Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Critical Care 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | Letter

Candida infections in severe acute pancreatitis: we need to do more in order to distinguish invasive infection from simple colonization

verfasst von: Patrick M. Honore, Aude Mugisha, Luc Kugener, Sebastien Redant, Rachid Attou, Andrea Gallerani, David De Bels

Erschienen in: Critical Care | Ausgabe 1/2020

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
SAP
Severe acute pancreatitis
CCIS
Candida colonization index score
We read with great interest the recent paper regarding anti-infective therapy for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) by Montravers et al., who conclude regarding fungal infections that most of their cases received azoles in the context of both documented and empirical antifungal therapies [1]. We would like to make some comments. Candida is present in huge quantity in the colon. An increase over the years in Candida infection in non-neutropenic critically ill patients has been demonstrated to put them at increased risk of mortality and morbidity [2]. While there is a concern that this is the case in patients with SAP [3], this has not been universally demonstrated [4]. It is, however, likely that colonization plays an important instigating role in these invasive infections [4]. Patients with SAP are at a particular risk of invasive Candida infections. In a study by Hall and colleagues, both colonization with Candida spp. and a Candida colonization index score (CCIS) > 0.5 were associated with subsequent infection [4]. The CCIS was calculated for each patient as follows: CCIS = ratio of the number of non-blood distinct body sites colonized with Candida spp. to the total number of body sites cultured [4]. A CCIS ≥ 0.5 predicts Candida infection; therefore, patients who had invasive Candida infections and a CCIS ≥ 0.5 were defined as true positives [4]. In their commentary regarding the Hall paper, Montravers et al. themselves concluded that the mistakes of previous decades in the field of bacterial infection should not be repeated; a step-by-step approach is required [5]. Additional scientifically rigorous studies with accurate descriptions of cases similar to those in the article by Hall et al. [4] are required before prophylaxis or extensive therapeutic indications of antifungal agents in SAP can be proposed [5]. In conclusion, we believe that the cohort study of Montravers et al. should have discussed in more detail the importance of distinguishing between invasive Candida infections and colonization, noting, for instance, the utility of scoring systems such as the CCIS score in preventing unnecessary treatment for Candida colonization.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Melissa Jackson for the critical review of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare to have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Leon C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Almirante B, Nolla-Salas J, Alvarez-Lerma F, Garnacho-Montero J, Leon MA: A bedside scoring system (“Candida score”) for early antifungal treatment in nonneutropenic critically ill patients with Candida colonization. Crit Care Med 2006,34:730–737. Leon C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Almirante B, Nolla-Salas J, Alvarez-Lerma F, Garnacho-Montero J, Leon MA: A bedside scoring system (“Candida score”) for early antifungal treatment in nonneutropenic critically ill patients with Candida colonization. Crit Care Med 2006,34:730–737.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoerauf A, Hammer S, Muller-Myhsok B, Rupprecht H. Intra-abdominal Candida infection during acute necrotizing pancreatitis has a high prevalence and is associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:2010–5.CrossRef Hoerauf A, Hammer S, Muller-Myhsok B, Rupprecht H. Intra-abdominal Candida infection during acute necrotizing pancreatitis has a high prevalence and is associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:2010–5.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Candida infections in severe acute pancreatitis: we need to do more in order to distinguish invasive infection from simple colonization
verfasst von
Patrick M. Honore
Aude Mugisha
Luc Kugener
Sebastien Redant
Rachid Attou
Andrea Gallerani
David De Bels
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Critical Care / Ausgabe 1/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02873-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Critical Care 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.