Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

26.01.2017 | Original Research

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment at the Time of Screening Mammography: Perceptions and Clinical Management Outcomes for Women at High Risk

verfasst von: Nichole A. Morman, Lindsey Byrne, Christy Collins, Kelly Reynolds, Jeffrey G. Bell

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a breast cancer risk assessment (BCRA) at the time of screening mammogram. Women whose BCRA indicated a high risk for cancer received a letter with instructions for breast health care and genetic counseling if appropriate. After 6 months this group received surveys to evaluate their risk perception and their recall of, and compliance with, recommendations. We also explored the impact of other variables such as a recommendation for genetic counseling and physician communication with the women. After the BCRA, the majority of high risk women reported no change in their perceived risk of cancer. A woman’s perceived risk of cancer after a BCRA was significantly associated with her recall of recommendations for breast health care, but not with compliance. A recommendation for genetic counseling was not significantly related to women’s perceived risk of cancer after the BCRA. Ten percent of women who should have obtained genetic counseling actually completed an appointment. Women who discussed their BCRA results with their physicians were more compliant with a six month breast exam with a doctor (53% vs 17%, p = 0.018). Overall, women felt that the BCRA was helpful and did not cause undue stress or anxiety. Although the cohort’s compliance with recommendations was suboptimal, physicians’ interactions with their patients may have a positive influence on their compliance.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Calvocoressi, L., Kasl, S. V., Lee, C. H., Stolar, M., Claus, E. B., & Jones, B. A. (2004). A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and white women ages 40 to 79 years. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 13(12), 2096–2105. Calvocoressi, L., Kasl, S. V., Lee, C. H., Stolar, M., Claus, E. B., & Jones, B. A. (2004). A prospective study of perceived susceptibility to breast cancer and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines in African American and white women ages 40 to 79 years. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 13(12), 2096–2105.
Zurück zum Zitat Espeland, M. A., Dotson, K., Jaramillo, S. A., Kahn, S. E., Harrison, B., Montez, M., et al. Look AHEAD Research Group. (2006). Consent for genetics studies among clinical trial participants: findings from action for health in diabetes (look AHEAD). Clinical Trials (London, England), 3(5), 443–456. doi:10.1177/1740774506070727. Espeland, M. A., Dotson, K., Jaramillo, S. A., Kahn, S. E., Harrison, B., Montez, M., et al. Look AHEAD Research Group. (2006). Consent for genetics studies among clinical trial participants: findings from action for health in diabetes (look AHEAD). Clinical Trials (London, England), 3(5), 443–456. doi:10.​1177/​1740774506070727​.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans, D. G. R., Ingham, S., Dawe, S., Roberts, L., Lalloo, F., Brentnall, A. R., et al. (2014). Breast cancer risk assessment in 8,824 women attending a family history evaluation and screening programme. Familial Cancer, 13(2), 189–196.CrossRefPubMed Evans, D. G. R., Ingham, S., Dawe, S., Roberts, L., Lalloo, F., Brentnall, A. R., et al. (2014). Breast cancer risk assessment in 8,824 women attending a family history evaluation and screening programme. Familial Cancer, 13(2), 189–196.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ford, B. M., Evans, J. S., Stoffel, E. M., Balmaña, J., Regan, M. M., & Syngal, S. (2006). Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 15(7), 1355–1359.CrossRef Ford, B. M., Evans, J. S., Stoffel, E. M., Balmaña, J., Regan, M. M., & Syngal, S. (2006). Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 15(7), 1355–1359.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Green, D., Cushman, M., Dermond, N., Johnson, E. A., Castro, C., Arnett, et al. (2006). Obtaining informed consent for genetic studies: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 164(9), 845–851. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj286 Green, D., Cushman, M., Dermond, N., Johnson, E. A., Castro, C., Arnett, et al. (2006). Obtaining informed consent for genetic studies: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 164(9), 845–851. doi:10.​1093/​aje/​kwj286
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobi, C. E., de Bock, G. H., Siegerink, B., & van Asperren, C. J. (2009). Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment models in clinical practice: which model to choose? Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 115(2), 381–390.CrossRefPubMed Jacobi, C. E., de Bock, G. H., Siegerink, B., & van Asperren, C. J. (2009). Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment models in clinical practice: which model to choose? Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 115(2), 381–390.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Katapodi, M., Lee, K., Facione, N., & Dodd, M. (2004). Predictors of breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Preventative Medicine, 38(4), 388–402. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.11.012.CrossRef Katapodi, M., Lee, K., Facione, N., & Dodd, M. (2004). Predictors of breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Preventative Medicine, 38(4), 388–402. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ypmed.​2003.​11.​012.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lerman, C., Lustbader, E., Rimer, B., Daly, M., Miller, S., Sands, C., et al. (1995). Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87(4), 286–292. doi:10.1093/jnci/87.4.286.CrossRefPubMed Lerman, C., Lustbader, E., Rimer, B., Daly, M., Miller, S., Sands, C., et al. (1995). Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87(4), 286–292. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​87.​4.​286.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McQuillan, G. M., Porter, K. S., Agelli, M., & Kington, R. (2003). Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience. Genetics in Medicine, 5(1), 35–42.CrossRefPubMed McQuillan, G. M., Porter, K. S., Agelli, M., & Kington, R. (2003). Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience. Genetics in Medicine, 5(1), 35–42.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mellon, S., Gold, R., Janisse, J., Cichon, M., Tainsky, M. A., Simon, M. S., et al. (2008). Risk perception and cancer worries in families at increased risk of familial breast/ovarian cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 756–766. doi:10.1002/pon.1370.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mellon, S., Gold, R., Janisse, J., Cichon, M., Tainsky, M. A., Simon, M. S., et al. (2008). Risk perception and cancer worries in families at increased risk of familial breast/ovarian cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 17(8), 756–766. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​1370.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Mezuk, B., Eaton, W. W., & Zandi, P. (2008). Participant characteristics that influence consent for genetic research in a population-based survey: the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow-up. Community Genetics, 11(3), 171–178. doi:10.1159/000113880.PubMedPubMedCentral Mezuk, B., Eaton, W. W., & Zandi, P. (2008). Participant characteristics that influence consent for genetic research in a population-based survey: the Baltimore epidemiologic catchment area follow-up. Community Genetics, 11(3), 171–178. doi:10.​1159/​000113880.PubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Moorman, P. G., Skinner, C. S., Evans, J. P., Newman, B., Sorenson, J. R., Calingaert, B., et al. (2004). Racial differences in enrollment in a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 13(8), 1349–1353. Moorman, P. G., Skinner, C. S., Evans, J. P., Newman, B., Sorenson, J. R., Calingaert, B., et al. (2004). Racial differences in enrollment in a cancer genetics registry. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 13(8), 1349–1353.
Zurück zum Zitat Royak-Schaler, R., Klabunde, C. N., Greene, W. F., Lannin, D. R., DeVellis, B., Wilson, K. R., et al. (2002). Communicating breast cancer risk: patient perceptions of provider discussions. Medscape Women’s Health, 7(2), 2.PubMed Royak-Schaler, R., Klabunde, C. N., Greene, W. F., Lannin, D. R., DeVellis, B., Wilson, K. R., et al. (2002). Communicating breast cancer risk: patient perceptions of provider discussions. Medscape Women’s Health, 7(2), 2.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Saslow, D., Boetes, C., Burke, W., Harms, S., Leach, M. O., Lehman, C. D., et al. (2007). American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 57(2), 75–89. Saslow, D., Boetes, C., Burke, W., Harms, S., Leach, M. O., Lehman, C. D., et al. (2007). American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 57(2), 75–89.
Zurück zum Zitat Shih, T. H., & Fan, X. (2009). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 26–40.CrossRef Shih, T. H., & Fan, X. (2009). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 26–40.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., & Jemal, A. (2014). Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64, 9–29. doi:10.3322/caac.21208. Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., & Jemal, A. (2014). Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 64, 9–29. doi:10.​3322/​caac.​21208.
Zurück zum Zitat Tchou, J., & Morrow, M. (2003). Available models for breast cancer risk assessment: how accurate are they? Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 197(6), 1029–1035.CrossRefPubMed Tchou, J., & Morrow, M. (2003). Available models for breast cancer risk assessment: how accurate are they? Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 197(6), 1029–1035.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment at the Time of Screening Mammography: Perceptions and Clinical Management Outcomes for Women at High Risk
verfasst von
Nichole A. Morman
Lindsey Byrne
Christy Collins
Kelly Reynolds
Jeffrey G. Bell
Publikationsdatum
26.01.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0050-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

KI-gestütztes Mammografiescreening überzeugt im Praxistest

Mit dem Einsatz künstlicher Intelligenz lässt sich die Detektionsrate im Mammografiescreening offenbar deutlich steigern. Mehr unnötige Zusatzuntersuchungen sind laut der Studie aus Deutschland nicht zu befürchten.

Einer von sieben Frauen macht die Menopause sehr zu schaffen

Von mäßigen bis schweren vasomotorischen Beschwerden sind 14,7% der Frauen in der Postmenopause betroffen. Das haben kanadische Forscherinnen in einer Subgruppenanalyse der WARM-Studie herausgefunden.

Die elektronische Patientenakte kommt: Das sollten Sie jetzt wissen

Am 15. Januar geht die „ePA für alle“ zunächst in den Modellregionen an den Start. Doch schon bald soll sie in allen Praxen zum Einsatz kommen. Was ist jetzt zu tun? Was müssen Sie wissen? Wir geben in einem FAQ Antworten auf 21 Fragen.

Keine eingeschränkten Kassenleistungen bei Schwangerschaft nach IVF

Nach privat bezahlter In-vitro-Fertilisation muss die gesetzliche Krankenkasse ein Arzneimittel zum Erhalt der Schwangerschaft bezahlen, so ein Urteil des Sozialgerichts in München.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.