Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2021

04.02.2021 | Special Section: Rectal Cancer

Bone lesions on baseline staging rectal MRI: prevalence and significance in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma

verfasst von: Jeffrey Levine, Iva Petkovska, Jonathan Landa, David D. B. Bates, Marinela Capanu, J. Louis Fuqua III, Viktoriya Paroder, Junting Zheng, Marc J. Gollub, Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A T1 sequence on routine baseline staging rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is thought to help detect bone lesions. Our primary aim was to evaluate the incidence of bone lesions encountered on baseline staging rectal MRI, particularly the prevalence of bone metastases. This retrospective study included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent baseline rectal MRI at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. The MRI report was reviewed for presence of bone lesions. When found, lesion type, presence of axial T1 non-fat-suppressed sequence, primary tumor T-stage, and presence of other organ metastases were recorded. In the absence of bone biopsy, the reference standard was follow-up imaging via computed tomography (CT), MRI, and/or positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) ≥ 1 year after the baseline MRI. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare clinicopathologic data of patients with malignant or benign bone lesions. A total of 1197 patients were included. 62/1197 patients (mean age 56.8 years (SD: 13.8), with 39 men) had bone lesions on baseline imaging, with 6 being bone metastases (0.5%, 95% CI 0.2%–1.1%). Of the 6 patients with bone metastases, 5/6 had other metastases (i.e., liver, lung) at baseline. Bone metastases on baseline rectal MRI performed for rectal adenocarcinoma are extremely rare. Furthermore, bone metastases without other organ (i.e., liver, lung) involvement is extremely rare.
Literatur
1.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Norenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W, D'Haese J, Rentsch M, Kolben T, Schreyer A, Rist C, Reiser M, Armbruster M (2017) Structured Reporting of Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Primary Rectal Cancer: Potential Benefits for Surgical Planning and Interdisciplinary Communication. Invest Radiol 52 (4):232-239. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000336CrossRefPubMed Norenberg D, Sommer WH, Thasler W, D'Haese J, Rentsch M, Kolben T, Schreyer A, Rist C, Reiser M, Armbruster M (2017) Structured Reporting of Rectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Primary Rectal Cancer: Potential Benefits for Surgical Planning and Interdisciplinary Communication. Invest Radiol 52 (4):232-239. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​RLI.​0000000000000336​CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gollub MJ, Arya S, Beets-Tan RG, dePrisco G, Gonen M, Jhaveri K, Kassam Z, Kaur H, Kim D, Knezevic A, Korngold E, Lall C, Lalwani N, Blair Macdonald D, Moreno C, Nougaret S, Pickhardt P, Sheedy S, Harisinghani M (2018) Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. Abdom Radiol (NY) 43 (11):2893-2902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1642-9CrossRef Gollub MJ, Arya S, Beets-Tan RG, dePrisco G, Gonen M, Jhaveri K, Kassam Z, Kaur H, Kim D, Knezevic A, Korngold E, Lall C, Lalwani N, Blair Macdonald D, Moreno C, Nougaret S, Pickhardt P, Sheedy S, Harisinghani M (2018) Use of magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer patients: Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) rectal cancer disease-focused panel (DFP) recommendations 2017. Abdom Radiol (NY) 43 (11):2893-2902. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00261-018-1642-9CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Bipat S, Barbaro B, Curvo-Semedo L, Fenlon HM, Gollub MJ, Gourtsoyianni S, Halligan S, Hoeffel C, Kim SH, Laghi A, Maier A, Rafaelsen SR, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 28 (4):1465-1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2CrossRefPubMed Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M, Bipat S, Barbaro B, Curvo-Semedo L, Fenlon HM, Gollub MJ, Gourtsoyianni S, Halligan S, Hoeffel C, Kim SH, Laghi A, Maier A, Rafaelsen SR, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: Updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 28 (4):1465-1475. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00330-017-5026-2CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweitzer ME LC, Mitchell DG, Gannon FH, Gomella LG. (1993) Bull’s-eyes and halos: useful MR discriminators of osseous metastases. Radiology 188:249-252CrossRefPubMed Schweitzer ME LC, Mitchell DG, Gannon FH, Gomella LG. (1993) Bull’s-eyes and halos: useful MR discriminators of osseous metastases. Radiology 188:249-252CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Simpfendorfer CS, Ilaslan H, Davies AM, James SL, Obuchowski NA, Sundaram M (2008) Does the presence of focal normal marrow fat signal within a tumor on MRI exclude malignancy? An analysis of 184 histologically proven tumors of the pelvic and appendicular skeleton. Skeletal Radiol 37 (9):797-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0523-7CrossRefPubMed Simpfendorfer CS, Ilaslan H, Davies AM, James SL, Obuchowski NA, Sundaram M (2008) Does the presence of focal normal marrow fat signal within a tumor on MRI exclude malignancy? An analysis of 184 histologically proven tumors of the pelvic and appendicular skeleton. Skeletal Radiol 37 (9):797-804. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00256-008-0523-7CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal I, Fowler KJ, Kaur H, Cash BD, Feig BW, Gage KL, Garcia EM, Hara AK, Herman JM, Kim DH, Lambert DL, Levy AD, Peterson CM, Scheirey CD, Small W, Jr., Smith MP, Lalani T, Carucci LR (2017) ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Pretreatment Staging of Colorectal Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 14 (5S):S234-S244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.012CrossRef Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal I, Fowler KJ, Kaur H, Cash BD, Feig BW, Gage KL, Garcia EM, Hara AK, Herman JM, Kim DH, Lambert DL, Levy AD, Peterson CM, Scheirey CD, Small W, Jr., Smith MP, Lalani T, Carucci LR (2017) ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Pretreatment Staging of Colorectal Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 14 (5S):S234-S244. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacr.​2017.​02.​012CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Bone lesions on baseline staging rectal MRI: prevalence and significance in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma
verfasst von
Jeffrey Levine
Iva Petkovska
Jonathan Landa
David D. B. Bates
Marinela Capanu
J. Louis Fuqua III
Viktoriya Paroder
Junting Zheng
Marc J. Gollub
Jennifer S. Golia Pernicka
Publikationsdatum
04.02.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02923-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Abdominal Radiology 6/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.