nach oben

Osteoporosis International

Erschienen in:

01.06.2011 | Bone Quality Seminars: Bone Fracture Healing and Strengthening

Biomechanics and tissue engineering

verfasst von: D. P. Pioletti

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 6/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Development of artificial scaffold for musculo-skeletal applications, especially in load-bearing situations, requires the consideration of biomechanical aspects for its integrity and its function. However, the biomechanical loading could also be used to favour tissue formation through mechano-transduction phenomena. Design of scaffold could take advantages of this intrinsic mechanical loading.

Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD (2000) Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 405(6787):704–706PubMedCrossRef

Ramaniraka NA, Leyvraz PF, Rakotomanana LR, Rubin PJ, Zysset PK (1996) Micromotion at the bone-stem interface during the gait cycle after cementless total hip replacement: influence of stem design and loading level. Hip Inter 6(2):51–58

Peter B, Gauthier O, Laib S, Bujoli B, Guicheux J, Janvier P et al (2006) Local delivery of bisphosphonate from coated orthopedic implants increases implants mechanical stability in osteoporotic rats. J Biomed Mater Res A 76(1):133–143PubMed

Chen CS (2008) Mechanotransduction—a field pulling together? J Cell Sci 121(Pt 20):3285–3292PubMedCrossRef

Jacobs CR, Yellowley CE, Davis BR, Zhou Z, Cimbala JM, Donahue HJ (1998) Differential effect of steady versus oscillating flow on bone cells. J Biomech 31(11):969–976PubMedCrossRef

Cavalcant-Adam EA, Shapiro IM, Composto RJ, Macarak EJ, Adams CS (2002) RGD peptides immobilized on a mechanically deformable surface promote osteoblast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res 17(12):2130–2140CrossRef

Lacouture ME, Schaffer JL, Klickstein LB (2002) A comparison of type I collagen, fibronectin, and vitronectin in supporting adhesion of mechanically strained osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 17(3):481–492PubMedCrossRef

Handschel J, Wiesmann HP, Stratmann U, Kleinheinz J, Meyer U, Joos U (2002) TCP is hardly resorbed and not osteoconductive in a non-loading calvarial model. Biomaterials 23(7):1689–1695PubMedCrossRef

Guldberg RE (2002) Consideration of mechanical factors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 961(6):312–314PubMedCrossRef

10.

Butler DL, Goldstein SA, Guilak F (2000) Functional tissue engineering: the role of biomechanics. J Biomech Eng 122(6):570–575PubMedCrossRef

11.

Tate ML, Knothe U (2000) An ex vivo model to study transport processes and fluid flow in loaded bone. J Biomech 33(2):247–254CrossRef

12.

Cowin SC (2001) Mechanics of materials. In: Cowin SC (ed) Bone mechanics handbook—2nd edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 6.1–6.16

13.

Ghanbari J, Naghdabadi R (2009) Nonlinear hierarchical multiscale modeling of cortical bone considering its nanoscale microstructure. J Biomech 42(10):1560–1565PubMedCrossRef

14.

Blecha LD, Zambelli PY, Ramaniraka NA, Bourban PE, Manson JA, Pioletti DP (2005) How plate positioning impacts the biomechanics of the open wedge tibial osteotomy; a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 8(5):307–313CrossRef

15.

Mathieu LM, Mueller TL, Bourban PE, Pioletti DP, Muller R, Manson JA (2006) Architecture and properties of anisotropic polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27(6):905–916PubMedCrossRef

16.

Meyer U, Joos U, Wiesmann HP (2004) Biological and biophysical principles in extracorporal bone tissue engineering. Part III International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 33(7):635–641CrossRef

17.

Brunski JB (1991) Influence of biomechanical factors at the bone–biomaterial interface. In: Davis JE (ed) The bone-biomaterial interface. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 391–405

18.

Stadelmann VA, Terrier A, Pioletti DP (2008) Microstimulation at the bone-implant interface upregulates osteoclast activation pathways. Bone 42(2):358–364PubMedCrossRef

19.

Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O'Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH (1997) In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(5):707–714PubMed

20.

Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Soballe K (1997) ESB Research Award 1996. Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech 30(6):539–548PubMedCrossRef

21.

Carter DR, Beaupre GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355(Suppl):S41–S55PubMedCrossRef

22.

Buchler P, Pioletti DP, Rakotomanana LR (2003) Biphasic constitutive laws for biological interface evolution. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 1(4):239–249PubMedCrossRef

23.

Behravesh E, Yasko AW, Engel PS, Mikos AG (1999) Synthetic biodegradable polymers for orthopaedic applications. Clin Orthop 367(Suppl):S118–S129PubMed

24.

Carter DR, Fyhrie DP, Whalen RT (1987) Trabecular bone density and loading history: regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy. J Biomech 20(8):785–794PubMedCrossRef

25.

Brazel E, Taylor D (2009) Predicting the structural integrity of bone defects repaired using bone graft materials. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 12(3):297–304CrossRef

26.

Williams JM, Adewunmi A, Schek RM, Flanagan CL, Krebsbach PH, Feinberg SE et al (2005) Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26(23):4817–4827PubMedCrossRef

27.

Sikavitsas VI, Temenoff JS, Mikos AG (2001) Biomaterials and bone mechanotransduction. Biomaterials 22(19):2581–2593PubMedCrossRef

28.

Klein-Nulend J, Bacabac RG, Mullender MG (2005) Mechanobiology of bone tissue. Pathol Biol (Paris) 53(10):576–580

29.

Bilodeau K, Mantovani D (2006) Bioreactors for tissue engineering: focus on mechanical constraints. A comparative review. Tissue Eng 12(8):2367–2383PubMedCrossRef

30.

Yu X, Botchwey EA, Levine EM, Pollack SR, Laurencin CT (2004) Bioreactor-based bone tissue engineering: the influence of dynamic flow on osteoblast phenotypic expression and matrix mineralization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(31):11203–11208PubMedCrossRef

31.

Datta N, Pham QP, Sharma U, Sikavitsas VI, Jansen JA, Mikos AG (2006) In vitro generated extracellular matrix and fluid shear stress synergistically enhance 3D osteoblastic differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(8):2488–2493PubMedCrossRef

32.

Mauney JR, Sjostorm S, Blumberg J, Horan R, O'Leary JP, Vunjak-Novakovic G et al (2004) Mechanical stimulation promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on 3-D partially demineralized bone scaffolds in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int 74(5):458–468PubMedCrossRef

33.

Jaecques SV, Van Oosterwyck H, Muraru L, Van Cleynenbreugel T, De Smet E, Wevers M et al (2004) Individualised, micro CT-based finite element modelling as a tool for biomechanical analysis related to tissue engineering of bone. Biomaterials 25(9):1683–1696PubMedCrossRef

34.

Milan JL, Planell JA, Lacroix D (2009) Computational modelling of the mechanical environment of osteogenesis within a polylactic acid-calcium phosphate glass scaffold. Biomaterials 30(25):4219–4226PubMedCrossRef

35.

Jungreuthmayer C, Donahue SW, Jaasma MJ, Al-Munajjed AA, Zanghellini J, Kelly DJ et al (2009) A comparative study of shear stresses in collagen-glycosaminoglycan and calcium phosphate scaffolds in bone tissue-engineering bioreactors. Tissue Eng A 15(5):1141–1149CrossRef

36.

Kelly DJ, Prendergast PJ (2006) Prediction of the optimal mechanical properties for a scaffold used in osteochondral defect repair. Tissue Eng 12(9):2509–2519PubMedCrossRef

37.

Sengers BG, Taylor M, Please CP, Oreffo RO (2007) Computational modelling of cell spreading and tissue regeneration in porous scaffolds. Biomaterials 28(10):1926–1940PubMedCrossRef

38.

Martin I, Smith T, Wendt D (2009) Bioreactor-based roadmap for the translation of tissue engineering strategies into clinical products. Trends Biotechnol 27(9):495–502PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Biomechanics and tissue engineering
verfasst von: D. P. Pioletti
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1616-z

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Biomechanics and tissue engineering

Abstract

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2011

Adherence, preference, and satisfaction of postmenopausal women taking denosumab or alendronate

Bone lengthening (distraction osteogenesis): a literature review

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and their relationship with bone mineral density changes after 24 months of treatment with teriparatide

Oral bisphosphonates and risk of ischemic stroke: a case–control study

Evaluation of bone scaffolds by micro-CT

Fifth Meeting on Bone Quality: Bone Fracture Healing and Strengthening

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie