Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 5/2017

02.08.2017

Benefits of marriage on relative and conditional relative cancer survival differ between males and females in the USA

verfasst von: Ray M. Merrill, Erin Johnson

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to assess the influence of marital status on conditional relative survival of cancer according to sex.

Methods

Analyses involved 779,978 males and 1,032,868 females diagnosed with 1 of 13 cancer types between 2000 and 2008, and followed through 2013. Data are from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, race, and tumor stage.

Results

Five-year relative survival conditional on years already survived is higher among married patients with less lethal cancers (oral cavity and pharynx, colon and rectum, breast, urinary bladder, kidney and renal pelvis, melanoma of the skin, thyroid, lymphoma). For more lethal cancers, married patients have similar (liver, lung and bronchus, pancreas, leukemia) or poorer (brain and other nervous system) cancer survival. Separated/divorced or widowed patients have the lowest conditional relative survival rates. For most cancers, 5-year cancer relative survival rates conditional on time already survived through 5 years approach 70 to 90% of that for the general population. The beneficial effect of marriage on survival decreases with years already survived. Superior conditional relative survival rates in females decrease with time already survived and are less pronounced in married patients.

Conclusion

Five-year relative survival rates improve with time already survived. The benefits of marriage on conditional relative survival are greater for less lethal cancers. Greater 5-year conditional relative survival rates in females narrow with time already survived and are less pronounced in married patients.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Conditional relative survival rates of cancer can lead to more informed decisions and understanding regarding treatment and prognosis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American Cancer Society Cancer facts & figures 2017 Atlanta American Cancer Society, 2017. American Cancer Society Cancer facts & figures 2017 Atlanta American Cancer Society, 2017.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, Altekruse SF, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer 1975–2012 featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer. Cancer. 2016;122(9):1312–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, Altekruse SF, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer 1975–2012 featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer. Cancer. 2016;122(9):1312–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomez SL, Hurley S, Canchola AJ, et al. Effects of marital status and economic resources on survival after cancer: a population-based study. Cancer. 2016;122:1618–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gomez SL, Hurley S, Canchola AJ, et al. Effects of marital status and economic resources on survival after cancer: a population-based study. Cancer. 2016;122:1618–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sammon JD, Morgan M, Djahangirian O, et al. Marital status: a gender-independent risk factor for poorer survival after radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2–12;110(9):1201–29. Sammon JD, Morgan M, Djahangirian O, et al. Marital status: a gender-independent risk factor for poorer survival after radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2–12;110(9):1201–29.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Gan L, Wu Z, et al. The influence of marital status on the stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival of adult patients with gastric cancer: a population-based study. Oncotarget (2016); Epub ahead of print. Zhang J, Gan L, Wu Z, et al. The influence of marital status on the stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival of adult patients with gastric cancer: a population-based study. Oncotarget (2016); Epub ahead of print.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Wilson SE, Stewart DB, et al. Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage? Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(5):417–22.CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Wilson SE, Stewart DB, et al. Marital status and colon cancer outcomes in US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries: does marriage affect cancer survival by gender and stage? Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(5):417–22.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez ME, Anderson K, Murphy JD, et al. Differences in marital status and mortality by race/ethnicity and nativity among California cancer patients. Cancer. 2016;15:122(10):1570–8. Martínez ME, Anderson K, Murphy JD, et al. Differences in marital status and mortality by race/ethnicity and nativity among California cancer patients. Cancer. 2016;15:122(10):1570–8.
10.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Inverso G, Mahal BA, Aizer AA, et al. Marital status and head and neck cancer outcomes. Cancer. 2015;121(8):1273–8.CrossRefPubMed Inverso G, Mahal BA, Aizer AA, et al. Marital status and head and neck cancer outcomes. Cancer. 2015;121(8):1273–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Enewold L, Harlan LC, Tucker T, et al. Pancreatic cancer in the USA: persistence of undertreatment and poor outcome. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015;46(1):9–20.CrossRefPubMed Enewold L, Harlan LC, Tucker T, et al. Pancreatic cancer in the USA: persistence of undertreatment and poor outcome. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015;46(1):9–20.CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellison LF. Differences in cancer survival in Canada by sex. Health Rep. 2016;27(4):19–27. Ellison LF. Differences in cancer survival in Canada by sex. Health Rep. 2016;27(4):19–27.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat St John PD, Montgomery PR. Marital status, partner satisfaction, and depressive symptoms in older men and women. Can J Psychiatr. 2009;54(7):487–92.CrossRef St John PD, Montgomery PR. Marital status, partner satisfaction, and depressive symptoms in older men and women. Can J Psychiatr. 2009;54(7):487–92.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rendall MS, Weden MM, Favreault MM, et al. The protective effect of marriage for survival: a review and update. Demography. 2011;48(2):481–506.CrossRefPubMed Rendall MS, Weden MM, Favreault MM, et al. The protective effect of marriage for survival: a review and update. Demography. 2011;48(2):481–506.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bortolato B, Hyphantis TN, Valpione S, et al. Depression in cancer: the many biobehavioral pathways driving tumor progression. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;52:58–70.CrossRefPubMed Bortolato B, Hyphantis TN, Valpione S, et al. Depression in cancer: the many biobehavioral pathways driving tumor progression. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;52:58–70.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat The International Agency for Research on Cancer. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissue (IARC WHO classification of tumours) 4th Edition. World Health Organization, 2008. The International Agency for Research on Cancer. WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissue (IARC WHO classification of tumours) 4th Edition. World Health Organization, 2008.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamo M, Dickie L, Ruhl J. SEER program coding and staging manual 2015. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20850-9765, 2015. Adamo M, Dickie L, Ruhl J. SEER program coding and staging manual 2015. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20850-9765, 2015.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ederer F, Axtell LM, Culter SJ. The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1961;6:101–21. Ederer F, Axtell LM, Culter SJ. The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1961;6:101–21.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hieke S, Kleber M, Konig C, et al. Conditional survival: a useful concept to provide information on how prognosis evolves over time. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(7):1530–6.CrossRefPubMed Hieke S, Kleber M, Konig C, et al. Conditional survival: a useful concept to provide information on how prognosis evolves over time. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(7):1530–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Reynolds P, Hurley S, Torres M, et al. Use of coping strategies and breast cancer survival: results from the Black/White Cancer Survival Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:940–9.CrossRefPubMed Reynolds P, Hurley S, Torres M, et al. Use of coping strategies and breast cancer survival: results from the Black/White Cancer Survival Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:940–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, et al. Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(7):1105–11.CrossRefPubMed Kroenke CH, Kubzansky LD, Schernhammer ES, et al. Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(7):1105–11.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Epplein M, Zheng Y, Zheng W, et al. Quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(4):406–12.CrossRefPubMed Epplein M, Zheng Y, Zheng W, et al. Quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis and survival. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(4):406–12.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kroenke CH, Quesenberry C, Kwan ML, et al. Social networks, social support, and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Life After Breast Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(1):261–71.CrossRefPubMed Kroenke CH, Quesenberry C, Kwan ML, et al. Social networks, social support, and burden in relationships, and mortality after breast cancer diagnosis in the Life After Breast Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;137(1):261–71.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Jafri NS, Gould M, El-Serag HB, et al. Incidence and survival of colorectal cancer among Hispanics in the United States: a population-based study. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2052–60.CrossRefPubMed Jafri NS, Gould M, El-Serag HB, et al. Incidence and survival of colorectal cancer among Hispanics in the United States: a population-based study. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2052–60.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjödahl R, Rosell J, Starkhammar H. Causes of death after surgery for colon cancer-impact of other diseases, urgent admittance, and gender. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:1160–5.CrossRefPubMed Sjödahl R, Rosell J, Starkhammar H. Causes of death after surgery for colon cancer-impact of other diseases, urgent admittance, and gender. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:1160–5.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotake K, Asano M, Ozawa H, et al. Gender differences in colorectal cancer survival in Japan. International J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:194–203.CrossRef Kotake K, Asano M, Ozawa H, et al. Gender differences in colorectal cancer survival in Japan. International J Clin Oncol. 2016;21:194–203.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee W, Nelson R, Mailey B, et al. Socioeconomic factors impact colon cancer outcomes in diverse patient populations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;16:692–704.CrossRef Lee W, Nelson R, Mailey B, et al. Socioeconomic factors impact colon cancer outcomes in diverse patient populations. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;16:692–704.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Meeting psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, 2004. Institute of Medicine. Meeting psychosocial needs of women with breast cancer. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, 2004.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwan ML, Ergas IJ, Somkin CP, et al. Quality of life among women recently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer: the Pathways Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(2):507–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kwan ML, Ergas IJ, Somkin CP, et al. Quality of life among women recently diagnosed with invasive breast cancer: the Pathways Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(2):507–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Classen C, Butler LD, Koopman C, et al. Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical intervention trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:494–501.CrossRefPubMed Classen C, Butler LD, Koopman C, et al. Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical intervention trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:494–501.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodwin PJ, Leszcz M, Ennis M, et al. The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1719–26.CrossRefPubMed Goodwin PJ, Leszcz M, Ennis M, et al. The effect of group psychosocial support on survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1719–26.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowland JH, Massie MJ. Chapter 95: Psychosocial adaptation during and after breast cancer, in J.R. Harris, M.E. Lippman, M. Morrow, C.K. Osborne. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2010. Rowland JH, Massie MJ. Chapter 95: Psychosocial adaptation during and after breast cancer, in J.R. Harris, M.E. Lippman, M. Morrow, C.K. Osborne. Diseases of the Breast, 4th edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2010.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Høyer H, Johansson B, Nordin K, et al. Health-related quality of life among women with breast cancer—a population-based study. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(7):1015–26.CrossRefPubMed Høyer H, Johansson B, Nordin K, et al. Health-related quality of life among women with breast cancer—a population-based study. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(7):1015–26.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Björneklett HG, Lindemalm C, Rosenblad A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of support group intervention after breast cancer treatment: results on anxiety and depression. Acta Oncol. 2012;51(2):198–207.CrossRefPubMed Björneklett HG, Lindemalm C, Rosenblad A, et al. A randomised controlled trial of support group intervention after breast cancer treatment: results on anxiety and depression. Acta Oncol. 2012;51(2):198–207.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Nausheen B, Gidron Y, Peveler R, et al. Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2009, 2009;67(5):403–15. Nausheen B, Gidron Y, Peveler R, et al. Social support and cancer progression: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2009, 2009;67(5):403–15.
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Michael YL, Berkman LF, Colditz GA, et al. Social networks and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a prospective study. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:285–93.CrossRefPubMed Michael YL, Berkman LF, Colditz GA, et al. Social networks and health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors: a prospective study. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:285–93.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Matheson FI, Smith KL, Fazli GS, et al. Physical health and gender as risk factors for usage of services for mental illness. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(10):971–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matheson FI, Smith KL, Fazli GS, et al. Physical health and gender as risk factors for usage of services for mental illness. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(10):971–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Benefits of marriage on relative and conditional relative cancer survival differ between males and females in the USA
verfasst von
Ray M. Merrill
Erin Johnson
Publikationsdatum
02.08.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Elektronische ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-017-0627-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.