nach oben

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome

Erschienen in:

Open Access 01.12.2021 | Research

Associations between metabolic syndrome and type of dementia: analysis based on the National Health Insurance Service database of Gangwon province in South Korea

verfasst von: Yeo Jin Kim, Sang Mi Kim, Dae Hyun Jeong, Sang-Kyu Lee, Moo-Eob Ahn, Ohk-Hyun Ryu

Erschienen in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome | Ausgabe 1/2021

Abstract

Background

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of conditions that occur together, increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between metabolic syndrome and dementia has remained controversial. Using nationwide population cohort data, we investigated the association between metabolic syndrome and dementia, according to the dementia type.

Methods

We analyzed data of 84,144 individuals, in the aged group of more than 60 years, between January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2009, at Gangwon province by using the information of the (Korean) National Health Insurance Service. After eight years of gap, in 2017, we investigated the relationship between metabolic syndrome and dementia. We classified Dementia either as dementia of the Alzheimer type (AD) or vascular dementia (VD). AD and VD were defined as per the criteria of International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multiple logistic regression analyses examined the associations between metabolic syndrome or five metabolic syndrome components and dementia. Analyses included factors like age, sex, smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, previous stroke, and previous cardiac disease.

Results

Metabolic syndrome was associated with AD (OR = 11.48, 95% CI 9.03–14.59), not with VD. Each of five components of metabolic syndrome were also associated with AD. (high serum triglycerides: OR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.60–2.19; high blood pressure: OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.55–2.21; high glucose: OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.52–2.06; abdominal obesity: OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.57–2.25; low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.63–2.24) However, among components of metabolic syndrome, only the high glucose level was associated with VD. (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.01–1.56) body mass index (BMI), fasting glucose, and smoking were also associated with AD. (BMI: OR = 0.951, 95% CI 0.927–0.975; fasting glucose: OR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001–1.005; smoking: OR = 1.020, 95% CI 1.003–1.039) A history of the previous stroke was associated with both AD and VD. (AD: OR = 1.827, 95% CI 1.263–2.644; VD: OR 2.775, 95% CI 1.747–4.406)

Conclusions

Metabolic syndrome was associated with AD but not with VD. Patients with metabolic syndrome had an 11.48 times more likeliness to develop AD compared to those without metabolic syndrome. VD was associated only with several risk factors that could affect the vascular state rather than a metabolic syndrome. We suggested that the associations between metabolic syndrome and dementia would vary depending on the type of dementia.

Yeo Jin Kim and Sang Mi Kim contributed equally to this work

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Dementia of the Alzheimer type

Vascular dementia

BMI

Body mass index

Blood pressure

Triglycerides

HDL-C

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

NHIS

(Korean) National Health Insurance Service

NHIS-NSC

National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort

ICD-10-CM

International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification

Standard deviation

Odds ratio

95% CI

95% Confidence interval

Aβ

Amyloid beta

ROS

Reactive oxygen species

BBB

Blood–brain barrier

Background

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of components that indicate overnutrition and includes five components that are high blood pressure (BP), high blood glucose, high serum triglycerides (TG), low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and abdominal obesity. Metabolic syndrome components like high blood pressure, blood glucose, abdominal obesity, and dyslipidemia are well-known factors associated with the occurrence of dementia in late life [1‐4]. However, previous studies between metabolic syndrome and cognitive impairment were inconsistent. Some studies reported that metabolic syndrome was related to increased risk of cognitive impairment [5], while other studies reported no association between the two [6‐8], and even some reported that metabolic syndrome decelerated cognitive impairment [9, 10].

Of the numerous dementia etiologies, dementia of the Alzheimer type is the most common type of dementia, about 60% of the cases [11]. Vascular dementia (VD) is the second most common type, accounting for about 20% of dementia [12]. Cardiovascular risk factors could affect the development of both types, but the extent of their influences would depend on the type of dementia. VD had a leading cause in most cases, such as ischemia, hemorrhage, anoxia, or hypoxia, while the causes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were not well understood [12]. Yet, previous studies that investigated the relationship between dementia and metabolic syndrome usually did not consider the type of dementia.

Gangwon province is located in the northeastern part of South Korea and is divided into two areas by the Mountains. It has an aging society with a relatively low population density in Korea. Although a large part of the population resides in the urban area, 11 out of 18 administrative areas have inadequate medical facilities because of the presence of mountains. That means this area is one of the most vulnerable areas of medical service in South Korea. The risk factors related to metabolic syndrome (cardiovascular and related diseases) are not well managed in this region; therefore, the disease’s characteristics might differ from other regions.

We hypothesized that metabolic syndrome would be more associated with the risk of dementia than its individual components due to the synergistic effect of vascular risk factors. We also thought that the risk of dementia associated with metabolic syndrome differed between AD and VD. Therefore, we analyzed the association of metabolic syndrome and its five components with the incidence of dementia (a gap of eight years), according to the dementia type, in a population-based sample in Gangwon province, South Korea.

Methods

Data source and study population

The present study was conducted using data from the South Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC), which includes demographic information, medical use, disease information, lifestyle habits, and basic laboratory data [13, 14]. The NHIS registration is mandatory for all Koreans, and the NHIS database represents health information for almost all populations in Korea [15].

Patient data of Gangwon province in South Korea from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2009, was included (n = 455,859). Of these patients, we selected only those aged more than 60 years (n = 105,786). Patients with dementia who was diagnosed before the index day were excluded (n = 21,642). In the end, 84,144 individuals were included in this study. (Fig. 1) We defined diagnoses using the International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes.

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, and all methods were performed in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations.

Definition of dementia

For defining dementia of the Alzheimer type (AD), the code of F00 or G30 was included, but F01, F02, F03, F051, and G31 were excluded. For the definition of vascular dementia (VD), codes of F02 were included. For defining dementia of any type of dementia, the code of F00, F01, F02, F03, G30, and G31 were included.

Definition of metabolic syndrome

Individuals who met three or more of the five components were defined as having metabolic syndrome. Five components were abdominal obesity, high TG level, reduced HDL-C level, elevated BP, and elevated blood glucose [16]. Individuals having abdominal obesity were defined if waist circumference were over 90 cm in males and 80 cm in the female. Individuals having high TG level were defined if the serum TG level was over 150 mg/dL. Individuals having low HDL-C level were defined if serum HDL-C level was lower than 40 mg/dL in male and 50 mg/dL in the female. Individuals were defined as having elevated blood pressure if anti-hypertensive medications were prescribed or systolic blood pressure more than 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure more than 85 mmHg was recorded. Individuals having high blood glucose were defined if anti-diabetic drugs (insulins, sulfonylureas, metformin, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and α-glucosidase inhibitors) were prescribed or fasting serum glucose level was over 100 mg/dL.

Statistical analysis

The baseline characteristics based on the data from the NHIS database were presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. Differences between the metabolic syndrome group and no metabolic syndrome group were confirmed using the Student t-test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. The relationship of metabolic syndrome and each component of metabolic syndrome for dementia was evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis. We ran three regression models. In model 1, we performed multiple logistic regression analyses with metabolic syndrome or each of the components as determinant and AD or VD as outcome variables after controlling for age and sex. In model 2, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis with age, sex, smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, and metabolic syndrome. We also performed multiple logistic regression analysis with age, sex, smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, and five metabolic syndrome components (high TG, high BP, high blood glucose, abdominal obesity, and low HDL-C). In model 3, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis with age, sex, smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, previous stroke, previous cardiac disease, and metabolic syndrome or five metabolic syndrome components (high TG, high BP, high glucose, abdominal obesity, and low HDL-C). Again, the relationship of other vascular risk factors for dementia was evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis. We also ran three regression models in this analysis. In model 1, we performed multiple logistic regression analyses with vascular risk factors as determinants and AD or VD as outcome variables after controlling for age and sex. In model 2, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis with age, sex, metabolic syndrome, BMI, systolic BP, diastolic BP, fasting glucose, and total cholesterol. In model 3, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis with age, sex, metabolic syndrome, BMI, systolic BP, diastolic BP, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, previous stroke, and previous cardiac disease. Disease risks were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We defined statistical significance as p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS version 25 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Demographics and baseline characteristics

Detailed demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants were presented in Table 1. 40.2% of participants had metabolic syndrome. The mean age of the metabolic syndrome group was higher than the no metabolic syndrome group. The metabolic syndrome group had a higher proportion of females than the no metabolic syndrome group. The no metabolic syndrome group had a higher level of physical inactivity; however, they were also engaged in smoking and alcohol intake. The mortality rate of both groups was similar.

Table 1

Demographics and baseline characteristics

	Metabolic syndrome (n = 33,828)	No metabolic syndrome (n = 50,316)	p value
Mean age	67.42 ± 5.28	66.79 ± 5.11	< 0.0001
Sex, female number (%)^a	23,020 (68.1)	25,088 (49.9)	< 0.0001
BMI	25.88 ± 2.96	23.68 ± 2.90	< 0.0001
Systolic BP	136.61 ± 15.15	126.54 ± 15.91	< 0.0001
Diastolic BP	82.03 ± 10.12	77.18 ± 9.97	< 0.0001
Fasting glucose	112.14 ± 31.27	96.70 ± 20.45	0.001
Total cholesterol	200.80 ± 46.30	194.55 ± 38.46	< 0.0001
Smoking, pack-year	1.33 ± 4.89	2.16 ± 5.99	< 0.0001
Alcohol, cup/week	1.20 ± 2.94	1.54 ± 3.20	< 0.0001
Previous stroke (%)^a	804 (2.38)	876 (1.74)	< 0.0001
Previous cardiac disease (%)^a	2137 (62.2)	2513 (5.8)	< 0.0001
Previous HTN (%)^a	18,062 (62.2)	17,180 (39.6)	< 0.0001
Previous DM (%)^a	6969 (24.1)	4102 (9.5)	< 0.0001
Previous dyslipidemia (%)^a	2225 (7.7)	2493 (5.8)	< 0.0001
Physical inactivity (%)^a	5487 (29.8)	9483 (35.0)	< 0.0001
High TG (%)^a	21,746 (64.3)	7617 (15.1)	< 0.0001
High BP (%)^a	27,571 (81.5)	22,848 (45.4)	< 0.0001
High glucose (%)^a	22,422 (33.7)	12,804 (74.6)	< 0.0001
Abdominal obesity (%)^a	26,806 (79.2)	14,939 (29.7)	< 0.0001
Low HDL-C (%)^a	19,768 (58.4)	8,377 (16.65)	< 0.0001

Data are mean ± SD unless otherwise indicated

BMI body mass index, SD standard deviation, HTN hypertension, DM diabetes mellitus, TG triglyceride, BP blood pressure, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

^a Number (%)

After eight years, of the 33,828 patients with metabolic syndrome, 1380 patients (4.08%) converted to AD, and 335 patients (0.99%) converted to VD. Of the 50,316 patients without metabolic syndrome, 176 patients (0.35%) converted to AD, and 380 patients (0.76%) converted to VD.

Association between metabolic syndrome and AD

Table 2 showed the risk of AD according to the metabolic syndrome and component of the definition of metabolic syndrome.

Table 2

Metabolic syndrome and odds of dementia in Alzheimer’s type

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value
MetS	10.58 (9.02, 12.41)	< 0.0001	12.03 (9.58, 15.10)	< 0.0001	11.48 (9.03, 14.59)	< 0.0001
Hight TG	2.64 (2.38, 2.92)	< 0.0001	2.00 (1.73, 2.31)	< 0.0001	1.87 (1.60, 2.19)	< 0.0001
High BP	1.87 (1.67, 2.11)	< 0.0001	1.78 (1.51, 2.10)	< 0.0001	1.85 (1.55, 2.21)	< 0.0001
High glucose	2.31 (2.08, 2.54)	< 0.0001	1.84 (1.60, 2.12)	< 0.0001	1.77 (1.52, 2.06)	< 0.0001
Abdominal obesity	2.37 (2.10, 2.67)	< 0.0001	1.77 (1.50, 2.09)	< 0.0001	1.88 (1.57, 2.25)	< 0.0001
Low HDL-C	2.33 (2.10, 2.59)	< 0.0001	1.95 (1.69, 2.26)	< 0.0001	1.91 (1.63, 2.24)	< 0.0001

Model 1: separate models associated each exposure variable with AD with adjustment for age and sex

Model 2: single model including age, sex, smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, and metabolic syndrome or 5 metabolic syndrome components (high TG, high BP, high glucose, abdominal obesity, low HDL-C)

Model 3: single model including age, sex, smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, previous stroke, previous cardiac disease, and metabolic syndrome or 5 metabolic syndrome components (high TG, high BP, high glucose, abdominal obesity, low HDL-C)

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, MetS metabolic syndrome, TG triglyceride, BP blood pressure, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Metabolic syndrome was associated with AD. (OR 11.48, 95% CI 9.03, 14.59, p < 0.0001). Each of the five components of metabolic syndrome were also associated with AD. Patients with high TG had 1.87-fold odds of AD (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.60, 2.19, p < 0.001). Patients with high BP had 1.85-fold odds of AD (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.55, 2.21, p < 0.0001). Patients with high glucose levels had 1.77-fold odds of AD (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.52, 2.06, p < 0.0001). Patients with abdominal obesity had 1.88-fold odds of AD (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.57, 2.25, p < 0.0001). Patients with low HDL-C had 1.91-fold odds of AD (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.63, 2.24, p < 0.0001).

Association between metabolic syndrome and VD

Table 3 showed the risk of VD according to the metabolic syndrome and component of the definition of metabolic syndrome.

Table 3

Metabolic syndrome and odds of vascular dementia

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value
MetS	1.08 (1.02, 1.15)	0.006	1.17 (0.95, 1.45)	0.144	1.17 (0.94, 1.47)	0.158
Hight TG	1.03 (0.88, 1.20)	0.709	0.95 (0.76, 1.19)	0.631	0.90 (0.71, 1.14)	0.392
High BP	1.07 (0.92, 1.25)	0.404	1.31 (1.05, 1.64)	0.019	1.25 (0.99, 1.58)	0.066
High glucose	1.30 (1.11, 1.50)	0.001	1.29 (1.04, 1.59)	0.019	1.26 (1.01, 1.56)	0.042
Abdominal obesity	1.08 (0.92, 1.21)	0.362	0.97 (0.77, 1.21)	0.754	0.99 (0.78, 1.26)	0.939
Low HDL-C	1.03 (0.88, 1.20)	0.736	0.97 (0.77, 1.22)	0.806	0.97 (0.76, 1.23)	0.785

Model 1: separate models associated each exposure variable with VD with adjustment for age and sex

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, MetS metabolic syndrome, TG triglyceride, BP blood pressure, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Metabolic syndrome was not associated with VD (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.94, 1.47, p = 0.158). Among the five components of metabolic syndrome, high glucose was associated with VD. Patients with high glucose had 1.26-fold odds of VD (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.01, 1.56, p = 0.042). High TG, high BP, abdominal obesity, and low HDL-C were not associated with VD.

Association between metabolic syndrome and Any type of dementia

Table 4 showed the risk of any type of dementia according to the metabolic syndrome and component of the definition of metabolic syndrome.

Table 4

Metabolic syndrome and odds of any type of dementia

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value
MetS	1.44 (1.37, 1.50)	< 0.0001	1.47 (1.39, 1.57)	< 0.0001	1.47 (1.37, 1.57)	< 0.0001
Hight TG	1.25 (1.20, 1.31)	< 0.0001	1.19 (1.12, 1.27)	< 0.0001	1.16 (1.08, 1.24)	< 0.0001
High BP	1.04 (1.00, 1.09)	0.073	1.04 (0.97, 1.10)	0.264	1.06 (0.99, 1.14)	0.092
High glucose	1.19 (1.14, 1.24)	< 0.0001	1.12 (1.06, 1.20)	< 0.0001	1.13 (1.05, 1.20)	< 0.0001
Abdominal obesity	1.22 (1.16, 1.28)	< 0.0001	1.17 (1.09, 1.24)	< 0.0001	1.17 (1.09, 1.26)	< 0.0001
Low HDL-C	1.18 (1.12, 1.23)	< 0.0001	1.12 (1.05, 1.19)	0.001	1.10 (1.03, 1.18)	0.007

Model 1: separate models associated each exposure variable with any type of dementia with adjustment for age and sex

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, MetS metabolic syndrome, TG triglyceride, BP blood pressure, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Metabolic syndrome was associated with any type of dementia (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37, 1.57, p < 0.0001). Among the five components of metabolic syndrome, high TG, high glucose, abdominal obesity, and low HDL-C were associated with any type of dementia. Patients with high TG had 1.16-fold odds of any type of dementia (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08, 1.24, p < 0.0001). Patients with high glucose had 1.13-fold odds of any type of dementia (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05, 1.20, p < 0.0001). Patients with abdominal obesity had 1.17-fold odds of any type of dementia (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09, 1.26, 0 < 0.0001). Patients with low HDL-C had 1.10-fold odds of any type of dementia (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03, 1.18, p = 0.007).

Association between other cardiovascular risk factors included continuous metabolic parameters and dementia

BMI, fasting glucose, smoking, and previous stroke history were found associated with AD (Table 5). Patients with each 1-unit kg/m² higher BMI had 0.951-fold odds of AD. (OR 0.951, 95% CI 0.927, 0.975, p < 0.0001) Patients with each 1-unit mg/dL higher fasting glucose had 1.003-fold odds of AD. (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.001, 1.005, p = 0.003) Patients with each 1-year higher pack/year smoking had 1.020-fold odds of AD (OR 1.020, 95% CI 1.003, 1.039, p = 0.024). Patients with having previous stroke history had 1.827-fold odds of AD. (OR 1.827, 95% CI 1.263, 2.644, p = 0.001).

Table 5

Odds of the dementia in Alzheimer’s type or VD according to vascular risk factors

	Alzheimer’s disease						Vascular dementia
	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3		Model 1		Model 2		Model 3
	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value	OR (95% CI)	p value
BMI	1.059 (1.042, 1.075)	< 0.0001	0.958 (0.941, 0.975)	< 0.0001	0.951 (0.927, 0.975)	< 0.0001	1.008 (0.984, 1.032)	0.528	0.998 (0.973, 1.023)	0.857	0.988 (0.952, 1.024)	0.504
Systolic BP	1.014 (1.011, 1.017)	< 0.0001	1.000 (0.995, 1.004)	0.882	0.999 (0.992, 1.005)	0.651	1.000 (0.996, 1.005)	0.855	0.994 (0.988, 1.000)	0.063	0.999 (0.990, 1.008)	0.788
Diastolic BP	1.014 (1.009, 1.018)	< 0.0001	0.996 (0.990, 1.002)	0.214	1.001 (0.991, 1.010)	0.916	1.007 (0.999, 1.014)	0.071	1.002 (1.002, 1.022)	0.019	1.004 (0.990, 1.019)	0.575
Fasting glucose	1.009 (1.008, 1.011)	< 0.0001	1.004 (1.002, 1.005)	< 0.0001	1.003 (1.001, 1.005)	0.003	1.005 (1.003, 1.007)	< 0.0001	1.002 (1.002, 1.007)	< 0.0001	1.004 (1.001, 1.008)	0.012
Total cholesterol	1.001 (1.000, 1.002)	0.003	1.001 (1.000, 1.002)	0.211	1.000 (0.998, 1.002)	0.793	1.000 (0.999, 1.002)	0.662	0.999 (0.999, 1.002)	0.793	1.000 (0.997, 1.003)	0.998
Smoking	1.007 (0.994, 1.021)	0.282			1.020 (1.003, 1.039)	0.024	0.928 (0.892, 0.966)	< 0.0001			0.988 (0.962, 1.014)	0.352
Alcohol	0.995 (0.969, 1.021)	0.694			0.979 (0.940, 1.019)	0.302	0.972 (0.936, 1.011)	0.155			1.014 (0.972, 1.056)	0.525
Physical inactivity	0.935 (0.945, 1.163)	0.415			0.997 (0.838, 1.188)	0.977	0.974 (0.836, 1.136)	0.741			0.898 (0.700, 1.153)	0.399
Previous stroke	2.248 (1.757, 2.874)	< 0.0001			1.827 (1.263, 2.644)	0.001	2.461 (1.753, 3.445)	< 0.0001			2.775 (1.747, 4.406)	< 0.0001
Previous cardiac disease	1.213 (1.004, 1.467)	0.046			1.088 (0.836, 1.416)	0.532	0.825 (0.598, 1.139)	0.242			0.702 (0.434, 1.136)	0.150

Model 1: separate models associated each exposure variable with AD or VD with adjustment for age and sex

Model 2: single model including age, sex, metabolic syndrome, BMI, systolic BP, diastolic BP, fasting glucose, total cholesterol

Model 3: single model including age, sex, metabolic syndrome, BMI, systolic BP, diastolic BP, fasting glucose, total cholesterol, smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, previous stroke and previous cardiac disease

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, BMI body mass index, BP blood pressure

Fasting glucose and previous stroke history were associated with VD. Patients with each 1-unit mg/dL higher fasting glucose had 1.004-fold odds of VD (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.001, 1.008, p = 0.012). Patients with having previous stroke history had 2.775-fold odds of VD. (OR 2.775, 95% CI 1.747, 4.406, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

We investigated how metabolic syndrome and its components were associated with the development of dementia after eight years. Metabolic syndrome was associated with AD, while it was not associated with VD. Rather than that, high fasting glucose and previous stroke history were associated with VD. BMI, fasting glucose, smoking, and previous stroke were also associated with AD.

The odds of metabolic syndrome were much greater than the sum of the odds of five components in AD. This might mean that the association between metabolic syndrome and AD was greater than the sum of the association between each component and AD. Metabolic syndrome represented a chronic state of inflammation, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, dysglycemia, vascular injury, and oxidative stress linked to AD [17]. Amyloid beta (Aβ) deposition initiated an immune response intended to clear the amyloid plaque [18]. However, this response also stimulated the cytokine cascade and reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to neurodegeneration [19]. Furthermore, the inflammatory cascade altered phosphorylation of tau protein along with the oxidative injury to the neurons. The immune response induced by amyloid, in addition to the chronic inflammatory state due to metabolic syndrome, exacerbated the AD pathogenic process, leading to the progression of AD. [20, 21] Metabolic syndrome also induced oxidative stress and increased ROS production. [22] The circulating lipid and glucose imbalance combined with ROS enhanced lipoperoxidation led to the dysfunction of the antioxidant system. This usually caused vascular injury and blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, affecting amyloid and tau accumulation and chronic hypoperfusion, leading to neuronal damage [17].

Previous studies that investigated the association between metabolic syndrome and dementia reported inconsistent results. Some studies showed an association between metabolic syndrome and AD [23, 24], while other studies showed no association [7, 25‐27]. French Three-City cohort and Italian Longitudinal Study on the aging study showed that metabolic syndrome increased VD risk, not AD [26, 27]. Other studies showed no association between metabolic syndrome and dementia [7, 9, 28]. However, the associations between metabolic syndrome and cognitive impairment varied with the study population characteristics, various criteria used to define metabolic syndrome, diverse approaches used to assess cognitive function, and different follow-up periods [6, 24]. Also, meta-analyses showed inconsistent associations between metabolic syndrome and dementia. It was reported that there was no association between metabolic syndrome and incident dementia or AD. Metabolic syndrome only increased the risk of pure VD [8]. Another meta-analysis showed that metabolic syndrome increased the risk of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to all-cause dementia [29]. Another study reported that metabolic syndrome decreased the risk of AD [10]. The association between metabolic syndrome and dementia could vary depending on age, follow-up period, and genetic susceptibility [30]. Especially, Apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4), the strongest genetic risk factor for late onset AD, was also associated with metabolic syndrome [31]. Apolipoprotein was a lipid carrying lipoprotein, which interacted with amyloid beta [32]. Influence of APOE4 on the cerebral cortex varied with age [33], and this might be related to inconsistent previous research results on the relationship between metabolic syndrome and risk of dementia.

In this study, all the five components of metabolic syndrome were associated with AD, while metabolic syndrome components except high blood glucose were not associated with VD. Although mid-life hypertension [34], mid-life dyslipidemia [35, 36], and mid-life obesity [37] were consistently related to late-life dementia, previous studies of the association between late-life vascular risk factors and dementia reported mixed results [34, 37‐39]. Meanwhile, ischemia could cause up-regulation of amyloid precursor protein expression in human brains [40]. The co-existence of cerebrovascular pathology and amyloid pathology could increase clinically incident dementia [41]. Even though we removed the patients who had AD and VD code in AD diagnosis, it might be possible to have co-pathology in AD. AD patients who had vascular pathology could develop clinical symptoms easier than VD patients having only vascular pathology.

In this study, patients with metabolic syndrome had an 11.48 times more likeliness to develop AD compared to those without metabolic syndrome, and there was no association between metabolic syndrome and VD. In a previous study, metabolic syndrome was associated with accelerated amyloid beta accumulation in the elderly with amyloid deposition [42]. Therefore, the combination of amyloid deposition and vascular risk factors might have increased AD incidence in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Even taking the combination of amyloid deposition and vascular risk factor into account, this study showed a very large OR value than other studies, which might be due to racial differences. Most of the previous studies have been conducted either on the European or American populations [8]. Since this study was only on the South Korean population, one of the Asian races, there was a possibility that there might be differences in the associations between metabolic syndrome and dementia according to races.

Among components of metabolic syndrome, only high glucose level was associated with both AD and VD, while others showed association only with AD. Patients with 10 mg/dL higher fasting glucose had a 0.3% increased risk of AD and a 0.4% increased risk of VD. This is consistent with previous studies showing the association between diabetes and increased risk of dementia, including all-cause dementia, AD and VD [43]. In addition, a previous study reported that, even in patients without diabetes, higher average glucose levels were associated with an increased risk of dementia [44]. Previous studies reported that diabetes mellitus not only affected cognitive decline [45] but was also associated with a high risk of cerebrovascular disease, including high white matter hyperintensities volume [46] and cerebral infarcts [47, 48]. Impaired insulin signaling and glucose metabolism in the brain were factors that were related to AD pathogenesis. Insulin modulated Aβ protein precursor expression and processing [49]. Insulin not only regulated glucose and lipid metabolism in the brain but also regulated neural development and neuronal activities associated with learning and memory [50]. Insulin receptors were expressed in the brain, particularly in memory registration-related areas, such as the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and amygdala [51]. Therefore, impairment of insulin signaling led to the pathologic processes of AD. Besides, we assumed that glucose metabolism would be more closely related to the mechanism that caused cognitive impairment after the vascular event than other components. Although previous studies showed that other components of metabolic syndromes, such as hypertension [52], dyslipidemia [53], and abdominal obesity [54], also increase ischemic stroke, our study showed that these factors were not associated with VD. Another study also showed that high glucose was the most significant component associated with cognitive impairment [55].

The previous stroke was also a factor that affected both AD and VD. Patients having stroke history were 1.8 times more likely to develop AD and 2.8 times more likely to develop VD. The association between stroke and dementia was already reported in several studies. Ischemic stroke was a risk factor for developing AD and VD [56, 57]. Stroke doubled the risk of dementia, and approximately 20% of stroke patients went on to develop cognitive dysfunction within 3 years [58]. Ischemic stroke led to pathophysiological processes that contributed to ischemic cell damage [59]. Stimulation of the inflammatory process, free radical production, excitotoxicity, disruption of sodium and calcium influx, enzymatic changes, endothelin release, delayed coagulation, activation of platelets and leukocytes, and endothelial dysfunction were the pathophysiological reactions resulting from the onset of stroke [60]. Several studies reported a synergistic relationship between ischemic stroke and AD. Postmortem studies showed that individuals with AD pathology with cerebral infarction had a markedly increased risk of dementia than those with AD pathology without infarcts [61, 62]. Stroke was suggested as a contributing factor to AD pathological changes, including selective brain atrophy and accumulation of abnormal protein such as Aβ [63]. A previous study also provided evidence that stroke led to cognitive dysfunction more rapidly in patients with AD [64]. Besides, VD was the severest form of vascular cognitive impairment [12], and it resulted from subclinical vascular brain injury and stroke. Major stroke and minor stroke, and even transient ischemic attack were known to increase the risk of dementia [65].

As per our study, while patients with abdominal obesity had a higher risk of AD, patients with higher BMI were less prone to AD. This discrepancy was probably due to BMI not being a perfect indicator of obesity. BMI could not distinguish between fat and lean body mass, and because lean body mass decreased due to aging, the increase in BMI in the elderly might be due to an increase in lean body mass rather than an increase in fat [66]. On the other hand, the waist circumference used as the criterion for abdominal obesity in this study was a more accurate indicator of abdominal visceral fat level, especially in old age. [67] While adipose tissue secreted leptin, which had a good effect on brain function, [68] abdominal visceral fat increased the risk of dementia through chronic inflammation and neuronal degeneration. [69‐71] Through this study, it could be assumed that abdominal visceral fat level was a more specific risk factor that increased the risk of dementia.

AD was also found associated with smoking. Patients with 10-year higher pack/year smoking had a 20% increased risk of AD. It was controversial whether smoking has any harmful effect on degenerative diseases. Previously some studies reported that smoking had a protective effect on degenerative diseases [72‐74]. Researches even showed that nicotine had a neuroprotective and anti-aging effect [75, 76]. However, nowadays, smoking was attributed as a risk factor for AD [77]. Smoking increased oxidative stress and might have indirect effects on several vascular, inflammatory, and degenerative processes [78, 79]. If smoking particles were inhaled, they stimulated ROS production and entered the brain via blood. Smoking-related cerebral oxidative stress was a potential mechanism to accelerate AD pathology and increasing the risk for AD [80]. Smoking also impaired nitric oxide synthesis in cerebral vascular endothelial cells leading to interference with cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism in the brain. [81, 82] It induced cerebral hypoperfusion and promoted the synthesis of Aβ [83]. Smoking stimulated the release of proinflammatory cytokines and immune system-mediated products, causing an increase in Aβ accumulation and tau phosphorylation, hallmarks of AD pathology [84].

Our study had some limitations. First, our study used claimed data, according to which we classified the types of dementia, but the actual amyloid burden was unknown. However, in order to distinguish the pure dementia type, those with codes of both AD and VD were excluded. Second, since we only investigated the presence of dementia eight years later, there was no consideration of what happened during the eight years and at what point dementia occurred during the eight years. Besides, there was no consideration for efforts to overcome metabolic syndrome. Some might have tried to treat metabolic syndrome, others might not, but the effect of improvement of metabolic syndrome was not known in our study. Third, there was no consideration for the duration of metabolic syndrome. The association with dementia might vary depending on how long metabolic syndrome components have existed, which were not known in our study. Therefore, further study considering the duration of metabolic syndrome is required. Finally, as the cohort only included the specific region of Korea, further investigation in other regions or population is required to generalize these findings.

Despite these limitations, we investigated the association between metabolic syndrome and different types of dementia and the association between components of metabolic syndrome and dementia, using population-based data. Therefore, we hope to provide new clinical insight into the association between metabolic syndrome and type of dementia with implications for considering different pathophysiology.

Conclusions

Metabolic syndrome was associated with AD, while it was not associated with VD. Patients with metabolic syndrome had an 11.48 times more likeliness to develop AD compared to those without metabolic syndrome. Therefore, the association between metabolic syndrome and dementia would be different depending on the type of dementia.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

The study was approved by the institutional review board of Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital.

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ninomiya T, Ohara T, Hirakawa Y, Yoshida D, Doi Y, Hata J, et al. Midlife and late-life blood pressure and dementia in Japanese elderly: the Hisayama study. Hypertension. 2011;58(1):22–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163055.CrossRefPubMed

Xu W, Qiu C, Gatz M, Pedersen NL, Johansson B, Fratiglioni L. Mid- and late-life diabetes in relation to the risk of dementia: a population-based twin study. Diabetes. 2009;58(1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-0586.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Luchsinger JA, Cheng D, Tang MX, Schupf N, Mayeux R. Central obesity in the elderly is related to late-onset Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2012;26(2):101–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0b013e318222f0d4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Xue-Shan Z, Juan P, Qi W, Zhong R, Li-Hong P, Zhi-Han T, et al. Imbalanced cholesterol metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;456:107–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.02.024.CrossRefPubMed

Ho RC, Niti M, Yap KB, Kua EH, Ng TP. Metabolic syndrome and cognitive decline in chinese older adults: results from the singapore longitudinal ageing studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16(6):519–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e31816b7841.CrossRefPubMed

van den Berg E, Biessels GJ, de Craen AJ, Gussekloo J, Westendorp RG. The metabolic syndrome is associated with decelerated cognitive decline in the oldest old. Neurology. 2007;69(10):979–85. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000271381.30143.75.CrossRefPubMed

Muller M, Tang MX, Schupf N, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Luchsinger JA. Metabolic syndrome and dementia risk in a multiethnic elderly cohort. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2007;24(3):185–92. https://doi.org/10.1159/000105927.CrossRefPubMed

Atti AR, Valente S, Iodice A, Caramella I, Ferrari B, Albert U, et al. Metabolic syndrome, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;27(6):625–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2019.01.214.CrossRefPubMed

Forti P, Pisacane N, Rietti E, Lucicesare A, Olivelli V, Mariani E, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of dementia in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(3):487–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02731.x.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Xu W, Tan L, Wang HF, Jiang T, Tan MS, Tan L, et al. Meta-analysis of modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(12):1299–306. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-310548.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kalaria RN, Maestre GE, Arizaga R, Friedland RP, Galasko D, Hall K, et al. Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia in developing countries: prevalence, management, and risk factors. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(9):812–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70169-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Rizzi L, Rosset I, Roriz-Cruz M. Global epidemiology of dementia: Alzheimer’s and vascular types. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:908915. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/908915.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Choi JB, Lee EJ, Han KD, Hong SH, Ha US. Estimating the impact of body mass index on bladder cancer risk: Stratification by smoking status. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):947. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19531-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Song SO, Jung CH, Song YD, Park CY, Kwon HS, Cha BS, et al. Background and data configuration process of a nationwide population-based study using the korean national health insurance system. Diabetes Metab J. 2014;38(5):395–403. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2014.38.5.395.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Lee SR, Choi EK, Han KD, Cha MJ, Oh S. Trends in the incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation and estimated thromboembolic risk using the CHA2DS2-VASc score in the entire Korean population. Int J Cardiol. 2017;236:226–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.039.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Luque-Contreras D, Carvajal K, Toral-Rios D, Franco-Bocanegra D, Campos-Pena V. Oxidative stress and metabolic syndrome: cause or consequence of Alzheimer’s disease? Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:497802. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/497802.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Calvillo M, Diaz A, Limon DI, Mayoral MA, Chanez-Cardenas ME, Zenteno E, et al. Amyloid-beta(25–35) induces a permanent phosphorylation of HSF-1, but a transitory and inflammation-independent overexpression of Hsp-70 in C6 astrocytoma cells. Neuropeptides. 2013;47(5):339–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2013.06.002.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Minter MR, Taylor JM, Crack PJ. The contribution of neuroinflammation to amyloid toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2016;136(3):457–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.13411.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Blasko I, Stampfer-Kountchev M, Robatscher P, Veerhuis R, Eikelenboom P, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. How chronic inflammation can affect the brain and support the development of Alzheimer’s disease in old age: the role of microglia and astrocytes. Aging Cell. 2004;3(4):169–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9728.2004.00101.x.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Milionis HJ, Florentin M, Giannopoulos S. Metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease: a link to a vascular hypothesis? CNS Spectr. 2008;13(7):606–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852900016886.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Nasoohi S, Parveen K, Ishrat T. Metabolic syndrome, brain insulin resistance, and Alzheimer’s disease: thioredoxin interacting protein (txnip) and inflammasome as core amplifiers. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(3):857–85. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180735.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Razay G, Vreugdenhil A, Wilcock G. The metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(1):93–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.64.1.93.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Vanhanen M, Koivisto K, Moilanen L, Helkala EL, Hanninen T, Soininen H, et al. Association of metabolic syndrome with Alzheimer disease: a population-based study. Neurology. 2006;67(5):843–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000234037.91185.99.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Kalmijn S, Foley D, White L, Burchfiel CM, Curb JD, Petrovitch H, et al. Metabolic cardiovascular syndrome and risk of dementia in Japanese-American elderly men. The Honolulu-Asia aging study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(10):2255–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.atv.20.10.2255.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Raffaitin C, Gin H, Empana JP, Helmer C, Berr C, Tzourio C, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk for incident Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia: the Three-City Study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(1):169–74. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-0272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Solfrizzi V, Scafato E, Capurso C, D’Introno A, Colacicco AM, Frisardi V, et al. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of vascular dementia: the Italian Longitudinal Study on Ageing. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(4):433–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.181743.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Feinkohl I, Janke J, Hadzidiakos D, Slooter A, Winterer G, Spies C, et al. Associations of the metabolic syndrome and its components with cognitive impairment in older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1073-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Cooper C, Sommerlad A, Lyketsos CG, Livingston G. Modifiable predictors of dementia in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172(4):323–34. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14070878.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Bangen KJ, Armstrong NM, Au R, Gross AL. Metabolic syndrome and cognitive trajectories in the framingham offspring study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(3):931–43. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190261.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Pendse AA, Arbones-Mainar JM, Johnson LA, Altenburg MK, Maeda N. Apolipoprotein E knock-out and knock-in mice: atherosclerosis, metabolic syndrome, and beyond. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(Suppl):S178–82. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.R800070-JLR200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Sanan DA, Weisgraber KH, Russell SJ, Mahley RW, Huang D, Saunders A, et al. Apolipoprotein E associates with beta amyloid peptide of Alzheimer’s disease to form novel monofibrils Isoform apoE4 associates more efficiently than apoE3. J Clin Invest. 1994;94(2):860–9. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Brandon JA, Farmer BC, Williams HC, Johnson LA. APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: neuroimaging of metabolic and cerebrovascular dysfunction. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10:180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00180.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

van den Berg E, Kloppenborg RP, Kessels RP, Kappelle LJ, Biessels GJ. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity: A systematic comparison of their impact on cognition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792(5):470–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.09.004.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Power MC, Rawlings A, Sharrett AR, Bandeen-Roche K, Coresh J, Ballantyne CM, et al. Association of midlife lipids with 20-year cognitive change: a cohort study. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(2):167–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2017.07.757.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Reitz C, Tang MX, Luchsinger J, Mayeux R. Relation of plasma lipids to Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(5):705–14. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.61.5.705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Pedditzi E, Peters R, Beckett N. The risk of overweight/obesity in mid-life and late life for the development of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Age Ageing. 2016;45(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afv151.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Fan YC, Hsu JL, Tung HY, Chou CC, Bai CH. Increased dementia risk predominantly in diabetes mellitus rather than in hypertension or hyperlipidemia: a population-based cohort study. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0236-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Levin BE, Llabre MM, Dong C, Elkind MS, Stern Y, Rundek T, et al. Modeling metabolic syndrome and its association with cognition: the Northern Manhattan study. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014;20(10):951–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000861.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Jendroska K, Poewe W, Daniel SE, Pluess J, Iwerssen-Schmidt H, Paulsen J, et al. Ischemic stress induces deposition of amyloid beta immunoreactivity in human brain. Acta Neuropathol. 1995;90(5):461–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00294806.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Riekse RG, Leverenz JB, McCormick W, Bowen JD, Teri L, Nochlin D, et al. Effect of vascular lesions on cognition in Alzheimer’s disease: a community-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(9):1442–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52405.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Gomez G, Beason-Held LL, Bilgel M, An Y, Wong DF, Studenski S, et al. Metabolic syndrome and amyloid accumulation in the aging brain. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(2):629–39. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Xue M, Xu W, Ou YN, Cao XP, Tan MS, Tan L, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risks of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 144 prospective studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2019;55:100944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100944.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Crane PK, Walker R, Hubbard RA, Li G, Nathan DM, Zheng H, et al. Glucose levels and risk of dementia. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(6):540–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215740.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Li X, Song D, Leng SX. Link between type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease: from epidemiology to mechanism and treatment. Clin Interv Aging. 2015;10:549–60. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S74042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Tamura Y, Araki A. Diabetes mellitus and white matter hyperintensity. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(Suppl 1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12666.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Yang R, Pedersen NL, Bao C, Xu W, Xu H, Song R, et al. Type 2 diabetes in midlife and risk of cerebrovascular disease in late life: a prospective nested case-control study in a nationwide Swedish twin cohort. Diabetologia. 2019;62(8):1403–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-4892-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Arboix A, Rivas A, Garcia-Eroles L, de Marcos L, Massons J, Oliveres M. Cerebral infarction in diabetes: clinical pattern, stroke subtypes, and predictors of in-hospital mortality. BMC Neurol. 2005;5(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-5-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Moloney AM, Griffin RJ, Timmons S, O’Connor R, Ravid R, O’Neill C. Defects in IGF-1 receptor, insulin receptor and IRS-1/2 in Alzheimer’s disease indicate possible resistance to IGF-1 and insulin signalling. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(2):224–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.002.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Gerozissis K. Brain insulin, energy and glucose homeostasis; genes, environment and metabolic pathologies. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;585(1):38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.01.050.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Unger J, McNeill TH, Moxley RT, White M, Moss A, Livingston JN. Distribution of insulin receptor-like immunoreactivity in the rat forebrain. Neuroscience. 1989;31(1):143–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(89)90036-5.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Cipolla MJ, Liebeskind DS, Chan SL. The importance of comorbidities in ischemic stroke: impact of hypertension on the cerebral circulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38(12):2129–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X18800589.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Sacco RL, Benson RT, Kargman DE, Boden-Albala B, Tuck C, Lin IF, et al. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ischemic stroke in the elderly: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. JAMA. 2001;285(21):2729–35. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.21.2729.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Suk SH, Sacco RL, Boden-Albala B, Cheun JF, Pittman JG, Elkind MS, et al. Abdominal obesity and risk of ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke. 2003;34(7):1586–92. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000075294.98582.2F.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Frisardi V, Solfrizzi V, Capurso C, Imbimbo BP, Vendemiale G, Seripa D, et al. Is insulin resistant brain state a central feature of the metabolic-cognitive syndrome? J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;21(1):57–63. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2010-100015.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Chi NF, Chien LN, Ku HL, Hu CJ, Chiou HY. Alzheimer disease and risk of stroke: a population-based cohort study. Neurology. 2013;80(8):705–11. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828250af.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Gamaldo A, Moghekar A, Kilada S, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, O’Brien R. Effect of a clinical stroke on the risk of dementia in a prospective cohort. Neurology. 2006;67(8):1363–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000240285.89067.3f.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Allan LM, Rowan EN, Firbank MJ, Thomas AJ, Parry SW, Polvikoski TM, et al. Long term incidence of dementia, predictors of mortality and pathological diagnosis in older stroke survivors. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 12):3716–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr273.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Xing C, Arai K, Lo EH, Hommel M. Pathophysiologic cascades in ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke. 2012;7(5):378–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00839.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Vijayan M, Kumar S, Bhatti JS, Reddy PH. Molecular links and biomarkers of stroke, vascular dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2017;146:95–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.12.014.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Snowdon DA. Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer disease. The Nun Study. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 1997;277:10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540340047031.CrossRef

62.

Esiri MM, Nagy Z, Smith MZ, Barnetson L, Smith AD. Cerebrovascular disease and threshold for dementia in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 1999;354(9182):919–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02355-7.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Kalaria RN, Akinyemi R, Ihara M. Does vascular pathology contribute to Alzheimer changes? J Neurol Sci. 2012;322(1–2):141–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.07.032.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Regan C, Katona C, Walker Z, Hooper J, Donovan J, Livingston G. Relationship of vascular risk to the progression of Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2006;67(8):1357–62. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000240129.46080.53.CrossRefPubMed

65.

Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Incidence and prevalence of dementia associated with transient ischaemic attack and stroke: analysis of the population-based Oxford Vascular Study. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(3):248–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30442-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Stevens J, Cai J, Pamuk ER, Williamson DF, Thun MJ, Wood JL. The effect of age on the association between body-mass index and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801013380101.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Rankinen T, Kim SY, Perusse L, Despres JP, Bouchard C. The prediction of abdominal visceral fat level from body composition and anthropometry: ROC analysis. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23(8):801–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0800929.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Harvey J, Solovyova N, Irving A. Leptin and its role in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Prog Lipid Res. 2006;45(5):369–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2006.03.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Marseglia L, Manti S, D’Angelo G, Nicotera A, Parisi E, Di Rosa G, et al. Oxidative stress in obesity: a critical component in human diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;16(1):378–400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16010378.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Moh MC, Low S, Ng TP, Wang J, Ang SF, Tan C, et al. Association of traditional and novel measures of central obesity with cognitive performance in older multi-ethnic Asians with type 2 diabetes. Clin Obes. 2020;10(2):e12352. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12352.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Beydoun MA, Beydoun HA, Wang Y. Obesity and central obesity as risk factors for incident dementia and its subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2008;9(3):204–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00473.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

72.

Tanner CM. Advances in environmental epidemiology. Mov Disord. 2010;25(Suppl 1):S58-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22721.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Fahn S. Parkinson’s disease: 10 years of progress, 1997–2007. Mov Disord. 2010;25(Suppl 1):S2-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22796.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Nicoletti A, Pugliese P, Nicoletti G, Arabia G, Annesi G, Mari MD, et al. Voluptuary habits and clinical subtypes of Parkinson’s disease: the FRAGAMP case-control study. Mov Disord. 2010;25(14):2387–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23297.CrossRefPubMed

75.

Picciotto MR, Zoli M. Neuroprotection via nAChRs: the role of nAChRs in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Front Biosci. 2008;13:492–504. https://doi.org/10.2741/2695.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Quik M, Perez XA, Bordia T. Nicotine as a potential neuroprotective agent for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2012;27(8):947–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25028.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

77.

Deckers K, van Boxtel MP, Schiepers OJ, de Vugt M, Munoz Sanchez JL, Anstey KJ, et al. Target risk factors for dementia prevention: a systematic review and Delphi consensus study on the evidence from observational studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;30(3):234–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4245.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Collins N, Sachs-Ericsson N, Preacher KJ, Sheffield KM, Markides K. Smoking increases risk for cognitive decline among community-dwelling older Mexican Americans. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17(11):934–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b0f8df.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Rusanen M, Rovio S, Ngandu T, Nissinen A, Tuomilehto J, Soininen H, et al. Midlife smoking, apolipoprotein E and risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a population-based cardiovascular risk factors, aging and dementia study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30(3):277–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000320484.CrossRefPubMed

80.

Calderon-Garciduenas L. Smoking and cerebral oxidative stress and air pollution: a dreadful equation with particulate matter involved and one more powerful reason not to smoke anything! J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;54(1):109–12. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160510.CrossRefPubMed

81.

Gerzanich V, Zhang F, West GA, Simard JM. Chronic nicotine alters NO signaling of Ca(2+) channels in cerebral arterioles. Circ Res. 2001;88(3):359–65. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.88.3.359.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Wang P, Li B, Cai G, Huang M, Jiang L, Pu J, et al. Activation of PPAR-gamma by pioglitazone attenuates oxidative stress in aging rat cerebral arteries through upregulating UCP2. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2014;64(6):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000000143.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Toda N, Okamura T. Cigarette smoking impairs nitric oxide-mediated cerebral blood flow increase: implications for Alzheimer’s disease. J Pharmacol Sci. 2016;131(4):223–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphs.2016.07.001.CrossRefPubMed

84.

Durazzo TC, Mattsson N, Weiner MW. Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I Smoking and increased Alzheimer’s disease risk: a review of potential mechanisms. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10(3 Suppl):S122–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Associations between metabolic syndrome and type of dementia: analysis based on the National Health Insurance Service database of Gangwon province in South Korea
verfasst von: Yeo Jin Kim
Sang Mi Kim
Dae Hyun Jeong
Sang-Kyu Lee
Moo-Eob Ahn
Ohk-Hyun Ryu
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2021
Verlag: BioMed Central
Erschienen in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome / Ausgabe 1/2021
Elektronische ISSN: 1758-5996
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-020-00620-5

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

24.04.2024 | DGIM 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Associations between metabolic syndrome and type of dementia: analysis based on the National Health Insurance Service database of Gangwon province in South Korea

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publisher's Note

Background

Methods

Data source and study population

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents

Definition of dementia

Definition of metabolic syndrome

Statistical analysis

Results

Demographics and baseline characteristics

Association between metabolic syndrome and AD

Association between metabolic syndrome and VD

Association between metabolic syndrome and Any type of dementia

Association between other cardiovascular risk factors included continuous metabolic parameters and dementia

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Competing interests

Publisher's Note

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Thrombophiliescreening – Wenn, dann richtig und nur bei therapeutischer Konsequenz

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Update Innere Medizin

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publisher's Note

Background

Methods

Data source and study population

Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents

Definition of dementia

Definition of metabolic syndrome

Statistical analysis

Results

Demographics and baseline characteristics

Association between metabolic syndrome and AD

Association between metabolic syndrome and VD

Association between metabolic syndrome and Any type of dementia

Association between other cardiovascular risk factors included continuous metabolic parameters and dementia

Discussion

Conclusions

Acknowledgements

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Consent for publication

Competing interests

Publisher's Note

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Ultrasound evaluation of the fetal fat tissue, heart, liver and umbilical cord measurements in pregnancies complicated by gestational and type 1 diabetes mellitus: potential application in the fetal birth-weight estimation and prediction of the fetal macrosomia

MiR-423-5p activated by E2F1 promotes neovascularization in diabetic retinopathy by targeting HIPK2

Association of diabetes and obesity with sperm parameters and testosterone levels: a meta-analysis

Overweight and obesity in type 1 diabetes is not associated with higher ghrelin concentrations

The product of waist and neck circumference outperforms traditional anthropometric indices in identifying metabolic syndrome in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study

Gut related inflammation and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CAD and type 2 diabetes: a sub-study of a randomized controlled trial on exercise training

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Metformin rückt in den Hintergrund

Myokarditis nach Infekt – richtig schwierig wird es bei Profisportlern

Thrombophiliescreening – Wenn, dann richtig und nur bei therapeutischer Konsequenz

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

Update Innere Medizin