Background
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in women, accounting for more than 1,300,000 cases and 450,000 deaths worldwide each year [
1]. Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease that comes in different morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics with corresponding clinical behaviour [
2]. The oncogenesis and progression of breast cancer is a complex process involving a variety of transcription factors, activation of oncogenes, and inactivation of tumour suppressor genes [
3,
4].
Recently gene expression profiling and immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies have been identified Tricho-rhino-phalangeal syndrome-1 gene (
TRPS1), a new GATA family member, to be highly prevalent gene in breast cancer [
5,
6]. TRPS is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterised by craniofacial and skeletal anomalies due to mutations or deletions of the
TRPS1 gene. It is composed of nine zinc finger motifs including a single GATA-type DNA-binding domain flanked by two potential nuclear localisation signals (NLS) and two C-terminal zinc fingers closely related to the domain found in the Ikaros family of lymphoid transcription factors [
7]. It has been demonstrated that
TRPS1 is a transcriptional repressor and its activities are dependent on both the highly conserved GATA DNA-binding domain and the Ikaros-like zinc finger motifs [
8]. For example,
TRPS1 can repress Stat3 to regulate proliferation and apoptosis of chondrocytes.
TRPS1 controls epithelial proliferation through repressing SOX9 in the developing vibrissa follicle in mice. It can also repress the expression of Runx2, a key regulator of osteoblastogenesis and chondrocyte maturation [
9]. Moreover,
TRPS1 can suppress the osteocalcin expression through binding to its promoter [
10].
As mentioned before, TRPS1 gene in human has been found to be overexpressed in breast cancer, expressed in more than 90% estrogen receptor α (ERα) positive and negative breast cancer subtype [
6]. The gene is localised on human chromosome 8q23–24.1, a region highly amplified in several cancers, especially in prostate and breast cancer. It is important to note that
TRPS1 gene has been found to be highly expressed not only in the mammary glands but also in prostate, testis, ovaries, kidneys, and lungs [
11]. Increasingly, there are more evidences to suggest the involvement of TRPS1 in a variety of functions in human cancers [
12‐
15].
Recent studies have reported that
TRPS1 can regulate mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) during embryonic development in a number of tissues, including kidneys, cartilages, and bones [
10,
16,
17]. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was first recognised as an important process during normal embryonic development [
18]; however, carcinoma cells are also capable of reactivating EMT during tumour progression [
19,
20]. During this transition, tumour cells lose epithelial characteristics such as cell apical-basal polarity, membrane-associated adherents, and cell-to-cell adhesion protein E-cadherin. Concurrently, these tumour cells also undergo a dramatic remodelling of the cytoskeleton to facilitate cell mortality and invasion; the cells are also transformed to obtain a spindle-like phenotype. A key feature of EMT is a gene switch, resulting in downregulation of E-cadherin and upregulation of vimentin, smooth muscle actin. Transcriptional factors, such as snail, slug, and twist, which function by suppressing the expression of epithelial specific adhesion molecules, such as E-cadherin, were unveiled as key regulators inducing EMT in breast cancer and other cancers [
21‐
24]. β-catenin was first identified as a protein that binds with E-cadherin to maintain cell-to-cell adhesion; however, it also functions as a transcription factor. Loss of membranous β-catenin expression and gain of cytoplasmic or nuclear β-catenin expression in neoplastic glands have been related to carcinogenesis and tumour progression in gastrointestinal cancers [
25,
26]. Thus, by detecting these EMT markers, one can roughly estimate the tumour cells undergoing EMT from non-EMT tumour cells.
In addition to the involvement of
TRPS1 in regulating MET, it has also been found to repress ZEB2, a key regulator of EMT that inhibits E-cadherin and other epithelial genes [
12]. Realizing the potential of TRPS1 gene as the new EMT marker, we focused our work in elucidating different roles and clinical relevance of
TRPS1 in ERα-positive and ERα-negative breast cancer subtypes.
Discussion
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease consisting of multiple molecular subtypes. The presence of hormone receptors ER, PR, and human EGFR-2 (HER-2) are significantly meaningful in therapeutic decision-making for patients with breast cancer. In addition, these factors may also predict the probability of disease relapse. Hormone receptor-positive tumours have favourable outcomes because of their response to endocrine manipulations such as tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, or ovarian ablation [
31]. Tumours with ERα-negative phenotype tend to have poor prognosis, unlike their hormone receptor or HER-2 positive counterparts; hence, such ERα-negative tumours lack targeted therapeutics.
Next, we investigated the expression of
TRPS1 in primary human breast cancer samples and explored its association with major breast tumour histological specialties and patients’ clinical characteristics.
TRPS1 was positively associated with ER and PR expressions and negatively associated with HER2 status, which is consistent with previous study [
6].
When the cut-off level score for TRPS1 to be positive is 1, the TRPS1 was not remarkably associated with the tumour grade, pathological stage, tumour size and lymph node metastasis. However, upon changing the cut-off level score of TRPS1 to be positive as ≥ 2, TRPS1 was found to be positively associated with lymph node metastasis and P53 status (data not shown).
However, previous studies showed that higher
TRPS1 expression, when analysed using univariate and multivariate models, predicted better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in a subgroup of ERα+, stage I/II breast cancer patients who received endocrine therapy only [
32]. Recent studies have also confirmed that high
TRPS1 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and higher pathological stage of patients with colon cancer [
14]. All these findings support our hypothesis that
TRPS1 may not merely be an indicator of better prognosis as shown in other studies. However, further research using larger patient cohort and more breast cancer cell lines is required to elucidate this contradictory result.
Epithelial cancer cells attain mesenchymal features that make them easier to invade the surrounding tissues and metastasise during EMT process. We used IHC to analyse these markers in 180 patients. Although
TRPS1 was significantly associated with E-cadherin and β-catenin, it was also positively associated with mesenchymal markers such as vimentin, SMA, and slug. The above data did not comply with previous results that
TRPS1 inhibits EMT process in breast cancer progression [
12]. Hence, we divided the patients into two groups as ERα-positive and ERα-negative and reanalysed these EMT markers. Surprisingly, in ERα-positive breast cancer, we found
TRPS1 to be positively associated with E-cadherin and β-catenin status with no significant correlation with any of the mesenchymal markers. Consistent with our hypothesis, significant association was also found between
TRPS1 expression and E-cadherin expression in ERα + breast cancer cases [
32]. In ERα-negative breast cancer, we found
TRPS1 to be positively associated with vimentin, SMA and slug.
TRPS1 was also found to be positively related with IMP3, which is expressed preferentially in triple negative breast cancers (TNBC). IMP3 is a member of insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) mRNA-binding proteins family. It contributes to the migration and invasion of TNBC cells. Thus,
TRPS1 may be associated with the migration, invasion, and EMT in ERα-negative breast cancer cells. Ligand-activated ERα could suppress slug transcription through direct association with the slug promoter. Human breast cancers, which lack ligand-activated ERα, may then over-express slug that may downregulate E-cadherin and lead to EMT [
33]. We found
TRPS1 to be associated with different EMT markers by different ERα status, therefore, ERα might play an important role in affecting the relationship between
TRPS1 and EMT markers.
Estrogen receptors include estrogen receptor α (ERα) and estrogen receptor β (ERβ). Most studies have provided evidence that ERβ acts as a negative modulator of ERα and indicates a good prognosis with prolonged DFS [
34,
35]. Several investigators have found ERβ expression to be positively correlated with poor prognostic phenotypes such as accelerated proliferation and basal phenotype in ERα-negative breast cancer [
36,
37]. We also stained ERβ and found its expression to be correlated with
TRPS1 expression.
TRPS1 expression was not regulated by ER signalling since estrogen withdrawal using charcoal-stripped serum did not affect
TRPS1 gene or protein expression in ERα-positive breast cancer cell lines [
32]. Thus, we have assumed that
TRPS1 might transcriptionally both regulate genes and affect tumour growth and development to varying degrees.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
PS and GZ conceived and designed the overall study. PS performed IHC and wrote the manuscript. HZ and XJ performed histological analysis and participated in the collection of data. JH and WL performed IHC manual assessment and analysis. MJ analysed the data and did the statistical data analyses. All authors read and approved the manuscript for publication.