Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health 5/2016

02.11.2015 | Original Paper

Bioethics, Religion, and Public Policy: Intersections, Interactions, and Solutions

verfasst von: Peter A. Kahn

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Bioethics in America positions itself as a totalizing discipline, capable of providing guidance to any individual within the boundaries of a health or medical setting. Yet the religiously observant or those driven by spiritual values have not universally accepted decisions made by “secular” bioethics, and as a result, religious bioethical thinkers and adherents have developed frameworks and rich counter-narratives used to fend off encroachment by policies perceived as threatening. This article uses brain death in Jewish law, the case of Jahi McMath, and vaccination refusal to observe how the religious system of ethics is presently excluded from bioethics and its implications.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Burkle, C. M., Schipper, A. M., & Wijdicks, E. F. (2011). Brain death and the courts. Neurology, 76(9), 837–841.CrossRefPubMed Burkle, C. M., Schipper, A. M., & Wijdicks, E. F. (2011). Brain death and the courts. Neurology, 76(9), 837–841.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Burkle, C. M., Sharp, R. R., & Wijdicks, E. F. (2014). Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion. Neurology, 83, 1464–1469.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burkle, C. M., Sharp, R. R., & Wijdicks, E. F. (2014). Why brain death is considered death and why there should be no confusion. Neurology, 83, 1464–1469.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat CDC. (2013). Notes from the field: Measles outbreak among members of a religious community—Brooklyn, New York, March–June 2013. Retrieved April 16, 2015, from http://perma.cc/E8DK-JVNX CDC. (2013). Notes from the field: Measles outbreak among members of a religious community—Brooklyn, New York, March–June 2013. Retrieved April 16, 2015, from http://​perma.​cc/​E8DK-JVNX
Zurück zum Zitat Fredrickson, D. D., Davis, T. C., Arnould, C. L., Kennen, E. M., Humiston, S. G., Cross, J. T., & Bocchini, J. A. (2004). Childhood immunization refusal: Provider and parent perceptions. FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY, 36, 431–439. Fredrickson, D. D., Davis, T. C., Arnould, C. L., Kennen, E. M., Humiston, S. G., Cross, J. T., & Bocchini, J. A. (2004). Childhood immunization refusal: Provider and parent perceptions. FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY, 36, 431–439.
Zurück zum Zitat Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History, 106(2), 16–22. Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History, 106(2), 16–22.
Zurück zum Zitat Korein, J. (1978). The problem of brain death: Development and history. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 315(1), 19–38.CrossRefPubMed Korein, J. (1978). The problem of brain death: Development and history. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 315(1), 19–38.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Salmon, D. A., Moulton, L. H., Omer, S. B., Patricia deHart, M., Stokley, S., & Halsey, N. A. (2005). Factors associated with refusal of childhood vaccines among parents of school-aged children: A case-control study. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(5), 470–476.CrossRefPubMed Salmon, D. A., Moulton, L. H., Omer, S. B., Patricia deHart, M., Stokley, S., & Halsey, N. A. (2005). Factors associated with refusal of childhood vaccines among parents of school-aged children: A case-control study. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159(5), 470–476.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shabtai, D. (2012). Defining the moment: Understanding brain death in Halakhah. New York: Shoresh. Shabtai, D. (2012). Defining the moment: Understanding brain death in Halakhah. New York: Shoresh.
Zurück zum Zitat Streefland, P., Chowdhury, A., & Ramos-Jimenez, P. (1999). Patterns of vaccination acceptance. Social Science and Medicine, 49(12), 1705–1716.CrossRefPubMed Streefland, P., Chowdhury, A., & Ramos-Jimenez, P. (1999). Patterns of vaccination acceptance. Social Science and Medicine, 49(12), 1705–1716.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Wijdicks, E. F., Varelas, P. N., Gronseth, G. S., Greer, D. M., & American Academy of Neurology. (2010). Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology, 74(23), 1911–1918. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e242a8.CrossRefPubMed Wijdicks, E. F., Varelas, P. N., Gronseth, G. S., Greer, D. M., & American Academy of Neurology. (2010). Evidence-based guideline update: determining brain death in adults: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology, 74(23), 1911–1918. doi:10.​1212/​WNL.​0b013e3181e242a8​.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Bioethics, Religion, and Public Policy: Intersections, Interactions, and Solutions
verfasst von
Peter A. Kahn
Publikationsdatum
02.11.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0144-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Journal of Religion and Health 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe