Skip to main content
main-content

12.09.2019 | Review | Ausgabe 2/2019 Open Access

Neurology and Therapy 2/2019

Burden of Disease and Current Management of Dementia with Lewy Bodies: A Literature Review

Zeitschrift:
Neurology and Therapy > Ausgabe 2/2019
Autoren:
Amir Abbas Tahami Monfared, Genevieve Meier, Richard Perry, Darren Joe
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s40120-019-00154-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Enhanced digital features

To view enhanced digital features for this article go to https://​doi.​org/​10.​6084/​m9.​figshare.​9741479.

Abstract

Introduction

A significant proportion of dementia is concretely estimated to be attributable to dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)—one of the most common types of progressive dementia; however, there is a paucity of literature on this disease. We aimed to examine available evidence to gain a better understanding of its treatment landscape, clinical management, and disease burden.

Methods

A systematic literature review captured any DLB studies that report on randomised controlled trials (RCTs), epidemiology, disease progression, and economic data. An additional targeted literature review captured studies reporting on clinical management and quality of life (QoL) in this disease. Publication date was limited to 1 January 2007–26 March 2018, with the exception for RCTs, where no time restrictions were applied.

Findings

Of the 3486 studies initially identified, 55 studies were eligible for inclusion. The studies were mainly from Europe (n = 29), the USA (n = 9), and Japan (n = 8). Mini-Mental State Examination and Neuropsychiatric Inventory scores were the most commonly reported clinical outcomes in RCTs (n = 14). The most frequently identified interventions reported in RCTs were donepezil and memantine. Patients with DLB typically reported worse outcomes in relation to efficacy and safety, cognitive impairment, survival, and QoL compared with those with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Additionally, patients with DLB were associated with higher hospitalisation rates and cost of care. Furthermore, there is a reliance on a small number of consensus guidelines. Of these, only one set of guidelines (DLB Consortium) was developed specifically for DLB.

Conclusion

The paucity of data indicates an unmet need in this therapy area. Although several studies look into the clinical and pathological aspects of DLB, consensus guidelines and studies on healthcare utilisation in patients with dementia have largely focused on AD. Additionally, most of the findings were made in comparison with AD.

Funding

Eisai Inc.
Zusatzmaterial
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Neurology and Therapy 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Innere Medizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

© Springer Medizin 

Bildnachweise