Background
Breast cancer refers to a malignancy in women and in a small percent in men, which arises from the epithelial tissue of the breast tissue, representing approximately 10% of the total volume of the breast [
1]. Breast cancer is the second most common cancer globally, and also the most common malignancy between women that consists of 18% of all female cancers [
1,
2]. Breast cancer has different treatment methods, and these methods have different effects on the patients and their life [
3]. The treatment of breast cancer usually starts with surgery and radiotherapy, and often involves chemotherapy or other drug therapies, such as hormonal treatment, either before or after surgery [
4]. Pain after treatment is a major clinical problem in breast cancer patients, and is one of the most common complications affecting 25 to 60% of breast cancer patient survivors [
5]. Post-treatment pain is defined as the pain related to treatment body regions with duration of more than 3 months after treatment is completed [
6]. Improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) has become one of the most essential goals of cancer therapy [
7‐
9]. HRQOL is a multidimensional instrument that includes the comprehension of the positive and the negative aspects of different dimensions such as the physical, emotional, cognitive and social domains, as well as pain/discomfort [
10].
In Palestine, cancer is the second most common cause of death, accounting for about 14.2% of all deaths in 2014, meaning that they are very common [
11]. According to the Ministry of Health records, breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in Palestine and the third most common type of cancer causing death (about 10.7%) after lung and colon cancer [
11]. Globally, there are many articles that talk about post-treatment pain and HRQOL among breast cancer survivors [
5,
6,
12‐
17]. In the Arab World and Palestine, there is no research related to the post-treatment pain and its association with HRQOL in breast cancer patients. Researches in Palestine about breast cancer focused on the palliative care situation [
18] and pharmacological treatment [
19,
20]. Therefore, this study was performed to examine cancer-related post-treatment pain (pain severity and interference) and its impact on HRQOL in the different stages of breast cancer in patients in Palestine. Also, this study aimed to determine QOL profile among breast cancer patients and stated the factors associated with QOL. Investigating and assessing QOL in breast cancer patients and the related post-treatment pain will help medical teams and patients to plan and develop spectacular pain management strategies to address common signs and symptoms, and provide breast cancer patients with better health and good QOL. Also, this will assist in creating a complete system in order to deal with current patients and future patients, so that we can help to end the suffering of these patients.
Methods
Study design
This cross-sectional study was conducted by using standardised and validated assessment tools in women with breast cancer from May 2016 to November 2016.
Study setting
This study was conducted in Al-Watani hospital and An-Najah National University hospital, Nablus, West Bank, Northern Palestine. These two hospitals serve as the main referral hospitals for the northern districts of West Bank-Palestine and receive most cases of breast cancer patients from all northern West Bank districts.
Study population
The medical records of both hospitals in 2015 showed that the number of breast cancer patients in both hospitals was around 600 patients in 1 year and around 300 patients during the period of study. Each of both hospitals where study was conducted gave us a list with the names of breast cancer patients in order to assess their comfort for this study.
Sampling procedure and sample size calculation
The Raosoft sample size calculating tool (an automated software program:
http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html) was used for sample size calculation. We assumed that 50% of women with breast cancer had a high QOL, which would give the maximum sample size. Furthermore, we used a 5% margin of error at a 95% confidence interval as recommended; the required sample size was calculated to be 170 women. Convenience sampling was used to recruit participants.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Women aged 18 years and above who were treated for breast cancer > 12 months prior to the conduct of our study, and who agreed to be participants in this study were included. The only exclusion criteria were women who had a major psychiatric illness, and those with an extremely ill condition.
Data collection instrument
The data collection form consisted of four sections:
1.
The first section was designed to obtain socio-demographic data such as age, marital status, place of residence, educational level, family monthly income, and height and weight, to calculate body mass index (BMI).
2.
The second section contained patient clinical data such as type of breast cancer, stage of breast cancer, duration of disease, and the types of management that the patient had undertaken.
3.
The third section was based on the assessment of post-treatment pain and discomfort among breast cancer patients by using a well-known pain-measuring scale which is called the Brief Pain Inventory scale (BPI); [
21]. The BPI was used to assess both pain severity and pain interference with normal functioning. Items used in determination of pain severity were worst pain in the last 24 h, least pain in the last 24 h, average pain in the last 24 h and pain right now. Seven items were designed to assess pain interference with general activity, walking ability, mood, normal work, sleep, relations with others, and enjoyment of life. Also, this scale determined pain location (head, right breast, left breast, abdomen, right upper limb, left upper limb, back, knees, ankle and feet and buttocks), pain relief by medication and percentage of pain relief. Pain severity score was measured by the sum of 4 items of pain severity. Each item was scored as a number from 0 to 10, and the sum of these numbers gave the final pain severity score with the lowest value of 0 and the highest value of 40. In addition, pain interference score was measured by the sum of the 7 items of pain interference. Each item was scored as a number from 0 to 10, and the sum of these numbers gave the final pain interference score with the lowest value of 0 and the highest value of 70. Permission was obtained from the Department of Symptom Research at the University of Texas to use the Arabic Brief Pain Inventory in our study.
4.
The fourth section consisted of the EQ-5D instrument to assess HRQOL. EQ-5D is a widely used instrument for evaluation of the generic quality of life [
22]. EQ-5D is a preference-based HRQOL measure; it includes one question for five dimensions: mobility, self-care, normal activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression [
23]. Moreover, the EQ-5D questionnaire also has a Visual Analog Scale (VAS); by using this scale, respondents can report and document their perceived health status by a grading system ranged from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status). The Arabic version of EQ-5D [
24] was provided by the EuroQol Research Foundation [
23] through registration on the EQ-5D online system (ID: 15804). This scale has been described in detail in many previous studies conducted by the principle investigator [
25‐
27]. The EQ-5D index scores were calculated as illustrated elsewhere [
27‐
31], using the EQ-5D-5L Crosswalk Index Value Calculator [
32] based on the UK general population scoring algorithm.
Academic experts (two clinical pharmacists with expertise in QOL research and one academic researcher with experience in statistical analysis) reviewed and evaluated measurement items for face and content validity, and clinical accuracy. Data collection forms were administered to participants face-to-face by two medical students. These researchers received training in investigation skills and research ethics at the College of Medicine and Health Sciences and from epidemiologists with expertise in quality of life research. In order to insure interviewer consistency, both of the interviewers interviewed the participants closely with each other. The data collection form was piloted on 15 patients (not included in the final study) to assess questionnaire comprehension, clarity, and completion time. The results of the pilot study were evaluated critically and some minor modifications were made accordingly for socio-demographic and clinical data.
Ethical approval
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of An-Najah National University (#20Mar2016) approved the study. Permission was obtained from the two selected hospitals for allowing researchers to interview their patients.
Statistical analysis
Analysis of data was done with the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version). Continuous variables were presented mainly as mean ± SD or medians (lower–upper quartiles), and categorical variables were both expressed as frequency and percentage. Normality of continuous data was checked by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Continuous variables such as the EQ-5D-5L index score was tested for intra-individual differences by using the Kruskal–Wallis or Mann–Whitney test, as required. In addition, the Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the degree of association between all scales. The significance level was determined at a p-value < 0.05. Multiple linear regression analysis was also used to determine independent associations with HRQOL. Variables (socio-demographic, clinical, and pain severity and interference) that were significant in bivariate analysis were entered into regression models. Cronbach’s alpha was assessed for each scale to check the scale’s internal consistency reliability.
Discussion
This study provided an inclusive measurement of HRQOL between breast cancer patients in Nablus, Palestine. In our study, EQ-5D QOL instrument was applied to measure HRQOL. Overall, the main socio-demographic factors related to breast cancer HRQOL were old age, being a housewife, low income, being single, an active or recurrent tumour and post-treatment pain. According to the literature, EQ-5D was also used to assess HRQOL among breast cancer patients in different countries [
33‐
35]. EQ-5D measured improvements and deteriorations in HRQOL after treatment [
36]. Thus, EQ-5D seemed an appropriate tool for evaluation of HRQOL and possible interventions to improve QOL among breast cancer patients, especially after treatment [
36].
In our study, the EQ-5D score median among breast cancer survivors in Palestine was 0.67 (interquartile range: 0.51–0.84); this compared to other studies which used the same instrument in Iran, Holland and Sweden, with the following results: 0.69 ± 0.22 [
33], 0.72 ± 0.29 at the end of treatment, 0.57 ± 0.29 12 months after the end of treatment [
34], and 0.70 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63–0.75) [
35], respectively. Several socioeconomic factors and factors related to the healthcare system could affect HRQOL in many aspects. Some of these variations resulted from differences in socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants such as: age, residency, marital status, occupation, income level, current condition of the tumour, and post-treatment pain.
According to our results, increased age was associated with lower HRQOL among breast cancer patients. Similarly, many previous studies concluded the same findings [
37]. One of these studies, a study from Malaysia, stated that QOL in breast cancer strongly varies by age as an important component of general health status [
38]. Younger patients reported significantly better HRQOL compared to older ones, possibly due to the short duration of disease and fewer complications.
One possible explanation is that older patients age, as the disease progresses, and will experience a poor social life with an increased rate of depression and physical inactivity, which could lead to high pain and fatigue level and thus lower QOL scores [
39]. This observation was also reported by Merom et al. [
40], who described physical inactivity as being high among Palestinian women. Thus, older patients who present with more symptoms of depression and anxiety and physical inactivity will contribute to the lower QOL [
41].
Our data showed in relation to marital and financial status that being single and having a low income level were significantly associated with poor QOL (i.e. lower EQ-5D scores). Low income level was also confirmed as being an important factor related to impaired HRQOL among breast cancer patients in other studies [
37]. Another study about HRQOL in breast cancer patients was performed in Lithuania, and showed a good QOL level in patients who were married and lived in families with fewer financial difficulties compared with patients who were single and with poor economic status [
42]. Also, being single was negatively associated with HRQOL, these results further support the idea that a strong family relationship, close communication, and positive emotional and social support given by the partner had a significant effect on improving QOL in breast cancer patients [
42‐
44]. Therefore, good social support from family and friends and good financial status may significantly improve the QOL in breast cancer patients [
45].
According to our study, current breast cancer condition was significantly related to impaired HRQOL in breast cancer patients. Patients experiencing recurrent cancer or undergoing active cancer treatments reported a lower HRQOL than those who are cancer-free. These findings could be explained by the suggestion that receiving breast cancer treatment will induce post-treatment pain which interferes with patients’ functioning and quality of life [
15,
46,
47].
Post-treatment pain in breast cancer patients remains clinically especially during the first few years following treatment [
48,
49]. Many patients experience severe post-treatment pain that significantly interferes with their functionality and quality of life [
50‐
52]. All treatment modalities of cancer have the ability to cause pain [
15]. The pain aetiology for breast cancer is categorised as: tumour-induced pain, treatment-induced pain such as side effects from chemotherapy, or post-procedural and post-surgical pain, and comorbidity-related pain such as constipation and thrombophlebitis [
15,
53,
54]. Among breast cancer patients, the prevalence of post-treatment pain may be much higher; according to our study, 87.6% of patients with breast cancer suffered from post-treatment pain. These results were much higher than the findings reported by Forsythe and colleagues, with more than 30% of breast cancer patients reporting above average pain after treatment [
55].
In this study, we found that post-treatment pain was significantly associated with low levels of HRQOL. Patients who experienced pain after breast cancer treatment reported lower EQ-5D scores. These findings were confirmed by the results of Kroenke and Theobald [
56]. Many studies also demonstrate that pain in breast cancer is associated with a lower HRQOL, especially in high levels of pain severity and pain interference, while good pain management led to an improved QOL [
42,
57,
58]. Pain interference mostly affected normal work, walking ability, mood, sleep and general activity. Our results showed that post-treatment pain did not negatively affect HRQOL alone, but was also the most significant determinant of HRQOL among breast cancer patients. In summary, our results indicated that patients who had chronic pain after breast cancer treatment reported fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances and impaired HRQOL. Receiving a combined treatment for breast cancer, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and regional radiotherapy, was related to a higher risk of developing chronic pain. The identification of those breast cancer patients who are at high risk of developing chronic pain after the completion of breast cancer treatment is hugely important in order to provide adequate pain relief, establish interventions which aim to reduce the adverse consequences of breast cancer treatment, restore functionality and support healthy life in long-term breast cancer patients.
Strengths and limitations
This study has many strong points in that it is the first study about HRQOL among breast cancer patients conducted at West Bank in Palestine; also, the information was gathered by face-to-face interviews to get more reliable and complete data. Also, the current study measured the impact of pain on HRQOL by using the global BPI and EQ-5D scales. However, in our study, we found a number of limitations that should be focused on. One of these limitations, the cross-sectional study type of this study, may prevent us from developing a good cause—effect relationship between post-treatment pain and HRQOL. Another limitation is that this study was held in Nablus city, which represents only one section of the entire Palestinian West Bank. Lastly, gathering study data via a face to-face interviews may have a negative outcome as the researchers can influence participant’s answers, leading to less reliable data.
Authors’ contributions
NHA and MTK collected data, performed the analyses and literature search and drafted the manuscript. SHZ conceptualized and designed the study, coordinated, supervised, analyzed and interpreted the data, and assisted in final write-up of the manuscript. HS contributed to the acquisition of the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.