Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2017 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2017 Open Access

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study

Zeitschrift:
BMC Health Services Research > Ausgabe 1/2017
Autoren:
Nelleke van Sluisveld, Anke Oerlemans, Gert Westert, Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven, Hub Wollersheim, Marieke Zegers
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s12913-017-2139-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Background

Evidence indicates that suboptimal clinical handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards leads to unnecessary ICU readmissions and increased mortality. We aimed to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implement and use ICU discharge practices.

Methods

A mixed methods approach was conducted, using 1) 23 individual and four focus group interviews, with post-ICU patients, ICU managers, and nurses and physicians working in the ICU or general ward of ten Dutch hospitals, and 2) a questionnaire survey, which contained 27 statements derived from the interviews, and was completed by 166 ICU physicians (21.8%) from 64 Dutch hospitals (71.1% of the total of 90 Dutch hospitals).

Results

The interviews resulted in 66 barriers and facilitators related to: the intervention (e.g., feasibility); the professional (e.g., attitude towards checklists); social factors (e.g., presence or absence of a culture of feedback); and the organisation (e.g., financial resources). A facilitator considered important by ICU physicians was a checklist to structure discharge communication (92.2%). Barriers deemed important were lack of a culture of feedback (55.4%), an absence of discharge criteria (23.5%), and an overestimation of the capabilities of general wards to care for complex patients by ICU physicians (74.7%).

Conclusions

Based on the barriers and facilitators found in this study, improving handover communication, formulating specific discharge criteria, stimulating a culture of feedback, and preventing overestimation of the general ward are important to effectively improve the ICU discharge process.
Zusatzmaterial
Additional file 1: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ). (PDF 609 kb)
12913_2017_2139_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Additional file 2: Example of the individual interview guide. (PDF 424 kb)
12913_2017_2139_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
Additional file 3: Example of the focus group interview guide. (PDF 275 kb)
12913_2017_2139_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
Additional file 4: Subgroup analyses. (PDF 468 kb)
12913_2017_2139_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe