the Western pattern identified in previous studies (e.g. sweets, desserts, fast foods, and sweetened beverages) [2123]. The Western pattern was shown to be adversely associated with incident MetS in the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study [24]. Another recent study in an urban Mexican population showed that consumption of a Western pattern was associated with 50% increase in the risk of MetS [25].
The traditional Lebanese pattern identified in this study was not associated with the MetS and its metabolic abnormalities. The Traditional Lebanese pattern is generally considered a Mediterranean pattern; however, it is important to note that Mediterranean diets may be different from one country to the other among the countries of the Mediterranean basin [26]. This pattern is highly loaded on fruits and vegetables which are likely to associate negatively with the risk of MetS. However, some energy dense foods as whole dairy products and traditional sweets were also heavily consumed in this dietary pattern and may have counteracted the protective effects of fruits and vegetables might have had on MetS. Consumption of sweets has its historical roots in the abundant usage of honey (an important element of the Mediterranean diet) that is currently replaced by the extensive use of corn syrup and sucrose in the making of many traditional sweets.
We also found that subjects who belonged to the fifth quintile of the High Protein pattern had higher blood pressure compared to those in the lowest quintile. While fish and particularly omega 3 fatty acids consumption was repeatedly reported in the literature to exert a protective effect against hypertension and MetS [27], the evidence regarding the association between red meat intake and MetS is less consistent [2830]. This controversy in the literature could be due to the various types of meats included in the “High Protein” or “meat-based” patterns and their methods of preparation. In our study, the High Protein dietary pattern included cured meat that are known to be high in salt content and might have contributed to elevated blood pressure among consumers.
The associations between the dietary patterns identified in this study and the sociodemographic characteristics of participants were in accordance with the literature. Our results showed that younger age and male gender were more likely to adhere to the Fast Food/Dessert [31, 32]. Crowding index was also positively associated with this dietary pattern. This is consistent with previous research reporting that the “unhealthy pattern” is associated with a lower socioeconomic status [33, 34]. The general observed socioeconomic nutritional gradient can be mediated by food costs, meaning that lowest cost diets mainly consumed by the lowest socioeconomic positions are generally unhealthy. People, who have less money, choose to buy cheaper foods, and these cheaper foods are less healthy [35].
Few limitations should be considered when interpreting the study findings. First, the percentage of survey participants who agreed to give blood (respondents) was low (24.3%). However, respondents and non-respondents were comparable across the sociodemographic characteristics except for marital status (62% of respondents vs. 50% of non-respondents are married) (data not shown). In addition, the dietary data of non-respondents were analyzed, and factor loading matrices were compared between respondents and non-respondents. All food groups with factor loadings greater than 0.4 loaded similarly on the three identified patterns in the two matrices. Minor differences were noted for few food groups with factor loadings lower than 0.4 and which included butter, alcoholic beverages, and hot drinks (“Appendix 2”). Second, this is a cross-sectional study, and its findings can mainly be used to test associations rather than assessing causal relationships. It remains important to note that the food frequency questionnaire used in this study was not validated in our study population. The fact that the food frequency questionnaire was administered by a trained dietitian and not self-completed offers many advantages in that it does not require a literate population and results in consistent interpretations and higher response and completion rates, each of which may enhance the validity of the data [36, 37].

Conclusion

Our results suggested that a Fast Food/Dessert type of diet is associated with higher likelihood of MetS, hypertension, and hyperglycemia, while a diet high in meat, poultry, and fish was associated with an elevated blood pressure. These findings lay grounds for planning intervention strategies that are culture based and in line with local dietary habits.

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by the Training Programs in Epidemiology and Public Health Interventions Network (TEPHINET). Additional funds were contributed by the World Health Organization (WHO-Lebanon) and the Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research (LNCSR). Funders had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation and reporting, and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Appendix 1

See Table 6.
Table 6
Food groupings used in the dietary pattern analysis
Food group
Components
Alcoholic beverages
Non-wine alcoholic beverages, beer, wine
Traditional sweets
All kinds of traditional sweets including baklava, ma’amoul, knafeh, and traditional ice cream
Breakfast cereals
Regular corn flakes
Butter
Butter and ghee
Carbonated beverages and juices
Sodas and all kinds of bottled juices
Chawarma
Chawarma sandwiches
Chicken
All kinds of poultry (broiled, fried, and boiled)
Dairy products-low fat
Half-skimmed milk, low-fat cheese, low-fat yogurt
Dairy products-full
Whole milk, whole-fat cheese, lebneh, whole-fat yogurt.
Desserts
Cakes, cookies, muffin, doughnut, honey, jams, chocolate.
Eggs
Eggs both boiled and fried
Falafel
Falafel sandwiches
Fish
Fish both fried and broiled
Fruits
Deep yellow orange fruits, bananas and apples, strawberries, citrus fruits, grapes, fresh fruit juices
Grains
Bread whole and refined, rice and rice products, pasta, crushed parboiled wheat
Hamburger
All types of hamburger sandwiches
Hot drinks
Turkish coffee, instant coffee, cocoa, and tea
Legumes
All kinds of legumes like beans, lentils, chickpeas, fava beans, and peas
Mayonnaise
All kinds of mayonnaise and mayonnaise-based salad dressing
Meat
Ovine, caprine, suine, and bovine meats, except for shawarma
Nuts and dried fruits
Nuts, both raw and roasted, dried raisin, prunes, and apricots
Olives
All kinds of pickled olives
Pizza and pies
Pizza, manaeesh with cheese, and thyme (manaeesh is the Lebanese version of the pizza dough)
Vegetable oil
Vegetable oil
Vegetables
Dark green and yellow vegetables, tomato, salad season, zucchini and eggplant, cauliflower, and potato

Appendix 2

See Table 7.
Table 7
Factor loading matrices for the three identified patterns among respondents (n = 323) and non-respondents (n = 1008)
 
Respondents
Non-respondents
Fast food/dessert
Traditional Lebanese
High protein
Fast food/dessert
Traditional Lebanese
High protein
Hamburger
0.76
0.55
Chawarma
0.72
0.85
Pizza and pies
0.70
0.39
Falafel Sandwiches
0.61
0.83
Desserts
0.41
0.23
0.59
Carbonated beverages and juices
0.40
0.35
Mayonnaise
0.35
0.67
Butter
0.22
0.21
0.33
Alcoholic beverages
0.20
0.21
Dairy products-full fat
0.58
0.46
Olives
0.56
0.56
Fruits
−0.22
0.49
0.21
0.42
 
Legumes
 
0.47
0.36
Grains
0.27
0.47
0.65
Eggs
0.21
0.45
0.35
Vegetable oil
0.43
0.33
Nuts and dried fruits
0.27
0.40
0.39
Traditional sweets
0.37
0.34
Vegetables
0.34
0.26
Fish
0.70
0.23
Chicken
0.21
0.69
0.69
Meat
0.22
0.60
0.61
Dairy products-low fat
−0.29
0.54
0.25
Breakfast cereals
0.23
0.24
Hot drinks
0.23
Percent variance explained by each pattern
13.11
9.71
7.80
15.56
7.44
6.43
Factor loadings of less than |0.2| were not listed in the table for simplicity. Loadings ≥ 0.3 are bolded

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Neuer Inhalt

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

European Journal of Nutrition 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe


 

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Inneren Medizin

2017 | Buch

Rheumatologie aus der Praxis

Entzündliche Gelenkerkrankungen – mit Fallbeispielen

Dieses Fachbuch macht mit den wichtigsten chronisch entzündlichen Gelenk- und Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen vertraut. Anhand von über 40 instruktiven Fallbeispielen werden anschaulich diagnostisches Vorgehen, therapeutisches Ansprechen und der Verlauf …

Herausgeber:
Rudolf Puchner

2016 | Buch

Ambulant erworbene Pneumonie

Was, wann, warum – Dieses Buch bietet differenzierte Diagnostik und Therapie der ambulant erworbenen Pneumonie zur sofortigen sicheren Anwendung. Entsprechend der neuesten Studien und Leitlinien aller wichtigen Fachgesellschaften.

Herausgeber:
Santiago Ewig

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Innere Medizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

© Springer Medizin 

Bildnachweise