Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2016

02.07.2016 | Original Article

Association of concurrent acid-suppression therapy with survival outcomes and adverse event incidence in oncology patients receiving erlotinib

verfasst von: Lisa H. Lam, Edmund V. Capparelli, Razelle Kurzrock

Erschienen in: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology | Ausgabe 2/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Acid-suppression therapy is known to decrease the systemic exposure of erlotinib. The erlotinib prescribing information recommends staggering dosing with a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) and avoiding concurrent use of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). This retrospective analysis evaluated the frequency of concurrent acid-suppression therapy in oncology patients receiving erlotinib and its association with outcomes.

Methods

All patients prescribed erlotinib within UC San Diego Health System between February 26, 2011, and February 28, 2014, were assessed for eligibility, survival outcomes and adverse events.

Results

Of the 76 patients in the analysis, 24 were prescribed both a PPI and an H2RA with erlotinib therapy (31.6 %). The two patient groups, with (n = 24) and without PPI/H2RA (n = 52), were similar in clinical characteristics and erlotinib dose. One patient received an H2RA therapy alone and was excluded from the analysis; no one received PPI therapy alone. Patients receiving erlotinib alone had a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to patients with concurrent PPI/H2RA therapy (11.0 months vs. 5.3 months; P = 0.029). Overall survival (OS) and incidence of rash and/or diarrhea did not correlate with use of acid-suppression therapy.

Conclusion

Nearly one-third of patients received acid-suppression therapy. Patients treated with erlotinib and PPI/H2RA therapy had shorter PFS, but similar OS and adverse event profile compared to those who did not receive acid-suppression.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Borad MJ, Curtis KK, Babiker HM et al (2012) The impact of concomitant medication use on patient eligibility for phase I cancer clinical trials. J Cancer 3:345–353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Borad MJ, Curtis KK, Babiker HM et al (2012) The impact of concomitant medication use on patient eligibility for phase I cancer clinical trials. J Cancer 3:345–353CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Smelick GS, Heffron TP, Chu L et al (2013) Prevalence of acid-reducing agents (ARA) in cancer populations and ARA drug-drug interaction potential for molecular targeted agents in clinical development. Mol Pharm 10(11):4055–4062CrossRefPubMed Smelick GS, Heffron TP, Chu L et al (2013) Prevalence of acid-reducing agents (ARA) in cancer populations and ARA drug-drug interaction potential for molecular targeted agents in clinical development. Mol Pharm 10(11):4055–4062CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kletzl H, Giraudon M, Ducray PS et al (2015) Effect of gastric pH on erlotinib pharmacokinetics in healthy individuals: omeprazole and ranitidine. Anticancer Drugs 26(5):565–572CrossRefPubMed Kletzl H, Giraudon M, Ducray PS et al (2015) Effect of gastric pH on erlotinib pharmacokinetics in healthy individuals: omeprazole and ranitidine. Anticancer Drugs 26(5):565–572CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu MP, Ghosh S, Chambers CR et al (2015) Gastric Acid suppression is associated with decreased erlotinib efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 16(1):33–39CrossRefPubMed Chu MP, Ghosh S, Chambers CR et al (2015) Gastric Acid suppression is associated with decreased erlotinib efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 16(1):33–39CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilton JF, Tu D, Seymour L et al (2013) An evaluation of the possible interaction of gastric acid suppressing medication and the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. Lung Cancer 82(1):136–142CrossRefPubMed Hilton JF, Tu D, Seymour L et al (2013) An evaluation of the possible interaction of gastric acid suppressing medication and the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. Lung Cancer 82(1):136–142CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat University of California, San Diego. Study of Personalized Cancer Therapy to Determine Response and Toxicity (UCSD_PREDICT). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2016 April 21]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02478931. NLM Identifier: NCT02478931 University of California, San Diego. Study of Personalized Cancer Therapy to Determine Response and Toxicity (UCSD_PREDICT). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2016 April 21]. https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​show/​NCT02478931. NLM Identifier: NCT02478931
15.
Zurück zum Zitat DeVault KR, Castell DO (2005) American College of G. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 100(1):190–200CrossRefPubMed DeVault KR, Castell DO (2005) American College of G. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 100(1):190–200CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R et al (2012) Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(3):239–246CrossRefPubMed Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R et al (2012) Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13(3):239–246CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Association of concurrent acid-suppression therapy with survival outcomes and adverse event incidence in oncology patients receiving erlotinib
verfasst von
Lisa H. Lam
Edmund V. Capparelli
Razelle Kurzrock
Publikationsdatum
02.07.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology / Ausgabe 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0344-5704
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3087-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2016

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 2/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.