We have received funding from Baui-Biotech, Taiwan, in the past five years.
SL carried out the FE analysis and drafted the manuscript. CH participated in the study design and discussion of the clinical results. CS constructed the FE model, performed the biomechanical analysis and participated in coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Pedicle-screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization devices are designed to alleviate the rate of accelerated degeneration of the vertebral level adjacent to the level of spinal fusion. A new pedicle- screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device- the Awesome Dynamic Rod System was designed with curve cuts on the rods to provide flexibility. The current study was conducted to evaluate the biomechanical properties of this new device.
Finite element models were developed for the intact spine (INT), the Awesome Dynamic Rod Implanted at L4-L5 (AWE), a traditional rigid rod system implanted at L4-L5 along with an interbody cage (FUS), and the Awesome Dynamic Rod System implanted at L4-L5 along with an interbody cage as an adjunct to fusion procedures and extension of dynamic fixation to L3-L4 (AWEFUS). The models were subjected to axial loads and pure moments and evaluated by a hybrid method on range of motion (ROM)s, disc stresses, pedicle screws stresses, and facet joint contact forces.
FUS sustained the lowest L4-L5 ROM decrement in flexion and torsion. AWE demonstrated the lowest adjacent level ROM increment in all moments except for extension at L3-L4, and AWEFUS showed the greatest ROM increment at L2-L3. AWE demonstrated lowest adjacent segment disc stress in flexion, lateral bending and torsion at L3-L4. AWEFUS showed the highest disc stress increment in flexion, extension, and lateral bending, and the lowest disc stress decrement in torsion at L2-L3. AWE sustained greater adjacent facet joint contact forces than did FUS in extension and lateral bending at L3-L4, and AWEFUS demonstrated the greatest contact forces concentrating at L2-L3.
The results demonstrate that the Awesome Dynamic Rod System preserved more bridged segment motion than did the traditional rigid rod fixation system except in extension. However, the Awesome Dynamic Rod System bore a greater facet joint contact force in extension. The Awesome Dynamic Rod System did protect the adjacent level of fusion segments, but led to much greater ROM, disc stresses, and facet joint contact forces increasing at the adjacent level of instrumented segments.
Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia N, Wellington KH, Dawson EG. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1497–503. PubMed
Chamoli U, Diwan AD, Tsafnat N. Pedicle screw‐based posterior dynamic stabilizers for degenerative spine: In vitro biomechanical testing and clinical outcomes. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2014;102(9):3324–40. CrossRef
Ozer AF. Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20(2):205–15. PubMed
Reyes-Sánchez A, Zárate-Kalfópulos B, Ramírez-Mora I, Rosales-Olivarez LM, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Sánchez-Bringas G. Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the Accuflex rod system as a stand-alone device: experience in 20 patients with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(12):2164–70. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Kaner T, Dalbayrak S, Oktenoglu T, Sasani M, Levent AA, Ozer AF. Comparison of posterior dynamic and posterior rigid transpedicular stabilization with fusion to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis. Orthopedics. 2010;33(5):309.
Awasthi D, Tender G, Thomas N. Juxtafusional outcomes with the dynamic posterior lumbar instrumentation. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: World Spine III; 2005.
Patel A, Welch WC. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with metal cages: current techniques. Oper Tech Orthop. 2000;10(4):311–9. CrossRef
Panjabi MM. Hybrid multidirectional test method to evaluate spinal adjacent-level effects. Clin Biomech. 2007;22(3):257–65. CrossRef
Mandigo CE, Sampath P, Kaiser MG. Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine: pedicle-based stabilization with the AccuFlex rod system. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22(1):1–4. CrossRef
Yu AK, Siegfried CM, Chew B, Hobbs J, Sabersky A, Jho DJ, et al. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic fusion systems in the lumbar spine: implications for stabilization with improved arthrodesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;10:1097.
Wolff J, Maquet P, Furlong R. The law of bone remodeling. Berlin: Springer; 1986. p. 126. CrossRef
Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s law for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 2004;74:3–15. PubMed
Ormond DR, Albert L Jr, Das K. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods in lumbar spine degenerative disease: A case series. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012. [Epub ahead of print].
- Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System) - a finite element analysis
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II