CDK9 inhibitors have been investigated as therapeutics for a variety of hematologic cancers and solid tumors. Table
1 [
46‐
59] provides CDK inhibition profiles for CDK9 inhibitors that have reached the clinic or have been evaluated in preclinical studies in AML and other hematologic cancers (Additional file
1: Table S1 summarizes the clinical status of other CDK9 inhibitors across a broader range of tumor types). Current CDK9 inhibitors are competitive inhibitors of the ATP-binding site, which is highly conserved across the CDK family; consequently CDK9 inhibitors lack specificity and generally also inhibit other CDKs to varying extents [
60,
61]. Although some progress has been made against other CDKs in discovery of allosteric inhibitors with greater selectivity potential by targeting residues outside the kinase domain (CDK12/13 [
62,
63]), no such inhibitors have been described for CDK9. Although they display activity against a variety of CDKs and enzymes, CDK9 inhibitors are referred to as such because they typically exhibit increased half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC
50) values for CDK9 compared with other CDKs/enzymes. As described in the sections that follow, CDK9 inhibitors in general exhibit a variety of effects in AML cells and in vivo models, including reduced phosphorylation of RNA Pol II; reduced levels of proteins such as MYC, MCL-1, XIAP, and cyclin D1; induction of apoptosis; and inhibition of tumor growth and prolonged survival in animal models. There is increasing interest in identifying predictive biomarkers of response to conventional and investigational-targeted therapies in AML, including CDK9 inhibitors. For example, measuring the function of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) family proteins using BCL-2 homology domain 3 (BH3) profiling has been shown to provide useful information in discriminating AML treatment response with traditional cytarabine-based therapy and investigational AML regimens [
64‐
68]. The underlying principle of BH3 profiling is that mitochondrial depolarization following exposure to BH3 domain peptides serves as a functional biomarker to predict cell sensitivity to individual antiapoptotic proteins [
69]. For example, sensitivity of cells to the NOXA-BH3 peptide provides a direct functional measurement of MCL-1 dependency, whereas sensitivity of cells to BAD-BH3 provides a measurement of BCL-2 dependency.
Alvocidib (flavopiridol) [ 47, 48] | Intravenous | CDK9: 6 nM CDK4: 10 nM CDK7: 23 nM CDK11: 57 nM CDK5: 110 nM | Phase 2: AML, ALL, CLL, DLBCL, MCL, MM, various lymphomas Phase 1: AML, ALL, B-cell CLL, CML, MCL, SLL, various lymphomas |
| Intravenous | CDK9: < 10 nM CDK5: 13 nM CDK2: 47 nM CDK4: 100 nM CDK6: 179 nM | Phase 2: CLL, MCL |
BAY 1143572 [50] | Oral | Not published | Phase 1: AML, ALL, DLBCL |
CDKI-73 (LS-007) [ 51, 52] | Intravenous, oral | CDK2: 3 nM CDK9: 6 nM CDK1: 8 nM CDK4: 8 nM CDK6: 37 nM CDK7: 134 nM | Preclinical |
| Intravenous | CDK2: 1 nM CDK5: 1 nM CDK1: 3 nM CDK9: 4 nM | Phase 3: CLLa Phase 2: AMLa, ALLa, B-cell CLLa, MCLa, MM Phase 1: CLL, DLBCL, MM |
| Intravenous | CDK9: 11 nM CDK8: 16 nM CDK7: 246 nM | Preclinical |
| Intravenous | CDK9: 20 nM CDK4: 63 nM CDK1: 79 nM CDK2: 224 nM | Phase 2: MCLa, MM Phase 1: MM |
SNS-032 (BMS-387032) [ 57, 58] | Intravenous | CDK9: 4 nM CDK2: 38 nM CDK7: 62 nM | Phase 1: CLL, MM |
| Oral | CDK9: 3 nM CDK5: 4 nM CDK2: 5 nM CDK3: 8 nM CDK1: 9 nM CDK7: 37 nM | Phase 1: AML, CML, SLL |
Alvocidib (flavopiridol)
Alvocidib was the first CDK inhibitor to enter clinical trials and has been the most studied to date. Alvocidib displays potent activity against CDK9 (6 nM), in addition to activity against CDK4, CDK5, CDK7, and CDK11 [
47,
48]. Although historically the mechanism of action of alvocidib was attributed to inhibition of the cell cycle at the G1 phase via targeting of CDK4/6 [
70], it is now understood that its primary mechanism of action is via transcriptional regulation via CDK9/P-TEFb [
71].
In vitro studies in diverse hematologic malignancies and studies on human on AML marrow blasts have shown that alvocidib reduces levels of MCL-1, BCL-2, and cyclin D1 and inhibits phosphorylation of RNA Pol II (reviewed in Karp, 2005) [
72]. Based on its noted effects on the cell cycle, transcription, and apoptosis, it was surmised that alvocidib could potentiate the cytotoxicity of cycle-dependent antileukemic agents. To evaluate the potential use of alvocidib in timed sequential therapy (TST) in the clinical setting, an in vitro model was developed using primary human bone marrow cells from adults with R/R AML, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), or newly diagnosed AML with poor risk features [
73]. In this model, alvocidib induced a 4.3-fold increase in apoptosis and increased the proapoptotic and cytotoxic effects of cytarabine. Subsequent studies in AML cell lines correlated rapid downregulation of
MCL-1 and a 2-fold reduction in MCL-1 levels with enhanced apoptosis [
74]. Gene expression studies in leukemic blasts from adult patients with refractory AML treated with alvocidib in a phase 1 study demonstrated induced expression of
BCL-2, which contrasts with earlier studies demonstrating downregulation of
BCL-2 expression and may represent a protective antiapoptotic response during cell-cycle arrest [
75]. Alvocidib administration also resulted in downregulation of genes encoding RNA Pol II and the oncogenic transcription factors high mobility group AT-hook 1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, and E2F transcription factor 1, which are known to be involved in AML and other hematologic malignancies.
Alvocidib was evaluated in combination with cytarabine and mitoxantrone (FLAM) in a TST manner in multiple clinical studies in R/R AML [
48,
72,
76,
77] and newly diagnosed, nonfavorable AML [
76,
78‐
80]. A review of the safety and efficacy results from these individual studies has recently been published [
80] and is beyond the scope of this review. In phase 2 trials in newly diagnosed poor-risk AML, overall CR rates of 67% to 75% were achieved, which were higher than that seen with standard 7 + 3 therapy [
76,
78‐
80]. In general, toxicity seen with FLAM was not increased over that seen with 7 + 3 therapy, with febrile neutropenia, infection, and hepatic dysfunction being the most common Grade 3 toxicities reported in the latest study [
80]. Treatment-related mortality was similar in both treatment arms in this study, but the majority of early deaths on FLAM occurred in patients
≥60 years. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) has been seen following initial dosing of alvocidib in AML studies (28% incidence overall, with 2% Grade 4), necessitating appropriate prophylaxis and monitoring [
80].
There are ongoing efforts to determine predictive biomarkers to allow identification of specific subsets of patients who are likely to respond to alvocidib, such as use of BH3 profiling [
66]. As NOXA interacts most directly with MCL-1, these findings suggest that the AML samples that are most responsive to FLAM treatment are highly dependent on MCL-1 for survival. MCL-1 dependency was also supported by data obtained using three additional BH3 members, and these BH3 priming profiles were additive to known risk factors associated with clinical response to chemotherapy, including cytogenetic risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of NOXA priming, cytogenetics, and MDS history showed that the combination of these variables was highly predictive of response to FLAM (area under the concentration-time curve 0.92,
p = 0.0002). An ongoing international biomarker-driven phase 2 study (NCT02520011) is incorporating this predictive information in identifying a subgroup of patients most likely to respond to alvocidib. The study is comparing FLAM vs. cytarabine and mitoxantrone (AM) in patients with MCL-1-dependent R/R AML as demonstrated by NOXA-BH3 priming of ≥40% by mitochondrial profiling of the bone marrow. It includes an exploratory arm evaluating patients with newly diagnosed MCL-1-dependent high-risk AML.
A phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, safety and biomarker prediction study was recently registered. This study will explore alvocidib and standard 7 + 3 chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML (NCT03298984). Correlation between the benefit from alvocidib in combination with 7 + 3 therapy and BH3 profiling for MCL-1 dependency will be assessed as a secondary outcome.
Bay 1143572
BAY 1143572 displays potent CDK9/P-TEFb inhibitory activity in the nanomolar range, with inhibitory activity against other CDKs that is at least 50-fold lower [
50,
81]. In in vitro models of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL), BAY 1143572 inhibited phosphorylation of RNA Pol II and reduced MYC and MCL-1 levels in ATL-derived and human T-lymphotropic virus 1 (HTLV-1)-transformed lines and primary ATL cells, with subsequent growth inhibition and apoptosis [
50]. It also displayed antitumor activity and prolonged survival in a human ATL cell-bearing mouse model. In AML, BAY 1143572 inhibited the proliferation of 7 cell lines (both
MLL-rearrangement positive and negative) with a median IC
50 of 385 nM and induced apoptosis [
82]. In addition, it displayed potent in vitro activity in 8 of 10 non-
MLL-rearranged patient AML samples, including those with mutant
NPM1 or internal tandem duplication of the juxtamembrane domain-coding sequence of the
FLT3 gene (FLT3-ITD).
A phase 1 dose escalation study of BAY 1143572 in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with advanced malignancies (ie, gastric cancer, triple negative breast cancer, or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL]; NCT01938638) has been completed, but results are yet to be reported. A phase I dose-escalation study designed to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase 2 dosing of BAY 1143572 in advanced acute leukemia has completed enrollment (NCT02345382).
Dinaciclib (SCH 727965)
Dinaciclib is a novel and potent inhibitor of CDK1, CDK2, CDK5, and CDK9 with IC
50 values in the low nanomolar range [
53]. In in vitro studies, dinaciclib blocked thymidine DNA incorporation (IC
50 = 4 nM) and completely suppressed retinoblastoma (Rb) phosphorylation, which correlated with induction of apoptosis. Dinaciclib exposure resulted in cell-cycle arrest in more than 100 tumor cell lines of diverse origin and across a broad range of transformed cellular backgrounds as evidenced by based on total inhibition of bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. Broad antiproliferative activity was seen across this panel of tumor cell lines, with median IC
50 values of 11 nM. Dinaciclib has also been shown to downregulate expression of
MCL-1 and induce apoptosis in primary patient chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells, with activity that was independent of high-risk genomic features [
83].
Apoptotic and antitumor effects of dinaciclib were demonstrated in
MLL-rearranged AML mouse models [
84]. Decreased expression of
Mcl-1 was seen and overexpression of
Mcl-1 protected AML cells from dinaciclib-induced apoptosis. In mice bearing
MLL-AF9-driven murine and human leukemias, dinaciclib exhibited potent antitumor activity and significantly prolonged survival.
Dinaciclib has been evaluated in clinical trials in various hematologic indications, with varied effectiveness. In a phase 2 study of dinaciclib monotherapy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), 11% of patients achieved a partial response or better [
54]. The most common adverse events included diarrhea, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, nausea, leukopenia, and neutropenia. Results were reported for three additional hematologic studies that were terminated early for reasons unrelated to safety or efficacy [
85‐
87].
A phase 2 randomized study comparing dinaciclib and gemtuzumab ozogamicin in R/R AML and evaluating dinaciclib in ALL (NCT00798213) demonstrated short-lived cytoreductive activity with dinaciclib but a lack of objective clinical response in the 20 patients treated [
85]. In addition, 75% of patients receiving dinaciclib experienced grade
≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, most commonly hematologic toxicities and fatigue. Interestingly, an additional clinical toxicity reported was TLS, where metabolic changes indicative of large-scale tumor cell lysis occur [
85]. While this phenomenon requires careful monitoring and management, this provides further evidence of potent anti-tumor activity underlying the cytoreductive observations, albeit currently short term in duration. This may be interpreted as illustrating the potential of CDK9-targeted therapy. Indeed, given the rapid clinical elimination of dinaciclib together with its potent cytotoxic effects observed on longer exposure in in vitro studies, evaluation of alternative clinical dosing regimens such as prolonged infusion are proposed for future studies in acute leukemia [
85]. Clearly, other considerations, such as tolerability and the intended selective targeting of short-lived antiapoptotic proteins such as MCL-1 and MYC, will also need to be considered when optimizing the drug exposure period and schedule.
A randomized phase 3 study in which 42 patients with R/R CLL received treatment suggested promising antileukemic activity with dinaciclib relative to ofatumumab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (median progression-free survival of 13.7 months vs. 5.9 months, and overall response rate of 40% vs. 8.3%, respectively) [
86]. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events experienced by patients receiving dinaciclib were neutropenia/reduced neutrophil counts/febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Limited data from five patients treated in a phase 1 study evaluating the combination of dinaciclib and rituxumab in R/R CLL showed an adverse event profile similar to that seen with dinaciclib monotherapy [
87]. No results have been reported for a discontinued phase 2 study in R/R mantle cell lymphoma and B-cell CLL (NCT00871546). Dinaciclib is being evaluated in combination with pembrolizumab in R/R hematologic malignancies (ie, CLL, MM, and DLBCL) in an ongoing phase 1 trial (NCT02684617).
SNS-032 (BMS-387032)
SNS-032, a potent CDK9 inhibitor (4 nM) with activity against CDK2 and CDK7, was evaluated in a phase 1 and pharmacologic study in patients with advanced CLL or MM [
57,
58]. Mechanism-based target modulation (ie, inhibition of CDK7 and CDK9, reduced
MCL-1 and
XIAP expression, and apoptosis) was demonstrated, but limited clinical activity was seen and three-quarters of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities, mainly myelosuppression [
58]. In vitro studies showed that SNS-032 inhibited proliferation of AML cell lines and primary AML blasts by inducing a reduced phosphorylation of Ser2, leading to RNA Pol II pausing and resulting in Ser5 dephosphorylation after a period of time [
88]. Combining SNS-032 with cytarabine was synergistic, causing reduced expression of the antiapoptotic genes
XIAP,
BCL-2, and
MCL-1.
TG02
TG02 is an oral CDK9 inhibitor with activity against several CDKs in the nanomolar range [
59]. TG02 exhibited potent antiproliferative effects against various tumor cell lines, induced cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in murine mutant
FLT3 leukemia cells, and induced tumor regression and prolonged survival in murine AML models. In primary AML patient samples, TG02 inhibited transcription by inducing RNA Pol II Ser2 dephosphorylation and downregulated
MCL-1 and
XIAP, leading to subsequent
BAX activation and apoptosis [
89]. Dynamic BH3 profiling has demonstrated that TG02 sensitizes to the BCL-2-inhibitory BAD-BH3 peptide in AML cells [
68]. In addition, TG02 was shown to synergize with the BCL-2 antagonist venetoclax (ABT-199), which sensitizes to the MCL-1-inhibitory NOXA-BH3 peptide, to induce apoptosis in AML cells.
Phase 1 studies evaluating TG02 in advanced hematologic malignancies (ie, relapsed AML or ALL, chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis, or MDS; NCT01204164) and in R/R CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (NCT01699152), have been completed.