Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2016

07.01.2016

Can DW-MRI, with its ADC values, be a reliable predictor of biopsy outcome in patients with suspected prostate cancer?

verfasst von: R. Faletti, G. Battisti, A. Discalzi, M. L. Grognardi, S. Martinello, M. Oderda, P. Gontero, L. Bergamasco, M. C. Cassinis, P. Fonio

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To relate the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) of patients with suspect peripheral prostate cancer (PCa) to the results of the subsequent biopsy: in particular to explore whether DWI and ADC can predict the biopsy outcome and to investigate the relation between ADC and Gleason score (GS).

Materials and methods

175 consecutive patients who underwent 1.5 T mp-MRI followed by prostate biopsy were retrospectively analyzed by two independent radiologists. ADC values were measured in the peripheral suspect lesion areas (ADCSL) and in the contralateral zones (ADCNSL) obtaining ADCnorm = ADCSL/ADCNSL. Results on T2W images, DWI, ADC values, and perfusion studies were matched to their corresponding biopsy.

Results

Negative DWI and T2W had 100% negative predictive value (NPV). When DWI was positive, ADCSL > 0.90 × 10 > 0.90 × 10−3 mm2/s (ADCnorm > 0.60) identified by the ROC curve (AUC = 0.80) corresponded to NPV = 85%. In positive biopsies, ADCSL and ADCnorm decreased significantly from GS = 6 to GS ≥ 8 with Spearman coefficient ρ = −0.40 and ROC curve AUC = 0.72.

Conclusion

mp-MRI allows a reliable prediction of a negative biopsy through the values of DWI, T2W, and ADC. In positive biopsies, there is a moderate correlation between ADC and the various GS levels.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitamura K, Muto S, Yokota I, et al. (2014) Feasibility of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of cancer distribution: histopathological correlation with prostatectomy specimens. Prostate Int 2:188–195. doi:10.12954/PI.14067 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kitamura K, Muto S, Yokota I, et al. (2014) Feasibility of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of cancer distribution: histopathological correlation with prostatectomy specimens. Prostate Int 2:188–195. doi:10.​12954/​PI.​14067 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Oto A, Yang C, Kayhan A, et al. (2011) Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1382–1390. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6861 CrossRefPubMed Oto A, Yang C, Kayhan A, et al. (2011) Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:1382–1390. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​11.​6861 CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, et al. (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.013 Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, et al. (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2015.​01.​013
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. (2014) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.026 Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, et al. (2014) Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging–ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy: a systematic review. Eur Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2014.​10.​026
7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y-D, Wang Q, Wu C-J, et al. (2015) The histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for differentiating the gleason grade of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 25:994–1004. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3511-4 CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y-D, Wang Q, Wu C-J, et al. (2015) The histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for differentiating the gleason grade of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 25:994–1004. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-014-3511-4 CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Schimmöller L, Quentin M, Arsov C, et al. (2014) MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy. Eur Radiol 24:2582–2589. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3276-9 CrossRefPubMed Schimmöller L, Quentin M, Arsov C, et al. (2014) MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy. Eur Radiol 24:2582–2589. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-014-3276-9 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimofusa R, Fujimoto H, Akamata H, et al. (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:149–153CrossRefPubMed Shimofusa R, Fujimoto H, Akamata H, et al. (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:149–153CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP, et al. (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269(2):482–492. doi:10.1148/radiol.13122233 CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP, et al. (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269(2):482–492. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​13122233 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Röthke M, Blondin D, Schlemmer H-P, Franiel T (2013) PI-RADS classification: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate. RöFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb Röntgenstrahlen Nukl 185:253–261. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1330270 CrossRef Röthke M, Blondin D, Schlemmer H-P, Franiel T (2013) PI-RADS classification: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate. RöFo Fortschritte Auf Dem Geb Röntgenstrahlen Nukl 185:253–261. doi:10.​1055/​s-0032-1330270 CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, European Association of Urology, et al. (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, European Association of Urology, et al. (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Jr Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, ISUP grading committee, et al. (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29(9):1228–1242CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Jr Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, ISUP grading committee, et al. (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29(9):1228–1242CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim TH, Jeong JY, Lee SW, et al. (2015) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer in potential candidates for active surveillance. Eur Radiol 25:1786–1792. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3566-2 CrossRefPubMed Kim TH, Jeong JY, Lee SW, et al. (2015) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of insignificant prostate cancer in potential candidates for active surveillance. Eur Radiol 25:1786–1792. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-014-3566-2 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Arumainayagam N, Ahmed HU, Moore CM, et al. (2013) Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard. Radiology 268:761–769. doi:10.1148/radiol.13120641 CrossRefPubMed Arumainayagam N, Ahmed HU, Moore CM, et al. (2013) Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard. Radiology 268:761–769. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​13120641 CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson JE, Moses D, Shnier R, et al. (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study. J Urol 192:67–74. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.014 CrossRefPubMed Thompson JE, Moses D, Shnier R, et al. (2014) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study. J Urol 192:67–74. doi:10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2014.​01.​014 CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Woodfield CA, Tung GA, Grand DJ, et al. (2010) Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W316–W322. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.2651 CrossRefPubMed Woodfield CA, Tung GA, Grand DJ, et al. (2010) Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:W316–W322. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​09.​2651 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman HJ, et al. (2011) Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 259:453–461. doi:10.1148/radiol.091409 CrossRefPubMed Hambrock T, Somford DM, Huisman HJ, et al. (2011) Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Radiology 259:453–461. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​091409 CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, et al. (2007) Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:146–152. doi:10.1002/jmri.20793 CrossRefPubMed Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Kohno H, et al. (2007) Prostate cancer screening: the clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic MR imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 25:146–152. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​20793 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Boesen L, Chabanova E, Løgager V, et al. (2014) Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio correlates significantly with prostate cancer Gleason score at final pathology. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.1002/jmri.24801 Boesen L, Chabanova E, Løgager V, et al. (2014) Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio correlates significantly with prostate cancer Gleason score at final pathology. J Magn Reson Imaging. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​24801
26.
Metadaten
Titel
Can DW-MRI, with its ADC values, be a reliable predictor of biopsy outcome in patients with suspected prostate cancer?
verfasst von
R. Faletti
G. Battisti
A. Discalzi
M. L. Grognardi
S. Martinello
M. Oderda
P. Gontero
L. Bergamasco
M. C. Cassinis
P. Fonio
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0574-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Abdominal Radiology 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.