Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Konkret geht es um den Diabetes-Patienten mit kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen oder Risiken, die Herzinsuffizienz sowie die kardiovaskuläre Primär- und Sekundärprävention. Sind Sie hier schon auf dem neuesten Stand? Unsere Experten beleuchten, wo und warum das bisherige Procedere geändert werden soll und was in der Praxis sinnvoll ist. Holen Sie sich Ihr Update und 2 CME-Punkte beim MMW-Webinar am 24. April von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Translational Stroke Research
Erschienen in: Translational Stroke Research 1/2017

01.06.2016 | SI: Present and future of neuroplasticity in CNS recovery

Biomaterials for Enhancing CNS Repair

verfasst von: Teck Chuan Lim, Myron Spector

Erschienen in: Translational Stroke Research | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The health of the central nervous system (CNS) does not only rely on the state of the neural cells but also on how various extracellular components organize cellular behaviors into proper tissue functions. Biomaterials have been valuable in restoring or augmenting the roles of extracellular components in the CNS in the event of injury and disease. In this review, we highlight how biomaterials have been enabling tools in important therapeutic strategies involving cell transplantation and drug/protein delivery. We further discuss advances in biomaterial design and applications that can potentially be translated into the CNS to provide unprecedented benefits.
Literatur
1.
Purushothaman A, Sugahara K, Faissner A. Chondroitin sulfate ‘wobble motifs’ modulate maintenance and differentiation of neural stem cells and their progeny. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:2935–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Lang BT et al. Modulation of the proteoglycan receptor PTPσ promotes recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature. 2015;518:404–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Orive G, Anitua E, Pedraz JL, Emerich DF. Biomaterials for promoting brain protection, repair and regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:682–92.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Cooke MJ, Vulic K, Shoichet MS. Design of biomaterials to enhance stem cell survival when transplanted into the damaged central nervous system. Soft Matter. 2010;6:4988.CrossRef
5.
Khaing ZZ, Thomas RC, Geissler SA, Schmidt CE. Advanced biomaterials for repairing the nervous system: what can hydrogels do for the brain? Mater Today. 2014;17:332–40.CrossRef
6.
Skop NB, Calderon F, Cho CH, Gandhi CD, Levison SW. Improvements in biomaterial matrices for neural precursor cell transplantation. Mol Cell Ther. 2014;2:19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Park KI, Teng YD, Snyder EY. The injured brain interacts reciprocally with neural stem cells supported by scaffolds to reconstitute lost tissue. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:1111–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Jin K et al. Transplantation of human neural precursor cells in Matrigel scaffolding improves outcome from focal cerebral ischemia after delayed postischemic treatment in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:534–44.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Guan J et al. Transplantation of human mesenchymal stem cells loaded on collagen scaffolds for the treatment of traumatic brain injury in rats. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5937–46.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Tate CC et al. Laminin and fibronectin scaffolds enhance neural stem cell transplantation into the injured brain. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2009;3:208–17.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Bible E et al. The support of neural stem cells transplanted into stroke-induced brain cavities by PLGA particles. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2985–94.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Wang T-Y, Forsythe JS, Nisbet DR, Parish CL. Promoting engraftment of transplanted neural stem cells/progenitors using biofunctionalised electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2012;33:9188–97.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zhang J et al. Physically associated synthetic hydrogels with long-term covalent stabilization for cell culture and stem cell transplantation. Adv Mater. 2011;23:5098–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
He L et al. Surface modification of PLLA nano-scaffolds with laminin multilayer by LbL assembly for enhancing neurite outgrowth. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13:1601–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Mahairaki V et al. Nanofiber matrices promote the neuronal differentiation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural precursors in vitro. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17:855–63.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Lévesque SG, Shoichet MS. Synthesis of cell-adhesive dextran hydrogels and macroporous scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2006;27:5277–85.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Flanagan LA, Rebaza LM, Derzic S, Schwartz PH, Monuki ES. Regulation of human neural precursor cells by laminin and integrins. J Neurosci Res. 2006;83:845–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Nakaji-Hirabayashi T, Kato K, Iwata H. Improvement of neural stem cell survival in collagen hydrogels by incorporating laminin-derived cell adhesive polypeptides. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23:212–21.CrossRefPubMed
19.
He L et al. Synergistic effects of electrospun PLLA fiber dimension and pattern on neonatal mouse cerebellum C17.2 stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:2960–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Lim SH, Liu XY, Song H, Yarema KJ, Mao H-Q. The effect of nanofiber-guided cell alignment on the preferential differentiation of neural stem cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31:9031–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Christopherson GT, Song H, Mao H-Q. The influence of fiber diameter of electrospun substrates on neural stem cell differentiation and proliferation. Biomaterials. 2009;30:556–64.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, Nasr-Esfahani M-H, Ramakrishna S. Electrospun poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29:4532–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Yang F, Murugan R, Wang S, Ramakrishna S. Electrospinning of nano/micro scale poly(L-lactic acid) aligned fibers and their potential in neural tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2603–10.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Teng YD et al. Functional recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury mediated by a unique polymer scaffold seeded with neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:3024–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Wong DY, Krebsbach PH, Hollister SJ. Brain cortex regeneration affected by scaffold architectures. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:715–22.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Cui Y, Xu Q, Chow PK-H, Wang D, Wang C-H. Transferrin-conjugated magnetic silica PLGA nanoparticles loaded with doxorubicin and paclitaxel for brain glioma treatment. Biomaterials. 2013;34:8511–20.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Mishra V et al. Targeted brain delivery of AZT via transferrin anchored pegylated albumin nanoparticles. J Drug Target. 2006;14:45–53.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Karatas H et al. A nanomedicine transports a peptide caspase-3 inhibitor across the blood-brain barrier and provides neuroprotection. J Neurosci. 2009;29:13761–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Liu L et al. Biologically active core/shell nanoparticles self-assembled from cholesterol-terminated PEG-TAT for drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1509–17.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Ke W et al. Gene delivery targeted to the brain using an Angiopep-conjugated polyethyleneglycol-modified polyamidoamine dendrimer. Biomaterials. 2009;30:6976–85.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Costantino L et al. Peptide-derivatized biodegradable nanoparticles able to cross the blood-brain barrier. J Control Release. 2005;108:84–96.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Tamargo RJ et al. Interstitial chemotherapy of the 9L gliosarcoma: controlled release polymers for drug delivery in the brain. Cancer Res. 1993;53:329–33.PubMed
33.
Emerich DF et al. Injectable VEGF hydrogels produce near complete neurological and anatomical protection following cerebral ischemia in rats. Cell Transplant. 2010;19:1063–71.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Nakaguchi K et al. Growth factors released from gelatin hydrogel microspheres increase new neurons in the adult mouse brain. Stem Cells Int. 2012;2012:915160.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Taylor SJ, Sakiyama-Elbert SE. Effect of controlled delivery of neurotrophin-3 from fibrin on spinal cord injury in a long term model. J Control Release. 2006;116:204–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Gupta D, Tator CH, Shoichet MS. Fast-gelling injectable blend of hyaluronan and methylcellulose for intrathecal, localized delivery to the injured spinal cord. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2370–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Kang CE, Poon PC, Tator CH, Shoichet MS. A new paradigm for local and sustained release of therapeutic molecules to the injured spinal cord for neuroprotection and tissue repair. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15:595–604.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Cooke MJ, Wang Y, Morshead CM, Shoichet MS. Controlled epi-cortical delivery of epidermal growth factor for the stimulation of endogenous neural stem cell proliferation in stroke-injured brain. Biomaterials. 2011;32:5688–97.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Wang Y, Cooke MJ, Morshead CM, Shoichet MS. Hydrogel delivery of erythropoietin to the brain for endogenous stem cell stimulation after stroke injury. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2681–92.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Hu X et al. Microglia/macrophage polarization dynamics reveal novel mechanism of injury expansion after focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2012;43:3063–70.CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
Kigerl KA et al. Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2009;29:13435–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Rapalino O et al. Implantation of stimulated homologous macrophages results in partial recovery of paraplegic rats. Nat Med. 1998;4:814–21.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Shechter R et al. Infiltrating blood-derived macrophages are vital cells playing an anti-inflammatory role in recovery from spinal cord injury in mice. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Fridlender ZG et al. Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-beta: ‘N1’ versus ‘N2’ TAN. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:183–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
47.
Farina C, Aloisi F, Meinl E. Astrocytes are active players in cerebral innate immunity. Trends Immunol. 2007;28:138–45.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Mokarram N, Merchant A, Mukhatyar V, Patel G, Bellamkonda RV. Effect of modulating macrophage phenotype on peripheral nerve repair. Biomaterials. 2012;33:8793–801.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
49.
Spiller KL et al. Sequential delivery of immunomodulatory cytokines to facilitate the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages and enhance vascularization of bone scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2015;37:194–207.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Boehler RM et al. Lentivirus delivery of IL-10 to promote and sustain macrophage polarization towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111:1210–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
McBane JE, Matheson LA, Sharifpoor S, Santerre JP, Labow RS. Effect of polyurethane chemistry and protein coating on monocyte differentiation towards a wound healing phenotype macrophage. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5497–504.CrossRefPubMed
52.
53.
Garg K, Pullen NA, Oskeritzian CA, Ryan JJ, Bowlin GL. Macrophage functional polarization (M1/M2) in response to varying fiber and pore dimensions of electrospun scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2013;34:4439–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Almeida CR et al. Impact of 3-D printed PLA- and chitosan-based scaffolds on human monocyte/macrophage responses: unraveling the effect of 3-D structures on inflammation. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:613–22.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Macaya DJ, Hayakawa K, Arai K, Spector M. Astrocyte infiltration into injectable collagen-based hydrogels containing FGF-2 to treat spinal cord injury. Biomaterials. 2013;34:3591–602.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Huang KF, Hsu WC, Chiu WT, Wang JY. Functional improvement and neurogenesis after collagen-GAG matrix implantation into surgical brain trauma. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2067–75.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Ernst B, Magnani JL. From carbohydrate leads to glycomimetic drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8:661–77.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Huang ML, Smith RAA, Trieger GW, Godula K. Glycocalyx remodeling with proteoglycan mimetics promotes neural specification in embryonic stem cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:10565–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Liu P et al. Tailored chondroitin sulfate glycomimetics via a tunable multivalent scaffold for potentiating NGF/TrkA-induced neurogenesis. Chem Sci. 2015;6:450–6.CrossRef
60.
Karumbaiah L et al. Chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycan hydrogels create endogenous niches for neural stem cells. Bioconjug Chem. 2015;26:2336–49.CrossRefPubMed
61.
62.
Koshy ST, Ferrante TC, Lewin SA, Mooney DJ. Injectable, porous, and cell-responsive gelatin cryogels. Biomaterials. 2014;35:2477–87.CrossRefPubMed
63.
64.
Kim J et al. Injectable, spontaneously assembling, inorganic scaffolds modulate immune cells in vivo and increase vaccine efficacy. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:64–72.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Sztriha LK et al. Monitoring brain repair in stroke using advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke. 2012;43:3124–31.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Yang X et al. Injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel for 19F magnetic resonance imaging. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;110:95–9.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Kim J. Il, Kim, B., Chun, C., Lee, S. H. & Song, S.-C. MRI-monitored long-term therapeutic hydrogel system for brain tumors without surgical resection. Biomaterials. 2012;33:4836–42.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Zhang Y et al. Injectable in situ forming hybrid iron oxide-hyaluronic acid hydrogel for magnetic resonance imaging and drug delivery. Macromol Biosci. 2014;14:1249–59.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Chan KWY et al. MRI-detectable pH nanosensors incorporated into hydrogels for in vivo sensing of transplanted-cell viability. Nat Mater. 2013;12:268–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
70.
Liang Y et al. Label-free imaging of gelatin-containing hydrogel scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2015;42:144–50.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Dorsey SM et al. Visualization of injectable hydrogels using chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2015;1:227–37.CrossRef
72.
Richardson TP, Peters MC, Ennett AB, Mooney DJ. Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:1029–34.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Vulic K, Shoichet MS. Tunable growth factor delivery from injectable hydrogels for tissue engineering. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:882–5.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Lin C-C, Metters AT. Bifunctional monolithic affinity hydrogels for dual-protein delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:789–95.CrossRefPubMed
75.
76.
Lim TC et al. Chemotactic recruitment of adult neural progenitor cells into multifunctional hydrogels providing sustained SDF-1 release and compatible structural support. FASEB J. 2013;27:1023–33.CrossRefPubMed
77.
Santos T et al. Polymeric nanoparticles to control the differentiation of neural stem cells in the subventricular zone of the brain. ACS Nano. 2012;6:10463–74.CrossRefPubMed
78.
79.
Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polym(Basel). 2011;3:1377–97.
Metadaten
Titel
Biomaterials for Enhancing CNS Repair
verfasst von
Teck Chuan Lim
Myron Spector
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Translational Stroke Research / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1868-4483
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-601X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-016-0470-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Translational Stroke Research 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial

Mechanisms, Imaging, and Therapy in Stroke Recovery

Original Article

Enhanced Procoagulant Activity on Blood Cells after Acute Ischemic Stroke

SI: Present and future of neuroplasticity in CNS recovery

The Plasminogen Activation System Promotes Dendritic Spine Recovery and Improvement in Neurological Function After an Ischemic Stroke

SI: Present and future of neuroplasticity in CNS recovery

Neurogenesis in Stroke Recovery

Original Article

Translational MR Neuroimaging of Stroke and Recovery

Original Article

Interactive Voice Response—An Innovative Approach to Post-Stroke Depression Self-Management Support

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

18.04.2024 | Arterielle Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

18.04.2024 | Spinale Muskelatrophien | Nachrichten

Spinale Muskelatrophie: Neugeborenen-Screening lohnt sich

16.04.2024 | Maligne primäre ZNS-Tumoren | Nachrichten

Manche Gestagene können das Risiko für Meningeome erhöhen

15.04.2024 | Parkinson-Krankheit | Nachrichten

Parkinson: Größere Studie bestätigt Genauigkeit von Hauttest
weitere anzeigen

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise