Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2018 | Commentary | Ausgabe 1/2018 Open Access

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2018

Balancing autonomy and beneficence at the time of psychiatric discharge

Zeitschrift:
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research > Ausgabe 1/2018
Autoren:
Abhishek Jain, Paul S. Appelbaum
Wichtige Hinweise
This comment refers to the article available at: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s13584-017-0178-8.

Abstract

As in much of the world, mental health law in Israel has evolved over the past half-century toward greater protection of patients’ liberty and an increased emphasis on due process. Part of that process in Israel involved taking decisions about prolonged involuntary hospitalization out of the hands of treating psychiatrists and turning them over to independent review panels. Argo and colleagues examined outcomes of discharge decisions made by these panels compared with treating psychiatrists. In this brief commentary, we describe related trends in mental health law in other countries, especially the U.S., consider countervailing perspectives on the role of review panels, and suggest how the Argo et al. study might be followed up with additional research.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe