Background
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent chronic joint disease and a major cause of pain and disability worldwide [
1]. Although the pathophysiologic mechanisms of OA are inconclusive, growing evidence has supported that metabolic factors may contribute to the initiation and progression of OA process [
2]. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated a positive association between OA and several metabolic risk factors, such as dyslipidemia, hyperglycaemia and hypertension [
3‐
5]. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a common metabolic disorder that results from the increasing prevalence of obesity and associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease [
2,
6]. Recently, metabolic OA has been nominated as the fifth component of MetS [
2], since OA was classified into three phenotypes including metabolic OA, age-related OA and injure-related OA [
7]. In view of the shared mechanisms, scholars concluded that MetS is closely related to OA, and OA is even a part of the generalized metabolic disorder [
2,
7‐
9].
OA is characterized by the pathologic features of joint space narrowing (JSN) and osteophyte (OSP) formation. Because accumulating evidences have shown that these two abnormalities have distinct etiologic mechanism [
10‐
12], it would be helpful to elucidate the pathogenesis of MetS or OA by gaining more in-depth understanding of the associations of MetS with JSN and OSP. During the past several decades, the Chinese population has experienced remarkable changes in lifestyle as economic development and the ageing process went on [
13]. As a consequence, a variety of health problems emerged, such as the increase of the prevalence of MetS and OA [
14‐
18]. Recently, a case-control study which included 70 end-stage OA patients and a matched control group conducted in China revealed a correlation between MetS and OA [
19]. However, due to the small sample size and only grade IV OA being involved in this study, the possible applicability of the results to the general Chinese population, as the authors acknowledged, would be limited. To our best knowledge, no analysis based on a large sample has examined the association between MetS and OA regarding general Chinese population.
To bridge the knowledge gap, we used data collected from a large population-based study (i.e., Xiangya Hospital Health Management Center Study) and examined the relation of MetS and its components with the prevalence of radiographic knee OA and to explore the association between MetS with OSP and JSN respectively.
Results
As previously described [
23], a total of 5764 subjects were included in the present cross-sectional study. The characteristics of the study population in terms of knee OA status were illustrated in Table
1. The overall prevalence of OA and MetS in the target population was 29.0% and 17.7%, respectively. The prevalence of MetS in knee OA subjects (20.3%) was significantly higher than non-knee OA subjects (16.6%) (
P = 0.001). Significant differences were observed between knee OA and non-knee OA subjects in terms of the age, sex, BMI, fasting glucose, blood pressure, HDL-cholesterol, and triglyceride.
Table 1
Basic characteristics of included subjects according to OA status (n = 5764)
Participants (n) | 1669 | 4095 | – |
MetS (%) | 20.3 | 16.6 | 0.001 |
Age (years) | 55.84 (8.01) | 51.81 (6.84) | <0.001 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 24.84 (3.36) | 24.36 (3.14) | <0.001 |
Female (%) | 43.3 | 46.8 | 0.018 |
Smoking (%) | 21.2 | 22.5 | 0.251 |
Alcohol drinking (%) | 37.1 | 38.9 | 0.223 |
High school diploma (%) | 46.2 | 47.7 | 0.306 |
Activity level (h/w) | 2.49 (3.71) | 2.20 (3.43) | 0.069 |
Fasting glucose (mmol/l) | 5.81 (1.74) | 5.66 (1.62) | <0.001 |
systolic pressure (mm Hg) | 128.56 (17.20) | 125.40 (17.49) | <0.001 |
Diastolic pressure (mm Hg) | 80.62 (11.39) | 79.92 (12.13) | 0.008 |
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.49 (0.38) | 1.52 (0.40) | 0.041 |
Triglyceride (mmol/l) | 1.96 (1.85) | 1.93 (1.81) | 0.476 |
HsCRP (mg/l) | 2.30 (4.95) | 2.39 (5.56) | 0.755 |
Outcomes of unadjusted, age-sex adjusted and multivariable adjusted associations (age, sex, activity level, smoking status, alcohol drinking status and educational background) between MetS and knee OA were shown in Table
2. The unadjusted OR (1.27, 95%CI: 1.10–1.47,
P = 0.001), age-sex adjusted OR (1.17, 95%CI: 1.01–1.36,
P = 0.041) and multivariable adjusted OR (1.17, 95%CI: 1.01–1.36,
P = 0.043) all suggested a positive association between MetS and OA. In addition, all the MetS components except for hyperglycaemia in the age-sex adjusted and multivariable adjusted models were associated with knee OA. In the two aforementioned models, the association between hyperglycaemia and knee OA approached significant. The relationships between the accumulation of MetS components and the prevalence of radiographic knee OA were presented in Table
3. Generally, the prevalence of knee OA increased with the accumulation of MetS components. The multivariable adjusted ORs are as follows: one component, 1.36, 95%CI: 1.14–1.61, P = 0.001; two components, 1.99, 95%CI: 1.67–2.38,
P < 0.001 and three or more components, 2.12, 95%CI: 1.74–2.57,
P < 0.001.
Table 2
Associations between MetS and OA in the present cross-sectional study (n = 5764)
MetS as a whole | 1.27 | 1.10–1.47 | 0.001 | 1.17 | 1.01–1.36 | 0.041 | 1.17 | 1.01–1.36 | 0.043 |
MetS components |
Overweight | 2.85 | 2.54–3.21 | <0.001 | 2.14 | 1.89–2.43 | <0.001 | 2.15 | 1.90–2.44 | <0.001 |
Hyperglycaemia | 1.36 | 1.18–1.57 | <0.001 | 1.15 | 0.99–1.33 | 0.067 | 1.15 | 0.99–1.33 | 0.066 |
Hypertension | 1.45 | 1.29–1.63 | <0.001 | 1.23 | 1.09–1.40 | 0.001 | 1.23 | 1.09–1.40 | 0.001 |
Dyslipidemia | 1.53 | 1.37–1.72 | <0.001 | 1.33 | 1.18–1.50 | <0.001 | 1.33 | 1.18–1.50 | <0.001 |
Table 3
Associations between number of MetS components and OA in the present cross-sectional study
Without MetS component | 1640 (28.5) | 292 (17.8) | 1.00 | reference | – |
With one MetS component | 1709 (29.6) | 446 (26.1) | 1.36 | 1.14–1.61 | 0.001 |
With two MetS components | 1396 (24.2) | 508 (36.4) | 1.99 | 1.67–2.38 | <0.001 |
With three or four MetS components | 1019 (17.7) | 423 (41.5) | 2.12 | 1.74–2.57 | <0.001 |
The result of sensitivity analysis shown that the multivariable adjusted association between MetS and knee OA remained significant after adding hsCRP into the multivariable model (OR, 1.45, 95%CI: 1.12–1.87,
P = 0.004). The associations between MetS and its components with JSN and OSP were shown in Table
4. Only MetS as a whole was associated with knee OSP (OR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.42–2.09,
P < 0.001), but not JSN (OR = 1.06, 95%CI: 0.91–1.23,
P = 0.449). In addition, overweight (OR = 1.26, 95%CI: 1.11–1.43,
P < 0.001) and dyslipidemia (OR = 1.18, 95%CI: 1.05–1.33,
P = 0.005) were associated with JSN; overweight (OR = 1.61, 95%CI: 1.36–1.90,
P < 0.001) and hypertension (OR = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.06–1.46,
P = 0.009) were associated with OSP. It should be noted that the positive association between MetS and radiographic knee OA also existed (crude OR = 1.29, 1.14–1.49,
P < 0.001; age-sex-BMI adjusted OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.10–1.29,
P = 0.058; multivariable adjusted OR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.00–1.30,
P = 0.052) when MetS was diagnosed based on the NCEP-ATPIII (Asian revised version) criteria. Besides, MetS was also associated with radiographic severity of knee OA (multivariable adjusted OR = 1.12, 95%CI: 0.99–1.27,
P = 0.08).
Table 4
Associations between MetS and its components with JSN and OSP in the present cross-sectional study (n = 5764)
JSN |
Adjusted OR | 1.06 | 1.26 | 1.10 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
95%CI | 0.91–1.23 | 1.11–1.43 | 0.95–1.27 | 0.91–1.17 | 1.05–1.33 |
P | 0.449 | <0.001 | 0.197 | 0.626 | 0.005 |
OSP |
Adjusted OR | 1.72 | 1.61 | 1.16 | 1.24 | 1.16 |
95%CI | 1.42–2.09 | 1.36–1.90 | 0.96–1.40 | 1.06–1.46 | 0.99–1.36 |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.132 | 0.009 | 0.065 |
Discussion
Based on a relatively large-scale population-based cross-sectional study, it was found that MetS and its components (e.g., overweight, hypertension and dyslipidemia) were associated with the prevalence of radiographic knee OA in a Chinese population with adjustment of a number of confounding factors. With the accumulation of MetS components, the prevalence of knee OA increased. The positive association remained significant after adding hsCRP into the multivariable model. In addition, MetS as a whole was only associated with knee OSP, but not JSN.
Notably, the present study found that MetS as a whole was associated with knee OSP, but not JSN, which is consistent with a previous cross-sectional study. In that study, Yoshimura et al. illustrated that the number of MetS components (e.g., overweight, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and impaired glucose tolerance) were positively related to OSP but not JSN [
36]. This may be explained by some mediators like adipocytokines, which are involved in many metabolic processes in the body [
37]. Besides, some animal studies also support our findings. Mooney et al. [
38] and Iwata et al. [
39] have demonstrated that high-fat diet increased the OSP diameter or volume in OA or type 2 diabetic mouse models. Similarly, Munter et al. [
40] showed that the accumulation of low density lipoprotein within synovial lining cells led to increased activation of synovium and OSP formation. This interesting finding of the present study may give evidence to a better understanding of the pathogenesis of OA.
In addition to high prevalence of OA [
18,
36,
41‐
44], Asian countries especially China, Japan and Korea are facing growing pressure of increasing prevalence of MetS, particular due to the dramatic changes in lifestyle in recent years [
45,
46]. The study conducted by Gandhi et al. [
47] showed that the prevalence of MetS in the Asian population was even higher than that in the white and black population. However, to the best of our knowledge, there was no large sample study yet examining the association between MetS and OA in the Chinese population. This is the first relatively large-scale study showing evidence that MetS diagnosed by the Chinese Diabetes Society criteria was associated with radiographic knee OA in the Chinese population. We speculate that the incidence and progression of MetS and OA are couple with each other including the severity of both diseases. This should be confirmed by further prospective cohort studies.
Among a variety of possible shared mechanisms between MetS and OA, chronic low-grade inflammation may be the most important one. An increasing number of researchers regarded MetS and OA as the low-grade inflammatory conditions, which were assessed by hsCRP levels sensitively [
48]. However, the present cross-sectional study indicated that the multivariable adjusted association between MetS and knee OA remained unchanged after adding hsCRP into the multivariable model. This suggests that chronic low-grade inflammation may not be a very important mediator between MetS and OA. However, hsCRP is not the only marker of low-grade inflammation state, and other biomarkers of it should be examined in further studies exploring the association between MetS and OA. Interestingly, knee OA and MetS were associated regardless of BMI according to the NCEP-ATPIII (Asian revised version) criteria in the present study. The result is consist with a previous prospective cohort study [
49] which showed that MetS was associated with increased risk of severe knee OA, independent of BMI. However, several previous studies [
35,
50] also showed that the association between MetS and OA may mainly mediated by BMI. The disparities exist in these studies may be explained by the difference among population involved, and further cohort studies are needed to confirm it in the Chinese population.
There are still some limitations to this study. The cross-sectional design precludes causal correlations, so further prospective studies and intervention trials should be undertaken to establish a causal association between MetS and knee OA. Besides, pain was not taken into account in the present study and, therefore, the association between MetS and symptomatic knee OA cannot be examined. The present study also has several strengths. This is the first relatively large-scale study examined the association between MetS and OA in the Chinese population, and the first suggesting that MetS as a whole was associated with OSP, but not JSN. Meanwhile, several MetS definitions, including CDS criteria and NCEP-ATPIII (Asian revised version) criteria were used to assess MetS. In addition, the multivariable model was adjusted by a considerable number of potential confounding factors, especially hsCRP, which greatly improved the reliability of the results.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.