Introduction
The development of time-lapse imaging technology has enabled consecutive observation of fertilization events, embryonic cleavage, compaction, and blastulation under stable and uninterrupted conditions, thus allowing the selection of appropriate embryos for transfer [
1‐
7]. Several studies that have utilized time-lapse systems have reported that blastomere movement (BMov) occurs after the first cell division in human embryos [
8,
9]. A recent study reported that BMov type (bouncing, wobbling, or twist-and-crumble) and duration vary markedly among embryos [
10]. Furthermore, this study showed BMov duration to be correlated with the incidence of asymmetric division, fragment generation, and ongoing pregnancy rate after fresh cleaved-embryo transfer on day 2. Therefore, BMov is considered a prognostic parameter for outcome prediction following cleavage-stage embryo transfer. However, it is not known whether BMov correlates with blastocyst formation and pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer. We evaluated the association between the BMov type and duration (dBMov) post first cell division and preimplantation development and live birth rates (LBRs) after blastocyst transfer.
Results
Patient characteristics are shown in Table
1. The characteristics and clinical outcomes of the embryos are shown in Table
2. The proportions of embryos with bouncing, wobbling, and twist-and-crumble movements were 56.2, 20.1, and 23.7%, respectively. Mean dBMov was 3.84 ± 0.07 h, and the value of dBMov/(t3-t2) was 0.366 ± 0.007. The type of blastomere movement was not correlated with age of the female (bouncing, 39.1 ± 0.2; wobbling, 39.2 ± 0.2; and twist-and-crumble, 38.8 ± 0.2,
P = 0.4746) or the male (bouncing, 41.0 ± 0.2; wobbling, 41.5 ± 0.4; and twist-and-crumble, 41.0 ± 0.4,
P = 0.2547). Furthermore, dBMov was not associated with the patient’s age (SRCC: female age, 0.0135,
P = 0.6820; male age, 0.0551,
P = 0.0942) and dBMov ratio (SRCC: female age, 0.030,
P = 0.3516; male age, 0.0576,
P = 0.0743) were not associated with the patient’s age.
Table 1
Patient characteristics (n = 634)
Age (years) |
Female | 39.2 ± 0.1 [27–47] |
Male | 41.1 ± 0.2 [25–64] |
No. of previous embryo transfer cycles | 1.62 ± 0.03 [0–3] |
BMI | 21.2 ± 0.1 [15.7–33.7] |
Cause of infertility |
Ovulation | 7 (1.1) |
Tubal factor | 15 (2.4) |
Endometrial factor | 45 (7.1) |
Male factor | 110 (17.4) |
Combined | 29 (4.6) |
Unexplained | 428 (67.5) |
Table 2
Analyzed embryo characteristics and clinical outcomes
No. of cleaved embryos analyzed | 966 | 543 (56.2) | 194 (20.1) | 229 (23.7) |
Four-cell stage embryos | 964 (99.8) | 543 (100) | 194 (100) | 228 (99.6) |
Eight-cell stage embryos | 900 (93.2) | 516 (95.0)a | 181 (93.3)a | 202 (88.2)b |
Morula | 842 (87.2) | 493 (90.8)a | 167 (86.1)a,b | 180 (78.6)b |
Blastocysts | 731 (75.7) | 435 (80.1)a | 144 (74.2)a,b | 152 (66.4)b |
Blastocysts expanded | 681 (70.5) | 406 (74.8)a | 136 (70.1)a,b | 139 (60.7)b |
Blastocysts cryopreserved | 625 (64.7) | 378 (69.6)a | 124 (63.9)a | 123 (53.7)b |
Morphological grade of blastocysts |
ICM | | | | |
Grade A | 291 (46.6) | 184 (48.7) | 59 (47.6) | 48 (39.0) |
Grade B | 214 (34.2) | 129 (34.1) | 37 (29.8) | 48 (39.0) |
Grade C | 120 (19.2) | 65 (17.2) | 28 (22.6) | 27 (22.0) |
TE |
Grade A | 267 (42.7) | 177 (46.8)a | 56 (45.2)a | 34 (27.6)b |
Grade B | 178 (28.5) | 97 (25.7)a | 35 (28.2)a,b | 46 (37.4)b |
Grade C | 180 (28.8) | 104 (27.5) | 33 (26.6) | 43 (35.0) |
No. of blastocysts thawed | 499 | 298 | 102 | 99 |
No. of survived blastocysts | 496 (99.3) | 297 (99.7) | 101 (99.0) | 98 (99.0) |
No. of blastocysts transferred | 496 | 297 | 101 | 98 |
Morphological grade of blastocysts transferred |
ICM |
Grade A | 250 (50.3) | 157 (52.7) | 52 (51.5) | 41 (41.8) |
Grade B | 158 (31.9) | 90 (30.4) | 33 (32.7) | 35 (35.7) |
Grade C | 88 (17.8) | 50 (16.9) | 16 (15.8) | 22 (22.5) |
TE |
Grade A | 235 (47.3) | 155 (52.0)a | 50 (49.5)a | 30 (30.6)b |
Grade B | 128 (25.9) | 65 (22.0)a | 27 (26.7)a,b | 36 (36.7)b |
Grade C | 133 (26.9) | 77 (26.0) | 24 (23.8) | 32 (32.7) |
Clinical pregnancies | 234 (47.2) | 136 (45.8) | 47 (46.5) | 51 (52.0) |
Ongoing pregnancies | 201 (40.5) | 115 (38.7) | 41 (40.6) | 45 (45.9) |
Follow-up data on live birth (ET date: April–December 2017) | 246 | 149 | 53 | 44 |
Live birth | 88 (35.8) | 52 (34.9) | 18 (34.0) | 18 (40.9) |
dBMov | 3.84 ± 0.07 [0.16–25.54] | 2.82 ± 0.05a [0.16–8.49] | 5.20 ± 0.13b [0.734–14.57] | 5.36 ± 0.17b [0.63–25.54] |
dBMov/(t3-t2) | 0.366 ± 0.007 [0.014–1.000] | 0.253 ± 0.004a [0.014–0.727] | 0.497 ± 0.015b [0.071–1.000] | 0.523 ± 0.016b [0.061–1.000] |
Embryos categorized with bouncing movement exhibited significantly higher developmental rates to the 8-cell, morula, blastocyst, and expanded-blastocyst stages than embryos with twist-and-crumble movement, especially from the 4-cell to the morula stage (Table
2 and Additional file
1). To adjust for potential statistical confounding bias, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was also performed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis also indicated low developmental rates in the twist-and-crumble group (Table
3). In contrast, the developmental rates were comparable between embryos with bouncing and wobbling movements. Furthermore, the morphological quality of the trophectoderm (TE) of embryos with twist-and-crumble movement was significantly lower than that of embryos with bouncing and wobbling movements, although the quality of the inner cell mass (ICM) was comparable among all groups (Table
2). The CPR, OPR, and LBR after SVBT were comparable among groups (Table 2). Multivariate logistic regression analysis also showed that movement type was not associated with OPR or LBR (Table
3).
Table 3
Adjusted odds ratio of blastomere movement type for embryonic development and pregnancy outcomes
Expanded blastocysta | Bouncing | Reference | – |
Wobbling | 0.763 (0.526–1.112) | 0.1584 |
Twist-and-crumble | 0.476 (0.339–0.668) | < 0.0001 |
Ongoing pregnancyb | Bouncing | Reference | – |
Wobbling | 1.182 (0.701–1.993) | 0.5316 |
Twist-and-crumble | 1.514 (0.799–2.342) | 0.1505 |
Live birthb | Bouncing | Reference | – |
Wobbling | 1.303 (0.598–2.838) | 0.5048 |
Twist-and-crumble | 1.295 (0.566–2.967) | 0.5405 |
Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that an increased value of dBMov/(t3-t2) was significantly correlated with decreased developmental rates to the 8-cell, morula, blastocyst, and expanded blastocyst stages, especially from the 4-cell to the morula stage (Table
4 and Additional file
1). No correlation was observed between the value of dBMov/(t3-t2) and morphological quality of ICM (Grade A, 0.344 ± 0.011; B, 0.343 ± 0.014; C, 0.375 ± 0.021;
P = 0.3065) or TE (Grade A, 0.335 ± 0.011; B, 0.359 ± 0.016; C, 0.363 ± 0.016;
P = 0.0.2677). The CPR, OPR, and LBR were not correlated with the value of dBMov/(t3-t2) (Table
4).
Table 4
Adjusted odds ratio of the value of dBMov/(t3-t2) for embryonic development and pregnancy outcomes
Four-cell stage embryosa | 0.131 (0.008–2.294) | 0.1951 |
Eight-cell stage embryosa | 0.265 (0.095–0.784) | 0.0132 |
Morulaa | 0.274 (0.123–0.624) | 0.0017 |
Blastocystsa | 0.345 (0.176–0.678) | 0.0019 |
Blastocysts expandeda | 0.415 (0.217–0.794) | 0.0077 |
Clinical pregnancyb | 1.697 (0.659–4.368) | 0.2711 |
Ongoing pregnancyb | 1.578 (0.398–5.554) | 0.5357 |
Live birthb | 1.543 (0.321–6.946) | 0.5773 |
Embryos were stratified into four groups according to the value of dBMov/(t3-t2): group A, dBMov/(t3-t2) < 0.217; group B, 0.217 ≤ dBMov/(t3-t2) < 0.300; group C, 0.300 ≤ dBMov/(t3-t2) < 0.420; and group D, 0.420 ≤ dBMov/(t3-t2) (Table
5). The cut-off values for group designation were determined using statistical software. The developmental rates to expanded blastocyst stage decreased significantly from group A to group D, and the Cochran-Armitage test confirmed a significant trend of declining expanded blastocyst rate with increasing dBMov/(t3-t2) value (
P < 0.0001). On the other hand, the CPR, OPR and LBR were not correlated with the dBMov/(t3-t2) value.
Table 5
Embryonic and pregnancy outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer, stratified by the value of dBMov/(t3-t2)
Group A [dBMov/(t3-t2) < 0.217] | 208 | 39.1 ± 0.2 | 41.0 ± 0.4 | 170 (81.7)a | 165 (79.3)a | 121 | 58 (47.9) | 48 (39.7) | 72 | 27 (37.5) |
Group B [0.217 ≤ dBMov/(t3-t2) < 0.300] | 243 | 39.2 ± 0.2 | 41.2 ± 0.3 | 190 (78.2)a | 178 (73.3)a, b | 125 | 62 (49.6) | 56 (44.8) | 62 | 21 (33.9) |
Group C [0.300 ≤ dBMov/(t3-t2) < 0.420] | 232 | 38.9 ± 0.2 | 40.6 ± 0.3 | 178 (76.7)a | 160 (69.0)b, c | 118 | 51 (43.2) | 42 (35.6) | 55 | 19 (34.6) |
Group C [0.420 ≤ dBMov/(t3-t2)] | 283 | 39.1 ± 0.2 | 41.4 ± 0.4 | 193 (68.2)b | 178 (62.9)c | 132 | 63 (47.7) | 55 (41.7) | 57 | 21 (36.8) |
Discussion
This study demonstrates that embryos, those with twist-and-crumble movement, have a lower developmental rate after the 4-cell stage and poor morphological quality of the trophectoderm at the blastocyst stage. The poor trophectoderm morphology of twist-and-crumble embryos may influence the cumulative pregnancy rate, although the present study revealed no statistical correlation between the twist-and-crumble movement and pregnancy outcome after SVBT. Blastomere polarization in preimplantation embryos plays an important role in the patterning of embryos and proper embryonic development. In humans, disrupted polarization is associated with significantly reduced blastocyst formation and implantation rates [
13]. We observed that the twist-and-crumble movement occurred concurrently with blastomere rolling. Although it is not known whether the twist-and-crumble movement interferes with or corrects cell polarity, our results suggest a potential association between improper blastomere polarization and decreased development in embryos with twist-and-crumble movement.
We have previously demonstrated that the prolongation of BMov is negatively associated with pregnancy outcomes following cleavage-stage embryo transfer on day 2; this extended BMov was associated with the delay of pronuclear fading and first cell division [
10]. The present study also showed significant correlations between prolonged BMov and decreased blastocyst formation rates. The cytoskeleton plays a key role in organelle transport, segregation of chromosomes, cell division, motility, and signaling, which are crucial steps in cell cycle progression [
14]. The distribution of cytoskeletal components is markedly changed in the cytoplasm of zygotes during the postfertilization period, and cytoskeletal reorganization after the first cell division is related to the success of embryonic development [
15]. Therefore, prolongation of blastomere movement after the first cell division can be caused by abnormal cytoplasmic activity with respect to cytoskeleton modification and reorganization, which negatively affects subsequent blastocyst development. The LBRs following SVBT were not affected by BMov type or duration in the present study, suggesting that BMov is not correlated with pregnancy outcomes once transferable expanded blastocysts are produced and transferred. However, the correlation between blastocyst development and BMov duration rationalizes our previous finding of prolonged BMov being negatively correlated with pregnancy outcomes after cleavage-stage embryo transfer [
10].
Conclusions
The present study provides evidence that BMov after the first cell division significantly predicts blastocyst formation. Therefore, taken together with our previous findings, we suggest that analysis of BMov is effective for predicting pregnancy outcome after cleaved-embryo transfer on days 2 and 3, but not after blastocyst transfer on day 5. However, this study is limited by its retrospective nature; thus, further randomized controlled trial studies are required to validate our findings.