nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.07.2015 | Review

Bone turnover markers in Paget’s disease of the bone: A Systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: A. A. Al Nofal, O. Altayar, K. BenKhadra, O. Q. Qasim Agha, N. Asi, M. Nabhan, L. J. Prokop, P. Tebben, M. H. Murad

Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International | Ausgabe 7/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Summary

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to study the utility of the commonly used bone turnover markers in evaluating disease activity in patients with Paget’s disease of bone before and after treatment with bisphosphonates. We found good correlation between the bone turnover marker concentrations and disease activity assessed by bone scintigraphy.

Introduction

Paget’s disease of bone is a common skeletal disorder of the elderly. Bone turnover marker concentrations are used for diagnosis and follow-up. We aimed to compare the available bone turnover markers and determine their utility in assessing disease activity when compared to quantitative bone scintigraphy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. We evaluated total alkaline phosphatase (total ALP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP), procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP), serum, and urine C-terminal telopeptide (uCTx and sCTx, respectively), and urine N-terminal telopeptide (uNTx). The main outcome of interest was the correlation of disease activity with concentrations of bone turnover markers in Paget’s disease patients before and after treatment with bisphosphonates. Correlation coefficients were pooled across studies using the random effects model.

Results

We included 17 observational studies and one trial reporting on 953 patients. Prior to treatment, all studied bone turnover markers had moderate to strong correlation with scintigraphic indices (correlation coefficients ranging from 0.58 to 0.80) with no statistically significant difference between the bone turnover markers overall (p = 0.08). P1NP, uNTx, and bone ALP tend to have higher correlation with scintigraphy. After starting treatment with bisphosphonate, there was moderate to strong correlation with disease activity with all markers except bone ALP (correlation coefficients ranging from 0.43 to 0.70).

Conclusion

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest the Paget’s disease activity is best monitored by following P1NP levels. However, total ALP, bone ALP, and uNTx are good alternatives as markers of disease activity in untreated patients. Total ALP and uNTx can be useful in following patients with Paget’s disease after treatment if P1NP is not available. Clinicians, however, should take availability, cost, and the presence of liver disease into consideration when deciding which bone turnover marker is most appropriate when evaluating patients with Paget’s disease.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Corral-Gudino L, Borao-Cengotita-Bengoa M, Del Pino-Montes J, Ralston S (2013) Epidemiology of Paget’s disease of bone: a systematic review and meta-analysis of secular changes. Bone Meta-Anal Rev 55(2):347–352

Wermers RA, Tiegs RD, Atkinson EJ, Achenbach SJ, Melton LJ 3rd (2008) Morbidity and mortality associated with Paget’s disease of bone: a population-based study. J Bone Miner Res. [Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 23(6):819–25

Altman RD, Bloch DA, Hochberg MC, Murphy WA (2000) Prevalence of pelvic Paget’s disease of bone in the United States. J Bone Miner Res. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 15(3):461–5

Siris ES, Ottman R, Flaster E, Kelsey JL (1991) Familial aggregation of Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. 6(5):495–500

Merlotti D, Gennari L, Galli B, Martini G, Calabro A, De Paola V et al (2005) Characteristics and familial aggregation of Paget’s disease of bone in Italy. J Bone Miner Res 20(8):1356–1364PubMedCrossRef

Laurin N, Brown JP, Morissette J, Raymond V (2002) Recurrent mutation of the gene encoding sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1/p62) in Paget disease of bone. Am J Hum Genet. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 70(6):1582–8

Hocking LJ, Lucas GJ, Daroszewska A, Mangion J, Olavesen M, Cundy T (2002) et al. Domain-specific mutations in sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1) cause familial and sporadic Paget’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 11(22):2735–9

Alvarez L, RicOs C, Peris P, GuaNabens N, Monegal A, Pons F, et al (2000) Components of biological variation of biochemical markers of bone turnover in Paget’s bone disease. Bone. [Comparative Study]. 26(6):571–6

Bonnin MR, Moragues C, Nolla JM, Liron FJ, Roig-Escofet D, Navarro MA (1998) Evaluation of circulating type I procollagen propeptides in patients with Paget’s disease of bone. Clin Chem Lab Med. [Comparative Study]. 36(1):53–5

10.

Alexandersen P, Peris P, Guanabens N, Byrjalsen I, Alvarez L, Solberg H, et al (2005) Non-isomerized C-telopeptide fragments are highly sensitive markers for monitoring disease activity and treatment efficacy in Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res. [Evaluation Studies]. 20(4):588–95

11.

Alvarez L, Guanabens N, Peris P, Vidal S, Ros I, Monegal A, et al (2001) Usefulness of biochemical markers of bone turnover in assessing response to the treatment of Paget’s disease. Bone. [Clinical Trial]. 29(5):447–52

12.

Roodman GD, Windle JJ (2005) Paget disease of bone. J Clin Invest. [Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S. Review]. 115(2):200–8

13.

Reid IR, Miller P, Lyles K, Fraser W, Brown JP, Saidi Y et al (2005) Comparison of a single infusion of zoledronic acid with risedronate for Paget’s disease. N Engl J Med 353(9):898–908PubMedCrossRef

14.

Reid IR, Miller P, Lyles K, Fraser W, Brown JP, Saidi Y et al (2005) Comparison of a single infusion of zoledronic acid with risedronate for Paget’s disease. New Engl J Med 353(9):898–908PubMedCrossRef

15.

Leung KS, Fung KP, Sher AH, Li CK, Lee KM (1993) Plasma bone-specific alkaline phosphatase as an indicator of osteoblastic activity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. [Comparative Study]. 75(2):288–92

16.

Shankar S, Hosking DJ (2006) Biochemical assessment of Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res 21:P22–P27PubMedCrossRef

17.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. [Guideline Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 151(4):264–9, W64

18.

Wells G SB, O’connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2014) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed June, 2014 [cited 2014 May, 2014]

19.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al (2011) The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 343:d5928

20.

David Machine MJC, Stephen J (2007) Walters medical statistics — a text book for the health sciences, 4th edn

21.

Alvarez L, Peris P, Pons F, Guanabens N, Herranz R, Monegal A et al (1997) Relationship between biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone scintigraphic indices in assessment of Paget’s disease activity. Arthritis Rheum 40(3):461–468PubMedCrossRef

22.

Pons F, Alvarez L, Peris P, Guanabens N, Vidal-Sicart S, Monegal A et al (1999) Quantitative evaluation of bone scintigraphy in the assessment of Paget’s disease activity. Nucl Med Commun 20(6):525–528PubMedCrossRef

23.

Meunier PJ, Salson C, Mathieu L, Chapuy MC, Delmas P, Alexandre C, et al (1987) Skeletal distribution and biochemical parameters of Paget’s disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. [Comparative Study]. (217):37–44

24.

Woitge HW, Pecherstorfer M, Li Y, Keck AV, Horn E, Ziegler R, et al (1999) Novel serum markers of bone resorption: clinical assessment and comparison with established urinary indices. J Bone Miner Res. [Comparative Study]. 14(5):792–801

25.

Bachiller-Corral J, Diaz-Miguel C, Morales-Piga A (2013) Monostotic Paget’s disease of the femur: a diagnostic challenge and an overlooked risk. Bone 57(2):517–521PubMedCrossRef

26.

Woitge HW, Oberwittler H, Heichel S, Grauer A, Ziegler R, Seibel MJ (2000) Short- and long-term effects of ibandronate treatment on bone turnover in Paget disease of bone. Clin Chem 46(5):684–690PubMed

27.

de la Piedra C, Rapado A, Diaz Diego EM, Diaz Martin MA, Aguirre C, Lopez Gavilanes E, et al (1996) Variable efficacy of bone remodeling biochemical markers in the management of patients with Paget’s disease of bone treated with tiludronate. Calcif Tissue Int. [Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 59(2):95–9

28.

Ulivieri FM, Piodi LP, Marotta G, Marchelli D, Corradini C, Parravicini L et al (2006) Usefulness of osteoprotegerin in assessing responses to neridronate treatment in Paget’s disease of bone. J Orthop Traumatol 7(4):192–194CrossRef

29.

Reid IR, Davidson JS, Wattie D, Wu F, Lucas J, Gamble GD et al (2004) Comparative responses of bone turnover markers to bisphosphonate therapy in Paget’s disease of bone. Bone 35(1):224–230PubMedCrossRef

30.

Randall AG, Kent GN, Garcia-Webb P, Bhagat CI, Pearce DJ, Gutteridge DH et al (1996) Comparison of biochemical markers of bone turnover in Paget disease treated with pamidronate and a proposed model for the relationships between measurements of the different forms of pyridinoline cross-links. J Bone Miner Res 11(8):1176–1184PubMedCrossRef

31.

Alvarez L, Peris P, Guanabens N, Vidal S, Quinto L, Monegal A et al (2004) Long-term biochemical response after bisphosphonate therapy in Paget’s disease of bone. Proposed intervals for monitoring treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford) 43(7):869–874CrossRef

32.

Garnero P, Gineyts E, Schaffer AV, Seaman J, Delmas PD (1998) Measurement of urinary excretion of nonisomerized and beta-isomerized forms of type I collagen breakdown products to monitor the effects of the bisphosphonate zoledronate in Paget’s disease. Arthritis Rheum. [Clinical Trial Randomized Controlled Trial]. 41(2):354–60

33.

Griffith K, Pearson D, Parker C, Thorpe S, Vincent RM, Hosking DJ (2001) The use of a whole body index with bone scintigraphy to monitor the response to therapy in Paget’s disease. Nucl Med Commun 22(10):1069–1075PubMedCrossRef

34.

Zati A, Colori BC, Bonfiglioli Stagni S, Mignani A (2011) Pain in Paget’s disease: a retrospective study of treatment efficacy. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 32(2):127–132PubMed

35.

36.

Alexandersen P, Peris P, Guanabens N, Byrjalsen I, Alvarez L, Solberg H et al (2005) Non-isomerized C-telopeptide fragments are highly sensitive markers for monitoring disease activity and treatment efficacy in Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res 20(4):588–595PubMedCrossRef

37.

Ulivieri FM, Marchelli D, Como G, Valente G, Messa P, Raimondi AR, et al (2006) Increased osteoprotegerin in Italian haemodialysis patients. Osteoporos Int. [Comment Letter]. 17(12):1822–3; author reply 4

38.

Ralston SH (2013) Clinical practice. Paget’s disease of bone. N Engl J Med. [Review]. 368(7):644–50

39.

Selby PL, Davie MW, Ralston SH, Stone MD (2002) Guidelines on the management of Paget’s disease of bone. Bone. [Guideline Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t]. 31(3):366–73

40.

Ingram RT, Collazo-Clavell M, Tiegs R, Fitzpatrick LA (1996) Paget’s disease is associated with changes in the immunohistochemical distribution of noncollagenous matrix proteins in bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81(5):1810–1820PubMed

41.

Shankar S, Hosking DJ (2006) Biochemical assessment of Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Mineral Res: Of J Am Soc Bone Mineral Res 21(Suppl 2):P22–P27CrossRef

42.

Delmas PD (1999) Biochemical markers of bone turnover in Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res Off J Am Soc Bone Miner Res 14(Suppl 2):66–69CrossRef

Titel: Bone turnover markers in Paget’s disease of the bone: A Systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von: A. A. Al Nofal
O. Altayar
K. BenKhadra
O. Q. Qasim Agha
N. Asi
M. Nabhan
L. J. Prokop
P. Tebben
M. H. Murad
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2015
Verlag: Springer London
Erschienen in: Osteoporosis International / Ausgabe 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3095-0

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Bone turnover markers in Paget’s disease of the bone: A Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Summary

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2015

Endpoint comparison for bone mineral density measurements in North Central Cancer Treatment Group cancer clinical trials N02C1 and N03CC (Alliance)

Erratum to: Intraoperative detection of viable bone with fluorescence imaging using Visually Enhanced Lesion Scope in patients with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: clinical and pathological evaluation

Intraoperative detection of viable bone with fluorescence imaging using Visually Enhanced Lesion Scope in patients with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: clinical and pathological evaluation

Vertebroplasty increases trabecular microfractures in elderly female cadaver spines

Association of polymorphisms in the beta-2 adrenergic receptor gene with fracture risk and bone mineral density

Vitamin D status in men with psoriatic arthritis: a case-control study

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie