Burkitt’s lymphoma is a highly aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and is the fastest growing human tumour [
9,
10]. This EBV-associated lymphoma was one of the first tumours shown to have a chromosomal translocation (
chromosome 14) that activates an oncogene (c-MYC) [
4]. The incidence is very high with an aggressive clinical course in immunosuppressed patients in non-endemic areas especially when associated with HIV infection. They were all positive for EBV in a case series [
11]. Clinically, Burkitt’s lymphoma patients do not usually exhibit the B-symptoms (fever, night sweats, and weight loss) characteristic of early non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. This is because the transformation of these cells compromises host defence and evolves mechanisms to escape immune surveillance [
12]. Patients with a rapidly growing extranodal intra-abdominal Burkitt's tumour present with symptoms of bowel obstruction, intussusception, or appendicitis [
13]. Both cases reported here gave an atypical history for appendicitis especially regarding the duration of the abdominal pain [
14]. The differential diagnosis would include a true relapsing or chronic appendicitis which are rare and often difficult to diagnose as the symptoms may be atypical and short-lived [
15]. Because of resource limitations, the diagnoses of Burkitt’s lymphoma in these cases were post-operative. In the first case the diagnosis was made from the histological examination of the appendix specimen. In the second case, where an ileocecal Burkitt’s lymphoma masqueraded as an appendicitis, the diagnosis was made only following the histological examination of the resected ileocecal specimen. The demonstration of a malignant appendix by preoperative imaging with ultrasonography or CT would influence the surgical approach for pathological staging of the disease [
16]. A bone marrow biopsy may show infiltration by Burkitt’s lymphoma (dissemination) [
17]. The diagnosis may also be established by laparoscopy following which the appendix can be removed [
18]. Due to Burkitt’s lymphoma’s rapid doubling time, aggressive chemotherapy is required to control its spread and growth [
19,
20]. Paradoxically it is the high grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma that may be curable and consequently should be treated with high-dose multidrug regimens in addition to malaria prophylaxis in Burkitt’s lymphoma [
20]. Intensive chemotherapy with CODOX-M/IVAC (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and high dose methotrexate, alternating with ifosfamide, etoposide, and cytarabine) is the definitive treatment [
17,
19,
20]. The improved chemotherapy and support care available are due to the better understanding of the biology of the disease [
12,
17]. The outcome has improved and is now excellent in children; the current 5-year survival for advanced (disseminated) Burkitt’s lymphoma in children and adolescents has increased by 2- to3-fold in the past 3 decades to 85% to 90% following less than 6 months of intensive chemotherapy [
9,
10].
The two patients in the case report were tested as being HIV seronegative prior to commencing the above standard chemotherapy regimen. The successful outcome in these patients may perhaps not have been achieved if they were HIV seropositive in terms of disease progression and response to chemotherapy [
11,
21]. Adjuvant CD20-directed monoclonal antibody therapy with rituximab shows promise for improving outcome and reducing the toxic effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Rituximab decreased the recurrence rate and showed a trend in favour of improvement in overall survival or disease-free survival [
22]. CODOX-M/IVAC with rituximab is a highly effective regime for the treatment of adult Burkitt’s lymphoma which usually has a poor prognosis [
23]. Current risk factors in the prognosis of children and adolescent Burkitt’s are elevated lactate dehydrogenase greater than twice the upper limit, bone marrow and central nervous system involvement, poor response to cytoreduction therapy, and poor risk cytogenetics [
3,
9,
10]. Radiotherapy is used only in emergencies such as superior vena cava syndrome, acute neurological impairment, or in patients with relapse [
1,
3,
9,
10]. Further investigations including CT and PET scanning for response evaluation in these patients would be possible in a resourced area. There is a need for more clinical data on the use of PET and magnetic resonance technology in the determination of response evaluation of children with Burkitt’s lymphoma [
3,
16].