Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2019

27.11.2018 | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine

Bologna criteria are predictive for ovarian response and live birth in subsequent ovarian stimulation cycles

verfasst von: Kayhan Yakin, Ozgur Oktem, Basak Balaban, Bulent Urman

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The ESHRE Working Group on Poor Ovarian Response defined a set of variables to define poor responders, named as the Bologna Criteria, but several concerns have been raised regarding their applicability and prognostic significance. In order to evaluate the clinical relevance of the criteria, we retrospectively analyzed the ovarian response and live birth rates in women who had consecutive IVF attempts, according to their fulfillment of the criteria.

Methods

The study group comprised 1153 and 288 women who had two and three consecutive ovarian stimulation (OS) cycles between May 2010 and January 2017, respectively. We compared the ovarian response and live birth rates in subsequent IVF attempts of Bologna criteria-defined poor responder women and women who did not fulfill the Bologna criteria.

Results

Women who fulfilled the criteria achieved higher rates of poor ovarian response (76.2% vs 14.3% and 60.3% vs 13.4%) and lower live birth rates (14.6% vs 33.3% and 12.9% vs 34.3%) in their second and third OS cycles, respectively (both p < 0.001) compared to women who did not fulfill the criteria. The former group also had lower number of oocytes and lower likelihood of having embryo transfer in their subsequent OS cycles. The criteria were able to predict both ovarian response and clinical outcome in the subsequent cycle in < 40-year-old women, whereas they were predictive only for the ovarian response but not for the clinical outcome in women over 40 years of age, who exhibited very low live birth rates regardless of the fulfillment of the criteria.

Conclusions

The results of this study show that the Bologna criteria are clinically relevant in terms of prediction of ovarian response and clinical outcome in subsequent OS cycles.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, On Behalf of the ESHRE Working Group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition (2011) ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 26:1616–1624CrossRefPubMed Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L, On Behalf of the ESHRE Working Group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition (2011) ESHRE consensus on the definition of ‘poor response’ to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 26:1616–1624CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Boots CE, Bernardi LA (2018) Bologna criteria: clinically or academically relevant? Fertil Steril 109:59–60CrossRefPubMed Boots CE, Bernardi LA (2018) Bologna criteria: clinically or academically relevant? Fertil Steril 109:59–60CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat De Ziegler D, Streuli I, Meldrum DR, Chapron C (2011) The value of growth hormone supplements in ART for poor ovarian responders. Fertil Steril 96:1069–1076CrossRefPubMed De Ziegler D, Streuli I, Meldrum DR, Chapron C (2011) The value of growth hormone supplements in ART for poor ovarian responders. Fertil Steril 96:1069–1076CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat La Marca A, Grisendi V, Giulini S, Sighinolfi G, Tirelli A, Argento C, Re C, Tagliasacchi D, Marsella T, Sunkara SK (2015) Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study. J Assist Reprod Genet 32:931–937CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral La Marca A, Grisendi V, Giulini S, Sighinolfi G, Tirelli A, Argento C, Re C, Tagliasacchi D, Marsella T, Sunkara SK (2015) Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study. J Assist Reprod Genet 32:931–937CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Papathanasiou A (2014) Implementing the ESHRE ‘poor responder’ criteria in research studies: methodological implications. Hum Reprod 29:1835–1838CrossRefPubMed Papathanasiou A (2014) Implementing the ESHRE ‘poor responder’ criteria in research studies: methodological implications. Hum Reprod 29:1835–1838CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Polyzos N, Devroey P (2011) A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril 96:1058–1061CrossRefPubMed Polyzos N, Devroey P (2011) A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril 96:1058–1061CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Younis JS (2012) The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response; has the job been accomplished? Hum Reprod 27:1874–1875CrossRefPubMed Younis JS (2012) The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response; has the job been accomplished? Hum Reprod 27:1874–1875CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Boza A, Yildiz Oguz S, Misirlioglu S, Yakin K, Urman B (2018) Utilization of the Bologna criteria: a promise unfulfilled? A review of published and unpublished/ongoing trials. Fertil Steril 109:104–109CrossRefPubMed Boza A, Yildiz Oguz S, Misirlioglu S, Yakin K, Urman B (2018) Utilization of the Bologna criteria: a promise unfulfilled? A review of published and unpublished/ongoing trials. Fertil Steril 109:104–109CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Busnelli A, Papaleo E, Del Prato D, La Vecchia I, Iachini E, Paffoni A, Candiani M, Somigliana E (2015) A retrospective evaluation of prognosis and cost-effectiveness of IVF in poor responders according to the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 30:315–322CrossRefPubMed Busnelli A, Papaleo E, Del Prato D, La Vecchia I, Iachini E, Paffoni A, Candiani M, Somigliana E (2015) A retrospective evaluation of prognosis and cost-effectiveness of IVF in poor responders according to the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 30:315–322CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Busnelli A, Somigliana E (2018) Prognosis and cost-effectiveness of IVF in poor responders according to the Bologna criteria. Minerva Ginecol 70:89–98PubMed Busnelli A, Somigliana E (2018) Prognosis and cost-effectiveness of IVF in poor responders according to the Bologna criteria. Minerva Ginecol 70:89–98PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Eppsteiner EE, Sparks AET, Liu D, Van Voorhis BJ (2014) Change in oocyte yield in repeated in vitro fertilization cycles: effect of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 101:399–402CrossRefPubMed Eppsteiner EE, Sparks AET, Liu D, Van Voorhis BJ (2014) Change in oocyte yield in repeated in vitro fertilization cycles: effect of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 101:399–402CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Oudendijk JF, Yarde F, Eijkemans MJC, Broekmans FJM, Broer SL (2012) The poor responders in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 18:1–11CrossRefPubMed Oudendijk JF, Yarde F, Eijkemans MJC, Broekmans FJM, Broer SL (2012) The poor responders in IVF: is the prognosis always poor? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 18:1–11CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L (2012) Reply: The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response; has the job been accomplished? Hum Reprod 27:1875–1876CrossRef Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L (2012) Reply: The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response; has the job been accomplished? Hum Reprod 27:1875–1876CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L (2014) The Bologna criteria for the definition of poor responders: is there a need for revision? Hum Reprod 29:1942–1945CrossRef Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L (2014) The Bologna criteria for the definition of poor responders: is there a need for revision? Hum Reprod 29:1942–1945CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sallam HN, Ezzeldin F, Agameya AF, Abdel-Rahman AF, El-Garem YH (2012) The definition of “poor response”: Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 27:626–627CrossRefPubMed Sallam HN, Ezzeldin F, Agameya AF, Abdel-Rahman AF, El-Garem YH (2012) The definition of “poor response”: Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod 27:626–627CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Venetis CA (2014) The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response: the good, the bad and the way forward. Hum Reprod 29:1839–1841CrossRefPubMed Venetis CA (2014) The Bologna criteria for poor ovarian response: the good, the bad and the way forward. Hum Reprod 29:1839–1841CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Papathanasiou A, Searle BJ, King NMA, Bhattacharya S (2016) Trends in ‘poor responder’ research: lessons learned from RCTs in assisted conception. Hum Reprod Update 22:306–319CrossRefPubMed Papathanasiou A, Searle BJ, King NMA, Bhattacharya S (2016) Trends in ‘poor responder’ research: lessons learned from RCTs in assisted conception. Hum Reprod Update 22:306–319CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P, Poseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) (2016) A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril 105:1452–1453CrossRefPubMed Alviggi C, Andersen CY, Buehler K, Conforti A, De Placido G, Esteves SC, Fischer R, Galliano D, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Ubaldi FM, Humaidan P, Poseidon Group (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing Individualized Oocyte Number) (2016) A new more detailed stratification of low responders to ovarian stimulation: from a poor ovarian response to a low prognosis concept. Fertil Steril 105:1452–1453CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK (2015) Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group? Hum Reprod 30:2005–2008CrossRefPubMed Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK (2015) Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group? Hum Reprod 30:2005–2008CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Bologna criteria are predictive for ovarian response and live birth in subsequent ovarian stimulation cycles
verfasst von
Kayhan Yakin
Ozgur Oktem
Basak Balaban
Bulent Urman
Publikationsdatum
27.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4987-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.