nach oben

Erschienen in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

2. Bildgebung der Endoprothetik

verfasst von : PD Dr. med. T. Gotterbarm, PD Dr. med. C. Merle, Dr. med. J. K. Kloth, PD Dr. med. S. Kinkel

Erschienen in: Kompendium Orthopädische Bildgebung

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Die Knie- und Hüftgelenkarthrose stellt bei Erwachsenen die häufigste Erkrankung des Knie- und Hüftgelenkes mit hohen sozioökonomischen Auswirkungen dar. Die konventionelle Röntgenbildgebung ist für die Diagnostik der Gon- und Coxarthrose, die Indikationsstellung zur endoprothetischen Versorgung und die Verlaufskontrolle nach Endoprothesenimplantation die Methode der Wahl. Die Magnetresonanztomographie kann frühe Veränderungen des Gelenkknorpels und Aktivitätszeichen der Arthrose darstellen und vermag die Operationsindikation bei Diskrepanz zwischen Klinik und röntgenologischer Arthroseausprägung zu erhärten. Mittels Computertomographie wird die Knochensubstanz vor endoprothetischer Versorgung sowie in der Revisionssituation im Einzelfall beurteilt. In diesem Kapitel wird die bildgebende Diagnostik des Knie- und Hüftgelenkes vor und nach endoprothetischen Eingriffen und in der Revisionssituation vorgestellt. Es werden die Modalitäten Projektionsradiographie, Computertomographie und Magnetresonanztomographie diskutiert.

Barrack RL, Burnett SJ (2005) Preoperative planning for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(12): 2800–2811CrossRefPubMed

Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH (2005) Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect 54: 131–141PubMed

Lonner JH, Fehring TK, Hanssen AD et al. (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty: the preoperative evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 (Suppl 5): 64–68CrossRefPubMed

Potter HG, Foo LF (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 37(3): 361–373, vi–viiCrossRefPubMed

Weber MA, Egermann M, Thierjung H, Kloth JK (2015) Moderne radiologische postoperative Diagnostik des Hüftgelenks im Kindes- und Erwachsenenalter. Fortschr Röntgenstr 187: 525–542

Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM (2005) Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20(4): 414–420CrossRefPubMed

Baba T, Homma Y, Ochi H, Kobayashi H, Matsumoto M, Sakamoto Y, Kuwahara H, Maeda K, Kaneko K (2015) Higher reliability and validity of Baba classification with computerised tomography imaging and implant information for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop 39(9): 1695–1699CrossRefPubMed

Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Kransdorf MJ (2005) MR imaging of tumors and tumor-like lesions of the hip. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13(4): 757–774CrossRefPubMed

Barrack RL, Burnett SJ (2005) Preoperative planning for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(12): 2800–2811CrossRefPubMed

Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE (1998) Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (356): 144–153

Bonnin MP, Archbold PH, Basiglini L, Selmi TA, Beverland DE (2011) Should the acetabular cup be medialised in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 21(4): 428–435CrossRefPubMed

Bonnin MP, Archbold PH, Basiglini L, Fessy MH, Beverland DE (2012) Do we medialise the hip centre of rotation in total hip arthroplasty? Influence of acetabular offset and surgical technique. Hip Int 22(4): 371–378CrossRefPubMed

Bozic KJ, Freiberg AA, Harris WH (2004) The high hip center. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (420): 101–105

Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55(8): 1629–1632CrossRefPubMed

Burge AJ (2015) Total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging of complications unrelated to metal wear. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19(1): 31–39CrossRefPubMed

Burge AJ, Gold SL, Lurie B et al. (2015) MR imaging of adverse local tissue reactions around rejuvenate modular dual-taper stems. Radiology 277(1): 142–150CrossRefPubMed

Callaghan JJ, Fulghum CS, Glisson RR, Stranne SK (1992) The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74(6): 839–848CrossRefPubMed

Cameron HU, Pilliar RM, MacNab I (1973) The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 7(4): 301–311CrossRefPubMed

Chan YS, Lien LC, Hsu HL et al. (2005) Evaluating hip labral tears using magnetic resonance arthrography: a prospective study comparing hip arthroscopy and magnetic resonance arthrography diagnosis. Arthroscopy 21(10): 1250CrossRefPubMed

Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH (2005) Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Course Lect 54: 131–141PubMed

Claes L, Kirschner P, Perka C, Rudert M (Hrsg) (2012) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik Hüfte und Hüftrevision, Springer Heidelberg

Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS (1979) Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61(1): 15–23CrossRefPubMed

Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes LE (2006) Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21(5): 495–501CrossRef

DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res (121): 20–32

Della Valle CJ, Paprosky WG (2004) The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (420): 55–62

Doehring TC, Rubash HE, Shelley FJ, Schwendeman LJ, Donaldson TK, Navalgund YA (1996) Effect of superior and superolateral relocations of the hip center on hip joint forces. An experimental and analytical analysis. J Arthroplasty 11(6): 693–703CrossRefPubMed

Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14(3): 231–242CrossRefPubMed

Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48: 167–175 Fackler CD, Poss R 1980 Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res (151): 169–178

Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Notzli H, Siebenrock KA (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res (417): 112–120

Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) »Modes of failure« of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res (141): 17–27

Haddad RJ Jr, Cook SD, Thomas KA (1987) Biological fixation of porous-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(9): 1459–1466CrossRefPubMed

Hart AJ, Satchithananda K, Liddle AD, Sabah SA, McRobbie D, Henckel J, Cobb JP, Skinner JA, Mitchell AW (2012) Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(4): 317–325CrossRefPubMed

Hartofilakidis G, Stamos K, Karachalios T, Ioannidis TT, Zacharakis N (1996) Congenital hip disease in adults. Classification of acetabular deficiencies and operative treatment with acetabuloplasty combined with total hip

arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(5): 683–692

Hauptfleisch J, Pandit H, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Murray DW, Ostlere S (2012) A MRI classification of periprosthetic soft tissue masses (pseudotumours) associated with metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol 41(2): 149–155CrossRefPubMed

Hodge WA, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO (1991) A relationship between stem orientation and function following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 6(3): 229–235CrossRefPubMed

Hug KT, Alton TB, Gee AO (2015) Classifications in Brief. Brooker Classification of Heterotopic Ossification After Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473: 2154–2157CrossRefPubMed

Iorio R, Siegel J, Specht LM, Tilzey JF, Hartman A, Healy WL (2009) A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe? J Arthroplasty 24(2): 175–179CrossRefPubMed

Jacofsky DJ, Della Valle CJ, Meneghini RM, Sporer SM, Cercek RM, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2010) Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(5): 1282–1292PubMed

Jakubowitz E, Bitsch RG, Heisel C, Lee C, Kretzer JP, Thomsen MN (2008) Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: an in vitro comparison. J Biomech 41(14): 3078–3084CrossRefPubMed

Johnston C, Kerr J, Ford S, O’Byrne J, Eustace S (2007) MRI as a problem- solving tool in unexplained failed total hip replacement following conventional assessment. Skeletal Radiol 36(10): 955–961CrossRefPubMed

Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4): 494–502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

King RJ, Makrides P, Gill JA, Karthikeyan S, Krikler SJ, Griffin DR (2009) A novel method of accurately calculating the radiological magnification of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(9): 1217–1222CrossRefPubMed

Kundel K (2012) Schenkelhalsfrakturen. In: Haas NP, Krettek C (Hrsg) Tscherne Unfallchirurgie Hüfte und Oberschenkel. Springer, Heidelberg,

S. 113–170 Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C 2007 The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370(9597): 1508–1519

Lewallen DG, Fehring TK, Dennis DA, Scuderi GR (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty: surgical techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 5): 69–71CrossRefPubMed

Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60(2): 217–220CrossRefPubMed

Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (2009) Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(11): 2895–2900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lonner JH, Fehring TK, Hanssen AD et al. (2009) Revision total knee arthroplasty: the preoperative evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 Suppl 5: 64–68CrossRefPubMed

Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD (2007) Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(8): 1832–1842PubMed

Maloney E, Ha AS, Miller TT (2015) Imaging of adverse reactions to metal debris. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19(1): 21–30CrossRefPubMed

McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME (1995) Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(6): 865–869PubMed

Meermans G, Malik A, Witt J, Haddad F (2011) Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(6): 1677–1682CrossRefPubMed

Merle C, Waldstein W, Pegg E et al. (2012) Femoral offset is underestimated on anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis but accurately assessed on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(4): 477–482CrossRefPubMed

Merle C, Waldstein W, Gregory JS et al. (2014) How many different types of femora are there in primary hip osteoarthritis? An active shape modeling study. J Orthop Res 32(3): 413–422CrossRefPubMed

Morgan-Jones R, Oussedik SI, Graichen H, Haddad FS (2015) Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 97-B(2): 147–149CrossRefPubMed

Mukherjee K, Pandit H, Dodd CA, Ostlere S, Murray DW (2008) The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiological perspective. Clin Radiol 63(10): 1169–1176CrossRefPubMed

Müller-Mai C, Ekkernkamp A (2010) Frakturen. Klassifikation und Behandlungsoptionen. Springer HeidelbergCrossRef

Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res (235): 148–165

Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, Achten J, Dhillon M, Krikler SJ (2010) The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: Five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1): 56–60CrossRefPubMed

Paprosky WG, Burnett RS (2002) Assessment and classification of bone stock deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 31(8): 459–464

Parvizi J, Haddad FS (2015) Periprosthetic joint infection: the last frontier. Bone Joint J 97-B(9): 1157–1158CrossRefPubMed

Pfirrmann CW, Mengiardi B, Dora C, Kalberer F, Zanetti M, Hodler J (2006) Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients. Radiology 240(3): 778–785CrossRefPubMed

Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (208): 108–113

Potter HG, Foo LF (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 37(3): 361–373CrossRefPubMed

Rand JA (1999) Planning for revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 48: 161–166PubMed

Robertsson O, Ranstam J, Sundberg M, A WD, Lidgren L (2014) The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a review. Bone Joint Res 3(7): 217–222

Rubash HE (1998) Osteolysis: dealing with the consequences. Orthopedics 21(9): 949–950PubMed

Saleh KJ, Hoeffel DP, Kassim RA, Burstein G (2003a) Complications after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (Suppl 1): S71–74

Saleh KJ, Rand JA, McQueen DA (2003b) Current status of revision total knee arthroplasty: how do we assess results? J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (Suppl 1): S18–20

Sandgren B, Crafoord J, Garellick G, Carlsson L, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona H (2013) Computed tomography vs. digital radiography assessment for detection of osteolysis in asymptomatic patients with uncemented cups: a proposal for a new classification system based on computer tomography. J Arthroplasty 28(9): 1608–1613CrossRefPubMed

Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J (2014) Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today–has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty 29(9): 1774–1778CrossRefPubMed

Sneag DB, Bogner EA, Potter HG (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the painful total knee arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 19(1): 40–48CrossRefPubMed

Streit MR, Merle C, Clarius M, Aldinger PR (2011) Late peri-prosthetic femoral fracture as a major mode of failure in uncemented primary hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2): 178–183CrossRefPubMed

Weber MA, Egermann M, Thierjung H, Kloth JK (2015) Moderne radiologische postoperative Diagnostik des Hüftgelenks im Kindes- und Erwachsenenalter. Fortschr Röntgenstr 187(7): 525–542

Weber MA, Merle C, Rehnitz C, Gotterbarm T (2016) Moderne radiologische Bildgebung der Arthrose des Hüftgelenks unter Berücksichtigung der Präarthrosen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 188 (7): 635–651

Zilkens C, Jager M, Bittersohl B et al. (2009) Delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): molecular MRI of hip joint cartilage. Orthopade 38(7): 591–599 98

Titel: Bildgebung der Endoprothetik
verfasst von: PD Dr. med. T. Gotterbarm
PD Dr. med. C. Merle
Dr. med. J. K. Kloth
PD Dr. med. S. Kinkel
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Kompendium Orthopädische Bildgebung
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-50524-3

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-50525-0

Copyright-Jahr: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-50525-0_2

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

18.04.2024 | Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin | Nachrichten

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

2. Bildgebung der Endoprothetik

Zusammenfassung

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Quantitative Angiografie könnte IVUS-Alternative darstellen

Update Radiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

Studie bestätigt Potenzial von KI in der Radiologie

Quantitative Angiografie könnte IVUS-Alternative darstellen

Update Radiologie