Background
CD24 is expressed in hematopoietic cell types, including B-cell precursors and neutrophils [
1], and is also conventionally used as a differentiation marker for keratinocytes [
2]. Accumulating evidence supports a role for CD24 in a variety of malignancies, including B-cell lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma, small-cell and non small-cell lung carcinoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, bladder carcinoma, epithelial ovarian cancer and breast cancer [
3].
CD24, designated 'heat-stable antigen' (HSA) in mice, is a glycosylated cell-surface protein linked to the membrane via a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor [
4]. CD24 has several potential N- and O-linked glycosylation sites, which act as ligands for P-selectin [
4].
CD24 is involved in cellular adhesion processes and signalling pathways in cancer cells that are dependent on interactions with P-selectin [
4]. Moreover, CD24-mediated binding to P-selectin on endothelial cells and platelets may facilitate the exit of tumor cells from the bloodstream and potentiate metastasis [
3]. In P-selectin-deficient mice, diminished tumor growth and metastasis is observed, compared with wild-type animals [
5]. Moreover, CD24 over-expression is associated with invasiveness in urothelial carcinoma [
6] and with migration and invasion in gliomas [
7]. These studies collectively imply that CD24 might play an important role in tumorigenesis and in the progression of cancer. Moreover, CD24 expression is suggested to be a marker of poor prognosis in various cancers, including breast carcinoma [
8]. In breast cancer, CD24 mediates progression, metastasis, and rolling of tumor cells through interactions with P-selectin [
9]. Additionally, CD24 function may be related to tamoxifen resistance [
10]. In this study, MCF-7 cells were used as a general breast cancer cell model, based on the fact that these cells are derived from a pleural effusion from a patient with metastatic breast carcinoma [
11]. MCF-7 cells are adherent, and they aggregate into clusters under standard culture conditions to form duct like structures that mimic luminal structures observed in under three-dimensional culture conditions [
12]. For this reason, MCF-7 cells have primarily been used as model of the luminal breast cancer cell type, which express CK8/18 [
13], CK19 [
14], CD24 [
15] and the estrogen receptor [
16], but not vimentin [
11].
Recently, CD24 was recommended as a prognostic indicator of poor patient survival in breast cancer [
17]. It is known that CD24 mRNA becomes unregulated after amino acid starvation in MCF-7 cells and that the CD24 protein is expressed more than 80% in MCF-7 cells [
15]. For this reason it is suggested that CD24 may play an important role in the progression and metastasis of human breast cancer [
8,
18].
The aim of this study was to further clarify the role of CD24 in breast cancer cell growth using a cross-linking approach. Changes in viable cell number, on adhesion and migration abilities, and in cell growth and death were assessed. We did to study directly impact on cross-linking with CD24 (FL-80) antibody in MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line.
Methods
Cell culture
Unless otherwise specified, all reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). For the anchorage-dependent culture, 5×105 cells were seeded on a tissue culture dish (Falcon, San Jose, CA). Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Photographs were obtained with an inverted system microscope (IX51 model) equipped with a DP50 camera system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
CD24 expression in breast cell lines
To detach MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells, cultures were trypsinized for 3 min to minimize growth inhibition, and detachment was monitored with a phase-contrast microscope. After visual identification of detached cells, 5 ml of medium containing serum was added to the culture for trypsin inactivation. Cells were collected by centrifugation, and washed with 5 ml of PBS. Following a second centrifugation step, pellets were resuspended in 500 μl total volume with the appropriate amounts of antibodies and supplement of PBS. The PE anti-human CD24 antibody (BD Pharmingen, NJ, USA) was applied according to the manufacturer's manual. After antibody binding for 25 min at room temperature, cells were rinsed three times with PBS and flow cytometry analyses were performed in triplicate using a FACSCalibur system (Becton & Dickinson, San Jose, CA).
Assessment of changes in proliferation of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells upon CD24 cross-linking
For each line, 5×105 cells were seeded with DMEM containing 10% FBS and after 24 h, they were washed twice with PBS. Fresh DMEM+10% FBS was added to the dish, and CD24 was cross-linked with anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG antibody and anti-human CD24 (FL-80) rabbit polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Rabbit-polyclonal anti-CD24 (FL-80) antibody was raised against amino acids 1–80, representing full length CD24 of human origin. For each condition, the number of viable cells was estimated by trypan blue staining.
Three-dimensional matrigel culture, and MTT assays
For a three-dimensional culture, a millicell (millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) of 3 μm pore size was coated with 5 mg/ml matrigel (BD Pharmingen, NJ, USA) on a 6-well plate at 37°C for 1 h. MCF-7 cells were trypsinized and seeded onto millicells in a dose dependent manner of 1×105, 3×105, or 5×105 cells at 37°C for 24 h. After 24 h, cells cross-linked with anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG (500 ng/ml) or anti-human CD24 (FL-80) rabbit polyclonal antibody (500 ng/ml) at 37°C for 72 h, then the media was removed. 100 μl of MTT reagents (5 mg/ml) were added to each millicell, whch was incubated at 37°C for 3 h and the media was removed. 200 μl of dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) was then added to each millicell with shaking for 10 min and the absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 595 nm.
Cell cycle analysis and Annexin V staining
After cross-linking for 72 h, the MCF-7 culture was harvested, where cells were fixed in 70% ethanol for 1 h, and washed with PBS. Cells were then treated with 100 μg/ml RNase A for 1 h at 37°C, followed by 25 μg/ml propidium iodide solution. Flow cytometry was then performed in triplicate for each experiment on a FACSCalibur system (Becton & Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Annexin V staining was done according to the manufacturer's protocol (BD Pharmingen, NJ, USA). MCF-7 cells were washed with PBS and trypsinized. After centrifugation, cells were washed twice with cold PBS, and resuspended in binding buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2) at a concentration of 1×106 cells/ml. An aliquot (100 μl) of the solution containing 1 × 105 cells was transferred to a 5 ml culture tube, and 5 μl each of Annexin V-FITC and PI were added. After vortexing, cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature (25°C) in the dark, and 400 μl of 1× binding buffer was added to each tube. Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCalibur system (Becton & Dickinson, San Jose, CA) within 1 h.
Adhesion assay
For adhesion assay, a 96-well plate was coated with type I collagen (10 μg/ml) at 37°C for 1 h, washed twice with PBS, and blocked with 10% FBS in PBS. MCF-7 cells were seeded and incubated with anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG (500 ng/ml) or anti-human CD24 rabbit polyclonal antibody (500 ng/ml) at 37°C for 24 h. After 24 h, MCF-7 cells were washed twice with PBS and trypsinized, then seeded at 2×104/well and incubated at 37°C incubator for 24 h. Adherent cells were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 20 min, and cells were air-dried for 5 min, followed by staining with 0.1% crystal violet in methanol at room temperature for 45 min. Cells were washed three times with PBS, and rinsed with 0.1 M sodium citrate at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the resulting solution was measured at 595 nm.
Migration assay
The migration assay was performed following the manufacturer's protocol (BD Pharmingen, NJ, USA). MCF-7 cells were pre-treated with anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG (500 ng/ml) or anti-human CD24 rabbit polyclonal antibody (500 ng/ml) at 37°C for 24 h. 2×104/well cells were seeded onto the upper side of a transwell chamber (BD Pharmingen, NJ, USA) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Cells from the upper side of the transwell were then scraped off mechanically, fixed with 100% methanol at room temperature for 2 min and stained with 1% toluidine blue in 1% borax solution at room temperature for 2 min and then counted with an inverted system microscope.
Statistical analysis
All data were compiled from a minimum of three replicate experiments. Data for statistical analysis were expressed as the mean ± standard error. Comparison of results from treated versus control cells was done using t-stests. p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Discussion
CD24 is important for progression, migration, and metastasis of human breast cancer [
8]. However, the specific functions of CD24 in breast cancer are unclear. Here, we showed that CD24 cross-linking is sufficient to inhibit tumor growth (Fig.
2C), and migration (Fig.
6B) in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Additionally, apoptosis increased upon CD24 cross-linking (Fig.
5).
Our results are in agreement with previous findings when Suzuki
et al. [
19] reported that CD24 cross-linking induced apoptosis in a human B-cell subset during the early activation stage through interactions with glycolipid-enriched membrane domains. Taguchi et al. [
20] demonstrated that apoptosis observed upon cross-linking CD24 did not result from non-specific binding of either mouse immunoglobulin or secondary rabbit polyclonal anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody, but from treatment with a combination of anti-CD24 and rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibodies in KM-3 pro-B cells. To confirm that the apoptosis observed upon cross-linking of CD24 was not resulting from the non-specific binding of secondary rabbit polyclonal antibodies, MCF-7 cells were cross-linked with anti-human CD24 (SN3) mouse monoclonal antibody raised against NALM-1 human pre-B leukemia cell line. Effect of cross-linking with anti-human CD24 (SN3) mouse monoclonal antibody was similar to what was observed anti-human CD24 (FL-80) rabbit polyclonal antibody (Additional files.
2,
3). Several analogous reports documented proliferation and apoptosis in human B-cells [
19] and murine thymocytes [
21] after CD24 cross-linking.
In contrast to our findings, Schabath and colleagues showed that MDA-MB-231 cells (used as a control in this study) transfected to express CD24 had reduced migration and tumor growth in NOD/SCID mice [
22]. We cross-linked CD24 in MCF-10A breast cells expressing CD24 and observed inhibited growth in the CD24 expressing cells (Additional files.
1), similar to what was observed in MCF-7 cells.
We found that CD24 cross-linking exhibited an inhibitory effect on breast cancer cell growth in the three-dimensional culture system. In agreement with our findings, Wang
et al. [
23] reported a reduction in T-cell proliferation upon blockage with an anti-HSA antibody. Moreover, cross-linking of CD24 induced apoptosis in murine thymocytes [
21]. Jung and colleagues [
21] demonstrated that apoptosis triggered by CD24 cross-linking results in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and that the release of apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) does not lead to caspase activation in murine thymocytes.
Migration capacities of MCF-7 cells were reduced by 30% after CD24 cross-linking. Our results further indicate that CD24 is involved in migration in MCF-7 cells, and imply that tumor progression can be inhibited by CD24 cross-linking (Fig.
6B). Using
in vitro migration assays (matrigel) and
in vivo immunohistochemical staining, Senner
et al. [
7] have found, in a rat model, that CD24-positive gliomas are more aggressive than CD24 negative implants, but did not observe a greater migration rate of CD24-positive cells in matrigel assays, which is in concordance with our data. CD24 is an adhesion molecule [
2] and during tumor progression, adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM) is the initial step for invasion and metastasis [
24]. In our study the adhesion of MCF-7 cells was reduced slightly, but not significantly after CD24 cross-linking.
Interestingly, we observed variable expression rates of CD24 in both control and MCF-7 cells. Figure
1 depicts CD24 expression in 2% of control cells and 66% of MCF-7 cells. However, expression levels of CD24 in MCF-7 cells ranged from 66% to 98%, depending on the passage number and culture conditions, including culture medium serum composition (data not shown). A number of reports show that alterations in protein expression are dependent on the culture environment. For instance, serum in MCF-10A cell culture plays an important role in CD24 expression [
11]. Estrogen-receptor expression is altered in MCF-7 and BT474 cells depending on the passage number [
25].
Recently, CD44
+CD24
-/low lineage-cells were implicated in breast cancer initiated tumorigenesis in NOD/SCID mice [
26]. This work suggested that the tumor initiating cells were cancer stem cells. Furthermore, early cancer cells detected in bone marrow of breast cancer patients were observed to have breast cancer stem sell phenotype [
27], but the frequency of CD44
+/CD24
-/low cells in breast cancer tissue was not correlated with clinical outcome [
28]. CD24 was suggested as a marker of luminal cells in the breast [
29], and a previous report indicated the existence of progenitor cells in luminal epithelia which could be reflective of myoepithelial cells [
30]. On the other hand, normal stem cells have been isolated using CD24, CD29, and CD49f in mouse mammary glands [
31,
32], so a single, definitive breast cancer stem cell marker has yet to be defined.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
All the authors contributed to the conception of the work during the initial stages and study design, analysis and interpretation of the data, as well as drafting and critical revision of the important intellectual content. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published. JBK and EK have equally contributed to all parts of this study. DYN and WH were in charge of the general supervision of the research. The order of authorship was based on a joint decision.