Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 1/2019

Open Access 01.12.2019 | Letter to the Editor

Body adiposity index in assessing the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus development: the Baependi Heart Study

verfasst von: Camila Maciel de Oliveira, Jessica Pavani, José Eduardo Krieger, Rafael de Oliveira Alvim, Carlos Alberto Mourão-Junior, Alexandre da Costa Pereira

Erschienen in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome | Ausgabe 1/2019

Abstract

Background

The association between diabetes and obesity is very well established. Faced with this, several anthropometric indices of adiposity are often involved in studies on diabetes. Our main goal in this paper is to evaluate the association between body adiposity index (BAI) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a sample of the Brazilian population after 5-year follow-up.

Methods

The data used come from the Baependi Heart Study cohort, which consists of two periods: cycle 1 (2005–2006) and cycle 2 (2010–2013). Individuals of both sexes (n = 1121) were selected by excluding participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus at baseline or those that were lost to follow-up.

Results

The diabetic subjects showed higher systolic blood pressure, BAI, body mass index, waist circumference and fasting glucose levels. In addition, using mixed-effects logistic regression, we found that the elevation of a single unit of BAI represented an increase of 8.4% in the risk of a patient developing T2DM (OR = 1.084 [95% CI 1.045–1.124]).

Conclusions

Obesity is recognised as one of the most important risk factors for T2DM and BAI has proven to be a useful tool in estimating the risk of a patient developing T2DM in a Brazilian population.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
BMI
body mass index
BAI
body adiposity index
WC
waist circumference
OR
odds ratio
T2DM
type 2 diabetes mellitus
PAS
systolic blood pressure
DBP
diastolic blood pressure

Introduction

Diabetes Mellitus is a multifactorial metabolic disease associated with various conditions, including genetic predisposition, physical inactivity and mainly obesity. In fact, obesity is the second most important risk factor for various diseases [1] and its association with diabetes is very well established [2, 3]. As in the rest of the world, obesity has attracted attention in Brazil. More than half of the Brazilian population is overweight and almost 20% is obese [1]. The increasing incidence of obesity and increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) has caused great concern about public policy.
Many studies have been carried out in this area, however, many gaps still need to be bridged. Previous studies have commonly discussed the effectiveness of anthropometric indices of adiposity in association with some cardiovascular risk factors [4]. Of these, the simplest ones, such as body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC), have been most widely explored by the scientific community, although their limitations are well understood as applied to the prediction of pathologies such as T2DM in different populations. As an alternative, other parameters have been proposed, such as the body adiposity index (BAI), which take account simple measures such as hip circumference and height. This parameter, developed by Bergman et al. [5], has proven to be effective when related to some metabolic diseases.
Comparisons between BAI and other adiposity indexes have been also explored [6, 7]. However, according to Alvim et al. [2], ethnic differences may influence the discriminatory power of BAI, as well as several other anthropometric indices, in assessing the risk of T2DM. In agreement with this reality, our main interest is to investigate the influence of BAI on T2DM in a sample of the Brazilian population, after 5-year follow-up.

Methods

The Baependi Heart Study cohort is a genetic epidemiological follow-up study of cardiovascular risk factors [8]. For the data collection process, individuals of both genders and aged 18–102 years were randomly considered, all from the municipality of Baependi. After recruitment, all relatives of the participants were invited to participate. Once selected, a physical examination was carried out and blood samples were collected. Currently, the cohort study consists of two periods: cycle 1 (2005–2006) and cycle 2 (2010–2013). The present study was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo, Brazil (SDC: 3485/10/ 074), and each participant provided written informed consent before participation.
Based on this cohort study, 1225 individuals were selected following some inclusion and non-inclusion criteria. Initially, all the participants answered a questionnaire in which they stated whether they were affected by some type of diabetes or if they were users of some antidiabetic medication. If such questions had affirmative answers, the patient was not included in the study. After responding to the questionnaire, regardless of responses, patients were referred for blood screening. After screening test, T2DM was diagnosed by the presence of fasting plasma glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL or antidiabetic drug use [9]. In such case, the subject was not included in the cycle 1. Therefore, in cycle 1 we assessed only non-diabetic patients, accordingly to the criteria above (questionnaire and fasting plasma glucose). Five years after cycle 1, cycle 2 of the study was carried out.
In cycle 2 the patients in cycle 1 were reassessed and divided into two groups: (i) those who remained non-diabetic (Diabetes Free group) and (ii) those who had fasting plasma glucose levels greater than 126 mg/dL or reported use of antidiabetic drug (Incident Diabetes group).
In both cycles, blood triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and fasting glucose were evaluated by standard techniques in 12-h fasting blood samples [10].
Dyslipidaemia treatment was defined as percentage of individuals who used at least one class of lipid-lowering drug.
Anthropometric parameters were measured according to a standard protocol [10]. Height was measured in centimetres and weight in kilograms using a calibrated digital balance. WC was measured at the mean point between the lowest rib margin and the iliac crest with the subject standing and at the maximum point of normal expiration. Hip circumference was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm around the thighs, at the height of the greater trochanter, in the standing position. Increased WC was defined as ≥ 88 cm for women and ≥ 102 cm for men. The calculation of BAI was based on hip circumference and height (BAI = [hip circumference (cm)/(height (m) 1.5] – 18) [5].
Also in both cycles, blood pressure was measured using a standard digital sphygmomanometer (OMRON, Brazil) on the left arm after 5 min rest, in the sitting position. Systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) were calculated from three readings (mean value of all measurements), with a minimal interval of 3 min [10]. Hypertension was defined as mean SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg and/or antihypertensive drug use.
Clinical characteristics of patients in both cycles were assessed using descriptive statistics. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± SD and categorical variables were expressed as percentages. Normality of all data was tested with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used in order to verify the association between BAI and the incidence of T2DM, and examine how much risk it represents for the development of this chronic disease. The regression model was carried out having BAI as the main parameter, and sex, age, SBP, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol as control variables. Taking into account the kinship relations among patients, we also considered family as an effect. All statistical analyses were carried out using the R (version 3.5.1) statistical software [11] with the level of significance set at 5%.

Results

Clinical, demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical data are summarised in Table 1. The percentage of men, hypertensives, obese (increased WC) and individuals treated with lipid-lowering drugs were higher in the group that became diabetic after 5-year follow-up. In addition, these individuals showed higher SBP, BMI, WC and fasting glucose levels. BAI increased only 3% between cycles 1 and 2. However, BAI was much higher in diabetics than non-diabetics in the cycle 2 (Fig. 1). In the present study, the incidence of T2DM after 5-year follow-up was 6.7% (75/1121).
Table 1
Characteristics of subjects in the sample
Variables
Cycle 1
Cycle 2
Diabetes free
Incident diabetes
p-value
n
1121
1046
75
Age, years
42.1 ± 16.1
46.9 ± 15.9
49.3 ± 16.6
0.24
Sex (% men)
44
43
47
< 0.001
Hypertension (%)
30
37
75
< 0.001
Increased WC (%)
30
42
61
< 0.001
Dyslipidaemia treatment (%)
3
7
24
< 0.001
SBP, mmHg
125.0 ± 18.5
125.2 ± 16.4
133.4 ± 17.8
< 0.001
DBP, mmHg
78.2 ± 11.2
76.7 ± 10.6
76.9 ± 10.3
0.88
BMI, kg/m2
24.3 ± 4.7
25.64 ± 4.9
28.45 ± 5.9
< 0.001
WC, cm
86.6 ± 11.79
90.6 ± 11.8
99.1 ± 11.6
< 0.001
Fasting glucose, mg/dL
87.5 ± 16.7
89.3 ± 10.2
137.3 ± 49.7
< 0.001
Total cholesterol, mg/dL
178.1 ± 46.9
200.6 ± 67.2
206.7 ± 51.9
0.33
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL
56.4 ± 15.7
47.5 ± 11.8
46.2 ± 11.2
0.33
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL
96.4 ± 42.8
125.3 ± 34.8
121.6 ± 44.9
0.51
Triglycerides, mg/dL
128.9 ± 68.9
123.8 ± 94.8
115.7 ± 78.6
0.39
Hypertension: systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg and/or anti-hypertensive drug use. Dyslipidaemia treatment: percentage of individuals who used at least one class of lipid-lowering drug. Increased WC: ≥ 88 cm for women and ≥ 102 cm for men. Continuous data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and categorical data are expressed as percentage
SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BAI, body adiposity index; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference
Using mixed-effects logistic regression we found that BAI was significantly different between groups (p-value < 0.001). The main finding of our study was that the elevation of a single unit of BAI represented an increase of 8.4% in the risk of patient developing T2DM (odds ratio [OR] = 1.084 [95% CI 1.045–1.124]) (Table 2). This model was adjusted for SBP, sex, age, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol.
Table 2
Variables associated with diabetes mellitus in a logistic regression analysis
Variables
OR
95% CI
p-value
BAI
1.084
1.045–1.124
 < 0.001
Sex
1.306
0.764–2.234
0.329
Age
1.004
0.988–1.020
0.633
SBP
1.025
1.011–1.040
< 0.001
Triglycerides
1.000
0.997–1.003
0.956
HDL
0.994
0.972–1.016
0.597
Diabetes mellitus: diagnosis was established in patients with fasting glucose equal to or greater than 126 mg/dL, or in patients who were under the use of anti-diabetic medicine
Predictive variable: BAI
Control variables: sex, age, PAS, triglycerides and HDL
BAI, body adiposity index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Discussion

The main finding of our study was the association between BAI and T2DM in a Brazilian population in which the elevation of a single unit of BAI represented an increase of 8.4% in the risk of patient developing T2DM, even after adjusting for confounding variables such as age, sex, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol and SBP.
Several studies have focused on the relationship between anthropometric indices of adiposity and diabetes mellitus in samples from different populations. In Brazil, Flor et al. [3] and Freitas [12] demonstrated a strong association between T2DM and obesity, considering different Brazilian population samples. Supporting such studies, our findings confirm this relationship, highlighting BAI as an effective parameter. Corroborating with the findings of Bergman et al. [5] and López et al. [7], our study highlights that an increasing BAI implies a significant increase in the risk of developing T2DM. Therefore, BAI is a relevant tool to predict T2DM risk in the Baependi population.
This study has some limitations. First, all the participants live in Baependi, a small town with great rural activity located in South-eastern Brazil. Therefore, these results cannot be extrapolated to the general Brazilian population. Second, because it is an observational study where the participant makes a single visit per cycle, it becomes impracticable to diagnose diabetes through two measures of fasting glycaemia on different days. Therefore, like other observational studies, the diagnosis of diabetes is based on a single measurement of fasting glucose (≥ 126 mg/dL) or if the participant reports the use of hypoglycaemic drugs. On the other hand the main strengths are that our study has an appropriate sample size, which allowed for high statistical power, and, additionally, the anthropometric measures were obtained by a single investigator.
In conclusion, obesity is recognised as one of the most important risk factors for T2DM. The results of our study showed that BAI could be a useful tool for the assessment of T2DM risk in a Brazilian population.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the population of Baependi for their participation in the Baependi Heart Study.
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Hospital das Clínicas (SDC: 3485/10/074), University of São Paulo, Brazil, and each subject provided informed written consent before participation.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Malta DC, Felisbino-Mendes MS, Machado IE, de Azeredo Passos VM, de Abreu DMX, Ishitani LH, et al. Risk factors related to the global burden of disease in Brazil and its Federated Units. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015;20(1):217–32. Malta DC, Felisbino-Mendes MS, Machado IE, de Azeredo Passos VM, de Abreu DMX, Ishitani LH, et al. Risk factors related to the global burden of disease in Brazil and its Federated Units. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2015;20(1):217–32.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat de Oliveira Alvim R, Mourao-Junior CA, de Oliveira CM, Krieger JE, Mill JG, Pereira AC. Body mass index, waist circumference, body adiposity index, and risk for type 2 diabetes in two populations in Brazil: General and Amerindian. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e100223.CrossRef de Oliveira Alvim R, Mourao-Junior CA, de Oliveira CM, Krieger JE, Mill JG, Pereira AC. Body mass index, waist circumference, body adiposity index, and risk for type 2 diabetes in two populations in Brazil: General and Amerindian. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e100223.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Flor LS, Campos MR. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and its associated factors in the Brazilian adult population: evidence from a population-based survey. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017;20(1):16–29.CrossRef Flor LS, Campos MR. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and its associated factors in the Brazilian adult population: evidence from a population-based survey. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017;20(1):16–29.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lichtash CT, Cui J, Guo X, Chen YDI, Hsueh WA, Rotter JI, et al. Body adiposity index versus body mass index and other anthropometric traits as correlates of cardiometabolic risk factors. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65954.CrossRef Lichtash CT, Cui J, Guo X, Chen YDI, Hsueh WA, Rotter JI, et al. Body adiposity index versus body mass index and other anthropometric traits as correlates of cardiometabolic risk factors. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e65954.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, Sumner AE, Reynolds JC, Sebring NG, et al. A better index of body adiposity. Obesity. 2011;19(5):1083–9.CrossRef Bergman RN, Stefanovski D, Buchanan TA, Sumner AE, Reynolds JC, Sebring NG, et al. A better index of body adiposity. Obesity. 2011;19(5):1083–9.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennasar-Veny M, Lopez-Gonzalez AA, Tauler P, Cespedes ML, Vicente-Herrero T, Yañez A, et al. Body adiposity index and cardiovascular health risk factors in Caucasians: a comparison with the body mass index and others. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e63999.CrossRef Bennasar-Veny M, Lopez-Gonzalez AA, Tauler P, Cespedes ML, Vicente-Herrero T, Yañez A, et al. Body adiposity index and cardiovascular health risk factors in Caucasians: a comparison with the body mass index and others. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e63999.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat López AA, Cespedes ML, Vicente T, Tomas M, Bennasar-Veny M, Tauler P, et al. Body adiposity index utilization in a Spanish Mediterranean population: Comparison with the body mass index. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35281.CrossRef López AA, Cespedes ML, Vicente T, Tomas M, Bennasar-Veny M, Tauler P, et al. Body adiposity index utilization in a Spanish Mediterranean population: Comparison with the body mass index. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35281.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Egan KJ, Schantz M, Negrão AB, Santos HC, Horimoto AR, Duarte NE, et al. Cohort profile: the Baependi Heart Study-a family-based, highly admixed cohort study in a rural Brazilian town. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e011598.CrossRef Egan KJ, Schantz M, Negrão AB, Santos HC, Horimoto AR, Duarte NE, et al. Cohort profile: the Baependi Heart Study-a family-based, highly admixed cohort study in a rural Brazilian town. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e011598.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Padilha K, Venturini G, Pires TF, Horimoto ARVR, Malagrino PA, Gois TC, et al. Serum metabolomics profile of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Brazilian rural population. Metabolomics. 2016;12:156.CrossRef Padilha K, Venturini G, Pires TF, Horimoto ARVR, Malagrino PA, Gois TC, et al. Serum metabolomics profile of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Brazilian rural population. Metabolomics. 2016;12:156.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliveira CM, Pereira AC, de Andrade M, Soler JM, Krieger JE. Heritability of cardiovascular risk factors in a Brazilian population: Baependi Heart Study. BMC Med Genet. 2008;9(32):1–8. Oliveira CM, Pereira AC, de Andrade M, Soler JM, Krieger JE. Heritability of cardiovascular risk factors in a Brazilian population: Baependi Heart Study. BMC Med Genet. 2008;9(32):1–8.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat de Freitas ICM, de Moraes SA. Social vulnerability effect over obesity anthropometric indexes: results from population-based epidemiological study. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2016;19(2):433–50.CrossRef de Freitas ICM, de Moraes SA. Social vulnerability effect over obesity anthropometric indexes: results from population-based epidemiological study. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2016;19(2):433–50.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Body adiposity index in assessing the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus development: the Baependi Heart Study
verfasst von
Camila Maciel de Oliveira
Jessica Pavani
José Eduardo Krieger
Rafael de Oliveira Alvim
Carlos Alberto Mourão-Junior
Alexandre da Costa Pereira
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2019
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome / Ausgabe 1/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1758-5996
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-019-0467-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.