Background
Methods
Patients
MRI
CSF analysis
Stepwise approach
Step 1: obtain progression probability
Step 2: refine prognosis using a stepwise approach
Step 3: classification performance comparison
Evaluation of stepwise approach
Results
Total n = 402 | Non-progressors n = 213 | Progressors n = 189 | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | 66 ± 8 | 65 ± 8 | 67 ± 8 |
Sex, No. F (%) | 164 (41%) | 76 (36%) | 88 (47%) |
MMSE | 27 ± 2 | 27 ± 2 | 26 ± 3 |
Follow-up | 3 ± 2 | 3 ± 2 | 3 ± 2 |
MRI | |||
HCV (cm3, sum) | 6.8 ± 1 | 7.1 ± 1 | 6.5 ± 1 |
CSF | |||
Abeta (1-42) pg/ml | 778 (652–1083) | 976 (732–1191) | 686 (596–783) |
t-tau pg/ml | 397 (265–626) | 291 (207–422) | 566 (379–794) |
pTau pg/ml | 62 (44–85) | 51 (36–69) | 76 (59–100) |
Demographics only model | Demographics and MRI model | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Not selected Low prob. N = 103 | Selected N = 199 | Not selected High prob. N = 100 | Not selected Low prob. N = 100 | Selected N = 202 | Not selected High prob. N = 100 | |
Age | 60 ± 7 | 66 ± 7 | 71 ± 7 | 60 ± 7 | 66 ± 7 | 70 ± 7 |
Sex, No. F (%) | 10 (10%) | 81 (41%) | 73 (73%) | 28 (28%) | 119 (59%) | 47 (47%) |
MMSE | 28 ± 1 | 27 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 | 28 ± 1 | 27 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 |
MRI | ||||||
HCV (cm3, sum) | 7.3 ± 1 | 6.8 ± 1 | 6.3 ± 1 | 7.6 ± 1 | 6.8 ± 1 | 6.0 ± 1 |
CSF | ||||||
Abeta (1-42) pg/ml | 995 ± 301 | 844 ± 278 | 768 ± 235 | 976 ± 311 | 851 ± 276 | 778 ± 245 |
t-tau pg/ml | 332 ± 192 | 516 ± 372 | 564 ± 312 | 360 ± 234 | 489 ± 294 | 585 ± 433 |
pTau pg/ml | 52 ± 24 | 72 ± 37 | 77 ± 34 | 56 ± 26 | 69 ± 33 | 79 ± 40 |