The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05137-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). In addition, factors influencing breast sensibility were evaluated.
A cross-sectional study was performed in Maastricht University Medical Center between July 2016 and August 2018. Women with unilateral mastectomy with or without IBBR were included. Objective sensory measurements were performed using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. Their healthy breast served as control, using a paired t test. Differences between mastectomy with and without IBBR were evaluated using the independent t test. Linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between patient characteristics on breast sensibility. The paired t test was used to evaluate in which part of the breast the sensibility is best preserved.
Fifty-one patients were eligible for inclusion. Sixteen patients underwent IBBR after mastectomy. Twenty-three patients received radiotherapy and 35 patients received chemotherapy. Monofilament values were significantly higher in the operated group compared to the reference group (p < 0.001). Linear regression showed a statistically significant association between IBBR and objectively measured impaired sensation (p = 0.008). After mastectomy, the cutaneous protective sensation is only diminished. After IBBR, it is lost in the majority of the breast. The medial part of the breast was significantly more sensitive than the lateral part in all operated breasts (p < 0.001).
IBBR has a significantly negative impact on the breast sensibility compared to mastectomy alone. This study shows that the protective sensation of the skin in the breast is lost after IBBR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the level of sensible impairment after mastectomy or IBBR. More research is necessary to confirm these results.
Schreuder K, van Bommel ACM, de Ligt KM, Maduro JH, Vrancken Peeters M, Mureau MAM, Siesling S (2017) Hospital organizational factors affect the use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands. Breast 34:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.011
Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA). Jaarrapportage 2017 - Registraties.
Cornelissen AJM, Beugels J, van Kuijk SMJ, Heuts EM, Rozen SM, Spiegel AJ, van der Hulst R, Tuinder SMH (2017) Sensation of the autologous reconstructed breast improves quality of life: a pilot study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4547-3
Zimmerman A, Bai L, Ginty DD (2014) The gentle touch receptors of mammalian skin. Science 346(6212):950–954. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254229
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61(4):344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
World Medical A (2013) World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 310(20):2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Manual: Baseline® Tactile™ Semmes-Weinstein type monofilaments. Fabrication Enterprises Inc. Authorized CE representative: RMS UK Ltd. 28 Trinity Road. Nailsea, Somerset BS48 4NU (UK). ©2017, all rights reserved. Baseline and Tactile are trademarks of Goldberg
Marchac D, de Olarte G (1982) Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis with a short inframammary scar. Plast Reconstr Surg 69(1):45–55
Rabin RC (2017) After Mastectomies, an Unexpected Blow: Numb New Breasts. The New York Times
Hallowell N, Baylock B, Heiniger L, Butow PN, Patel D, Meiser B, Saunders C, kConFab Psychosocial Group on behalf of the kConFab I, Price MA (2012) Looking different, feeling different: women’s reactions to risk-reducing breast and ovarian surgery. Fam Cancer 11(2):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-011-9504-4
Peltoniemi H, Asko-Seljavaara S, Harma M, Sundell B (1993) Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Long term results and return of sensibility. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 27(2):127–131
Isenberg JS (2002) Sense and sensibility: breast reconstruction with innervated TRAM flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 18(1):23–28
Isenberg JS, Spinelli H (2004) Further experience with innervated autologous flaps in postoncologic breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52(5):448–451; discussion 451
Shaw WW, Orringer JS, Ko CY, Ratto LL, Mersmann CA (1997) The spontaneous return of sensibility in breasts reconstructed with autologous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 99(2):394–399
Temple CL, Ross DC, Kim S, Tse R, Bettger-Hahn M, Gan BS, MacDermid J (2009) Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction: Part II. Innervation improves patient-rated quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(5):1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b98963
Temple CL, Tse R, Bettger-Hahn M, MacDermid J, Gan BS, Ross DC (2006) Sensibility following innervated free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(7):2119–2127. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000218268.59024.cc; discussion 2128–2130.
Bresser PJ, Seynaeve C, Van Gool AR, Brekelmans CT, Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel AN, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Duivenvoorden HJ, Klijn JG, Tibben A (2006) Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women. Plast Reconstr Surg 117(6):1675–1682. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000217383.99038.f5 discussion 1683 –1674.
Temple CL, Hurst LN (1999) Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(1):72–76
Craig RD, Sykes PA (1970) Nipple sensitivity following reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 23(2):165–172
Ferreira MC, Costa MP, Cunha MS, Sakae E, Fels KW (2003) Sensibility of the breast after reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 51(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000054190.76311.1A
Hamdi M, Greuse M, De Mey A, Webster MH (2001) A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 54(1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.2000.3456
Chiari A Jr, Nunes TA, Grotting JC, Cotta FB, Gomes RC (2012) Breast sensitivity before and after the L short-scar mammaplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(1):105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9756-2
Chiummariello S, Angelisanti M, Arleo S, Alfano C (2013) Evaluation of the sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty. Our experience and review of the literature. Ann Ital Chir 84(4):385–388
Dikmans RE, Negenborn VL, Bouman MB, Winters HA, Twisk JW, Ruhe PQ, Mureau MA, Smit JM, Tuinder S, Eltahir Y, Posch NA, van Steveninck-Barends JM, Meesters-Caberg MA, van der Hulst RR, Ritt MJ, Mullender MG (2017) Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 18(2):251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30668-4
Brzezinski K (2012) Chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy. Part I. Pathophysiology. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 16(1):72–78. https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2012.27341
Lagergren J, Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Hansson P (2007) Long-term sensibility following nonautologous, immediate breast reconstruction. Breast J 13(4):346–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00441.x
Farina MA, Newby BG, Alani HM (1980) Innervation of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(4):497–501
Jaspars JJ, Posma AN, van Immerseel AA, Gittenberger-de Groot AC (1997) The cutaneous innervation of the female breast and nipple-areola complex: implications for surgery. Br J Plast Surg 50(4):249–259
le Roux CM, Pan WR, Matousek SA, Ashton MW (2011) Preventing venous congestion of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomical guide to preserving essential venous drainage networks. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1073–1079. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182044bb2
Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, Soutar DS (1996) An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg 49(3):156–164
Cooper A (1840) The anatomy of the breast. Longman, London, pp 91–97
Riccio CA, Zeiderman MR, Chowdhry S, Brooks RM, Kelishadi SS, Tutela JP, Choo J, Yonick DV, Wilhelmi BJ (2015) Plastic surgery of the breast: keeping the nipple sensitive. Eplasty 15:e28
Schulz S, Zeiderman MR, Gunn JS, Riccio CA, Chowdhry S, Brooks R, Choo JH, Wilhelmi BJ (2017) Safe plastic surgery of the breast II. Saving Nipple Sensation Eplasty 17:e33
Davison JA, Mercer DM (1998) Accidental burns following subcutaneous mastectomy and reconstruction with a prosthesis. Br J Plast Surg 51(6):486
Gandolfi S, Vaysse C, Garrido I, Joly-Fradin N, Grolleau JL, Chaput B (2014) Burn injury to a reconstructed breast via a cigarette causing implant exposure. The importance of the patient’s education. Breast J 20(5):543–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12314
Seth R, Lamyman MJ, Athanassopoulos A, Tyler M (2008) Too close for comfort: accidental burn following subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction. J R Soc Med 101(1):39–40. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2007.070032
Howard-McNatt MM (2013) Patients opting for breast reconstruction following mastectomy: an analysis of uptake rates and benefit. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 5:9–15. https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S29142
- Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
S. M. J. van Kuijk
A. J. M. Cornelissen
E. M. Heuts
R. R. W. J. van der Hulst
S. M. H. Tuinder
- Springer US
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II