nach oben

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Erschienen in:

17.06.2022 | Review Article

Cataract surgery astigmatism incisional management. Manual relaxing incision versus femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy. A systematic review

verfasst von: Timoteo González-Cruces, Antonio Cano-Ortiz, María Carmen Sánchez-González, José-María Sánchez-González

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 11/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review aims to compare corneal astigmatism correction in cataract surgery through corneal relaxing incision, manually and femtosecond laser assisted.

Methods

The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations. We used PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) as databases from January 2010 to March 30, 2021. Patients with keratoconus, corneal ectasia, and a previous history of eye surgery were excluded because our aim was to analyze only healthy eyes.

Results

A total of 1025 eyes were evaluated from 946 patients (mean age was 68.90 ± 5.12) in manual incision group articles, while 1905 eyes of 1483 patients (mean age was 65.05 ± 4.57) were evaluated in femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy (FLAK) articles. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.19 ± 0.12 and 0.15 ± 0.05 logMAR for manual incision and FLAK articles, respectively (p = 0.39). The mean correction index (CI) was similar in both groups: 0.77 ± 0.18 in manual incision and 0.79 ± 0.17 in femtosecond laser assisted incision (p = 0.70). Refractive stability was found after 3 months and no serious complications were reported during the follow-up in any group.

Conclusion

Both techniques are safe and moderately effective in corneal astigmatism correction in cataract surgery. FLAK represents a more precise and predictable approach. However, since visual and refractive outcomes appear to be similar in both cases, the cost-benefit analysis is controversial.

Arriola-Villalobos P, Burgos-Blasco B, Fernández-Vigo JI et al (2021) Biometry data and prevalence of corneal astigmatism in caucasian spanish candidates for cataract surgery. J Fr Ophtalmol 44:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2020.03.025CrossRefPubMed

Berdahl JP, Hardten DR, Kramer BA, Potvin R (2018) Effect of astigmatism on visual acuity after multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:1192–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.06.048CrossRefPubMed

Mayer WJ, Kreutzer T, Dirisamer M et al (2017) Comparison of visual outcomes, alignment accuracy, and surgical time between 2 methods of corneal marking for toric intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 43:1281–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.030CrossRefPubMed

Schallhorn SC, Hettinger KA, Pelouskova M et al (2021) Effect of residual astigmatism on uncorrected visual acuity and patient satisfaction in pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 47:991–998. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000560CrossRefPubMed

Osher RH (1989) Paired transverse relaxing keratotomy: a combined technique for reducing astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 15:32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(89)80137-3CrossRefPubMed

Lake JC, Victor G, Clare G et al (2019) Toric intraocular lens versus limbal relaxing incisions for corneal astigmatism after phacoemulsification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012801.pub2

Ganekal S, Dorairaj S, Jhanji V (2011) Limbal relaxing incisions during phacoemulsification: 6-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:2081–2082CrossRef

Ravikumar DK, Arthi MD, Rajakumari DR (2017) A study on efficacy of limbal relaxing incisions in correcting corneal astigmatism along with clear corneal phacoemulsification in a tertiary eye care centre in South India. Int J Med Res Rev 5:168–175. https://doi.org/10.17511/ijmrr.2017.i02.12CrossRef

Lever J, Dahan E (2000) Opposite clear corneal incisions to correct pre-existing astigmatism in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:803–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00378-3CrossRefPubMed

10.

Peyman A, Rahimi B, Razmjoo H et al (2014) Corneal astigmatism change and wavefront aberration evaluation after cataract surgery: “Single” versus “paired opposite” clear corneal incisions. Adv Biomed Res 3:163. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.139126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Chiam PJ (2015) Effect of paired opposite clear corneal incisions on with-the-rule versus against-the-rule astigmatism. Cornea 34:901–905. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000441CrossRefPubMed

12.

Al Mahmood AM, Al-Swailem SA, Behrens A (2014) Clear corneal incision in cataract surgery. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 21:25–31. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-9233.124084CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Löffler F, Böhm M, Herzog M et al (2017) Tomographic analysis of anterior and posterior and total corneal refractive power changes after femtosecond laser–assisted keratotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 180:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.05.015CrossRefPubMed

14.

Kolb CM, Shajari M, Mathys L et al (2020) Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional cataract surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Cataract Refract Surg 46:1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000228CrossRefPubMed

15.

Kanclerz P, Alio JL (2021) The benefits and drawbacks of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 31:1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120922448CrossRefPubMed

16.

Ye Z, Li Z, He S (2017) A meta-analysis comparing postoperative complications and outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification for cataract. J Ophthalmol 2017:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3849152CrossRef

17.

Alió JL, Abdou AA, Soria F et al (2013) Femtosecond laser cataract incision morphology and corneal higher-order aberration analysis. J Refract Surg 29:590–595. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130819-01CrossRefPubMed

18.

Berk TA, Schlenker MB, Campos-Möller X et al (2018) Visual and refractive outcomes in manual versus femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort analysis of 1838 eyes. Ophthalmology 125:1172–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.028CrossRefPubMed

19.

Day AC, Burr JM, Bennett K et al (2021) Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT. Health Technol Assess (Rockv) 25:a-94. https://doi.org/10.3310/HTA25060CrossRef

20.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

National Institute of Health (2021) National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Study Quality Assessment Tools. In: https://www.Nhlbi.Nih.Gov/Health-Topics/Study-Quality-Assessment-Tools

22.

Lim R, Borasio E, Ilari L (2014) Long-term stability of keratometric astigmatism after limbal relaxing incisions. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:1676–1681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.01.045CrossRefPubMed

23.

Monaco G, Scialdone A (2015) Long-term outcomes of limbal relaxing incisions during cataract surgery: aberrometric analysis. Clin Ophthalmol 9:1581. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S89024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Titiyal JS, Khatik M, Sharma N et al (2014) Toric intraocular lens implantation versus astigmatic keratotomy to correct astigmatism during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.036CrossRefPubMed

25.

Roberts TV, Sharwood P, Hodge C et al (2014) Comparison of toric intraocular lenses and arcuate corneal relaxing incisions to correct moderate to high astigmatism in cataract surgery. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol 3:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/apo.0b013e3182a0af21CrossRef

26.

Fouda S, Kamiya K, Aizawa D, Shimizu K (2010) Limbal relaxing incision during cataract extraction versus photoastigmatic keratectomy after cataract extraction in controlling pre-existing corneal astigmatism. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 248:1029–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1272-6CrossRef

27.

Mohammad-Rabei H, Mohammad-Rabei E, Espandar G et al (2016) Three methods for correction of astigmatism during phacoemulsification. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 11:162–167. https://doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.183924CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Ouchi M, Kinoshita S (2010) Prospective randomized trial of limbal relaxing incisions combined with microincision cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 26:594–599. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20091015-01CrossRefPubMed

29.

Leon P, Pastore MR, Zanei A et al (2015) Correction of low corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery. Int J Ophthalmol 8:719–724. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.04.14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Lam DKT, Chow VWS, Ye C et al (2016) Comparative evaluation of aspheric toric intraocular lens implantation and limbal relaxing incisions in eyes with cataracts and ≤3 dioptres of astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol 100:258–262. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306587CrossRefPubMed

31.

Freitas GO, Boteon JE, Carvalho MJ, Pinto RMC (2014) Treatment of astigmatism during phacoemulsification. Arq Bras Oftalmol 77:40–46. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20140011CrossRefPubMed

32.

Eliwa TF, Abdellatif MK, Hamza II (2016) Effect of limbal relaxing incisions on corneal aberrations. J Refract Surg 32:156–162. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160121-02CrossRefPubMed

33.

Roberts HW, Wagh VK, Sullivan DL et al (2018) Refractive outcomes after limbal relaxing incisions or femtosecond laser arcuate keratotomy to manage corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.027CrossRefPubMed

34.

Stanojcic N, Roberts H, Wagh V et al (2020) A randomised, prospective study of ‘off-the-shelf’ use of toric intraocular lenses for cataract patients with pre-existing corneal astigmatism in the NHS. Eye 34:1809–1819. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0919-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Maedel S, Hirnschall N, Chen YA, Findl O (2014) Rotational performance and corneal astigmatism correction during cataract surgery: Aspheric toric intraocular lens versus aspheric nontoric intraocular lens with opposite clear corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.11.039CrossRefPubMed

36.

Nemeth G, Kolozsvari B, Berta A, Modis L (2014) Paired opposite clear corneal incision: Time-related changes of its effect and factors on which those changes depend. Eur J Ophthalmol 24:676–681. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000428CrossRefPubMed

37.

Miyata K, Miyai T, Minami K et al (2011) Limbal relaxing incisions using a reference point and corneal topography for intraoperative identification of the steepest meridian. J Refract Surg 27:339–344. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20101005-02CrossRefPubMed

38.

Ren Y, Fang X, Fang A et al (2019) Phacoemulsification With 3.0 and 2.0 mm Opposite Clear Corneal Incisions for Correction of Corneal Astigmatism. Cornea 38:1105–1110. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001915CrossRefPubMed

39.

Wendelstein JA, Hoffmann PC, Mariacher S et al (2021) Precision and refractive predictability of a new nomogram for femtosecond laser-assisted corneal arcuate incisions. Acta Ophthalmol 99:e1297–e1306. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14837CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Schwarzenbacher L, Schartmüller D, Röggla V et al (2021) One-year results of arcuate keratotomy in patients with low to moderate corneal astigmatism using a low-pulse-energy femtosecond laser. Am J Ophthalmol 224:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.018CrossRefPubMed

41.

Chen W, Ji M, Wu J et al (2020) Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted steepest-meridian clear corneal incisions on preexisting corneal regular astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. Int J Ophthalmol 13:1895–1900. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2020.12.08CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Lee JA, Song WK, Kim JY et al (2019) Femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: Refractive and aberrometric outcomes with a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.08.032CrossRefPubMed

43.

Yoo A, Yun S, Kim JY et al (2015) Femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy versus toric IOL implantation for correcting astigmatism. J Refract Surg 31:574–578. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20150820-01CrossRefPubMed

44.

Day AC, Stevens JD (2016) Stability of keratometric astigmatism after non-penetrating femtosecond laser intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy performed during laser cataract surgery. J Refract Surg 32:152–155. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160204-01CrossRefPubMed

45.

Baharozian CJ, Song C, Hatch KM, Talamo JH (2017) A novel nomogram for the treatment of astigmatism with femtosecond-laser arcuate incisions at the time of cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 11:1841–1848. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S141255CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Blehm C, Potvin R (2017) Pseudophakic astigmatism reduction with femtosecond laser-assisted corneal arcuate incisions: A pilot study. Clin Ophthalmol 11:201–207. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S127279CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Byun YS, Kim S, Lazo MZ et al (2018) Astigmatic correction by intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy during femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery: Factors in outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 44:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.11.018CrossRefPubMed

48.

Visco DM, Bedi R, Packer M (2019) Femtosecond laser–assisted arcuate keratotomy at the time of cataract surgery for the management of preexisting astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 45:1762–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.08.002CrossRefPubMed

49.

Rani K, Grover A, Singh A et al (2020) Correction of preexisting astigmatism by penetrating arcuate keratotomy in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 68:1569–1572. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2060_19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Wortz G, Gupta PK, Goernert P et al (2020) Outcomes of femtosecond laser arcuate incisions in the treatment of low corneal astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol 14:2229–2236. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S264370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Rückl T, Dexl AK, Bachernegg A et al (2013) Femtosecond laser-assisted intrastromal arcuate keratotomy to reduce corneal astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:528–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.10.043CrossRefPubMed

52.

Day AC, Stevens JD (2016) Predictors of femtosecond laser intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy efficacy for astigmatism management in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.028CrossRefPubMed

53.

Day AC, Lau NM, Stevens JD (2016) Nonpenetrating femtosecond laser intrastromal astigmatic keratotomy in eyes having cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.045CrossRefPubMed

54.

Ganesh S, Brar S, Reddy Arra R (2020) Comparison of astigmatism correction between anterior penetrating and intrastromal arcuate incisions in eyes undergoing femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 46:394–402. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000069CrossRefPubMed

55.

Lim CW, Somani S, Chiu HH et al (2020) Astigmatic outcomes of single, non-paired intrastromal limbal relaxing incisions during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery based on a custom nomogram. Clin Ophthalmol 14:1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Moon SY, Chung HS, Lee JH et al (2021) Evaluation of astigmatic correction using vector analysis after combined femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification and intrastromal arcuate keratotomy. J Ophthalmol 2021:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2860840CrossRef

57.

Merriam JC, Zheng L, Merriam JE et al (2003) The effect of incisions for cataract on corneal curvature. Ophthalmology 110:1807–1813. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00537-2CrossRefPubMed

58.

Budak K, Yilmaz G, Aslan BS, Duman S (2001) Limbal relaxing incisions in congenital astigmatism: 6 month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:715–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00687-8CrossRefPubMed

59.

Mingo-Botín D, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Won Kim HR et al (2010) Comparison of toric intraocular lenses and peripheral corneal relaxing incisions to treat astigmatism during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1700–1708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.04.043CrossRefPubMed

60.

Chan TCY, Cheng GPM, Wang Z et al (2015) Vector analysis of corneal astigmatism after combined femtosecond-assisted phacoemulsification and arcuate keratotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 160:250–255.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.004CrossRefPubMed

61.

Kaufmann C, Peter J, Ooi K et al (2005) Limbal relaxing incisions versus on-axis incisions to reduce corneal astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:2261–2265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.08.046CrossRefPubMed

62.

Muftuoglu O, Dao L, Cavanagh HD et al (2010) Limbal relaxing incisions at the time of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation to reduce astigmatism with or without subsequent laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:456–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.037CrossRefPubMed

63.

Cooper BA, Holekamp NM, Bohigian G, Thompson PA (2003) Case-control study of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery comparing scleral tunnel and clear corneal wounds. Am J Ophthalmol 136:300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00202-2CrossRefPubMed

64.

Kankariya VP, Diakonis VF, Kymionis GD, Yoo SH (2014) Anterior gas breakthrough during Femtosecond Intrastromal Astigmatic Keratotomy (FISK). J Refract Surg 30:511–513. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140711-02CrossRefPubMed

65.

Chang JSM (2018) Femtosecond laser-assisted astigmatic keratotomy: a review. Eye Vis 5:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-018-0099-9CrossRef

66.

Vickers LA, Gupta PK (2016) Femtosecond laser-assisted keratotomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 27:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000267CrossRefPubMed

67.

Wu E (2011) Femtosecond-assisted astigmatic keratotomy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 51:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/IIO.0b013e31820f26cdCrossRefPubMed

68.

Dick HB, Schultz T, Gerste RD (2014) Lessons from a corneal perforation during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:2168–2169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.018CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Cataract surgery astigmatism incisional management. Manual relaxing incision versus femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy. A systematic review
verfasst von: Timoteo González-Cruces
Antonio Cano-Ortiz
María Carmen Sánchez-González
José-María Sánchez-González
Publikationsdatum: 17.06.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05728-0

Macular and peripapillary vessel density alterations in a large series of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus without ocular involvement

Retinal Disorders

Predicting retinal sensitivity using optical coherence tomography parameters in central serous chorioretinopathy

Retinal Disorders

Iridian anterior segment OCT in rubella uveitis syndrome and cytomegalovirus anterior uveitis: a comparative study

Inflammatory Disorders

Comment re: “A comparison of long-term results after Baerveldt 250 implantation in advanced uveitic vs. other forms of glaucoma”

Letter to the Editor

Machine learning predicting myopic regression after corneal refractive surgery using preoperative data and fundus photography

Refractive Surgery

One-year follow-up of optical coherence tomography angiography microvascular findings: macular telangiectasia type 2 versus tamoxifen retinopathy

Retinal Disorders

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Zirkulierende Tumorzellen bei uvealem Melanom

Aderhautmelanom
Leitthema

Die Erstbeschreibung von Tumorzellen in der Blutbahn erfolgte 1869 durch Thomas Ashworth. Dieser beschrieb in der Blutprobe eines metastasierten Krebskranken „cells identical with those of the cancer itself“ und postulierte, dass diese „may tend …

Elektrophysiologie in der Augenheilkunde

Visuell-evozierte-Potentiale
CME-Artikel

Mit elektrophysiologischen Untersuchungen kann man in der Augenheilkunde die Funktionalität der Neurone der Sehbahn untersuchen. Weil elektrophysiologische Ableitungen von der subjektiven Wahrnehmung und Antwort des Patienten unabhängig sind …

„Liquid biopsy“ bei Retinoblastom

Retinoblastom
Leitthema

Die „liquid biopsy“ spielt eine zunehmend wichtige Rolle bei der Diagnose und Behandlung des Retinoblastoms. Die Möglichkeit der sicheren und unkomplizierten Entnahme und Untersuchung von Kammerwasser aus der Vorderkammer trägt wesentlich zur …

Die „onkologische Spur“: zirkulierende Tumor-DNA beim Aderhautmelanom

Aderhautmelanom
Leitthema

In Körperflüssigkeiten wurde zirkulierende Desoxyribonukleinsäure (DNA) bereits vor mehr als 75 Jahren beschrieben [ 19 ]. Aber erst durch die eindrucksvolle technische Weiterentwicklung im Bereich der Nukleinsäureanalyse in den letzten Jahren ist …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Cataract surgery astigmatism incisional management. Manual relaxing incision versus femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy. A systematic review

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2022

Macular and peripapillary vessel density alterations in a large series of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus without ocular involvement

Predicting retinal sensitivity using optical coherence tomography parameters in central serous chorioretinopathy

Iridian anterior segment OCT in rubella uveitis syndrome and cytomegalovirus anterior uveitis: a comparative study

Comment re: “A comparison of long-term results after Baerveldt 250 implantation in advanced uveitic vs. other forms of glaucoma”

Machine learning predicting myopic regression after corneal refractive surgery using preoperative data and fundus photography

One-year follow-up of optical coherence tomography angiography microvascular findings: macular telangiectasia type 2 versus tamoxifen retinopathy

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Zirkulierende Tumorzellen bei uvealem Melanom

Elektrophysiologie in der Augenheilkunde

„Liquid biopsy“ bei Retinoblastom

Die „onkologische Spur“: zirkulierende Tumor-DNA beim Aderhautmelanom

Update Augenheilkunde

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten