Discussion
Leiomyomas can occur in any body site where they originate either from smooth muscle of visceral organs or from vascular wall musculature, including the uterus, digestive tract, skin, and soft tissues. Multiple-organ, multifocal leiomyomas are rare and may represent either independent primaries (sharing a common etiology such as EBV infection in the immunocompromised patients or an inherited causal gene mutation such as
FH inactivation in the HLRCC syndrome context), or they are considered metastases originating from benign uterine leiomyoma [
10]. Benign metastasizing leiomyoma (BML) is an extremely rare disease, initially reported by Steiner in 1939 [
11], with over 160 documented cases in subsequent literature [
12]. It predominantly affects females with uterine leiomyomas, at an age ranging from 35 to 55 years [
13]. The lungs are the most commonly affected sites of metastases, commonly presenting as solitary or multiple bilateral masses with occasional cystic appearance [
12]. Diagnosis of BML should be critically rendered and only after critical reevaluation of both the primary and the metastatic nodule/s for evidence of malignancy. By definition, both the primary and the metastatic nodule/s of BML share similar histology and lack evidence of malignancy such as diffuse atypia, significant mitotic activity, and necrosis.
BML with FH defects is exceptionally rare with only two reported cases in the literature [
14,
15]. In both instances, lung metastasis occurred. In our study, both patients initially sought treatment for uterine leiomyomas with multiple recurrences and later were found to have multiple lung nodules, in addition to renal and other site involvement. Our cases are novel in that they represent the second documentation of histologically proven FH-d BML in the lungs (both cases) and the first documentation of multi-organ non-pulmonary involvement (verified histologically in the kidney in one case).
FH-d ULs comprise up to 2% of all uterine leiomyomas which in the light of very high prevalence of uterine fibroids in the general population, indicates these tumors are encountered relatively frequently in busy centers [
3]. The overall frequency of BML among FH-d UL and (conversely) the frequency of FH-d UL among reported BML cases are unknown, but might be under-reported, given that, including our two cases, only four cases have been reported (only three with histological verification) [
14,
15].
The differential diagnostic consideration of our cases is limited in the light of proven
FH gene mutations/inactivation. Metastasis from genuine uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) with FH loss is a possibility that is ruled out in both our cases by conventional histological malignancy criteria. Although initially considered controversial, the occurrence of FH-d uterine LMS has been recently documented. Chapel et al. detected 7 FH-d uterine LMS among 348 screened cases (2%) [
3]. The age spectrum of FH-d LMS (range, 42–67 years; median, 56) is significantly higher than in our cases (21 and 34 years). Reported FH-d LMS showed global FH loss, with one case displaying small subclonal LMS within a background leiomyoma, both were FH-d. Detailed clinical data on manifestations of the HLRCC syndrome and germline molecular data were not available for the reported FH-d LMS in the above-cited study [
3]. Based on these preliminary observations, the question of whether FH-d uterine LMSs originate from preexistent FH-d LM remains currently unanswered.
The possibility that the extra-uterine nodules in our cases might represent genuine independent primaries in our patients, both with germline disease (HLRCC), needs consideration. To date, FH-d ULs have been restricted to the uterus (in sporadic cases) or the uterus + skin in individuals with the HLRCC syndrome. To our knowledge, non-cutaneous extra-uterine FH-d ULs have not been reported in any other organ. Moreover, the widespread pattern in the lungs involving all lung lobes bilaterally is consistent with metastatic rather than primary disease.
The renal involvement in one of our cases represents a novel oncological pitfall, given that the majority of renal masses in HLRCC patients predominately indicate aggressive RCC as part of the syndrome. A previous case report on HLRCC syndrome has documented an incidental FH-proficient renal monotypic angiomyolipoma indicating the need for histological verification of any renal lesion in the context of HLRCC syndrome to avoid misinterpretation as aggressive RCC on imaging alone, which would result into unnecessary radical nephrectomy or systemic overtreatment [
16]. We herein report a new novel finding illustrating renal involvement by FH-d BML of uterine origin in the context of the HLRCC syndrome. This solitary FH-d renal leiomyoma was morphologically similar to the uterine leiomyomas, in line with a BML manifestation, same as the lung nodules. Finally, it is challenging to determine whether the lesions in other soft tissue locations in Case 1 lacking pathological confirmation represent metastatic FH-d BML or other unrelated lesions. However, histological verification of the renal lesion as being unusual FH-d BML strongly argues for the notion that these soft tissue and bone lesions very likely represent the same findings as the renal nodule and the multiple lung lesions.
The
fumarate hydratase gene FH (mapped to 1q43) is an integral key enzyme in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (the Krebs cycle) which is responsible for the conversion of fumarate to malate.
FH may be affected by both germline and somatic mutations, with the former associated with the HLRCC syndrome and the latter observed in the majority of sporadic FH-d ULs [
17]. In this study, we identified the
FH c.1256C > T mutation in Case 1 and the c.425A > G mutation in Case 2; both were germline variants. These mutations have been documented in the literature as pathogenic and are associated with HLRCC syndrome [
7‐
9,
18]. Although the two patients did not present with other features of the HLRCC syndrome yet, Case 1 had a strong family history of HLRCC syndrome, and genetic testing on her mother’s blood sample revealed the presence of the same
FH c.1256C > T mutation.
One last issue, raised by our cases, is whether BML cases with FH loss are enriched for germline disease (HLRCC). Indeed, both our cases and the case reported by Gilhooley et al. had a germline FH mutation indicating that three of four reported FH-d BML cases were germline disease. The case reported by Ahvenainen et al. did not have a germline FH variant, but only normal ovarian tissue was tested for the FH mutation and not a blood sample, so the presence of a germline disease is not reliably ruled out. Overall, these observations are suggestive of FH-d ULs as being more frequently associated with the HLRCC syndrome than sporadic FH-d leiomyoma, but this remains to be verified in future studies.
Despite FH-d UL’s large size, the prognosis seems generally favorable, with rare malignant transformation [
14]. However, limited data precludes any reliable prognostic conclusion. A study involving 86 FH-d ULs reported 5 deaths occurring 9–30 years after surgery in patients aged 56–97 years. However, death directly related to tumors is inconclusive due to advanced age of many included patients [
19]. FH-d UL, common in young females, often requires uterus-preserving surgery based on size and location. No standardized FH-d UL treatment guidelines exist, and options include observation, surgery, and hormone therapy [
20]. Patient prognosis is influenced by extent of tumor metastasis. The interval between hysterectomy and the diagnosis of BML varies, with an average duration of 10 years, ranging from 3 to 20 years [
21]. Similarly, patients in this study experienced multiple recurrences after myomectomy and developed multi-organ metastases, 10 years later.
Both of our patients have initially received morcellated myomectomy, suggesting a potential role for this type of conservative surgery in the pathogenesis of BML. However, a review of the previous literature did not support this notion, as BML has been reported across all types of myometrial surgery [
12]. Moreover, some cases have occurred without prior myometrial surgery [
12].
In summary, we have presented two histologically verified benign metastasizing FH-d ULs, one with multi-organ metastases in addition to lung nodules, occurring in two women with verified FH germline mutations. Familiarity of lung pathologists with the morphological patterns of FH-d UL is mandatory to initiate FH testing and uncover potential genetic diseases. Moreover, a biopsy of any kidney mass in patients with the HLRCC syndrome is mandatory to rule out BML in this context to facilitate nephron-sparing surgery and avoid unnecessary radical renal surgery for benign lesions.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.