Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2017

13.01.2017 | Original Research

Cancer Genetic Counselors’ Current Practices and Attitudes Related to the Use of Tumor Profiling

verfasst von: LeAnne Noelle Goedde, Nathan W. Stupiansky, Melissa Lah, Kimberly A. Quaid, Stephanie Cohen

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Tumor profiling (TP) is primarily used to identify driver mutations within a tumor for treatment purposes, but it may also identify germline mutations. Current involvement of cancer genetic counselors (GCs) in the TP process is not clear. Members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Cancer Special Interest Group were invited to participate in a confidential, web-based survey to characterize current practices and attitudes related to the use of TP. Of 105 useable responses, 86.7% of GCs reported their institutions were using TP, although only 6.7% did this routinely. Although 63.7% reported personal involvement in the process, largely with result interpretation and follow-up germline testing, 69.7% reported seeing fewer than 5 patients for this reason and 97.9% desired further education on this topic. Work and regional setting were not predictors of involvement with TP; however, GCs in the academic setting were less aware of who obtains consent (p = 0.001). GCs reported they were not often utilized as a resource regarding TP. Overall, GCs believed TP is beneficial in identifying hereditary cancer syndromes, although most reported finding a germline mutation in <10% of cases. This study provides a snapshot of current GC involvement with TP, and documents the desire by GCs for additional education on tumor profiling.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Boland, P. M., Ruth, K., Matro, J. M., Rainey, K. L., Fang, C. Y., Wong, Y. N., et al. (2015). Genetic counselors’ (GC) knowledge, awareness, understanding of clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) genomic testing. Clinical Genetics, 88(6), 565–572.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boland, P. M., Ruth, K., Matro, J. M., Rainey, K. L., Fang, C. Y., Wong, Y. N., et al. (2015). Genetic counselors’ (GC) knowledge, awareness, understanding of clinical next-generation sequencing (NGS) genomic testing. Clinical Genetics, 88(6), 565–572.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Dancey, J. E., Bedard, P. L., Onetto, N., & Hudson, T. J. (2012). The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell, 148(3), 409–420.CrossRefPubMed Dancey, J. E., Bedard, P. L., Onetto, N., & Hudson, T. J. (2012). The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell, 148(3), 409–420.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Douma, K. L., Meiser, B., Kirk, J., Mitchell, G., Saunders, C., Rahman, B., et al. (2015). Health professionals’ evaluation of delivering treatment-focused genetic testing to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Familial Cancer, 14(2), 265–272.CrossRefPubMed Douma, K. L., Meiser, B., Kirk, J., Mitchell, G., Saunders, C., Rahman, B., et al. (2015). Health professionals’ evaluation of delivering treatment-focused genetic testing to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Familial Cancer, 14(2), 265–272.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Everett, J., Gustafson, S., & Raymond, V. (2014). Traditional roles in a non-traditional setting: genetic counseling in precision oncology. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 655–660.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Everett, J., Gustafson, S., & Raymond, V. (2014). Traditional roles in a non-traditional setting: genetic counseling in precision oncology. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 655–660.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Jain, R., Savage, M. J., Forman, A. D., Mukherji, R., & Hall, M. J. (2016). The relevance of hereditary cancer risks to precision oncology: what should providers consider when conducting tumor genomic profiling? Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 14(6), 795–806.CrossRefPubMed Jain, R., Savage, M. J., Forman, A. D., Mukherji, R., & Hall, M. J. (2016). The relevance of hereditary cancer risks to precision oncology: what should providers consider when conducting tumor genomic profiling? Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 14(6), 795–806.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, J. J., Rubinstein, W. S., Facio, F. M., Ng, D., Singh, L. N., Teer, J. K., et al. (2012). Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 91(1), 97–108.CrossRefPubMed Johnston, J. J., Rubinstein, W. S., Facio, F. M., Ng, D., Singh, L. N., Teer, J. K., et al. (2012). Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 91(1), 97–108.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kou, T., Kanai, M., Matsumoto, S., Okuno, Y., & Muto, M. (2016). The possibility of clinical sequencing in the management of cancer. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 46(5), 399–406.CrossRefPubMed Kou, T., Kanai, M., Matsumoto, S., Okuno, Y., & Muto, M. (2016). The possibility of clinical sequencing in the management of cancer. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 46(5), 399–406.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lolkema, M. P., Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk, C. G., Bredenoord, A. L., Kapitein, P., Roach, N., Cuppen, E., et al. (2013). Ethical, legal, and counseling challenges surrounding the return of genetic results in oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(15), 1842–1848.CrossRefPubMed Lolkema, M. P., Gadellaa-van Hooijdonk, C. G., Bredenoord, A. L., Kapitein, P., Roach, N., Cuppen, E., et al. (2013). Ethical, legal, and counseling challenges surrounding the return of genetic results in oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(15), 1842–1848.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Meiser, B., Tucker, K., Friedlander, M., Barlow-Stewart, K., Lobb, E., Saunders, C., et al. (2008). Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda. Breast Cancer Research, 10(6), 216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meiser, B., Tucker, K., Friedlander, M., Barlow-Stewart, K., Lobb, E., Saunders, C., et al. (2008). Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda. Breast Cancer Research, 10(6), 216.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Mirnezami, R., Nicholson, J., & Darzi, A. (2012). Preparing for precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(6), 489–491.CrossRefPubMed Mirnezami, R., Nicholson, J., & Darzi, A. (2012). Preparing for precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(6), 489–491.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2016). Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. Version 1.2017. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from National Comprehensive Cancer Network website: www.nccn.org. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2016). Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian. Version 1.2017. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from National Comprehensive Cancer Network website: www.​nccn.​org.
Zurück zum Zitat National Society of Genetic Counselors. (2014a). NSGC Professional Status Survey Cancer Genetics Analysis 2014. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from National Society of Genetic Counselors website: www.nsgc.org. National Society of Genetic Counselors. (2014a). NSGC Professional Status Survey Cancer Genetics Analysis 2014. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from National Society of Genetic Counselors website: www.​nsgc.​org.
Zurück zum Zitat National Society of Genetic Counselors. (2014b). NSGC Professional Status Survey 2014. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from National Society of Genetic Counselors website: www.nsgc.org. National Society of Genetic Counselors. (2014b). NSGC Professional Status Survey 2014. Retrieved March 12, 2016, from National Society of Genetic Counselors website: www.​nsgc.​org.
Zurück zum Zitat Robson, M. E., Bradbury, A. R., Arun, B., Domchek, S. M., Ford, J. M., Hampel, H. L., et al. (2015). American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(31), 3660–3667.CrossRefPubMed Robson, M. E., Bradbury, A. R., Arun, B., Domchek, S. M., Ford, J. M., Hampel, H. L., et al. (2015). American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic and genomic testing for cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(31), 3660–3667.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Varga, E., Chao, E., & Yeager, N. (2015). The importance of proper bioinformatics analysis and clinical interpretation of tumor genomic profiling: a case study of undifferentiated sarcoma and a constitutional pathogenic BRCA2 mutation and an MLH1 variant of uncertain significance. Familial Cancer, 14(3), 481–485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Varga, E., Chao, E., & Yeager, N. (2015). The importance of proper bioinformatics analysis and clinical interpretation of tumor genomic profiling: a case study of undifferentiated sarcoma and a constitutional pathogenic BRCA2 mutation and an MLH1 variant of uncertain significance. Familial Cancer, 14(3), 481–485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Weitzel, J. N., Lagos, V. I., Cullinane, C. A., Gambol, P. J., Culver, J. O., Blazer, K. R., et al. (2007). Limited family structure and BRCA gene mutation status in single cases of breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(23), 2587–2595.CrossRefPubMed Weitzel, J. N., Lagos, V. I., Cullinane, C. A., Gambol, P. J., Culver, J. O., Blazer, K. R., et al. (2007). Limited family structure and BRCA gene mutation status in single cases of breast cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(23), 2587–2595.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Cancer Genetic Counselors’ Current Practices and Attitudes Related to the Use of Tumor Profiling
verfasst von
LeAnne Noelle Goedde
Nathan W. Stupiansky
Melissa Lah
Kimberly A. Quaid
Stephanie Cohen
Publikationsdatum
13.01.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0065-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.