Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 2/2018

01.04.2018 | Original Article

Auto strain ratio system for the quality control of breast strain elastography

verfasst von: Kazutaka Nakashima, Akiko Mizutou, Sayaka Sakurai

Erschienen in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the reproducibility, accuracy, and quantitative values of the auto strain ratio system (ASRS)—a newly developed strain elastography-based program.

Materials and methods

First, the accuracy of ASRS was verified using a breast phantom. A prospective clinical study was then performed in patients. Two hundred and one women (mean age 52.4 years ± SD 14.5) with 232 breast lesions (177 benign and 55 malignant) were enrolled in this study. We assessed the correlation between ASRS and manual strain ratio (MSR), calculating the diagnostic performance to determine the cut-off. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results

ASRS was strongly correlated with the subtle differences in phantom stiffness (R = 0.87). In the clinical study, there was a significant correlation between MSR and ASRS with R = 0.79 (P < 0.001). ASRS (cut-off = 3.9) had a sensitivity of 81.8%, specificity of 88.7%, accuracy of 87.1%, positive predictive value of 69.2%, and negative predictive value of 94%. The AUC of ASRS was 0.89.

Conclusion

The findings from this study have demonstrated that it is possible to quantify strain elastography and control its accuracy. ASRS is expected to contribute to the standardization of breast elastography.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakashima K, Shiina T, Sakurai M, et al. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines breast. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:359–91.CrossRef Nakashima K, Shiina T, Sakurai M, et al. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines breast. J Med Ultrason. 2013;40:359–91.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 2: breast. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1148–60.CrossRefPubMed Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 2: breast. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1148–60.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012;262:435–49.CrossRefPubMed Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Doré CJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology. 2012;262:435–49.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, et al. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W347–56.CrossRefPubMed Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, et al. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W347–56.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239:341–50.CrossRefPubMed Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239:341–50.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Barr RG. Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q. 2010;26:61–6.CrossRefPubMed Barr RG. Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Q. 2010;26:61–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB 2nd, et al. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:281–7.CrossRefPubMed Barr RG, Destounis S, Lackey LB 2nd, et al. Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging: a multicenter trial. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:281–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F. Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32:400–5.CrossRefPubMed Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F. Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32:400–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer T, Peisker T, Fiedor S, et al. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:372–9.CrossRefPubMed Fischer T, Peisker T, Fiedor S, et al. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:372–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakashima K, Moriya T. Comprehensive ultrasound diagnosis for intraductal spread of primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2013;20:3–12.CrossRefPubMed Nakashima K, Moriya T. Comprehensive ultrasound diagnosis for intraductal spread of primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2013;20:3–12.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Waki K, Kashiyama T, Suda M, et al. Development of new generation real-time tissue elastography for breast in ultrasound diagnostic scanner [published in Japanese]. MEDIX. 2016;65:32–6. Waki K, Kashiyama T, Suda M, et al. Development of new generation real-time tissue elastography for breast in ultrasound diagnostic scanner [published in Japanese]. MEDIX. 2016;65:32–6.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno E, Tohno E, Umemoto T, et al. A preliminary prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of assist strain ratio versus manual strain ratio. J Med Ultrason. 2015;42:521–31.CrossRef Ueno E, Tohno E, Umemoto T, et al. A preliminary prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of assist strain ratio versus manual strain ratio. J Med Ultrason. 2015;42:521–31.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Ultrasound. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013. Mendelson EB, Böhm-Vélez M, Berg WA, et al. ACR BI-RADS® Ultrasound. In: ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J. 2005;47:458–72.CrossRefPubMed Fluss R, Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point. Biom J. 2005;47:458–72.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, et al. Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:923–31.CrossRefPubMed Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, et al. Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:923–31.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonathan CF, Ewertsen Caroline, Lönn Lars, et al. Strain elastography ultrasound: an overview with emphasis on breast cancer diagnosis. Diagnostics. 2013;3:117–25.CrossRef Jonathan CF, Ewertsen Caroline, Lönn Lars, et al. Strain elastography ultrasound: an overview with emphasis on breast cancer diagnosis. Diagnostics. 2013;3:117–25.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1126–47.CrossRefPubMed Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:1126–47.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Auto strain ratio system for the quality control of breast strain elastography
verfasst von
Kazutaka Nakashima
Akiko Mizutou
Sayaka Sakurai
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1346-4523
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-2254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-017-0830-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.