nach oben

Rheumatology International

Erschienen in:

01.02.2013 | Review

Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors

verfasst von: Armen Yuri Gasparyan, Lilit Ayvazyan, George D. Kitas

Erschienen in: Rheumatology International | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Authorship problems in scholarly journals shake the foundations of research, diminish scientific quality of papers and devalue records of citation tracking services. The ‘Publish or Perish’ mantra is thought to drive some instances of unfair, honorary authorship, particularly in countries of emerging scientific power. Though causes of honorary, gift, guest and ghost authorship are still ill-defined, it is possible to avoid some of these instances by improving awareness of what constitutes authorship and by adhering to the editorial policies of learned associations. This paper overviews common cases of inappropriate authorship and suggests options to solve related problems by authors, reviewers and editors of scholarly journals.

Scott JT (1993) Is it worth writing about? J R Soc Med 86(1):5–6PubMed

Greene M (2007) The demise of the lone author. Nature 450(7173):1165. doi:10.1038/4501165a PubMedCrossRef

Patel VM, Ashrafian H, Ahmed K, Arora S, Jiwan S, Nicholson JK, Darzi A, Athanasiou T (2011) How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review. J R Soc Med 104(6):251–261. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2011.110005 PubMedCrossRef

Osareh F, Chakoli NA, Keshvari M (2010) Co-authorship of Iranian researchers in science, social science, art and humanities citation indexes in the web of science between 2000 and 2006. Inform Sci Technol 25(4):573–595

Yousefi A, Hemmat M, Gilvari A, Shahmirzadi T (2012) Citation analysis and co-authorship of Iranian researchers in the field of immunology in ISI web of science: a brief report. Tehran Univ Med J 70(3):188–193

Vinther S, Rosenberg J (2012) Authorship trends over the past fifty years in the Journal of the Danish Medical Association (Danish: Ugeskrift for Læger). Dan Med J 59(3):A4390PubMed

Mirzazadeh A, Navadeh S, Rokni MB, Farhangniya M (2011) The prevalence of honorary and ghost authorships in Iranian bio-medical journals and its associated factors. Iran J Public Health 40(1):15–21PubMed

Figg WD, Dunn L, Liewehr DJ, Steinberg SM, Thurman PW, Barrett JC, Birkinshaw J (2006) Scientific collaboration results in higher citation rates of published articles. Pharmacotherapy 26(6):759–767. doi:10.1592/phco.26.6.759 PubMedCrossRef

Bornmann L, Daniel HD (2009) The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Rep 10(1):2–6. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.233 PubMedCrossRef

10.

Bosch X, Ross JS (2012) Ghostwriting: research misconduct, plagiarism, or fool’s gold? Am J Med 125(4):324–326. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.015 PubMedCrossRef

11.

Ross JS, Hill KP, Egilman DS, Krumholz HM (2008) Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. JAMA 299(15):1800–1812. doi:10.1001/jama.299.15.1800 PubMedCrossRef

12.

Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Cocco G, Kitas GD (2012) Adverse cardiovascular effects of antirheumatic drugs: implications for clinical practice and research. Curr Pharm Des 18(11):1543–1555. doi:10.2174/138161212799504759 PubMed

13.

Butler D (2008) Iranian paper sparks sense of déjà vu. Nature 455(7216):1019. doi:10.1038/4551019a PubMedCrossRef

14.

Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD (2011) Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int 31(11):1409–1417. doi:10.1007/s00296-011-1999-3 PubMedCrossRef

15.

Leek JT, Taub MA, Pineda FJ (2011) Cooperation between referees and authors increases peer review accuracy. PLoS ONE 6(11):e26895. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026895 PubMedCrossRef

16.

Marusić M, Bozikov J, Katavić V, Hren D, Kljaković-Gaspić M, Marusić A (2004) Authorship in a small medical journal: a study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors. Sci Eng Ethics 10(3):493–502PubMedCrossRef

17.

Dotson B, Slaughter RL (2011) Prevalence of articles with honorary and ghost authors in three pharmacy journals. Am J Health Syst Pharm 68(18):1730–1734PubMedCrossRef

18.

Bonekamp S, Halappa VG, Corona-Villalobos CP, Mensa M, Eng J, Lewin JS, Kamel IR (2012) Prevalence of honorary coauthorship in the American journal of roentgenology. Am J Roentgenol 198(6):1247–1255CrossRef

19.

Wislar JS, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, Deangelis CD (2011) Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey. BMJ 343:d6128. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6128 PubMedCrossRef

20.

Marušić A, Bošnjak L, Jerončić A (2011) A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS ONE 6(9):e23477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477 PubMedCrossRef

21.

Baerlocher MO, Newton M, Gautam T, Tomlinson G, Detsky AS (2007) The meaning of author order in medical research. J Investig Med 55(4):174–180. doi:10.2310/6650.2007.06044 PubMedCrossRef

22.

Costas R, Bordons M (2011) Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics 88(1):145–161. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0368-z PubMedCrossRef

23.

Salita JT (2010) Authorship practices in Asian cultures. The Write Stuff 19(1):36–38

24.

Wang F, Tang L, Bo L, Li J, Deng X (2012) Equal contributions and credit given to authors in critical care medicine journals during a 10-yr period*. Crit Care Med 40(3):967–969PubMedCrossRef

25.

Tao T, Bo L, Wang F, Li J, Deng X (2012) Equal contributions and credit given to authors in anesthesiology journals during a 10-year period. Scientometrics 91(3):1005–1010. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0558-8 CrossRef

26.

Hu W, Sun L, Gao J, Li Y, Wang P, Cheng Y, Pan T, Han J, Liu Y, Lu W, Zuo X, Sheng Y, Yao S, He C, Yu Z, Yin X, Cui Y, Yang S, Zhang X (2011) Down-regulated expression of IKZF1 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 31(6):819–822. doi:10.1007/s00296-010-1576-1 PubMedCrossRef

27.

Akhabue E, Lautenbach E (2010) “Equal” contributions and credit: an emerging trend in the characterization of authorship. Ann Epidemiol 20(11):868–871. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004 PubMedCrossRef

28.

Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L (1997) When authorship fails: a proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 278:579–585. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041 PubMedCrossRef

29.

Smith R (1997) Authorship is dying: long live contributorship. BMJ 315(7110):696PubMedCrossRef

30.

Carter S (2010) Authorship: definitions and declarations—a perspective from the BMJ. The Write Stuff 19(1):18

31.

Rohlfing T, Poline JB (2012) Why shared data should not be acknowledged on the author byline. Neuroimage 59(4):4189–4195. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.080 PubMedCrossRef

32.

Smith R (2012) Let’s simply scrap authorship and move to contributorship. BMJ 344:e157. doi:10.1136/bmj.e157 PubMedCrossRef

33.

Macrina FL (2011) Teaching authorship and publication practices in the biomedical and life sciences. Sci Eng Ethics 17(2):341–354. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9275-1 PubMedCrossRef

34.

Scott-Lichter D (2012) Authorship disputes: me first, me equally, me too, not me. Learn Publ 25(2):83–85. doi:10.1087/20120201 CrossRef

35.

Kisacik B, Kalyoncu U, Erol MF, Karadag O, Yildiz M, Akdogan A, Kaptanoglu B, Hayran M, Ureten K, Ertenli I, Kiraz S, Calguneri M (2007) Accurate diagnosis of acute abdomen in FMF and acute appendicitis patients: how can we use procalcitonin? Clin Rheumatol 26(12):2059–2062. doi:10.1007/s10067-007-0617-y PubMedCrossRef

36.

Kisacik B, Kasifoglu T, Akay S, Yilmaz O, Yilmaz S, Simsek I, Erdem H, Pay S, Dinc A (2010) Ulnar artery aneurysm in a patient with Behçet’s disease. Rheumatol Int 30(3):383–385. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-0951-2 PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kisacik B, Yildirim B, Tasliyurt T, Ozyurt H, Ozyurt B, Yuce S, Kaya S, Ertenli I, Kiraz S (2009) Increased frequency of familial Mediterranean fever in northern Turkey: a population-based study. Rheumatol Int 29(11):1307–1309. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-0849-z PubMedCrossRef

38.

Cagatay T, Aydin M, Sunmez S, Cagatay P, Gulbaran Z, Gul A, Artim B, Kilicaslan Z (2010) Follow-up results of 702 patients receiving tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and evaluation of risk of tuberculosis. Rheumatol Int 30(11):1459–1463. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-1170-6 PubMedCrossRef

39.

Wager E, Kleinert S on behalf of COPE Council. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). March 2012. Available at http://publicationethics.org/files/Research_institutions_guidelines_final.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2012

40.

Gasparyan AY (2011) Familiarizing with science editors’ associations. Croat Med J 52(6):735–739. doi:10.3325/cmj.2011.52.735 PubMedCrossRef

41.

Habibzadeh F, Marcovitch H (2012) Authorship dispute among the league of extraordinary gentlemen. Eur Sci Editing 38(2):40–41

42.

EASE guidelines for authors and translators of scientific articles to be published in English. Available at http://www.ease.org.uk/sites/default/files/ease_guidelines-june2011c.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2012

43.

Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: authorship and contributorship. Available at http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html. Accessed 22 May 2012

44.

CSE’s white paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications, 2012 update. Editorial Policy Committee (2011–2012) Available at http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/files/public/entire_whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2012

45.

Wager E (2007) Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship? MedGenMed 9(3):16PubMed

46.

Jaykaran Yadav P, Chavda N, Kantharia ND (2011) Survey of “instructions to authors” of Indian medical journals for reporting of ethics and authorship criteria. Indian J Med Ethics 8(1):36–38PubMed

47.

Samad A, Khanzada TW, Siddiqui AA (2009) Do the instructions to authors of Pakistani medical journals convey adequate guidance for authorship criteria? Pak J Med Sci 25(6):879–882

48.

Wager L (2010) Authorship—more than just writing, but how much more? The Write Stuff 19(1):19–21

49.

Wager E, Kleinert S, Responsible research publication: international standards for authors. A position statement developed at the 2nd world conference on research integrity, Singapore, 22–24 July 2010. Available at http://publicationethics.org/files/International%20standards_authors_for%20website_11_Nov_2011.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2012

50.

http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/All_flowcharts.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2012

51.

Policy Statements. Prepared by the WAME editorial policy committee. Available at http://www.wame.org/resources/policies. Accessed 20 May 2012

52.

Schöffel N, Mache S, Quarcoo D, Scutaru C, Vitzthum K, Groneberg DA, Spallek M (2010) Rheumatoid arthritis: scientific development from a critical point of view. Rheumatol Int 30(4):505–513. doi:10.1007/s00296-009-1005-5 PubMedCrossRef

53.

Pile K (2009) Publish or perish. Int J Rheum Dis 12(3):183–185. doi:10.1111/j.1756-185X.2009.01408.x PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
verfasst von: Armen Yuri Gasparyan
Lilit Ayvazyan
George D. Kitas
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2013
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Rheumatology International / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0172-8172
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-160X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors

Abstract

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Update Innere Medizin

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Effects of dialysis on the pharmacokinetics of salazosulfapyridine

Multiclinical experiences in erythema nodosum: rheumatology clinics versus dermatology and infection diseases clinics

A shoulder-hand syndrome revealing a lung cancer

Performance of ultrasounds compared with radiographs to detect chronic enthesitis signs in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Role of Sp1 transcription factor in Interleukin-1-induced ADAMTS-4 (aggrecanase-1) gene expression in human articular chondrocytes

Sleep disturbance in Moroccan patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Prevalence and relationships with disease-specific variables, psychological status and quality of life

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Europäische Ernährungsgewohnheiten: Das sind die häufigsten Fehler

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Update Innere Medizin