Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Sports Medicine
Erschienen in: Sports Medicine 11/2019

19.08.2019 | Review Article

Bio-Banding in Youth Sports: Background, Concept, and Application

verfasst von: Robert M. Malina, Sean P. Cumming, Alan D. Rogol, Manuel J. Coelho-e-Silva, Antonio J. Figueiredo, Jan M. Konarski, Sławomir M. Kozieł

Erschienen in: Sports Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Inter-individual differences in size, maturity status, function, and behavior among youth of the same chronological age (CA) have long been a concern in grouping for sport. Bio-banding is a recent attempt to accommodate maturity-associated variation among youth in sport. The historical basis of the concept of maturity-matching and its relevance to youth sport, and bio-banding as currently applied are reviewed. Maturity matching in sport has often been noted but has not been systematically applied. Bio-banding is a recent iteration of maturity matching for grouping youth athletes into ‘bands’ or groups based on characteristic(s) other than CA. The percentage of predicted young adult height at the time of observation is the estimate of maturity status of choice. Several applications of bio-banding in youth soccer have indicated positive responses from players and coaches. Bio-banding reduces, but does not eliminate, maturity-associated variation. The potential utility of bio-banding for appropriate training loads, injury prevention, and fitness assessment merits closer attention, specifically during the interval of pubertal growth. The currently used height prediction equation requires further evaluation.
Fußnoten
1
Although Crampton is given credit for coining the term “physiological age”, he indicated that the credit “…properly belongs to … Franz Boas, who, with G. Stanley Hall and Luther H. Gulick, gave the author [Crampton] the encouragement of their approval and interest” (p. 52) [92]. Boas was an anthropologist with a primary interest in the study of growth and especially adolescence, Hall was a psychologist who focused on adolescence, and Gulick was a physician active in school physical education and physical training.
 
2
Krogman worked under the direction of T.W. Todd at Western Reserve University in Cleveland in the 1930s; skeletal maturity was likely assessed with the atlas method of Todd [27], which was in the process of development at this time.
 
Literatur
1.
Cumming SP, Lloyd RS, Oliver JL, et al. Bio-banding in sport: applications to competition, talent identification, and strength and conditioning of youth athletes. Strength Cond J. 2017;39:34–47.
2.
Horrocks JE. The psychology of adolescence: behavior and development. Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin; 1951.
3.
Tanner JM. Growth at adolescence. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1962.
4.
Beunen G (1989) Biological age in pediatric research. In: Bar-Or O (ed) Advances in pediatric sports sciences. Biological issues, Vol. 3. Champaign: Human Kinetics, pp. 1–39.
5.
Beunen G, Malina RM. Growth and physical performance relative to the timing of the adolescent spurt. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1988;16:503–40.PubMed
6.
Malina RM. Physical growth and biological maturation of young athletes. Exerc Sports Sci Rev. 1994;22:389–433.
7.
Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. 2nd ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2004.
8.
Malina RM, Beunen G. Matching of opponents in youth sports. In: Bar-Or O, editor. The child and adolescent athlete. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1996. p. 202–13.
9.
Beunen G, Malina RM. Growth and biologic maturation: relevance to athletic performance. In: Hebestreit H, Bar-Or O, editors. The young athlete. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2008. p. 3–17.
10.
Malina RM. Skeletal age and age verification in youth sport. Sports Med. 2011;41:925–47.PubMed
11.
12.
Saunders E. Teeth as a test of age considered with reference to the factory children: addressed to the members of both houses of parliament. London: H Renshaw; 1837.
13.
Saunders E. The teeth as a test of age. Lancet. 1938;30(774):492–6.
14.
Crampton CW. Pubescence: a preliminary report. Am Anthropol. 1904;6:705–9.
15.
16.
Crampton CW. Anatomical or chronological age: versus chronological age. Pedagogical Semin. 1908;15:230–7.
17.
Crampton CW. Physiological age—a fundamental principle. Am Phys Educ Rev. 1908;13:141–54.
18.
Rotch TM. Chronological and anatomical age early in life. JAMA. 1908;51:1197–205.
19.
Rotch TM. A study of the development of the bones in childhood by the roentgen method, with the view of establishing a developmental index for the grading of and the protection of early life. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1909;24:603–24.
20.
Foster WL. Physiological age as a basis for the classification of pupils entering high schools—relation of pubescence to height. Psychol Clin. 1910–1911;4:83–8.
21.
Baldwin BT. A measuring scale for physical growth and physiological age. Fifteenth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Bloomington:Public School Publishing Company; 1916. p. 11–23.
22.
Baldwin BT. The physical growth of children from birth to maturity. University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare, Vol. 1. Iowa City: The University; 1921. p. 1–411.
23.
Dimock HS. A research in adolescence. 1. Pubescence and physical growth. Child Develop. 1935;6:177–95.
24.
Dimock HS. Rediscovering the adolescent: a study of personality development in adolescent boys. New York: Association Press; 1937.
25.
Rotch TM, Smith HW. A study of the development of the epiphyses of the hand and wrist for the purpose of classifying cadets at Annapolis. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1910;25:200–10.
26.
Smith HW. Rotch method of roentgenographic age determination. US Naval Med Bull. 1913;7:1–20.
27.
Todd TW. Atlas of skeletal maturation. St. Louis: Mosby; 1937.
28.
American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation. Desirable athletic competition for children: joint committee report. Washington, DC: American Association for Health Physical Education and Recreation; 1952.
29.
Stotz CE, Baldwin MW. At bat with Little League. Philadelphia: Macrae Smith Company; 1952.
30.
Hale CJ. Physiologic maturity of Little League baseball players. Res Q. 1956;27:276–84.
31.
Krogman WM. Maturation age of 55 boys in the little league world series, 1957. Res Q. 1959;30:54–6.
32.
Malina RM. Biological maturity status of young athletes. In: Malina RM, editor. Young athletes: biological, psychological and educational perspectives. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 1988. p. 121–40.
33.
Malina RM, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Figueiredo AJ. Growth and maturity status of youth players. In: Williams AM, editor. Science and soccer: developing elite performers. 3rd ed. Abington: Routledge; 2013. p. 307–32.
34.
Beunen GP, Rogol AD, Malina RM. Indicators of biological maturation and secular changes in biological maturation. Food Nutr Bull. 2006;27:S244–56.PubMed
35.
Malina RM, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Figueiredo AJ, et al. Tanner-Whitehouse skeletal ages in male youth soccer players: TW2 or TW3? Sports Med. 2018;48:991–1008.PubMed
36.
Malina RM. Assessment of biological maturation. In: Armstrong N, van Mechelen W, editors. Oxford textbook of children’s exercise science and medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. p. 3–11.
37.
Van Wieringen JC, Wafelbakker F, Verbrugge HP, De Haas JH. Growth diagrams 1965 Netherlands. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoof Publishing; 1971.
38.
Roche AF, Wellens R, Attie KM, Siervogel RM. The timing of sexual maturation in a group of US White youths. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1995;8:11–8.PubMed
39.
Roche AF, Tyleshevski F, Rogers E. Non-invasive measurement of physical maturity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1983;54:364–71.
40.
Malina RM. Top 10 research questions related to growth and maturation of relevance to physical activity, performance, and fitness. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014;85:157–73.PubMed
41.
Nicolson AB, Hanley C. Indices of physiological maturity: deviation and interrelationships. Child Dev. 1953;24:3–38.PubMed
42.
Bielicki T, Koniarek J, Malina RM. Interrelationships among certain measures of growth and maturation rate in boys during adolescence. Ann Hum Biol. 1984;11:201–10.PubMed
43.
Bielicki T. Interrelationships between various measures of maturation rate in girls during adolescence. Stud Phys Anthrop. (Wrocław, Poland). 1975;1:51–64.
44.
Malina RM, Rogol AD, Cumming SP, et al. Biological maturation of youth athletes: assessment and implications. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:852–9.PubMed
45.
Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones ADG, Bailey DA, Beunen GP. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:689–94.PubMed
46.
Moore SA, McKay HA, Macdonald H, et al. Enhancing a somatic maturity prediction model. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47:1755–64.PubMed
47.
Malina RM, Kozieł SM. Validation of maturity offset in a longitudinal sample of Polish boys. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:424–37.PubMed
48.
Malina RM, Kozieł SM. Validation of maturity offset in a longitudinal sample of Polish girls. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:1374–82.PubMed
49.
Kozieł SM, Malina RM. Modified maturity offset prediction equations: validation in independent longitudinal samples of boys and girls. Sports Med. 2018;48:221–36.PubMed
50.
Malina RM, Choh AC, Czerwinski SA, Chumlea WC. Validation of maturity offset in the Fels longitudinal Study. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2016;28:439–55.PubMed
51.
52.
Ferguson A. Leading. London: Hoddler and Stoughton; 2015.
53.
Price RJ, Hawkins RD, Hulse MA, et al. The Football Association medical research programme: an audit of injuries in academy youth football. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:466–71.PubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Weigerinck JI, Yntema C, Brouwer HJ, Struijs PAA. Incidence of calcaneal apophysitis in the general population. Eur J Pediatr. 2014;173:677–9.
55.
Gholve PA, Scher DM, Khakharia S, et al. Osgood Schlatter syndrome. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;19:44–50.PubMed
56.
Willie MC. Revised maturity and physical fitness standards for the selection/classification screening procedures: the selection/classification program procedures for implementation of the regulations of the Commissioner of Education regarding athletic eligibility standards for pupils of advanced or delayed maturity. Albany: University of the State of New York; 1982.
57.
University of the State of New York. Athletic placement process for interschool athletic programs. Albany: University of the State of New York, New York State Education Department, Office of Curriculum and Instruction; 2015.
58.
University Interscholastic League. 2018–2019 junior high school athletics coaches manual. Austin: University Interscholastic League; 2018.
59.
Iowa High School Athletic Association. Junior high sports manual. Boone: Iowa High School Athletic Association; 2017.
60.
Bayley N, Pinneau SR. Tables for predicting adult height from skeletal age: revised for use with the Greulich-Pyle hand standards. J Pediatr 1952;423–41.PubMed
61.
Bayer LM, Bayley N. Growth diagnosis: selected methods for interpreting and predicting development from 1 year to maturity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1959.
62.
Roche AF, Wainer H, Thissen D. The RWT method for the prediction of adult stature. Pediatrics. 1975;56:1026–33.
63.
Roche AF, Wainer H, Thissen D. Predicting adult stature for individuals. Monographs in Paediatrics 3. Basel: Karger; 1975.
64.
Khamis HJ, Guo S. Improvement in the Roche–Wainer–Thissen stature prediction model: a comparative study. Am J Hum Biol. 1993;5:669–79.PubMed
65.
Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Cameron N, et al. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press; 1983.
66.
Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein H, et al. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method). 3rd ed. London: Saunders; 2001.
67.
Khamis HJ, Roche AF. Predicting adult stature without using skeletal age: the Khamis–Roche method. Pediatrics 1994; 94: 504–7 [Erratum in Pediatrics 1995;95:457 (corrected tables)].
68.
Roche AF. Growth, maturation and body composition: the Fels Longitudinal Study 1929–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
69.
Cumming SP, Brown DJ, Mitchell S, et al. Premier League academy soccer players’ experiences of competing in a tournament bio-banded for biological maturation. J Sports Sci. 2018;36:757–65.PubMed
70.
Cumming SP, Searle C, Hemsley JK, et al. Biological maturation, relative age and self-regulation in male professional academy soccer players: a test of the underdog hypothesis. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;39:147–53.
71.
Thomas CH. A pilot study of the demands of chronological age group and bio-banded match play in elite youth soccer [dissertation]. Cardiff: Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff School of Sport; 2017.
72.
Thomas CH, Oliver J, Kelly A, Knapman H. A pilot study of the demands of chronological age group and bio-banded match play in elite youth soccer [poster]. British Assoc Sports Exerc Sci, University of St Mark and St John, Plymouth, Devon, 12–13 Apr 2017.
73.
74.
Preece MA. Prediction of adult height: methods and problems. Acta Paediatr Scand Suppl. 1988;347:4–11.PubMed
75.
Cumming SP, Hill M, Mitchell SB. US Soccer: bio-banded tournament report. Bath: University of Bath; 2018.
76.
Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Thissen D. Assessing the skeletal maturity of the hand-wrist: Fels method. Springfield: CC Thomas; 1988.
77.
Malina RM, Dompier TP, Powell JW, et al. Validation of a noninvasive maturity estimate relative to skeletal age in youth football players. Clin J Sports Med. 2007;17:362–8.
78.
Malina RM, Coelho e Silva MJ, Figueiredo AJ, et al. Interrelationships among invasive and non-invasive indicators of biological maturation in adolescent male soccer players. J Sports Sci 2012;30:1705–17.PubMed
79.
Bunce J. The future of soccer in the United States, part 3: high performance [paper]. US Soccer conference—US Soccer Coaches Convention; 9–13 Jan 2019; Chicago.
80.
Malina RM, Cumming SP, Morano PJ, et al. Maturity status of youth football players: a noninvasive estimate. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1044–52.PubMed
81.
Figueiredo AJ, Gonçalves CE, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Malina RM. Youth soccer players, 11–14 years: maturity, size, function, skill and goal orientation. Ann Hum Biol. 2009;36:60–73.PubMed
82.
83.
Molinari L, Gasser T, Largo R. A comparison of skeletal maturity and growth. Ann Hum Biol. 2013;40:333–40.PubMed
84.
Tillmann V, Clayton PE. Diurnal variation in height and the reliability of height measurements using stretched and unstretched techniques in the evaluation of short term growth. Ann Hum Biol. 2001;28:195–206.PubMed
85.
Cole TJ. Seasonality of growth. In: Ulijaszek SJ, Johnston FE, Preece MA, editors. The Cambridge encyclopedia of human growth and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 223.
86.
Coelho-e-Silva SJ, Figueiredo AJ, Simões F, et al. Discrimination of U-14 soccer players by level and position. Int J Sports Med. 2010;31:390–6.
87.
Huijgen BCH, Elferink-Gemser MT, Lemmink KAPM, Visscher C. Multidimensional performance characteristics in selected and deselected talented soccer players. Eur J Sport Sci. 2010;14:2–10.
88.
Figueiredo AJ, Goncalves CE, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Malina RM. Characteristics of youth soccer players who drop out, persist or move up. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:883–91.PubMed
89.
Figueiredo AJ, Coelho-e-Silva MJ, Cumming SP, Malina RM. Relative age effect: characteristics of youth soccer players by birth quarter and subsequent playing status. J Sports Sci. 2019;37:677–84.PubMed
90.
Johnson A, Farooq A, Whiteley R. Skeletal maturation status is more strongly associated with academy selection than birth quarter. Sci Med Football. 2017;1:157–63.
91.
Mann DL, van Ginneken PJMA. Age-ordered shirt numbering reduces the selection bias associated with the relative age effect. J Sports Sci 2017;784–90.PubMed
92.
Crampton CW. Statement of C. W. Crampton, M.D. Child Develop. 1944;15:52 (this number of the journal includes a reprint of Crampton [17]: Physiological age: a fundamental principle. Child Develop. 1944;15:3–51. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2307/​1125405).
Metadaten
Titel
Bio-Banding in Youth Sports: Background, Concept, and Application
verfasst von
Robert M. Malina
Sean P. Cumming
Alan D. Rogol
Manuel J. Coelho-e-Silva
Antonio J. Figueiredo
Jan M. Konarski
Sławomir M. Kozieł
Publikationsdatum
19.08.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Sports Medicine / Ausgabe 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01166-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2019

Sports Medicine 11/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Systematic Review

Determining the Sites of Neural Adaptations to Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Review Article

Resistance Training and Skeletal Muscle Protein Metabolism in Eumenorrheic Females: Implications for Researchers and Practitioners

Original Research Article

Comparing the Effectiveness of Blood Flow Restriction and Traditional Heavy Load Resistance Training in the Post-Surgery Rehabilitation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients: A UK National Health Service Randomised Controlled Trial

Systematic Review

Effectiveness of Education Interventions Designed to Improve Nutrition Knowledge in Athletes: A Systematic Review

Commentary

How the 2018 US Physical Activity Guidelines are a Call to Promote and Better Understand Acute Physical Activity for Cognitive Function Gains

Systematic Review

Quality of Life and Life Satisfaction in Former Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

18.04.2024 | Wirbelsäulenmetastase | Nachrichten

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

16.04.2024 | Spondylitis ankylosans | Nachrichten

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

15.04.2024 | Knie-TEP | Nachrichten

Brustkrebs in der Vorgeschichte macht Gelenkersatz komplikationsträchtiger

11.04.2024 | Spondyloarthritiden | Nachrichten

Zwei neue Alternativen zu TNF-Inhibitoren bei axSpA
weitere anzeigen

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise