Background
With the development of the economy and modern medical techniques, population aging is an inevitable trend. World health organization (WHO) reported that the global population of older people aged 60 years or older reached 0.9 billion in 2015 and may grow further into nearly 2 billion by 2050 [
1]. The 2010 census in China showed that individuals aged 60 years or above accounted for 13.3% of the total population in 2010, up by 2.9% as compared with that from the 2000 census [
2]. Due to the increasing life expectancy, health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) assessment is considered as a particularly important public health tool for the elderly, which can help determine the burden of preventable disease, injuries, and disabilities [
3].
HR-QOL is a common approach to the conceptualization of the broader concept of quality of life (QOL). It has been defined as: “the impact of perceived health on an individual’s ability to live a fulfilling life” [
4]. Common dimensions of HR-QOL include physical, psychological, and social components, which may compensate for, or depend on each other. The multidimensionality of HR-QOL makes it pertinent to examine both the respective dimensions of the concept but also the overall score for the population of interest [
5]. A number of factors have been identified to be related to HR-QOL among the elderly, such as socioeconomic status, lifestyle behaviors, and health conditions [
6‐
11]. However, social health (such as social support and social relationship) may also affect health-related quality of life in the elderly.
Social health is defined as an ability to accomplish potential and obligations, to manage their life to some extent despite a medical condition, and the ability to participate in social activities including work [
12]. Social health contains two aspects: individual and society or a population [
13]. Social health of an individual is usually explained as “well-being”, “adjustment” or other terms rather than health [
14], and it can be measured from two aspects: social support (SS) and social adjustment (SA). Social health for a society mainly reflects the neighborhood environment [
15]. A number of studies have focused on the association between a single level of social health and HR-QOL among the elderly [
16‐
19]. A study conducted in China found the relationship between social support and HR-QOL, mediating role of resilience [
20]; A longitudinal study indicated that consistent participation in religious activities, friendship organizations, leisure/culture clubs, family/school reunion, and volunteer work could improve the quality of life among middle-aged and older Koreans [
21]; And a cross-sectional study in Netherlands showed that multiple environmental factors were associated with quality of life in the elderly [
22]. However, up to now, limited studies can be available for evaluating the associations of individual and society levels of social health with health-related quality of life in the elderly.
Nowadays, a comprehensive structured scale called the Social Health Scale for the Elderly (SHSE) has been developed to fill the gap in social health status measurement [
15]. Herein, we reported a cross-sectional study to explore the relationship between social health status and HR-QOL among the elderly in Zhejiang, China.
Results
A total of 3161 elderly participants were recruited in our study, and we excluded 15 participants with incorrect information, 81 participants aged < 60 years and 113 participants with incomplete information of SF-12, and a total of 2952 participants were included in the final analysis. The number of poor, moderate and good social health status was 476, 1994, and 482, respectively. The mean scores were 48.10 ± 8.49(mean ± SD), 47.70 ± 7.09 and 47.90 ± 5.86 for PCS, MCS and SF-12 total score, separately. Mean age for all participants was 70.68 ± 7.75 years old, and 1487(50.4%) were females. Approximately 20% were not married, and less than 20% had no educational experience. Nearly 50% of participants lived in the urban regions and half of the participants had less than 2000 yuan per month of income. About 54.4% of elderly people lived with a spouse, and 49.4% had a normal BMI (Table
1). A significant difference in PCS was observed across the groups based on social health, gender, age, marital status, education level, monthly income, living arrangement, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, tea consumption, weekly physical activity, depression symptom and number of chronic conditions (
P < 0.01). Similar results were observed for MCS, except for gender, age, smoking, alcohol consumption and number of chronic conditions. For SF-12 total score, there was a significant difference across the groups of all demographic characteristics (
P < 0.01) (Table
1).
Table 1
HR-QOL according to different groups of demographic characteristics in the Zhejiang elderly
Social health status | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
Poor | 476(16.12) | 45.07 ± 9.64 | | 45.61 ± 8.23 | | 45.34 ± 6.68 | |
Moderate | 1994(67.55) | 48.25 ± 8.34 | | 47.80 ± 6.96 | | 48.02 ± 5.73 | |
Good | 482(16.33) | 50.45 ± 6.89 | | 49.36 ± 5.30 | | 49.91 ± 4.50 | |
Region | | | 0.18 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
Rural | 1518(51.42) | 47.89 ± 8.20 | | 46.10 ± 6.85 | | 47.00 ± 5.96 | |
Urban | 1434(48.58) | 48.31 ± 8.78 | | 49.39 ± 6.95 | | 48.85 ± 5.60 | |
Gender | | | < 0.01 | | > 0.05 | | < 0.01 |
Male | 1464(49.61) | 48.94 ± 8.35 | | 47.96 ± 6.70 | | 48.45 ± 5.67 | |
Female | 1487(50.39) | 47.26 ± 8.54 | | 47.45 ± 7.45 | | 47.35 ± 6.00 | |
Age group (Years) | | | < 0.01 | | 0.33 | | < 0.01 |
60–74 | 2069(70.09) | 49.49 ± 7.80 | | 47.78 ± 6.73 | | 48.64 ± 5.40 | |
≥75 | 883(29.91) | 44.84 ± 9.12 | | 47.51 ± 7.88 | | 46.17 ± 6.50 | |
Marital status | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.05 | | < 0.01 |
Married | 2370(80.28) | 48.65 ± 8.27 | | 47.87 ± 6.91 | | 48.26 ± 5.74 | |
Widowed | 491(16.63) | 45.33 ± 9.14 | | 47.10 ± 7.86 | | 46.21 ± 6.17 | |
Others | 91(3.08) | 48.44 ± 7.65 | | 46.50 ± 7.17 | | 47.48 ± 5.70 | |
Education level | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
Lower than primary school | 556(19.01) | 45.94 ± 8.68 | | 46.41 ± 7.50 | | 46.18 ± 6.20 | |
Primary school | 953(32.58) | 47.78 ± 8.57 | | 46.76 ± 7.03 | | 47.28 ± 6.01 | |
Middle school | 855(29.23) | 49.37 ± 8.07 | | 48.56 ± 6.81 | | 48.97 ± 5.40 | |
High school or higher | 567(19.38) | 48.87 ± 8.38 | | 49.23 ± 6.78 | | 49.05 ± 5.40 | |
Monthly income (CNY) | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
<1000 | 722(25.38) | 47.247 ± 8.43 | | 45.74 ± 7.50 | | 46.50 ± 6.32 | |
1000–1999 | 706(24.82) | 48.05 ± 8.45 | | 47.20 ± 6.78 | | 47.62 ± 6.04 | |
2000–2999 | 570(20.04) | 48.49 ± 8.29 | | 47.87 ± 7.48 | | 48.18 ± 5.71 | |
3000–3999 | 388(13.64) | 47.86 ± 9.28 | | 49.44 ± 6.34 | | 48.65 ± 5.45 | |
≥4000 | 459(16.13) | 49.31 ± 8.31 | | 50.35 ± 5.99 | | 49.83 ± 4.75 | |
Living arrangement | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
Live with spouse | 1607(54.44) | 48.71 ± 8.20 | | 48.06 ± 6.69 | | 48.39 ± 5.62 | |
Live with children | 296(10.03) | 45.70 ± 9.01 | | 46.69 ± 7.97 | | 46.19 ± 6.20 | |
Live with spouse and children | 573(19.41) | 49.02 ± 8.21 | | 48.03 ± 7.17 | | 48.52 ± 5.69 | |
Live alone | 322(10.91) | 45.65 ± 8.96 | | 46.99 ± 7.39 | | 46.32 ± 6.25 | |
Others | 154(5.22) | 47.95 ± 8.79 | | 46.16 ± 7.94 | | 47.05 ± 6.21 | |
BMI (kg/m2) | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
<18.5 | 184(6.44) | 45.04 ± 9.21 | | 46.81 ± 8.71 | | 45.93 ± 6.66 | |
18.5–23.9 | 1412(49.42) | 48.47 ± 8.40 | | 47.38 ± 7.24 | | 47.93 ± 5.87 | |
≥24.0 | 1261(44.14) | 48.08 ± 8.41 | | 48.21 ± 6.53 | | 48.15 ± 5.62 | |
Smoking | | | < 0.01 | | 0.81 | | < 0.01 |
Yes | 388(13.14) | 49.73 ± 8.42 | | 47.62 ± 6.62 | | 48.68 ± 5.76 | |
No | 2543(86.14) | 47.84 ± 8.48 | | 47.71 ± 7.17 | | 47.78 ± 5.87 | |
Alcohol drinking | | | < 0.01 | | 0.33 | | < 0.01 |
Yes | 558(19.04) | 49.95 ± 7.73 | | 47.96 ± 6.70 | | 48.96 ± 5.40 | |
No | 2373(80.96) | 47.65 ± 8.60 | | 47.64 ± 7.19 | | 47.65 ± 5.94 | |
Tea drinking | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
Yes | 964(32.89) | 49.28 ± 8.22 | | 48.52 ± 7.01 | | 48.90 ± 5.66 | |
No | 1967(67.11) | 47.51 ± 8.57 | | 47.30 ± 7.10 | | 47.41 ± 5.90 | |
Weekly physical activity | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
≤1 time | 1064(37.35) | 46.06 ± 9.26 | | 46.39 ± 7.62 | | 46.23 ± 6.47 | |
2–4 times | 1524(53.49) | 49.24 ± 7.69 | | 48.90 ± 6.54 | | 49.07 ± 5.08 | |
> 4 times | 261(9.16) | 50.23 ± 8.00 | | 47.39 ± 6.43 | | 48.81 ± 5.49 | |
Depression symptom | | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 | | < 0.01 |
Yes | 767(26.19) | 49.09 ± 7.91 | | 48.51 ± 6.25 | | 48.80 ± 5.17 | |
No | 2162(73.81) | 45.43 ± 9.35 | | 45.53 ± 8.66 | | 45.48 ± 6.91 | |
Number of chronic conditions | | | < 0.01 | | 0.15 | | < 0.01 |
0 | 777(26.32) | 50.56 ± 7.15 | | 47.75 ± 6.29 | | 49.15 ± 5.01 | |
1 | 1184(40.11) | 49.00 ± 7.84 | | 47.41 ± 7.23 | | 48.21 ± 5.77 | |
≥2 | 991(33.57) | 45.08 ± 9.30 | | 48.01 ± 7.50 | | 46.54 ± 6.30 | |
Table
2 summarizes the adjusted association of social health status with HR-QOL. As compared with individuals with a poor social health status, subjects who had a moderate or good social health status were more likely to report better HR-QOL (for moderate social health status: β = 1.90(95%CI:1.09, 2.71) for PCS; β = 1.78(1.08, 2.48) for MCS; β = 1.84(1.29, 2.39) for SF-12 total score; for good social health status: β = 3.29(2.24, 4.34) for PCS; β = 3.10(2.20, 4.01) for MCS; β =3.20(2.48, 3.91) for SF-12 total score). No collinearity was observed among the variables included in these models.
Table 2
Beta values and 95% confidence intervals of HR-QOL by social health status in the Zhejiang elderly
Poor | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Moderate | 1.90(1.09,2.71) | 1.78(1.08,2.48) | 1.84(1.29,2.39) |
Good | 3.29(2.24,4.34) | 3.10(2.20,4.01) | 3.20(2.48,3.91) |
As for covariates, individuals who were 75 years and older, or had a BMI < 18.5 kg/m
2 or chronic conditions, or did physical activity less than 2 times weekly, were more likely to report lower PCS. Participants who lived in urban regions and lived with spouse and children, or had a monthly income over 3000 Yuan or BMI ≥ 24 kg/m
2 or no depression symptom, were more likely to report higher MCS. As for SF-12 total score, subjects who lived in the rural regions, were female or 75 years and older or non-tea drinkers, whose monthly income less than 4000 yuan and BMI < 18.5 kg/m
2, or had chronic conditions with depression symptom were more likely to report lower SF-12 total score
(Supplementary Tables S1–3).
Discussion
This present study aimed at assessing whether social health status was associated with HR-QOL in the Zhejiang elderly. Compared with the elderly with a poor social health status, those who had a better social health status were more likely to report higher scores of PCS, MCS and SF-12 total score, after adjusting for potential covariates. These findings suggest that social health status may be considered as a comprehensive indicator of HR-QOL and may help to develop interventions to improve the quality of life in the elderly.
In this study, social health status was found to be positively associated with PCS among the elderly, which was supported by previous studies for the association of social health related factors with physical health among the elderly [
31‐
35]. A cross-sectional study conducted in Kuwaitis showed that having children, perception of social support, frequency of contact with kin, and strength of relationships with kin were important modulators of somatic symptoms among the elderly [
36]. And a longitudinal study in Japan suggested that interaction between environment and multifaceted social relationships had the strongest impact on functional ability for the elderly [
37]. Increased social relationships had beneficial effects in fostering the elders’ physical and cognitive functions through active participation in social activities and building social networks [
38].
Meanwhile, social health status was a positive factor of MCS, which was supported by previous studies for the association of social health related factors with mental health among the elderly [
39‐
43]. The wave three of Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3 Study) indicated that lesser psychological distress in the elderly was dependent on better scores on social support [
44]; An observational study demonstrated that in the healthy elderly, participating in a social activity could help improve psychological distress [
45]. Depression was one of the most prevalent mental disorders in the elderly population and was associated with risk of disability and mortality [
46], and several studies have suggested the associations of social support, social participation, and social relationships with depression symptom [
47‐
49].
Perceived environment resource is also an important dimension of social health. The World Report on Aging and Health recommends that decision-makers need to build supportive and enabling environments, which can help people build and maintain capacity (for example, a walkable environment may foster physical activity) [
50]. A study in Hong Kong showed that environmental walkability was associated with HR-QOL among older adults [
51]. Moreover, some perceived environment resources, such as safety from traffic and street noise were associated with HR-QOL [
16]. The changes in the environment around the community may also affect health-related quality of life in the elderly.
Additionally, we noticed that participants who lived in the rural region, were females, aged 75 years and older, were not tea drinkers, or had less than 4000 yuan of monthly income, BMI < 18.5 kg/m
2, or chronic conditions with depression symptom were more likely to report lower SF-12 total score. Also, we noticed that monthly income over 3000 CNY was a positive factor of MCS, which was not comparable with a previous study [
10]. Possible explanations could be: most of older people in this study were retirees and got money from their children or pension. Consequently, those older people who got more money per month could have less economic hardship and a peaceful life attitude.
Our study had some important strengths. It was the first study that explored the influential factors of HR-QOL among the elderly from a perspective of social health status. Moreover, we enrolled a total of 2952 elderly people, which could be considered as a large sample compared with similar studies. Finally, the combination of indicators (PCS, MCS, and SF-12 total score) could improve the meaning of our results. However, our study also had several limitations. Firstly, our study was a cross-sectional study and the causal relationship could not be demonstrated. Secondly, selection bias might not be avoided due to the nonrandomized sampling and relatively low response rate. However, the age and sex distributions of the study population were similar to the Zhejiang elderly population. Finally, although we adjusted for many possible confounders (such as smoking, alcohol drinking, and tea consumption), we lacked information on other potential confounders, such as dietary patterns.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.