Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2015 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2015 Open Access

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2015

Association between work-related biomechanical risk factors and the occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews and a meta-analysis of current research

Zeitschrift:
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders > Ausgabe 1/2015
Autoren:
Agnessa Kozak, Grita Schedlbauer, Tanja Wirth, Ulrike Euler, Claudia Westermann, Albert Nienhaus
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s12891-015-0685-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Grita Schedlbauer, Tanja Wirth and Albert Nienhaus contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AK participated in the conception of the study, the literature search, data extraction, analysis and interpretation, and was in charge of writing the manuscript. GS participated in developing the study’s concept, interpreting data and writing the manuscript. TW participated in the literature search, data extraction and data interpretation. CW participated in the literature search, data extraction and data interpretation. UE participated in the interpretation of the data and contributed to writing the manuscript. AN participated in developing the study’s concept, interpreting data and writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abstract

Background

Occupational risks for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) have been examined in various occupations, and several systematic reviews (SRs) have been published on this topic. There has been no critical appraisal or synthesis of the evidence in the SRs. The aims of this study are (1) to synthesise the observational evidence and evaluate the methodological quality of SRs that assess the effect of biomechanical risk factors on the development of CTS in workers, (2) to provide an update of current primary research on this association, (3) to assess a potential dose-response relationship.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and the reference lists of articles. The first step covered SRs (1998–2014), and the second step covered current primary studies (2011–2014). The methodological quality of the SRs was evaluated by using the AMSTAR-R tool; primary studies were assessed using a list of 20 items. A qualitative approach was used for synthesising evidence. In addition, we undertook a meta-analysis of the primary studies to determine risk ratios in the dose-response relationship.

Results

We identified ten SRs that covered a total of 143 original studies. Seven primary studies met the criteria for inclusion, of which four provided longitudinal data. We found high quality of evidence for risk factors such as repetition, force and combined exposures. Moderate quality of evidence was observed for vibration, and low quality of evidence was found for wrist postures. An association between computer use and CTS could not be established. Recent primary studies supported the existence of a significant relationship between CTS and repetition, force and combined exposure. The meta-analysis of current research revealed a dose-response relationship between CTS and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists’ (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) for hand-activity level (HAL). Those between the action limit and TLV and above TLV had RR of 1.5 (95 % CI 1.02–2.31) and RR 2.0 (95 % CI 1.46–2.82), respectively.

Conclusions

Occupational biomechanical factors play a substantial role in the causation of CTS. Data from current primary studies on dose-response suggest that the risk of CTS increases with the ACGIH TLV levels.
Zusatzmaterial
Additional file 1: A proposed reporting checklist for authors, editors and reviewers of meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE). (PDF 24 kb)
12891_2015_685_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Additional file 2: Search terms and strategy used for MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Databases. (PDF 23 kb)
12891_2015_685_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Additional file 3: Data extraction lists applied separately for systematic reviews and primary studies. (PDF 18 kb)
12891_2015_685_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Additional file 4: Quality assessment criteria applied to primary studies and the quality appraisal Table S1. Quality assessment criteria applied to primary studies; Table S2. Quality appraisal of the primary studies. (PDF 29 kb)
12891_2015_685_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Additional file 5: Appraisal of systematic reviews using AMSTAR-R tool. (PDF 33 kb)
12891_2015_685_MOESM5_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise