Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021

18.07.2020 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Association of RAS Mutation Location and Oncologic Outcomes After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

verfasst von: Lily V. Saadat, MD, Thomas Boerner, MD, Debra A. Goldman, MS, Mithat Gonen, PhD, Timothy L. Frankel, MD, Efsevia Vakiani, MD, PhD, T. Peter Kingham, MD, William R. Jarnagin, MD, Alice C. Wei, MD, Kevin C. Soares, MD, David B. Solit, MD, Michael I. D’Angelica, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

RAS mutations are prognostic for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We investigated clinical, pathologic, and survival differences based on RAS exon for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included patients with R0/R1 resection of CRLM from 1992 to 2016. Patients with unresected extrahepatic disease or liver-first resection were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were assessed and stratified by mutation status and location. Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and log-rank test were used, where appropriate.

Results

A total of 938 mCRC patients were identified with median age of 57 (range 19–91). Of the 445 patients with KRAS mutations, 407 (91%) had a mutation in exon 2, 14 (3%) exon 3, and 24 (5%) exon 4. Median OS was 71.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 66.1–76.5). Patients with KRAS mutations had worse OS compared with KRAS wild-type patients (median 55.5 vs. 91.3 months, p < 0.001). While there was no significant difference in OS based on the exon mutated (p = 0.12), 5-year OS was higher for patients with exon 4 mutations [68.8% (95% CI 0.45–0.84)] compared with those with mutations in exon 2 [45.7% (95% CI 0.40–0.51)] or exon 3 [39.1% (95% CI: 0.11–0.68)]. Patients with NRAS mutant tumors also had worse OS compared with NRAS wild-type patients (median 50.9 vs. 73.3 months, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

NRAS and KRAS exon 3/4 mutations are present in a minority of mCRC patients. Patients with exon 4 mutant tumors may have a more favorable prognosis, although the difference in oncologic outcomes based on mutated exon appears to be smaller than previously reported.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kemeny N, Kurilova I, Li J, Camacho JC, Sofocleous CT. Liver-directed and systemic therapies for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(9):1240–54.PubMedCrossRef Kemeny N, Kurilova I, Li J, Camacho JC, Sofocleous CT. Liver-directed and systemic therapies for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(9):1240–54.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Creasy JM, Sadot E, Koerkamp BG, et al. Actual 10-year survival after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: what factors preclude cure? Surgery 2018;163(6):1238–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Creasy JM, Sadot E, Koerkamp BG, et al. Actual 10-year survival after hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: what factors preclude cure? Surgery 2018;163(6):1238–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Buisman FE, Galjart B, van der Stok EP, et al. The impact of hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy on hepatic recurrences and survival in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2019. Buisman FE, Galjart B, van der Stok EP, et al. The impact of hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy on hepatic recurrences and survival in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2019.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Groot Koerkamp B, Sadot E, Kemeny NE, et al. Perioperative hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy is associated with longer survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(17):1938–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Groot Koerkamp B, Sadot E, Kemeny NE, et al. Perioperative hepatic arterial infusion pump chemotherapy is associated with longer survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(17):1938–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pollock CB, Shirasawa S, Sasazuki T, Kolch W, Dhillon AS. Oncogenic K-RAS is required to maintain changes in cytoskeletal organization, adhesion, and motility in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(4):1244–50.PubMedCrossRef Pollock CB, Shirasawa S, Sasazuki T, Kolch W, Dhillon AS. Oncogenic K-RAS is required to maintain changes in cytoskeletal organization, adhesion, and motility in colon cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(4):1244–50.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pawlak G, Helfman DM. Cytoskeletal changes in cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001;11(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef Pawlak G, Helfman DM. Cytoskeletal changes in cell transformation and tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2001;11(1):41–7.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell PM, Der CJ. Oncogenic Ras and its role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2004;14(2):105–14.PubMedCrossRef Campbell PM, Der CJ. Oncogenic Ras and its role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2004;14(2):105–14.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Datta J, Smith JJ, Chatila WK, et al. Coaltered Ras/B-raf and TP53 is associated with extremes of survivorship and distinct patterns of metastasis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(5):1077–85.PubMedCrossRef Datta J, Smith JJ, Chatila WK, et al. Coaltered Ras/B-raf and TP53 is associated with extremes of survivorship and distinct patterns of metastasis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(5):1077–85.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lan YT, Jen-Kou L, Lin CH, et al. Mutations in the RAS and PI3K pathways are associated with metastatic location in colorectal cancers. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(7):905–10.PubMedCrossRef Lan YT, Jen-Kou L, Lin CH, et al. Mutations in the RAS and PI3K pathways are associated with metastatic location in colorectal cancers. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(7):905–10.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, et al. Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2012;486(7404):532–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Misale S, Yaeger R, Hobor S, et al. Emergence of KRAS mutations and acquired resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Nature. 2012;486(7404):532–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Odisio BC, Yamashita S, Huang SY, et al. Impact of prior hepatectomy history on local tumor progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(3):395–403 e391.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Odisio BC, Yamashita S, Huang SY, et al. Impact of prior hepatectomy history on local tumor progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(3):395–403 e391.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan C, Du X. KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(37):5171–80.PubMedPubMedCentral Tan C, Du X. KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(37):5171–80.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408–17.PubMedCrossRef Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E, et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408–17.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cercek A, Braghiroli MI, Chou JF, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancers harboring NRAS mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(16):4753–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cercek A, Braghiroli MI, Chou JF, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancers harboring NRAS mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(16):4753–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers MG, Smith CG, Maughan TS, Kaplan R, Escott-Price V, Cheadle JP. BRAF and NRAS Locus-specific variants have different outcomes on survival to colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(11):2742–9.PubMedCrossRef Summers MG, Smith CG, Maughan TS, Kaplan R, Escott-Price V, Cheadle JP. BRAF and NRAS Locus-specific variants have different outcomes on survival to colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(11):2742–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Frankel TL, Vakiani E, Nathan H, et al. Mutation location on the RAS oncogene affects pathologic features and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2017;123(4):568–75.PubMedCrossRef Frankel TL, Vakiani E, Nathan H, et al. Mutation location on the RAS oncogene affects pathologic features and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2017;123(4):568–75.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Janakiraman M, Vakiani E, Zeng Z, et al. Genomic and biological characterization of exon 4 KRAS mutations in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(14):5901–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Janakiraman M, Vakiani E, Zeng Z, et al. Genomic and biological characterization of exon 4 KRAS mutations in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70(14):5901–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):703–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zehir A, Benayed R, Shah RH, et al. Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients. Nat Med. 2017;23(6):703–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Malapelle U, Bellevicine C, Salatiello M, et al. Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist’s perspective. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(10):940–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Malapelle U, Bellevicine C, Salatiello M, et al. Sanger sequencing in routine KRAS testing: a review of 1720 cases from a pathologist’s perspective. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65(10):940–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vakiani E, Janakiraman M, Shen R, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of primary versus metastatic colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(24):2956–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vakiani E, Janakiraman M, Shen R, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of primary versus metastatic colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(24):2956–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandramohan RS, O Reilly C, Ladanyi M, Borsu L. MSK-AmpliSeq: a custom 94 gene AmpliSeq cancer panel with a custom paired tumor-normal analysis pipeline results in improved sensitivity and specificity. J Mol Diag 2015;17(6):814. Chandramohan RS, O Reilly C, Ladanyi M, Borsu L. MSK-AmpliSeq: a custom 94 gene AmpliSeq cancer panel with a custom paired tumor-normal analysis pipeline results in improved sensitivity and specificity. J Mol Diag 2015;17(6):814.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips S, et al. OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;1:1–6. Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips S, et al. OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017;1:1–6.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Formento JL, Francoual M, et al. K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(15):4830–5.PubMedCrossRef Etienne-Grimaldi MC, Formento JL, Francoual M, et al. K-Ras mutations and treatment outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving exclusive fluoropyrimidine therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(15):4830–5.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Karagkounis G, Torbenson MS, Daniel HD, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2013;119(23):4137–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Karagkounis G, Torbenson MS, Daniel HD, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2013;119(23):4137–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie MZ, Li JL, Cai ZM, Li KZ, Hu BL. Impact of primary colorectal cancer location on the KRAS status and its prognostic value. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xie MZ, Li JL, Cai ZM, Li KZ, Hu BL. Impact of primary colorectal cancer location on the KRAS status and its prognostic value. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):46.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Baran B, Mert Ozupek N, Yerli Tetik N, Acar E, Bekcioglu O, Baskin Y. Difference between left-sided and right-sided colorectal cancer: a focused review of literature. Gastroenterology Res. 2018;11(4):264–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Baran B, Mert Ozupek N, Yerli Tetik N, Acar E, Bekcioglu O, Baskin Y. Difference between left-sided and right-sided colorectal cancer: a focused review of literature. Gastroenterology Res. 2018;11(4):264–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Span M, Moerkerk PT, De Goeij AF, Arends JW. A detailed analysis of K-ras point mutations in relation to tumor progression and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 1996;69(3):241–5.PubMedCrossRef Span M, Moerkerk PT, De Goeij AF, Arends JW. A detailed analysis of K-ras point mutations in relation to tumor progression and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 1996;69(3):241–5.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Kopetz SE, et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):619–626; discussion 626–7.PubMedCrossRef Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Kopetz SE, et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):619–626; discussion 626–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kemeny NE, Chou JF, Capanu M, et al. KRAS mutation influences recurrence patterns in patients undergoing hepatic resection of colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2014;120(24):3965–3971.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kemeny NE, Chou JF, Capanu M, et al. KRAS mutation influences recurrence patterns in patients undergoing hepatic resection of colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2014;120(24):3965–3971.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG, et al. Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2103–2114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG, et al. Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2103–2114.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Schirripa M, Cremolini C, Loupakis F, et al. Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(1):83–90.PubMedCrossRef Schirripa M, Cremolini C, Loupakis F, et al. Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(1):83–90.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Velho S, Vakiani E, et al. Mutant N-RAS protects colorectal cancer cells from stress-induced apoptosis and contributes to cancer development and progression. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(3):294–307.PubMedCrossRef Wang Y, Velho S, Vakiani E, et al. Mutant N-RAS protects colorectal cancer cells from stress-induced apoptosis and contributes to cancer development and progression. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(3):294–307.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Association of RAS Mutation Location and Oncologic Outcomes After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases
verfasst von
Lily V. Saadat, MD
Thomas Boerner, MD
Debra A. Goldman, MS
Mithat Gonen, PhD
Timothy L. Frankel, MD
Efsevia Vakiani, MD, PhD
T. Peter Kingham, MD
William R. Jarnagin, MD
Alice C. Wei, MD
Kevin C. Soares, MD
David B. Solit, MD
Michael I. D’Angelica, MD
Publikationsdatum
18.07.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08862-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.