Previous studies indicated that the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TLR9 gene might be associated with Tuberculosis (TB) risk. However, the results are inconsistent and inconclusive.
Methods
1745 articles from four databases were involved in our study. A meta-analysis on the associations between the seven polymorphisms and TB risk was carried out by comparison using different genetic models.
Results
In this systematic review 8 studies from seven English articles were analyzed. Our results showed that rs352139 is significantly associated with TB risk (AA vs. AG, OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.92, P = 0.004). In the ethnic subgroup analysis, Indonesians with AA genotype had a decreased susceptibility while Mexicans with GG allele had an increased risk.
Conclusions
The meta-analysis indicated that rs352139 polymorphism might be associated with decreased TB risk in Indonesians whereas increased risk in Mexicans. Whether the observed association was due to causal effect needs to be further studied.
Hinweise
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
ZC carried out the study design, data analysis. WW carried out the manuscript review. JL participated in the literature research. JW participated in the literature research. SF participated in the literature research. GZ conceived of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), is one of the most contagious diseases in humans. A recent report (2014) from WHO estimated that one third of the global population has been latently infected without clinical symptoms. In 2012, approximately 8.6 million people worldwide were diagnosed with TB and 1.3 million died from TB [1]. MTB could infect human by invading antigen presenting cell (Macrophages and Dendritic cells) in the lung. But only 5-10% of infected people developed clinical symptoms probably due to undermined immunity response [1].
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern recognizing receptors (PRRs) and play an important role in regulating human’s immune system. The TLRs can recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) in both extracellular and intracellular environment. The TLRs have the ability to initiate signaling pathways that are responsible for activating both innate and acquired immune responses as well as the production of inflammatory cytokines. The members of TLRs family have been detected on human plasma membrane (TLR1, TLR2, TLR4-6) and in leukocyte endosome (TLR3, TLR7-9) [2]. For the risk of MTB infection, the most important TLRs are TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR6 and TLR9 [3]. TLR1 combines with TLR2 as a heterodimer and recognizes triacylated lipopeptides of MTB. TLR2-TLR6 complex recognizes diacylated lipopeptides and bacterial LTA of Mycoplasmal compounds. TLR4 recognizes lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and TLR9 homodimer recognizes the exogenous MTB DNA as PAMPs [4]. Studies focusing on TLR1, 2, 4 and 6 have found that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of these TLRs genes might be associated with differential TB risk. However, neither systematic review nor meta-analysis has been reported for TLR9 [3].
Anzeige
The gene of toll-like receptor 9 is located on chromosome 3p21.3. The total length of TLR9 gene is approximate 5 kb. Its coding gene has two exons, and the major coding region is in the second exon [5]. Based on NCBI SNP database, twelve SNPs have been identified for TLR9 gene, in which NM_017442.3:c.-1486 T > C (rs187084) located at the upstream of promoter may be an important one [6]. Previous study it has shown that C genotype was associated with reduced TLR9 transcription activity when compared with T genotype [7], indicating population with C genotype may be susceptible to diseases related to TLR9 gene.
Researches have indicated certain race population with special genotype of TLR9 polymorphism might have higher risk for TB; however the findings are inconsistent and inconclusive. From public health perspective, given the widespread and severe nature of the disease, it is important to understand the association between TLR9 polymorphism and TB risk, so that individuals with higher risk genotype could be identified and receive targeted preventive care. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of current literature on this issue and analysis of the associations between TLR9 polymorphisms and TB risk.
Methods
Literature review
We searched the EMBASE, Web of science, PubMed and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to identify the publications that reported the association between the TLR9 polymorphism and risk for pulmonary tuberculosis from April, 2004 to July, 2014. The key words used were ‘toll like receptor 9, SNP, lung tuberculosis’, ‘toll like receptor 9, snp, pulmonary tuberculosis’, ‘toll like receptor 9, polymorphism, pulmonary tuberculosis’, or ‘toll like receptor 9, polymorphism, lung tuberculosis’. Only the articles in English or Chinese with an English abstract were selected. After excluding duplicates, titles and abstracts were reviewed. Studies would be selected if they: 1) were case-control studies; 2) reported genotype distribution in both cases and controls. The studies were excluded if they were: 1) review articles; 2) not related to TLR9; 3) not a human study; or 4) not related to the association between tuberculosis and host genetics. The study selection process was summarized in Figure 1. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The 309th hospital of PLA.
Figure 1
Flow chart showing the study selection procedure. CNKI: China National Knowledge Infrastructure.
×
Data extraction
For each study, the following information was extracted from original publication: the name of first author, the year of publication, country of origin, race of study population, genotypes distribution for each polymorphism in both cases and controls, statistical characteristics of each study (sample size, gender and age distribution of cases and controls, P values for HWE evaluation), source of controls, and genotyping methods (Table 1).
Table 1
Characteristics of the 16 studies included in the meta-analysis
Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) was examined in controls by asymptotic Pearson’s Chi-square test for each polymorphism in each study. The association between polymorphism and TB risk was estimated with odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Between studies heterogeneity was tested using Q test and I2 test, and the heterogeneity was considered significant if P-value was less than 0.05. Fixed-effects model was adopted when P-value was more than 0.05; otherwise random-effects models were used [8]. The publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s test and Egger’s test [9,10]. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted with Stata 13.0 (College Station, TX).
We used ‘Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology’ [11] as guideline for conduction and reporting of this meta-analysis.
Results
Characteristics of included studies
A total of 1745 articles were obtained from the literature search. As shown in Figure 1, after excluding the duplicates, 617 abstracts were reviewed. A total of 12 research articles that reported the association of human TLR9 gene polymorphisms and TB risk were identified. Five of them were excluded after reviewing the full-text article due to studying irrelevant polymorphism, focusing on data mining, studying the SNPs within microRNAs, or lacking the detail of SNP distribution. Finally, 8 studies from 7 articles were included in this analysis. All articles were published in English [12-18]. Overall, 7 different TLR9 SNPs were studied. Among them, there were 3 studies for rs187084 [12,14,17], 1 study for rs352165 [15], 3 studies for rs5743836 [14,17,18], 1 study for rs5743842 [18], 4 studies for rs352139 [13,16,18] (Kobayashi et al did studies on Indonesian and Vietnamese), 1 study for rs352140 [16] and 1 study for rs352167 [15]. As shown in Table 1, the race of study population ranged from African, Asian to Latin American. No studies from Caucasian were included due to lack of detailed SNP distribution. The pooled study population consisted of 4538 subjects (2222 cases and 2316 controls). The genotype and allele distributions of all the polymorphisms are shown in Table 2. In 3 studies, the genotype distributions in controls were deviated from HWE. The location of each SNP was shown in Figure 2 based on information from CNBI SNPs database.
Table 2
Genotype and allele distribution of TLR-9 polymorphisms in TB and controls
SNP
Study
Case
Control
HWE
TT
TC
CC
T
C
TT
TC
CC
T
C
χ2
P
rs187084
P. Selvaraj. et. al.
75
91
27
241
145
84
92
32
260
156
0.66
0.42
Jahantigh, et al.
63
51
10
177
71
82
59
8
223
75
0.39
0.53
Olesen, et al.
171
122
25
464
172
186
132
21
504
174
0.14
0.71
rs352165
Sa’nchez, et al.
90
238
138
418
514
53
162
83
268
328
2.88
0.90
rs5743836
Olesen, et al.-a
104
154
62
362
278
101
175
66
377
307
0.40
0.53
P. Selvaraj. et. al.
168
29
1
365
31
167
32
2
366
36
0.11
0.74
Diana Torres-García, et. al.
82
8
0
172
8
78
12
0
168
12
0.46
0.50
rs5743842
Diana Torres-García, et. al.
0
2
88
2
178
0
0
90
0
180
AA
AG
GG
A
G
AA
AG
GG
A
G
χ2
P
rs352139
Kobayashi, et. al.(Indonesian)
199
279
59
677
397
259
233
68
751
369
1.90
0.17
Kobayashi, et. al.(Vietnamese)
123
125
28
371
181
232
183
40
647
263
0.20
0.65
Yang, et al.
70
89
41
229
171
68
95
33
231
161
<0.00
0.98
Diana Torres-García, et al.
23
48
19
94
86
14
41
35
69
111
0.12
0.73
rs352140
Yang, et al.
40
88
72
168
232
32
93
71
157
235
0.03
0.87
rs352167
Sa’nchez, et al.
101
238
127
440
492
60
162
76
282
314
2.44
0.12
HWE: Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium.
Figure 2
The location of TLR9 SNPs and TLR9 signaling pathway. (A) Schematic representation of human chromosome 3 showing location of TLR9 gene. (B) Schematic representation of the selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TLR9. Drak regions in exon 1&2: protein coding region. (C) Schematic representation of selected SNPs in TLR9 protein. TLR9: Toll-Like Receptor; LRR: Leucine-rich repeat; TIR: Toll-Interleukin-1 Receptor Domain; LD: linkage disequilibrium. (D) The signaling pathway of TLR9. TLR9 homodimer could recruit adaptor proteins MyD88. MyD88 recruits IRAK-4 and activates NF-κB through IRAKs, TRAF6, TAK1, and IκKs, resulting in cell apoptosis or inflammatory cytokine synthesis. TLR9: Toll-Like Receptor 9; MyD88: Myeloid Differentiation Primary Response Gene 88; NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B; IRAK: Interleukin-1 Receptor associated kinase 1; TRAF 6: TNF Receptor Associated Factor 6; TAK1: TGF-b-Actiated Kinase 1; IκK: IκB kinase; IκB: Inhibitor of NF-κB.
×
Data synthesis by polymorphism
TLR9 rs187084 polymorphism
The Human Genome Variation Society (HGVS) name of rs187084 is NM_017442.3:c.-1486 T > C [19,20]. Three case-control studies (987cases and 405 controls) addressed the relationship between rs187084 polymorphism and the risk of TB. As shown in Table 3, the heterogeneity was not significant (P = s 0.78, I2 = 0.0%). The overall OR (T vs. C alleles) using fixed-effect model was 0.93 (95% CI 0.79–1.10), P =0.43. Analyses of other genetic models were also performed, and no association was identified (Table 3). The publication bias was also negligible in these genetic models (Table 3). Subgroup analysis in allele comparison (T vs. C) was performed by ethnicity in Figure 3.
Table 3
Summary of different comparative meta-analysis results
Polymorphism
Genetic model
Participants
OR (95% CI)
Z
P value
I2%
Phet
Effect model
Begg’s test p > │z│
Egger’s test p > │t│
rs187084
TT vs. TC + CC
1331
0.93 (0.75, 1.15)
0.68
0.49
0.0
0.91
F
0.29
0.30
CC vs. TC + TT
1331
1.12 (0.77, 1.63)
0.60
0.55
0.0
0.53
F
0.30
0.47
TT vs. CC
784
0.85 (0.58, 1.27)
0.79
0.43
0.0
0.6
F
0.30
0.47
TT vs. TC
1208
0.95 (0.75, 1.19)
0.50
0.63
0.0
0.91
F
0.30
0.17
T vs. C
2660
0.93 (0.79, 1.10)
0.80
0.43
0.0
0.78
F
1.00
0.57
rs5743836
TT vs. TC + CC
1241
1.18 (0.90, 1.54)
1.18
0.24
0.0
0.82
F
0.30
0.36
CC vs. TC + TT
1241
0.99 (0.68, 1.45)
0.06
0.95
0.0
0.58
F
1.00
_
TT vs. CC
831
1.12 (0.72, 1.73)
0.5
0.62
0.0
0.63
F
1.00
_
TT vs. TC
1110
1.19 (0.90, 1.57)
1.18
0.24
0.0
0.82
F
1.00
0.48
T vs. C
2482
1.09 (0.90, 1.33)
0.89
0.37
0.0
0.72
F
0.30
0.15
rs352139
AA vs. AG + GG
2404
0.88 (0.65, 1.19)
0.83
0.40
62.1
0.049
R
0.09
0.00
GG vs. AG + AA
2404
0.90 (0.60, 1.35)
0.51
0.61
61.9
0.049
R
0.73
0.59
AA vs. AG
2081
0.84 (0.63, 1.12)
2.9
0.004
55.4
0.081
R
0.31
0.07
AA vs. GG
1311
1.02 (0.65, 1.61)
0.1
0.92
62.0
0.048
R
0.73
0.24
A vs. G
4808
0.98 (0.77, 1.25)
0.17
0.87
72.5
0.012
R
0.09
0.10
Phet = P value for heterogeneity; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; F = fixed-effect model; R = random-effect model.
Figure 3
Forrest plot of the association between rs187084 and TB risk (T vs. C). Subgroup analysis was performed by ethnicity. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; df: degrees of freedom.
×
TLR9 rs5743836 polymorphism
The HGVS name of rs5743836 is NM_017442.3:c.-1237 T > C [19,21]. Three case-control studies (608 cases and 633 controls) were included for the analysis of the relationship between rs5743836 polymorphism and TB risk. As shown in Table 3, the heterogeneity between these studies was not significant (P = 0.72, I2 = 0.0%). The overall OR (T vs. C alleles) using fixed-effect model was 1.09 (95% CI 0.90–1.33), P =0.37. Analyses for other genetic models also did not identify significant association (Table 3). The publication bias was also insignificant (Table 3). Subgroup analysis in allele comparison (T vs. C) was performed by ethnicity in Figure 4.
Figure 4
Forrest plot of the association between rs5743836 and TB risk (T vs. C). Subgroup analysis was performed by ethnicity. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; df: degrees of freedom.
×
TLR9 rs352139 polymorphism
The HGVS name of rs352139 is NM_017442.3:c.4-44A > G [19,22]. Four case-control studies (1103 cases and 1301 controls) were included in the analysis of the relationship between rs352139 polymorphism and TB risk. As shown in Table 3, the heterogeneity between these studies was significant (P = 0.012, I2 = 72.5%). The overall OR (A vs. G alleles) using the random-effect model was 0.98 (95% CI 0.77–1.25), P =0.87. Analyses for other genetic models did not identify significant association (Table 3). Begg’s test (P = 0.09) and Egger’s test (P = 0.00) showed potential publication bias in the model of AA vs. AG + GG (Table 3). As shown in Figures 5 and 6, the Mexicans with homozygote gene AA might have higher risk TB whereas Indonesians with the same SNP genotype might have lower risk for TB. It is of note that there is only one study from each race.
Figure 5
Forrest plot of the association between rs352139 and TB risk (AA vs. AG + GG). Subgroup analysis was performed by ethnicity. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; df: degrees of freedom.
Figure 6
Forrest plot of the association between rs352139 and TB risk (AA vs. AG). Subgroup analysis was performed by ethnicity. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; df: degrees of freedom.
×
×
TLR9 rs5743842, rs352165, rs352140 and rs352167polymorphism
There was only one study for each SNP, which limited further analysis. As shown in Table 4, the overall ORs for T vs. C or A vs. G were all around 1, indicating lack of association between these polymorphisms and risk of pulmonary tuberculosis. Analyses for other genetic models were also performed, and no association was found (Table 4).
Table 4
Summary of different comparative SNPs results
Polymorphism
Genetic model
Participants
OR (95% CI)
Chi2
P value
rs5743842
TT vs. TC + CC
180
_
_
_
CC vs. TC + TT
180
0 (0, 1.91)
_
0.50
TT vs. CC
178
_
_
_
TT vs. TC
2
_
_
_
T vs C
360
_
_
_
rs352165
TT vs. TC + CC
764
1.11 (0.75, 1.64)
0.28
0.60
CC vs. TC + TT
764
1.09 (0.78, 1.53)
0.27
0.60
TT vs. CC
364
1.02 (0.65, 1.62)
0.01
0.92
TT vs. TC
543
1.16 (0.77, 1.75)
0.52
0.47
T vs C
1528
1.00 (0.81, 1.23)
0.00
0.96
rs352140
AA vs. AG + GG
396
1.28 (0.74, 2.22)
0.90
0.34
GG vs. AG + AA
396
0.99 (0.64, 1.52)
0.00
0.96
AA vs. AG
253
1.32 (0.74, 2.38)
0.99
0.32
AA vs. GG
215
1.23 (0.67, 2.27)
0.52
0.47
A vs G
792
1.08 (0.81, 1.45)
0.31
0.58
rs352167
AA vs. AG + GG
764
1.10 (0.76, 1.60)
0.26
0.61
GG vs. AG + AA
764
1.09 (0.78, 1.55)
0.29
0.59
AA vs. AG
561
1.15 (0.77, 1.70)
0.50
0.48
AA vs. GG
364
1.01 (0.64, 1.58)
0.00
0.97
A vs G
1528
1.00 (0.81, 1.23)
0.00
0.97
OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Two individual researchers independently reviewed the studies. The inter-rater agreement, as measured by kappa statistics, was calculated with MedCalc® software [23]. The weighted kappa is 0.500; 95% CI is 0139 to 0.861, indicating a moderate agreement between 2 researchers.
Discussion
In this study, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between seven extensively studied TLR9 polymorphisms (rs187084, rs352165, rs5743836, rs5743842, rs352139, rs352140 and rs352167) and TB risk. The analysis revealed an association between certain TLR9 polymorphism and TB risk. In addition, 5 different genetic models (Allele, Heterozygote, Homozygote, Dominant and Recessive model) were analyzed in all polymorphisms. A subgroup analysis by race was also performed for rs187084, rs352139 and rs5743836 polymorphisms, the studies of which included Indians, Iranian and West African, Indonesians, Vietnamese, Chinese and Mexicans. The results showed that rs187084 and rs5743836 polymorphisms were not associated with TB risk, while the association between rs352139 polymorphism and TB risk may vary by race.
We chose TLR9 gene in our analysis because it’s critical role in the incidence of TB from previous studies. Chen et al. demonstrated that cell apoptosis induced by Mycobacterium Tuberculosis required TLR9 in animal model [24]. Another study reported that the deficiency in a major adapter of TLR9 signaling pathway significantly increased the lethality of TB. The myeloid differentiation factor 88 knock-out mice (MyD88 −/−) died within 4 weeks after MTB infection [25]. All these evidences indicated the critical role of TLR9 in TB incidence and progression.
TLR9 is a recognition receptor in leukocytes endosome, especially in B cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) and macrophages. It is localized in the endosomal and lysosomal compartments. It is one of the most important receptors for the initiation of innate immune response against intracellular pathogens. The function of TLR9 is to recognize the unmethylated Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine (CpG) sequence which usually appears in bacterial DNA [5]. In recent study, hybrid RNA-DNA chains generated by viruses during reverse transcription were recognized by TLR9 [26]. The Toll-IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain of TLR9 in intracellular space associates with myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), and becomes the initiator component of TLR9 signaling pathway. Once bacterial CpG-DNA in lysosome combines with the nucleic acid ligand of TLR9, the signaling pathway is activated. MyD88, once stimulated, recruits IL-1 receptor associated kinase 4 (IRAK-4) to TLR9 through interaction of the functional domains. Then, IRAK-1 is phosphorylated and recruits Tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6). Consequently the inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase (IКK) complex is activated, leading to the activation of Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases (JNK, p38 MAPK). The nuclear factor inhibiter (IкB) is then phosphorylated and the level of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-кB) is elevated [27]. NF-кBs translocate to the nucleus, and then bind to DNA sites to regulate relevant gene transcription. Finally, inflammatory cytokines are synthesized through host defense immune response by TLRs- NF-кB pathway. The signaling pathway of TLR9 was shown in Figure 2.
SNPs rs352165 and rs352167 were located in intron 5 of aminolevulinate delta-, synthase 1 (ALAS1) gene in the downstream of TLR9. Sanchez D et al. have reported that these two SNPs were in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs352139 and rs352140 SNPs of TLR9 [15]. Thus they chose rs352165 and rs352167 as proxies for TLR9 gene. Lack of significant association with TB risk from our analysis indicated there was no relationship between rs352165/ rs352167 and this disease.
In our study, the association of rs352139 with TB risk varied by race. In Indonesians AA genotype is associated with lower risk of TB, while in Mexicans it is associated with higher risk of TB. The Mexicans with AA allele had 2.73 times higher risk of TB than Indonesians with the same genotype. There is no known explanation for the racial difference. Also, we observed a significant association between rs352139 polymorphism and TB risk in Indonesians for Allele, Heterozygote and Homozygote models. There was also a significant association between rs352139 polymorphism and TB risk in Mexicans for Allele, Dominant and Recessive models. Although 4 case-control studies of rs352139 were included in this analysis, there was only one study for each racial group. Therefore, our results should be interpreted with caution, and more studies with larger sample size should be considered to confirm this differential risk by race.
Anzeige
The SNP rs352139 is located in the intron of TLR9 gene (Figure 2). TIR domain consists of the end of exon 1, intron and a part of exon 2 which contains SNP rs352139. It is the only polymorphism located in the intron between two exons. The other polymorphisms are located in either the upstream of coding region or the exons. It is possible that the intron of TLR9 gene plays an important role in regulating the TLR-mediated immunologic response. However, it is currently unclear how this intronic SNP induces such a phenotype change. It is possible that it influences signaling by creating an alternative splicing site and thus, affecting the mRNA transcription and the final protein product. Similarly, the rs352139 SNP could be a likely marker in linkage disequilibrium with a polymorphic regulatory region that controls TLR9 expression or serve as a functional coding region SNP.
The SNP rs187084 is located in the promoter of TLR9 gene, which could create a Sp1 binding site [28]. Variant alleles of this SNP can alter the function of TLR9, impact the response to bacterial pathogens, and thereby change individual’s disease risk [29,30]. In our analysis, several studies investigated the role of rs187084 in the development of tuberculosis, but none of them showed significant association.
The SNP rs5743836 is located in the promoter region of TLR9. This SNP was thought to be associated with increased transcriptional activity and function of TLR9 [31]. In our study, rs5743836 polymorphism showed no significant association with TB risk. Nevertheless in a study of Caucasian patients, Digna Rosa Velez et al reported that the rs5743836 polymorphism had significant association with dominant and recessive models (TT vs. CT&CC, OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.28–0.87, p = 0.015). However, we did not include these data in our analysis because only the detail of additive model was presented in the original article.
Conclusions
This systematic review summarized the current literature on the association between TLR9 polymorphisms and TB risk. Our results indicated that rs187084, rs352165, rs5743836, rs5743842, rs352140 and rs352167 polymorphisms did not show significant association with TB risk. The rs352139 polymorphism might be associated with decreased TB risk in Indonesians whereas increased risk in Mexicans. However, the data were based on single study for each race. Whether the observed association was due to causal effect needs to be further studied.
Anzeige
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National 12th Five-year special grand project for infectious diseases (No. 2012ZX10003009).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
ZC carried out the study design, data analysis. WW carried out the manuscript review. JL participated in the literature research. JW participated in the literature research. SF participated in the literature research. GZ conceived of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
