Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2015

01.01.2015 | Magnetic Resonance

Brain tumours at 7T MRI compared to 3T—contrast effect after half and full standard contrast agent dose: initial results

verfasst von: Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann, P. Szomolanyi, C. Kronnerwetter, G. Widhalm, M. Weber, S. Nemec, V. Juras, M. E. Ladd, D. Prayer, S. Trattnig

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the contrast agent effect of a full dose and half the dose of gadobenate dimeglumine in brain tumours at 7 Tesla (7T) MR versus 3 Tesla (3T).

Methods

Ten patients with primary brain tumours or metastases were examined. Signal intensities were assessed in the lesion and normal brain. Tumour-to-brain contrast and lesion enhancement were calculated. Additionally, two independent readers subjectively graded the image quality and artefacts.

Results

The enhanced mean tumour-to-brain contrast and lesion enhancement were significantly higher at 7T than at 3T for both half the dose (91.8 ± 45.8 vs. 43.9 ± 25.3 [p = 0.010], 128.1 ± 53.7 vs. 75.5 ± 32.4 [p = 0.004]) and the full dose (129.2 ± 50.9 vs. 66.6 ± 33.1 [p = 0.002], 165.4 ± 54.2 vs. 102.6 ± 45.4 [p = 0.004]). Differences between dosages at each field strength were also significant. Lesion enhancement was higher with half the dose at 7T than with the full dose at 3T (p = .037), while the tumour-to-brain contrast was not significantly different. Subjectively, contrast enhancement, visibility, and lesion delineation were better at 7T and with the full dose. All parameters were rated as good, at the least.

Conclusion

Half the routine contrast agent dose at 7T provided higher lesion enhancement than the full dose at 3T which indicates the possibility of dose reduction at 7T.

Key Points

The contrast effect of gadobenate dimeglumine was assessed at 7T and 3T.
In brain tumours, contrast effect was higher at 7T than at 3T.
Tumour-to-brain contrast at 7T half dose and 3T full dose were comparable.
7T half dose lesion enhancement was higher than 3T full dose enhancement.
Our results indicate the possibility of contrast agent dose reduction at 7T.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brem SS, Bierman PJ, Brem H et al (2011) Central nervous system cancers. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 9:352–400 Brem SS, Bierman PJ, Brem H et al (2011) Central nervous system cancers. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 9:352–400
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Haustein J, Laniado M, Niendorf HP et al (1992) Administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging of intracranial tumors - dosage and field-strength. Am J Neuroradiol 13:1199–1206PubMed Haustein J, Laniado M, Niendorf HP et al (1992) Administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging of intracranial tumors - dosage and field-strength. Am J Neuroradiol 13:1199–1206PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Moser E, Stahlberg F, Ladd ME et al (2012) 7-T MR-from research to clinical applications? NMR Biomed 25:695–716PubMedCrossRef Moser E, Stahlberg F, Ladd ME et al (2012) 7-T MR-from research to clinical applications? NMR Biomed 25:695–716PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuh WTC, Fisher DJ, Runge VM et al (1994) Phase-III multicenter trial of high-dose gadoteridol in MR evaluation of brain metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 15:1037–1051PubMed Yuh WTC, Fisher DJ, Runge VM et al (1994) Phase-III multicenter trial of high-dose gadoteridol in MR evaluation of brain metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 15:1037–1051PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Akeson P, Vikhoff B, Stahlberg F et al (1997) Brain lesion contrast in MR imaging - dependence on field strength and concentration of gadodiamide injection in patients and phantoms. Acta Radiol 38:14–18PubMedCrossRef Akeson P, Vikhoff B, Stahlberg F et al (1997) Brain lesion contrast in MR imaging - dependence on field strength and concentration of gadodiamide injection in patients and phantoms. Acta Radiol 38:14–18PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang KH, Ra DG, Han MH et al (1994) Contrast enhancement of brain-tumors at different MR field strengths - comparison of 0.5-T and 2.0-T. Am J Neuroradiol 15:1413–1419PubMed Chang KH, Ra DG, Han MH et al (1994) Contrast enhancement of brain-tumors at different MR field strengths - comparison of 0.5-T and 2.0-T. Am J Neuroradiol 15:1413–1419PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Krautmacher C, Willinek WA, Tschampa HJ et al (2005) Brain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0T compared with 1.5T - initial experience. Radiology 237:1014–1019PubMedCrossRef Krautmacher C, Willinek WA, Tschampa HJ et al (2005) Brain tumors: full- and half-dose contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0T compared with 1.5T - initial experience. Radiology 237:1014–1019PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Nobauer-Huhmann IM, Ba-Ssalamah A, Mlynarik V et al (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement of brain tumors at 3 tesla versus 1.5 tesla. Investig Radiol 37:114–119CrossRef Nobauer-Huhmann IM, Ba-Ssalamah A, Mlynarik V et al (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancement of brain tumors at 3 tesla versus 1.5 tesla. Investig Radiol 37:114–119CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al (2002) Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 47:1202–1210PubMedCrossRef Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM et al (2002) Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 47:1202–1210PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Runge VM, Biswas J, Wintersperger BJ et al (2006) The efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) at 3 tesla in brain magnetic resonance imaging - comparison to 1.5 tesla and a standard gadolinium chelate using a rat brain tumor model. Investig Radiol 41:244–248CrossRef Runge VM, Biswas J, Wintersperger BJ et al (2006) The efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA) at 3 tesla in brain magnetic resonance imaging - comparison to 1.5 tesla and a standard gadolinium chelate using a rat brain tumor model. Investig Radiol 41:244–248CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinck PA, Fischer HW, Vanderelst L et al (1988) Field-cycling relaxometry - medical applications. Radiology 168:843–849PubMedCrossRef Rinck PA, Fischer HW, Vanderelst L et al (1988) Field-cycling relaxometry - medical applications. Radiology 168:843–849PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wansapura JP, Holland SK, Dunn RS et al (1999) NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla. JMRI-J Magn Reson Imaging 9:531–538CrossRef Wansapura JP, Holland SK, Dunn RS et al (1999) NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla. JMRI-J Magn Reson Imaging 9:531–538CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood ML, Hardy PA (1993) Proton relaxation enhancement. JMRI-J Magn Reson Imaging 3:149–156CrossRef Wood ML, Hardy PA (1993) Proton relaxation enhancement. JMRI-J Magn Reson Imaging 3:149–156CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernandez-Seara MA, Wehrli FW (2000) Postprocessing technique to correct for background gradients in image-based R-2(*) measurements. Magn Reson Med 44:358–366PubMedCrossRef Fernandez-Seara MA, Wehrli FW (2000) Postprocessing technique to correct for background gradients in image-based R-2(*) measurements. Magn Reson Med 44:358–366PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogler H, Platzek J, SchuhmannGiampieri G et al (1995) Pre-clinical evaluation of gadobutrol: a new, neutral, extracellular contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 21:1–10PubMedCrossRef Vogler H, Platzek J, SchuhmannGiampieri G et al (1995) Pre-clinical evaluation of gadobutrol: a new, neutral, extracellular contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 21:1–10PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J et al (2005) Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Investig Radiol 40:715–724CrossRef Rohrer M, Bauer H, Mintorovitch J et al (2005) Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths. Investig Radiol 40:715–724CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H et al (2006) Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), gadobutrol (Giadovist), and gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Investig Radiol 41:213–221CrossRef Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H et al (2006) Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), gadobutrol (Giadovist), and gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Investig Radiol 41:213–221CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Szomolanyi P, Juras V et al (2010) Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents at 7 tesla in vitro T-1 relaxivities in human blood plasma. Investig Radiol 45:554–558CrossRef Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Szomolanyi P, Juras V et al (2010) Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance contrast agents at 7 tesla in vitro T-1 relaxivities in human blood plasma. Investig Radiol 45:554–558CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rinck PA, Muller RN (1999) Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents. Eur Radiol 9:998–1004PubMedCrossRef Rinck PA, Muller RN (1999) Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents. Eur Radiol 9:998–1004PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sze G, Johnson C, Kawamura Y et al (1998) Comparison of single- and triple-dose contrast material in the MR screening of brain metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 19:821–828PubMed Sze G, Johnson C, Kawamura Y et al (1998) Comparison of single- and triple-dose contrast material in the MR screening of brain metastases. Am J Neuroradiol 19:821–828PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Schneider G, Kirchin MA, Pirovano G et al (2001) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial metastases: effect of dose on lesion detection and delineation. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:525–539PubMedCrossRef Schneider G, Kirchin MA, Pirovano G et al (2001) Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial metastases: effect of dose on lesion detection and delineation. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:525–539PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ba-Ssalamah A, Nobauer-Huhmann IM, Pinker K et al (2003) Effect of contrast dose and field strength in the magnetic resonance detection of brain metastases. Investig Radiol 38:415–422 Ba-Ssalamah A, Nobauer-Huhmann IM, Pinker K et al (2003) Effect of contrast dose and field strength in the magnetic resonance detection of brain metastases. Investig Radiol 38:415–422
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Burke VJ et al (1992) High-dose gadoteridol in MR imaging of intracranial neoplasms. JMRI-J Magn Reson Imaging 2:9–18CrossRef Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Burke VJ et al (1992) High-dose gadoteridol in MR imaging of intracranial neoplasms. JMRI-J Magn Reson Imaging 2:9–18CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Brekenfeld C, Foert E, Hundt W et al (2001) Enhancement of cerebral diseases: how much contrast agent is enough? Comparison of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol/kg gadoteridol at 0.2T with 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol at 1.5T. Investig Radiol 36:266–275 Brekenfeld C, Foert E, Hundt W et al (2001) Enhancement of cerebral diseases: how much contrast agent is enough? Comparison of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mmol/kg gadoteridol at 0.2T with 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol at 1.5T. Investig Radiol 36:266–275
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bracco (2012) Prescribing information. Bracco Diagnostics Inc Bracco (2012) Prescribing information. Bracco Diagnostics Inc
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schorner W, Laniado M, Niendorf HP et al (1986) Time-dependent changes in image-contrast in brain-tumors after gadolinium-DTPA. Am J Neuroradiol 7:1013–1020PubMed Schorner W, Laniado M, Niendorf HP et al (1986) Time-dependent changes in image-contrast in brain-tumors after gadolinium-DTPA. Am J Neuroradiol 7:1013–1020PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Runge VM, Gelblum DY, Pacetti ML et al (1990) Gd-Hp-Do3a in clinical MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 177:393–400PubMedCrossRef Runge VM, Gelblum DY, Pacetti ML et al (1990) Gd-Hp-Do3a in clinical MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 177:393–400PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang JC, Sammet S, Yang XY et al (2010) Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Investig Radiol 45:233–244CrossRef Liang JC, Sammet S, Yang XY et al (2010) Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Investig Radiol 45:233–244CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn MJ, Picozzi P, Maldjian JA et al (2007) Evaluation of intraaxial enhancing brain tumors on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for visualization and assessment, and implications for surgical intervention. J Neurosurg 106:557–566PubMedCrossRef Kuhn MJ, Picozzi P, Maldjian JA et al (2007) Evaluation of intraaxial enhancing brain tumors on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine for visualization and assessment, and implications for surgical intervention. J Neurosurg 106:557–566PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Rumboldt Z, Rowley HA, Steinberg F et al (2009) Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine in MRI of brain tumors at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:760–767PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Rumboldt Z, Rowley HA, Steinberg F et al (2009) Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, intra-individual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine in MRI of brain tumors at 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 29:760–767PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Brain tumours at 7T MRI compared to 3T—contrast effect after half and full standard contrast agent dose: initial results
verfasst von
Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann
P. Szomolanyi
C. Kronnerwetter
G. Widhalm
M. Weber
S. Nemec
V. Juras
M. E. Ladd
D. Prayer
S. Trattnig
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3351-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

European Radiology 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.