nach oben

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Erschienen in:

14.06.2019 | Original Article

Brain metabolic patterns in patients with suspected non-Alzheimer’s pathophysiology (SNAP) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD): is [¹⁸F] FDG a specific biomarker in these patients?

verfasst von: Agostino Chiaravalloti, Gaetano Barbagallo, Alessandro Martorana, Anna Elisa Castellano, Francesco Ursini, Orazio Schillaci

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The present study was conducted to compare the pattern of brain [¹⁸F] FDG uptake in suspected non-Alzheimer’s pathophysiology (SNAP), AD, and healthy controls using 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoroglucose ([¹⁸F] FDG) positron emission tomography imaging. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid-β1-42 peptide (Aβ1-42) and tau were used in order to differentiate AD from SNAP.

Methods

The study included 43 newly diagnosed AD patients (female = 23; male = 20) according to the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria, 15 SNAP patients (female = 12; male =3), and a group of 34 healthy subjects that served as the control group (CG), who were found to be normal at neurological evaluation (male = 20; female = 14). A battery of neuropsychological tests was administrated in AD and SNAP subjects; cerebrospinal fluid assay was conducted in both AD and SNAP as well. Brain PET/CT acquisition was started 30 ± 5 min after [¹⁸F] FDG injection in all subjects. SPM12 [statistical parametric mapping] implemented in MATLAB 2018a was used for the analysis of PET scans in this study.

Results

As compared to SNAP, AD subjects showed significant hypometabolism in a wide cortical area involving the right frontal, parietal, and temporal lobes. As compared to CG, AD subjects showed a significant reduction in [¹⁸F] FDG uptake in the parietal, limbic, and frontal cortex, while a more limited reduction in [¹⁸F] FDG uptake in the same areas was found when comparing SNAP to CG.

Conclusions

SNAP subjects show milder impairment of brain [¹⁸F] FDG uptake as compared to AD. The partial overlap of the metabolic pattern between SNAP and AD limits the use of [¹⁸F] FDG PET/CT in effectively discriminating these clinical entities.

Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Weigand SD, Wiste HJ, Vemuri P, Lowe V, et al. An operational approach to National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2012;71:765–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22628.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Burnham SC, Bourgeat P, Dore V, Savage G, Brown B, Laws S, et al. Clinical and cognitive trajectories in cognitively healthy elderly individuals with suspected non-Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology (SNAP) or Alzheimer’s disease pathology: a longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1044–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30125-9.CrossRefPubMed

Filippi L, Chiaravalloti A, Bagni O, Schillaci O. (18)F-labeled radiopharmaceuticals for the molecular neuroimaging of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;8:268–81PubMedPubMedCentral

Villemagne VL, Rowe CC. Long night’s journey into the day: amyloid-beta imaging in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S349–59. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2012-129034.CrossRefPubMed

Villemagne VL, Pike KE, Chetelat G, Ellis KA, Mulligan RS, Bourgeat P, et al. Longitudinal assessment of Aß and cognition in aging and Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:181–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mosconi L, Tsui WH, Herholz K, Pupi A, Drzezga A, Lucignani G, et al. Multicenter standardized 18F-FDG PET diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease, and other dementias. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:390–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.045385.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Duara R, Loewenstein DA, Shen Q, Barker W, Potter E, Varon D, et al. Amyloid positron emission tomography with (18)F-flutemetamol and structural magnetic resonance imaging in the classification of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:295–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.01.006.CrossRefPubMed

Wirth M, Villeneuve S, Haase CM, Madison CM, Oh H, Landau SM, et al. Associations between Alzheimer disease biomarkers, neurodegeneration, and cognition in cognitively normal older people. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70:1512–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chiaravalloti A, Ursini F, Fiorentini A, Barbagallo G, Martorana A, Koch G, et al. Functional correlates of TSH, fT3 and fT4 in Alzheimer disease: a F-18 FDG PET/CT study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6220. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06138-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Magni E, Binetti G, Padovani A, Cappa SF, Bianchetti A, Trabucchi M. The mini-mental state examination in Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 1996;8:127–34.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato F, Venneri A. Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. 2002;22:443–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100720200003.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Shin MS, Park SY, Park SR, Seol SH, Kwon JS. Clinical and empirical applications of the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:892–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.115.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G. The mental deterioration battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of cognitive impairment. The group for the standardization of the mental deterioration battery. Eur Neurol. 1996;36:378–84.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Chiaravalloti A, Barbagallo G, Ricci M, Martorana A, Ursini F, Sannino P, et al. Brain metabolic correlates of CSF tau protein in a large cohort of Alzheimer’s disease patients: a CSF and FDG PET study. Brain Res. 2018;1678:116–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.10.016.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Chiaravalloti A, Castellano AE, Ricci M, Barbagallo G, Sannino P, Ursini F, et al. Coupled imaging with [(18)F]FBB and [(18)F]FDG in AD subjects show a selective association between amyloid burden and cortical dysfunction in the brain. Mol Imaging Biol. 2018;20:659–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-018-1167-1.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Varma AR, Snowden JS, Lloyd JJ, Talbot PR, Mann DM, Neary D. Evaluation of the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria in the differentiation of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;66:184–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Chiaravalloti A, Koch G, Toniolo S, Belli L, Lorenzo FD, Gaudenzi S, et al. Comparison between early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease patients with amnestic presentation: CSF and (18)F-FDG PET study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2016;6:108–19. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441776.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Vos SJ, Xiong C, Visser PJ, Jasielec MS, Hassenstab J, Grant EA, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease and its outcome: a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:957–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70194-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Roe CM, Fagan AM, Grant EA, Hassenstab J, Moulder KL, Maue Dreyfus D, et al. Amyloid imaging and CSF biomarkers in predicting cognitive impairment up to 7.5 years later. Neurology. 2013;80:1784–91. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182918ca6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

van Harten AC, Smits LL, Teunissen CE, Visser PJ, Koene T, Blankenstein MA, et al. Preclinical AD predicts decline in memory and executive functions in subjective complaints. Neurology. 2013;81:1409–16. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a8418b.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Forlenza OV, Radanovic M, Talib LL, Aprahamian I, Diniz BS, Zetterberg H, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease: diagnostic accuracy and prediction of dementia. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015;1:455–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2015.09.003.CrossRef

22.

World Medical Association (WMA). Declaration of Helsinki. Amended by the 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013. WMA Archives, Ferney-Voltaire, France. https://web.archive.org/web/20140101202246/ http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/. Accessed 24 Oct 2018

23.

D’Agostino E, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P. Atlas-to-image non-rigid registration by minimization of conditional local entropy. Information processing in medical imaging : proceedings of the conference. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2007;20:320–32.

24.

Mazziotta JC, Toga AW, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J. A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development. The international consortium for brain mapping (ICBM). NeuroImage. 1995;2:89–101..CrossRefPubMed

25.

Mazziotta J, Toga A, Evans A, Fox P, Lancaster J, Zilles K, et al. A four-dimensional probabilistic atlas of the human brain. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:401–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Bennett CM, Wolford GL, Miller MB. The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009;4:417–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp053.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Lancaster JL, Rainey LH, Summerlin JL, Freitas CS, Fox PT, Evans AC, et al. Automated labeling of the human brain: a preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method. Hum Brain Mapp. 1997;5:238–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1997)5:4<238::aid-hbm6>3.0.co;2-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Soonawala D, Amin T, Ebmeier KP, Steele JD, Dougall NJ, Best J, et al. Statistical parametric mapping of (99m)Tc-HMPAO-SPECT images for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: normalizing to cerebellar tracer uptake. NeuroImage. 2002;17:1193–202.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Schmahmann JD, Doyon J, McDonald D, Holmes C, Lavoie K, Hurwitz AS, et al. Three-dimensional MRI atlas of the human cerebellum in proportional stereotaxic space. NeuroImage. 1999;10:233–60. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0459.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Chetelat G, Dickson D, Fagan AM, Frisoni GB, et al. Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology--concept and controversy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:117–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Bailly M, Destrieux C, Hommet C, Mondon K, Cottier JP, Beaufils E, et al. Precuneus and cingulate cortex atrophy and Hypometabolism in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: MRI and (18)F-FDG PET quantitative analysis using FreeSurfer. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:583931. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/583931.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Braak H, Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Del Tredici K. Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: age categories from 1 to 100 years. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70:960–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e318232a379.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Delacourte A, David JP, Sergeant N, Buee L, Wattez A, Vermersch P, et al. The biochemical pathway of neurofibrillary degeneration in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1999;52:1158–65.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Booij J, Arbizu J, Darcourt J, Hesse S, Nobili F, Payoux P, et al. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET imaging cannot replace guidelines: on behalf of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1122–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2415-x.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Bensaidane MR, Beauregard JM, Poulin S, Buteau FA, Guimond J, Bergeron D, et al. Clinical utility of amyloid PET imaging in the differential diagnosis of atypical dementias and its impact on caregivers. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;52:1251–62. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-151180.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Hohman TJ, Dumitrescu L, Oksol A, Wagener M, Gifford KA, Jefferson AL. APOE allele frequencies in suspected non-amyloid pathophysiology (SNAP) and the prodromal stages of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188501.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Schreiber S, Schreiber F, Lockhart SN, Horng A, Bejanin A, Landau SM, et al. Alzheimer disease signature neurodegeneration and APOE genotype in mild cognitive impairment with suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:650–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5349.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Persson S, Arai H, Batish SD, Bernardini S, et al. The Alzheimer’s Association external quality control program for cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:386–95.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2243.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Brain metabolic patterns in patients with suspected non-Alzheimer’s pathophysiology (SNAP) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD): is [18F] FDG a specific biomarker in these patients?
verfasst von: Agostino Chiaravalloti
Gaetano Barbagallo
Alessandro Martorana
Anna Elisa Castellano
Francesco Ursini
Orazio Schillaci
Publikationsdatum: 14.06.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04379-4

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

18F-FDG PET metabolic-to-morphological volume ratio predicts PD-L1 tumour expression and response to PD-1 blockade in non-small-cell lung cancer

Interobserver reproducibility of tumor uptake quantification with 89Zr-immuno-PET: a multicenter analysis

Increase of precuneus metabolism correlates with reduction of PTSD symptoms after EMDR therapy in military veterans: an 18F-FDG PET study during virtual reality exposure to war

PET imaging of distinct brain uptake of a nanobody and similarly-sized PAMAM dendrimers after intra-arterial administration

Diagnostic value of surveillance 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for detecting recurrent esophageal carcinoma after curative treatment

Differentiation of treatment-related changes from tumour progression: a direct comparison between dynamic FET PET and ADC values obtained from DWI MRI