Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine 4/2017

13.03.2017 | Original Research

Brookings supports breastfeeding: using public deliberation as a community-engaged approach to dissemination of research

verfasst von: Jenn Anderson, Ph.D., Rebecca A. Kuehl, Ph.D., Sara A. Mehltretter Drury, Ph.D., Lois Tschetter, Ed.D., RN, IBCLC, Mary Schwaegerl, R.N, Julia Yoder, M.B.A, Heidi Gullickson, B. S, Jamison Lamp, B. S, Charlotte Bachman, RN, IBCLC, Marilyn Hildreth, RN, IBCLC

Erschienen in: Translational Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Empirical evidence demonstrates myriad benefits of breastfeeding for mother and child, along with benefits to businesses that support breastfeeding. Federal and state legislation requires workplace support for pumping and provides protections for public breastfeeding. Yet, many are unaware of these laws, and thus, support systems remain underdeveloped. We used a community-based approach to spread awareness about the evidence-based benefits of breastfeeding and breastfeeding support. We worked to improve breastfeeding support at the local hospital, among local employers, and throughout the broader community. Our coalition representing the hospital, the chamber of commerce, the university, and local lactation consultants used a public deliberation model for dissemination. We held focus groups, hosted a public conversation, spoke to local organizations, and promoted these efforts through local media. The hospital achieved Baby-Friendly status and opened a Baby Café. Breastfeeding support in the community improved through policies, designated pumping spaces, and signage that supports public breastfeeding at local businesses. Community awareness of the benefits of breastfeeding and breastfeeding support increased; the breastfeeding support coalition remains active. The public deliberation process for dissemination engaged the community with evidence-based promotion of breastfeeding support, increased agency, and produced sustainable results tailored to the community’s unique needs.
Literatur
6.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Carcasson M, Sprain L. Beyond problem solving: reconceptualizing the work of public deliberation as deliberative inquiry. Commun Theory. 2016;26(1):41–63. doi: 10.1111/comt.12055.CrossRef Carcasson M, Sprain L. Beyond problem solving: reconceptualizing the work of public deliberation as deliberative inquiry. Commun Theory. 2016;26(1):41–63. doi: 10.​1111/​comt.​12055.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Koerber A. Breast or bottle? Contemporary controversies in infant-feeding policy and practice. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press; 2013. Koerber A. Breast or bottle? Contemporary controversies in infant-feeding policy and practice. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press; 2013.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Asen R. Deliberation and trust. Argumentation and Advocacy. 2013;50:2–17. Asen R. Deliberation and trust. Argumentation and Advocacy. 2013;50:2–17.
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho H (Ed). Health communication message design: Theory and practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2012. Cho H (Ed). Health communication message design: Theory and practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage; 2012.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, McGivern G, Dopson S, Bennett C. Making wicked problems governable? The case of managed networks in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.CrossRef Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, McGivern G, Dopson S, Bennett C. Making wicked problems governable? The case of managed networks in health care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nabatchi T. An introduction to deliberative civic engagement. In: Nabatchi T, Gastil J, Weiksner GM, Leighninger M, eds. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012:3–18.CrossRef Nabatchi T. An introduction to deliberative civic engagement. In: Nabatchi T, Gastil J, Weiksner GM, Leighninger M, eds. Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012:3–18.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McCornack S. Reflect & Relate: An Introduction to Interpersonal Communication. 4th ed. Bedford/St. Martin’s: Boston, MA; 2016. McCornack S. Reflect & Relate: An Introduction to Interpersonal Communication. 4th ed. Bedford/St. Martin’s: Boston, MA; 2016.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Makau JM, Marty DL. Dialogue & Deliberation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press; 2013. Makau JM, Marty DL. Dialogue & Deliberation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press; 2013.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobsen TL. Participatory communication for social change: the relevance of the theory of communicative action. Communication Yearbook. 2003;27:87–124.CrossRef Jacobsen TL. Participatory communication for social change: the relevance of the theory of communicative action. Communication Yearbook. 2003;27:87–124.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1991.CrossRef Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1991.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2010. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2010.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson J, Kuehl RA, Drury SAM. 2017 Blending qualitative, quantitative, and rhetorical methods to engage citizens in public deliberation to improve workplace breastfeeding support. In SAGE Research Methods Cases Part 2. doi:10.4135/9781473953796 Anderson J, Kuehl RA, Drury SAM. 2017 Blending qualitative, quantitative, and rhetorical methods to engage citizens in public deliberation to improve workplace breastfeeding support. In SAGE Research Methods Cases Part 2. doi:10.​4135/​9781473953796
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
31.
Metadaten
Titel
Brookings supports breastfeeding: using public deliberation as a community-engaged approach to dissemination of research
verfasst von
Jenn Anderson, Ph.D.
Rebecca A. Kuehl, Ph.D.
Sara A. Mehltretter Drury, Ph.D.
Lois Tschetter, Ed.D., RN, IBCLC
Mary Schwaegerl, R.N
Julia Yoder, M.B.A
Heidi Gullickson, B. S
Jamison Lamp, B. S
Charlotte Bachman, RN, IBCLC
Marilyn Hildreth, RN, IBCLC
Publikationsdatum
13.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Translational Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1869-6716
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-9860
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-017-0480-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Translational Behavioral Medicine 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe